Skip to content

A Study of Tadalafil in Men With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) and Erectile Dysfunction (ED)

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Design, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tadalafil Once-Daily Dosing for 12 Weeks in Men With Signs and Symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Erectile Dysfunction

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01937871
Enrollment
909
Registered
2013-09-10
Start date
2013-09-30
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2017-06-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Benign Prostate Hyperplasia, Erectile Dysfunction

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to see whether tadalafil can reduce the signs and symptoms in men with Erectile Dysfunction (ED) and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia-Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (BPH-LUTS) and improve their quality of life.

Interventions

DRUG5 mg Tadalafil

Administered orally

DRUGPlacebo

Administered orally

DRUG0.2 mg Tamsulosin

Administered orally

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
45 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Main Inclusion Criteria: * Present with a history of ED and signs and symptoms of BPH. * Are sexually active with an adult female partner, and expect to remain sexually active with the same adult female partner for the duration of the study. Main

Exclusion criteria

* Current treatment with nitrates. * Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) greater than 10.0 nanogram (ng)/mL at 1st screening. * PSA greater than or equal to 4.0 to less than or equal to 10.0 ng/mL at 1st screening if prostate malignancy has not been ruled out to the satisfaction of a urologist * Suffering from other urinary disease like cancer, or infection * Serious cardiovascular disease * History of significant renal insufficiency

