Skip to content

Comparison of AccuCath IV Catheter and Conventional IV Catheter in Interventional Radiology

A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Comparison of First Attempt Success Between the AccuCath Intravenous System With Retractable Coiled Tip Guide Wire and Conventional Peripheral Intravenous Catheters With Interventional Radiology Nurses

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01940354
Enrollment
220
Registered
2013-09-12
Start date
2013-08-31
Completion date
2015-03-31
Last updated
2017-11-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Vascular Access Complications

Keywords

IV Catheter comparison, AccuCath versus Conventional IV Catheters, IV Catheter Study, IV Catheter User Preference Comparison, First Attempt Success Rate for IV Catheters, AccuCath Device Performance, Patient Satisfaction with IV Catheters, Clinician Satisfaction with AccuCath Device Performance

Brief summary

The study will test a hypothesis that the AccuCath™ System will have a higher rate of successful first attempt peripheral IV placement and higher clinician and patient satisfaction compared to Conventional IV Catheters.

Detailed description

This study is designed to evaluate user/physician preference as it relates to use of a 510(k) cleared vascular access peripheral IV catheter device compared with peripheral IV conventional needle/catheter devices, in terms of first stick success rates, adverse events and overall user and patient satisfaction. As noted above, the study is designed to formally test the hypothesis that the AccuCath™ System will exhibit superiority in terms of the rate of successful first attempt peripheral IV placement and higher user and patient satisfaction compared to Conventional IV Catheters.

Interventions

DEVICEAccuCath IV Catheter System

Vascular access and indwelling catheter placement via study device for infusion of fluids and removal of blood samples.

DEVICEConventional IV Catheter System

Vascular access and indwelling catheter placement via control device for infusion of fluids and removal of blood samples

Sponsors

C. R. Bard
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 89 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Inclusion Criteria: 1. Male or female, age \> or equal to 18 years or \< or equal to 89 years old; 2. Capable and willing to give informed consent; 3. English speaking; 4. Acceptable candidate for an elective, non-emergent peripheral intravenous (PIV) catheter placement as determined by ordering physician; 5. Admitted to study area.

Exclusion criteria

1. Male or female, \< 18 years old or \> 89 years old; 2. Requirement for emergent IV placement (patient's condition would be compromised if there is a delay in IV placement); 3. Previous venous grafts or surgery at the target vessel access site; 4. Currently involved in other investigational clinical trials (unless permission is granted by other study PI).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
First Attempt Success Rate With Peripheral IV (PIV) Catheter PlacementBaseline/at catheter placement, PIV placement duration ranges from 3-15 minutes

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Satisfaction Upon Successful PIV PlacementBaseline/at catheter placement; PIV placement duration ranges from 3-15 minutesPatient Satisfaction was measured at initial PIV placement using a 5 Point Likert Scale: 5 - Very Comfortable, 4 - Somewhat Comfortable, 3 - Neutral, 2- Somewhat Uncomfortable, 1 - Very Uncomfortable
Clinician Satisfaction Upon Successful PIV PlacementBaseline/at catheter placement; PIV placement duration ranges from 3-15 minutesClinician Satisfaction was measured at initial PIV placement using a 5 Point Likert Scale: How easy was the AccuCath™ System to use in comparison to the current catheter? 5 - Easier to Use 4 - Somewhat Easier to Use 3 - Neutral 2 - Somewhat Difficult to Use 1 - Very Difficult to Use

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Enrollment occurred from April 2013 - November 2013. Location was Interventional Radiology Department at participating hospital.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Vascular Access Via Study Device
AccuCath IV Catheter System will be used for IV therapy during interventional radiology procedure. Intervention includes vascular access, fluid infusion, and blood sample removal. AccuCath IV device: Vascular access and indwelling catheter placement via study device for infusion of fluids and removal of blood samples.
110
Vascular Access Via Control Device
Conventional IV Catheter (current catheter) will be used for IV therapy during interventional radiology procedure. Interventions include vascular access, administration of fluids, and blood sample removal. Conventional IV catheters: Vascular access and indwelling catheter placement via control device for infusion of fluids and removal of blood samples
110
Total220

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject42

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicVascular Access Via Study DeviceVascular Access Via Control DeviceTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
29 Participants39 Participants68 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
81 Participants71 Participants152 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants5 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
27 Participants28 Participants55 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
9 Participants7 Participants16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
73 Participants70 Participants143 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
110 participants110 participants220 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
47 Participants34 Participants81 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
63 Participants76 Participants139 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1100 / 110
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 11010 / 110
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1100 / 110

Outcome results

Primary

First Attempt Success Rate With Peripheral IV (PIV) Catheter Placement

Time frame: Baseline/at catheter placement, PIV placement duration ranges from 3-15 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Vascular Access Via Study DeviceFirst Attempt Success Rate With Peripheral IV (PIV) Catheter Placement84 Participants
Vascular Access Via Control DeviceFirst Attempt Success Rate With Peripheral IV (PIV) Catheter Placement90 Participants
Secondary

Clinician Satisfaction Upon Successful PIV Placement

Clinician Satisfaction was measured at initial PIV placement using a 5 Point Likert Scale: How easy was the AccuCath™ System to use in comparison to the current catheter? 5 - Easier to Use 4 - Somewhat Easier to Use 3 - Neutral 2 - Somewhat Difficult to Use 1 - Very Difficult to Use

Time frame: Baseline/at catheter placement; PIV placement duration ranges from 3-15 minutes

Population: The number of patients analyzed in each group differs from the numbers in the Participant Flow due to missing data (n = 5 in Study Device arm and n = 1 in the Control Arm).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Vascular Access Via Study DeviceClinician Satisfaction Upon Successful PIV Placement3.27 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.11
Vascular Access Via Control DeviceClinician Satisfaction Upon Successful PIV Placement3.48 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.04
Secondary

Patient Satisfaction Upon Successful PIV Placement

Patient Satisfaction was measured at initial PIV placement using a 5 Point Likert Scale: 5 - Very Comfortable, 4 - Somewhat Comfortable, 3 - Neutral, 2- Somewhat Uncomfortable, 1 - Very Uncomfortable

Time frame: Baseline/at catheter placement; PIV placement duration ranges from 3-15 minutes

Population: The number of patients analyzed in each group differs from the numbers in the Participant Flow due to missing data (n = 6 in Study Device arm and n = 1 in the Control Arm).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Vascular Access Via Study DevicePatient Satisfaction Upon Successful PIV Placement3.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.11
Vascular Access Via Control DevicePatient Satisfaction Upon Successful PIV Placement4.46 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.95

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026