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Week 12Baseline, Week 12IPSS Total Score is the sum of Questions 1 through 7 of the IPSS questionnaire. Each question was scored from 0 (none/no symptoms) to 5 (frequent symptoms) for an IPSS Total Score ranging from 0 to 35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM).The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, prior alpha-blocker therapy, baseline Erectile dysfunction (ED) severity (mild/moderate/severe),visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment.The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 2 of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Questionnaire at Week 12Baseline, Week 12Participant-assessed diary assesses the mean change from baseline in the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q2, Were you able to insert your penis into your partner's vagina?. The SEP Q2 score was determined as the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q2 out of all sexual attempts recorded during the time period. Change is defined as the percentage of yes responses at endpoint minus the percentage of yes responses at baseline. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment, country/region, baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe), centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), the centered baseline-by-treatment and the treatment-by-country/region interactions. The interaction terms are removed if p \>= 0.10.
Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 3 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 12Baseline, Week 12Participant-assessed diary assesses the mean change from baseline in the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q3, Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse?.The SEP Q3 score is determined as the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q3 out of all sexual attempts recorded during the time period. Change was defined as the percentage of yes responses at endpoint minus percentage of yes responses at baseline. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment, country/region, baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe), centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), the centered baseline-by-treatment and the treatment-by-country/region interactions. The interaction terms are removed if p \>= 0.10.
Change From Baseline in IPSS at Week 12Baseline, Week 12IPSS Total Score is the sum of Questions 1 through 7 of the IPSS questionnaire. Each question is scored from 0 (none/no symptoms) to 5 (frequent symptoms) for an IPSS Total Score ranging from 0 to 35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM).The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, prior alpha-blocker therapy, baseline Erectile dysfunction (ED) severity (mild/moderate/severe),visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10.
Change From Baseline in Uroflowmetry Measures at Week 12Baseline, Week 12Qmax is defined as the peak urine flow rate (measured in milliliters per second \[mL/sec\] using standard calibrated flowmeter). At each visit, a uroflowmetry assessment was considered valid and the data were included only if the prevoid total bladder volume (assessed by ultrasound) was \>=150 to \<=550 milliliters (mL) and the voided volume (Vcomp) was \>=125 mL. Changes in Qmax from baseline to endpoint in the double-blind treatment period were analyzed using Type III sums of squares ANOVA on rank-transformed data with a term for treatment group.
Change From Baseline in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR) at Week 12Baseline, Week 12The amount of urine remaining in the bladder after void completion.
Change From Baseline in IPSS Storage (Irritative) Subscore at Week 12Baseline, Week 12IPSS Storage (Irritative) subscore is the sum of Questions 2, 4 and 7 of the IPSS questionnaire. Scores ranged from 0 (no irritative symptoms) to 5 (frequent irritative symptoms), with total subscore of the 3 questions for irritative subscore ranging from 0 to 15; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM). The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, prior alpha-blocker therapy, baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe), visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions.
Change From Baseline in IPSS Voiding (Obstructive) Subscore at Week 12Baseline, Week 12IPSS voiding (obstructive) subscore is the sum of Questions 1, 3, 5 and 6 of the IPSS questionnaire. Scores ranged from 0 (no obstructive symptoms) to 5 (frequent obstructive symptoms), with total subscore of the 4 questions of the obstructive score ranging from 0 to 20; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM). The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, prior alpha-blocker therapy, baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe),visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions.
Change From Baseline in IPSS Quality of Life (QoL) Index at Week 12Baseline, Week 12IPSS QoL assess participant response to the following question:If you were to spend the rest of your life with your urinary condition just the way it is now, how would you feel about that?. Response options are Delighted(0),Pleased(1);Mostly satisfied(2);mixed about equally satisfied and dissatisfied(3);Mostly dissatisfied(4);Unhappy(5);Terrible(6),with a total ranging from 0 to 6; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares(LS) mean of change from baseline(bl) to endpoint is from MMRM.The model includes effects for treatment,country/region, prior alpha-blocker therapy,baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe),visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered bl value (defined as the bl value for a participant -the overall bl mean value),placebo lead-in total IPSS change(change from Visit 2 at Visit 3),centered bl-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions.
Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12Week 12PGI-I measures a participant's perception of improvement at the time of assessment compared with the start of treatment. Score ranges from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse).
Number of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12Week 12CGI-I measures clinician's perception of participant improvement at the time of assessment (compared with the start of treatment) with scores ranging from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse).
Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Erectile Function (EF) Domain at Week 12Baseline, Week 12IIEF is a 15 item self-reported questionnaire to assess overall erectile function and satisfaction during the past 4 weeks. IIEF- EF is the sum of Questions 1-5 and 15 of the IIEF. Questions 1-5 are scored 0(low/no erectile function) to 5(high erectile function) and Question 15 is scored 1(very low confidence) to 5(very high confidence) with a total score ranging from 1 to 30.Higher scores represent better erectile function.LS mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from MMRM.The model includes effects for treatment,country/region,baseline lower urinary tract symptoms(LUTS) severity (moderate/severe),visit,treatment-by-visit interaction,centered baseline value(defined as the baseline value for a participant-the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change(change from Visit 2 at Visit 3),centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions.The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10.
Change From Baseline in IIEF Intercourse Satisfaction at Week 12Baseline, Week 12IIEF is a 15 item self-reported questionnaire used to assess overall erectile function and satisfaction during the past 4 weeks. IIEF-IS is the sum of Questions 6,7 and 8 of the IIEF. Scores range from 0(low/no satisfaction) to 5(high satisfaction) for each question, with the total possible score for the 3 questions ranging from 0 to 15.Higher scores were indicative of an increase in intercourse satisfaction. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from MMRM. The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, baseline LUTS severity (moderate/severe), visit, treatment-by-visit interaction,centered baseline value(defined as the baseline value for a participant- the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10.
Change From Baseline in IIEF Orgasmic Function at Week 12Baseline, Week 12IIEF is a 15 item self-reported questionnaire used to assess overall erectile function and satisfaction during the past 4 weeks. IIEF orgasmic function is the sum of Q9 and Q10 of the IIEF. Scores ranged from 0 (no stimulation) to 5 (almost always) for each question, with the total possible score for the 2 questions ranging from 0 to 10. Higher scores were indicative of better orgasmic function. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from MMRM. The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, baseline LUTS severity (moderate/severe), visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10.
Change From Baseline in IIEF Sexual Desire at Week 12Baseline, Week 12IIEF is a 15 item self-reported questionnaire used to assess overall erectile function and satisfaction during the past 4 weeks. IIEF sexual desire is the sum of Q11 and Q12. Scores ranged from 1 (low/almost never) to 5 (very high/almost always) for each question, with the total possible score for the 2 questions ranging from 2 to 10. Higher scores were indicative of increased sexual desire. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from MMRM. The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, baseline LUTS severity (moderate/severe), visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10.
Change From Baseline in IIEF Subscores at Week 12Baseline, Week 12IIEF Question 3 asks how often a participant was able to penetrate his partner over the past 4 weeks. Scores range from 0 (did not attempt intercourse) to 5 (almost always or always). IIEF Question 4 asks whether/how often a participant was able to maintain an erection after penetration over the past 4 weeks. Scores range from 0 (did not attempt intercourse) to 5 (almost always or always). Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from MMRM. The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, baseline LUTS severity (moderate/severe), visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10.
Change From Baseline in Total IPSS at Week 4 and Week 8Baseline, Week 4; Baseline, Week 8IPSS Total Score is the sum of Questions 1 through 7 of the IPSS questionnaire. Each question is scored from 0 (none/no symptoms) to 5 (frequent symptoms) for an IPSS Total Score ranging from 0 to 35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM). The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, prior alpha-blocker therapy, baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe),visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10.
Change From Baseline in IIEF EF at Week 4 and Week 8Baseline, Week 4; Baseline, Week 8IIEF is a 15 item self-reported questionnaire used to assess overall erectile function and satisfaction during the past 4 weeks. IIEF- EF is the sum of Questions 1-5 and 15 of the IIEF. Questions 1-5 were scored 0 (low/no erectile function) to 5 (high erectile function) and Question 15 was scored 1 (very low confidence) to 5 (very high confidence) with a total score ranging from 1 to 30. Higher scores represent better erectile function. LS mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from MMRM. The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, baseline LUTS severity (moderate/severe), visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10.
Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 2 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 4 and Week 8Baseline, Week 4; Baseline, Week 8Participant-assessed diary assesses the mean change from baseline in the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q2, Were you able to insert your penis into your partner's vagina?. The SEP Q2 score is determined as the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q2 out of all sexual attempts recorded during the time period. Change was defined as the percentage of yes responses at endpoint minus the percentage of yes responses at baseline. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment, country/region, baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe), centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), the centered baseline-by-treatment and the treatment-by-country/region interactions. The interaction terms are removed if p \>= 0.10.
Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 3 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 4 and Week 8Baseline, Week 4; Baseline, Week 8Participant-assessed diary assesses the mean change from baseline in the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q3, Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse?. The SEP Q3 score is determined as the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q3 out of all sexual attempts recorded during the time period. Change was defined as the percentage of yes responses at endpoint minus percentage of yes responses at baseline. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment, country/region, baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe), centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), the centered baseline-by-treatment and the treatment-by-country/region interactions. The interaction terms are removed if p \>= 0.10.
Change From Baseline in Modified International Prostate Symptom Score (mIPSS) at Week 2Baseline, Week 2The modified IPSS is the total IPSS collected at 2 weeks post-baseline.The total IPSS is obtained by combining the scores of the responses to component questions 1 through 7. Each question is scored from 0-5 for a total IPSS range of 0-35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from ANCOVA. The model includes terms for treatment, country/region, prior alpha-blocker use and baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe), centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), the centered baseline-by-treatment and the treatment-by-country/region interactions. The interaction terms are removed if p \>= 0.10.
Change From Baseline in IIEF Overall Satisfaction (OS) at Week 12Baseline, Week 12IIEF is a 15 item self-reported questionnaire used to assess overall erectile function and satisfaction during the past 4 weeks. IIEF-OS is the sum of Questions 13 and 14. Scores range from 1 (low/no satisfaction) to 5 (high satisfaction) for each question, with a total subscore ranging from 2 to 10;higher scores represent better erectile function. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM). The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, baseline LUTS severity (moderate/severe), visit, treatment-by-visit interaction,centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10.

Countries

China

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Placebo matching tadalafil or tamsulosin administered once daily by mouth for 16 weeks.
361
5 mg Tadalafil
Placebo administered once daily by mouth for 4 weeks during the single-blind placebo run-in period. Tadalafil 5 milligram (mg) tablet administered once daily by mouth for 12 weeks during the double-blind treatment period.
363
0.2 mg Tamsulosin
Placebo administered once daily by mouth for 4 weeks during the single-blind placebo run-in period. Tamsulosin 0.2 mg capsule administered once daily by mouth for 12 weeks during the double-blind treatment period.
185
Total909

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event662
Overall StudyEntry Criteria Not Met121
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up824
Overall StudyPhysician Decision010
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject964

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo5 mg Tadalafil0.2 mg TamsulosinTotal
Age, Continuous61.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.35
61.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.27
61.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.06
61.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.25
Region of Enrollment
China
279 Participants277 Participants143 Participants699 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Korea, Republic of
71 Participants71 Participants35 Participants177 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
11 Participants15 Participants7 Participants33 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
361 Participants363 Participants185 Participants909 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
62 / 36164 / 36221 / 185
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 3617 / 3622 / 185

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Week 12

IPSS Total Score is the sum of Questions 1 through 7 of the IPSS questionnaire. Each question was scored from 0 (none/no symptoms) to 5 (frequent symptoms) for an IPSS Total Score ranging from 0 to 35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM).The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, prior alpha-blocker therapy, baseline Erectile dysfunction (ED) severity (mild/moderate/severe),visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment.The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline IPSS measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Week 12-4.08 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.402
5 mg TadalafilChange From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Week 12-5.49 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.395
0.2 mg TamsulosinChange From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Week 12-4.92 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.493
95% CI: [-2.25, -0.57]
Secondary

Change From Baseline in IIEF EF at Week 4 and Week 8

IIEF is a 15 item self-reported questionnaire used to assess overall erectile function and satisfaction during the past 4 weeks. IIEF- EF is the sum of Questions 1-5 and 15 of the IIEF. Questions 1-5 were scored 0 (low/no erectile function) to 5 (high erectile function) and Question 15 was scored 1 (very low confidence) to 5 (very high confidence) with a total score ranging from 1 to 30. Higher scores represent better erectile function. LS mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from MMRM. The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, baseline LUTS severity (moderate/severe), visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4; Baseline, Week 8

Population: All randomized participants who had at least one dose of the study, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline IIEF measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in IIEF EF at Week 4 and Week 8Week 41.23 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.412
PlaceboChange From Baseline in IIEF EF at Week 4 and Week 8Week 81.51 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.423
5 mg TadalafilChange From Baseline in IIEF EF at Week 4 and Week 8Week 44.50 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.403
5 mg TadalafilChange From Baseline in IIEF EF at Week 4 and Week 8Week 84.77 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.414
0.2 mg TamsulosinChange From Baseline in IIEF EF at Week 4 and Week 8Week 41.43 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.498
0.2 mg TamsulosinChange From Baseline in IIEF EF at Week 4 and Week 8Week 82.19 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.516
Secondary

Change From Baseline in IIEF Intercourse Satisfaction at Week 12

IIEF is a 15 item self-reported questionnaire used to assess overall erectile function and satisfaction during the past 4 weeks. IIEF-IS is the sum of Questions 6,7 and 8 of the IIEF. Scores range from 0(low/no satisfaction) to 5(high satisfaction) for each question, with the total possible score for the 3 questions ranging from 0 to 15.Higher scores were indicative of an increase in intercourse satisfaction. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from MMRM. The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, baseline LUTS severity (moderate/severe), visit, treatment-by-visit interaction,centered baseline value(defined as the baseline value for a participant- the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline IIEF measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in IIEF Intercourse Satisfaction at Week 12-0.05 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.183
5 mg TadalafilChange From Baseline in IIEF Intercourse Satisfaction at Week 121.08 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.179
0.2 mg TamsulosinChange From Baseline in IIEF Intercourse Satisfaction at Week 120.41 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.227
Secondary

Change From Baseline in IIEF Orgasmic Function at Week 12

IIEF is a 15 item self-reported questionnaire used to assess overall erectile function and satisfaction during the past 4 weeks. IIEF orgasmic function is the sum of Q9 and Q10 of the IIEF. Scores ranged from 0 (no stimulation) to 5 (almost always) for each question, with the total possible score for the 2 questions ranging from 0 to 10. Higher scores were indicative of better orgasmic function. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from MMRM. The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, baseline LUTS severity (moderate/severe), visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline IIEF measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in IIEF Orgasmic Function at Week 120.28 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.169
5 mg TadalafilChange From Baseline in IIEF Orgasmic Function at Week 121.31 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.165
0.2 mg TamsulosinChange From Baseline in IIEF Orgasmic Function at Week 120.57 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.207
Secondary

Change From Baseline in IIEF Overall Satisfaction (OS) at Week 12

IIEF is a 15 item self-reported questionnaire used to assess overall erectile function and satisfaction during the past 4 weeks. IIEF-OS is the sum of Questions 13 and 14. Scores range from 1 (low/no satisfaction) to 5 (high satisfaction) for each question, with a total subscore ranging from 2 to 10;higher scores represent better erectile function. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM). The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, baseline LUTS severity (moderate/severe), visit, treatment-by-visit interaction,centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline IIEF measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in IIEF Overall Satisfaction (OS) at Week 120.62 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
5 mg TadalafilChange From Baseline in IIEF Overall Satisfaction (OS) at Week 121.54 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.118
0.2 mg TamsulosinChange From Baseline in IIEF Overall Satisfaction (OS) at Week 120.71 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Secondary

Change From Baseline in IIEF Sexual Desire at Week 12

IIEF is a 15 item self-reported questionnaire used to assess overall erectile function and satisfaction during the past 4 weeks. IIEF sexual desire is the sum of Q11 and Q12. Scores ranged from 1 (low/almost never) to 5 (very high/almost always) for each question, with the total possible score for the 2 questions ranging from 2 to 10. Higher scores were indicative of increased sexual desire. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from MMRM. The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, baseline LUTS severity (moderate/severe), visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline IIEF measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in IIEF Sexual Desire at Week 120.46 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.114
5 mg TadalafilChange From Baseline in IIEF Sexual Desire at Week 121.12 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.111
0.2 mg TamsulosinChange From Baseline in IIEF Sexual Desire at Week 120.28 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.142
Secondary

Change From Baseline in IIEF Subscores at Week 12

IIEF Question 3 asks how often a participant was able to penetrate his partner over the past 4 weeks. Scores range from 0 (did not attempt intercourse) to 5 (almost always or always). IIEF Question 4 asks whether/how often a participant was able to maintain an erection after penetration over the past 4 weeks. Scores range from 0 (did not attempt intercourse) to 5 (almost always or always). Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from MMRM. The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, baseline LUTS severity (moderate/severe), visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline IIEF measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in IIEF Subscores at Week 12IIEF Question 30.28 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.097
PlaceboChange From Baseline in IIEF Subscores at Week 12IIEF Question 40.30 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.093
5 mg TadalafilChange From Baseline in IIEF Subscores at Week 12IIEF Question 30.87 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.095
5 mg TadalafilChange From Baseline in IIEF Subscores at Week 12IIEF Question 40.87 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.091
0.2 mg TamsulosinChange From Baseline in IIEF Subscores at Week 12IIEF Question 30.39 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
0.2 mg TamsulosinChange From Baseline in IIEF Subscores at Week 12IIEF Question 40.50 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.115
Secondary

Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Erectile Function (EF) Domain at Week 12

IIEF is a 15 item self-reported questionnaire to assess overall erectile function and satisfaction during the past 4 weeks. IIEF- EF is the sum of Questions 1-5 and 15 of the IIEF. Questions 1-5 are scored 0(low/no erectile function) to 5(high erectile function) and Question 15 is scored 1(very low confidence) to 5(very high confidence) with a total score ranging from 1 to 30.Higher scores represent better erectile function.LS mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from MMRM.The model includes effects for treatment,country/region,baseline lower urinary tract symptoms(LUTS) severity (moderate/severe),visit,treatment-by-visit interaction,centered baseline value(defined as the baseline value for a participant-the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change(change from Visit 2 at Visit 3),centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions.The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who had at least one dose of the study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline IIEF measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Erectile Function (EF) Domain at Week 121.88 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.448
5 mg TadalafilChange From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Erectile Function (EF) Domain at Week 125.24 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.439
0.2 mg TamsulosinChange From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Erectile Function (EF) Domain at Week 122.64 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.556
Secondary

Change From Baseline in IPSS at Week 12

IPSS Total Score is the sum of Questions 1 through 7 of the IPSS questionnaire. Each question is scored from 0 (none/no symptoms) to 5 (frequent symptoms) for an IPSS Total Score ranging from 0 to 35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM).The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, prior alpha-blocker therapy, baseline Erectile dysfunction (ED) severity (mild/moderate/severe),visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline IPSS measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in IPSS at Week 12-4.08 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.402
5 mg TadalafilChange From Baseline in IPSS at Week 12-5.49 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.395
0.2 mg TamsulosinChange From Baseline in IPSS at Week 12-4.92 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.493
95% CI: [-1.87, 0.18]
Secondary

Change From Baseline in IPSS Quality of Life (QoL) Index at Week 12

IPSS QoL assess participant response to the following question:If you were to spend the rest of your life with your urinary condition just the way it is now, how would you feel about that?. Response options are Delighted(0),Pleased(1);Mostly satisfied(2);mixed about equally satisfied and dissatisfied(3);Mostly dissatisfied(4);Unhappy(5);Terrible(6),with a total ranging from 0 to 6; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares(LS) mean of change from baseline(bl) to endpoint is from MMRM.The model includes effects for treatment,country/region, prior alpha-blocker therapy,baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe),visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered bl value (defined as the bl value for a participant -the overall bl mean value),placebo lead-in total IPSS change(change from Visit 2 at Visit 3),centered bl-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline QoL measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in IPSS Quality of Life (QoL) Index at Week 12-0.85 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.099
5 mg TadalafilChange From Baseline in IPSS Quality of Life (QoL) Index at Week 12-0.98 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.097
0.2 mg TamsulosinChange From Baseline in IPSS Quality of Life (QoL) Index at Week 12-1.00 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.121
Secondary

Change From Baseline in IPSS Storage (Irritative) Subscore at Week 12

IPSS Storage (Irritative) subscore is the sum of Questions 2, 4 and 7 of the IPSS questionnaire. Scores ranged from 0 (no irritative symptoms) to 5 (frequent irritative symptoms), with total subscore of the 3 questions for irritative subscore ranging from 0 to 15; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM). The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, prior alpha-blocker therapy, baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe), visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline IPSS measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in IPSS Storage (Irritative) Subscore at Week 12-1.68 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.176
5 mg TadalafilChange From Baseline in IPSS Storage (Irritative) Subscore at Week 12-2.01 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.173
0.2 mg TamsulosinChange From Baseline in IPSS Storage (Irritative) Subscore at Week 12-1.90 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.215
Secondary

Change From Baseline in IPSS Voiding (Obstructive) Subscore at Week 12

IPSS voiding (obstructive) subscore is the sum of Questions 1, 3, 5 and 6 of the IPSS questionnaire. Scores ranged from 0 (no obstructive symptoms) to 5 (frequent obstructive symptoms), with total subscore of the 4 questions of the obstructive score ranging from 0 to 20; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM). The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, prior alpha-blocker therapy, baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe),visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline IPSS measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in IPSS Voiding (Obstructive) Subscore at Week 12-2.42 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.271
5 mg TadalafilChange From Baseline in IPSS Voiding (Obstructive) Subscore at Week 12-3.49 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.266
0.2 mg TamsulosinChange From Baseline in IPSS Voiding (Obstructive) Subscore at Week 12-3.07 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.331
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Modified International Prostate Symptom Score (mIPSS) at Week 2

The modified IPSS is the total IPSS collected at 2 weeks post-baseline.The total IPSS is obtained by combining the scores of the responses to component questions 1 through 7. Each question is scored from 0-5 for a total IPSS range of 0-35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from ANCOVA. The model includes terms for treatment, country/region, prior alpha-blocker use and baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe), centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), the centered baseline-by-treatment and the treatment-by-country/region interactions. The interaction terms are removed if p \>= 0.10.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 2

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline mIPSS measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Modified International Prostate Symptom Score (mIPSS) at Week 2-2.19 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.342
5 mg TadalafilChange From Baseline in Modified International Prostate Symptom Score (mIPSS) at Week 2-3.40 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.336
0.2 mg TamsulosinChange From Baseline in Modified International Prostate Symptom Score (mIPSS) at Week 2-3.20 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.403
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR) at Week 12

The amount of urine remaining in the bladder after void completion.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline PVR measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR) at Week 12-6.3 milliliters (mL)Standard Deviation 47.86
5 mg TadalafilChange From Baseline in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR) at Week 12-3.8 milliliters (mL)Standard Deviation 49.02
0.2 mg TamsulosinChange From Baseline in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR) at Week 12-9.5 milliliters (mL)Standard Deviation 44.76
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total IPSS at Week 4 and Week 8

IPSS Total Score is the sum of Questions 1 through 7 of the IPSS questionnaire. Each question is scored from 0 (none/no symptoms) to 5 (frequent symptoms) for an IPSS Total Score ranging from 0 to 35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM). The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, prior alpha-blocker therapy, baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe),visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4; Baseline, Week 8

Population: All randomized participants who had at least one dose of the study, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline IPSS measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total IPSS at Week 4 and Week 8Week 4-2.99 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.365
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total IPSS at Week 4 and Week 8Week 8-3.50 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.385
5 mg TadalafilChange From Baseline in Total IPSS at Week 4 and Week 8Week 4-4.10 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.359
5 mg TadalafilChange From Baseline in Total IPSS at Week 4 and Week 8Week 8-4.85 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.378
0.2 mg TamsulosinChange From Baseline in Total IPSS at Week 4 and Week 8Week 4-3.92 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.434
0.2 mg TamsulosinChange From Baseline in Total IPSS at Week 4 and Week 8Week 8-4.44 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.465
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Uroflowmetry Measures at Week 12

Qmax is defined as the peak urine flow rate (measured in milliliters per second \[mL/sec\] using standard calibrated flowmeter). At each visit, a uroflowmetry assessment was considered valid and the data were included only if the prevoid total bladder volume (assessed by ultrasound) was \>=150 to \<=550 milliliters (mL) and the voided volume (Vcomp) was \>=125 mL. Changes in Qmax from baseline to endpoint in the double-blind treatment period were analyzed using Type III sums of squares ANOVA on rank-transformed data with a term for treatment group.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline Uroflowmetry measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Uroflowmetry Measures at Week 121.5 Milliliters/seconds (mL/sec)Standard Deviation 5.46
5 mg TadalafilChange From Baseline in Uroflowmetry Measures at Week 121.9 Milliliters/seconds (mL/sec)Standard Deviation 5.68
0.2 mg TamsulosinChange From Baseline in Uroflowmetry Measures at Week 122.0 Milliliters/seconds (mL/sec)Standard Deviation 5.37
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 2 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 4 and Week 8

Participant-assessed diary assesses the mean change from baseline in the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q2, Were you able to insert your penis into your partner's vagina?. The SEP Q2 score is determined as the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q2 out of all sexual attempts recorded during the time period. Change was defined as the percentage of yes responses at endpoint minus the percentage of yes responses at baseline. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment, country/region, baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe), centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), the centered baseline-by-treatment and the treatment-by-country/region interactions. The interaction terms are removed if p \>= 0.10.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4; Baseline, Week 8

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline SEP measurement. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) was used to impute missing post-baseline values.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 2 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 4 and Week 8Week 45.43 percentage of yes responsesStandard Error 2.394
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 2 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 4 and Week 8Week 810.79 percentage of yes responsesStandard Error 2.51
5 mg TadalafilChange From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 2 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 4 and Week 8Week 420.53 percentage of yes responsesStandard Error 2.325
5 mg TadalafilChange From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 2 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 4 and Week 8Week 823.22 percentage of yes responsesStandard Error 2.441
0.2 mg TamsulosinChange From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 2 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 4 and Week 8Week 46.21 percentage of yes responsesStandard Error 2.827
0.2 mg TamsulosinChange From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 2 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 4 and Week 8Week 87.42 percentage of yes responsesStandard Error 2.95
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 2 of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Questionnaire at Week 12

Participant-assessed diary assesses the mean change from baseline in the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q2, Were you able to insert your penis into your partner's vagina?. The SEP Q2 score was determined as the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q2 out of all sexual attempts recorded during the time period. Change is defined as the percentage of yes responses at endpoint minus the percentage of yes responses at baseline. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment, country/region, baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe), centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), the centered baseline-by-treatment and the treatment-by-country/region interactions. The interaction terms are removed if p \>= 0.10.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline SEP measurement. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) was used to impute missing post-baseline values.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 2 of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Questionnaire at Week 1210.90 percentage of yes responsesStandard Error 2.618
5 mg TadalafilChange From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 2 of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Questionnaire at Week 1223.87 percentage of yes responsesStandard Error 2.548
0.2 mg TamsulosinChange From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 2 of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Questionnaire at Week 126.84 percentage of yes responsesStandard Error 3.074
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 3 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 12

Participant-assessed diary assesses the mean change from baseline in the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q3, Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse?.The SEP Q3 score is determined as the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q3 out of all sexual attempts recorded during the time period. Change was defined as the percentage of yes responses at endpoint minus percentage of yes responses at baseline. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment, country/region, baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe), centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), the centered baseline-by-treatment and the treatment-by-country/region interactions. The interaction terms are removed if p \>= 0.10.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline SEP measurement. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) was used to impute missing post-baseline values.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 3 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 1215.96 percentage of yes responsesStandard Error 3.016
5 mg TadalafilChange From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 3 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 1236.62 percentage of yes responsesStandard Error 2.935
0.2 mg TamsulosinChange From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 3 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 1217.42 percentage of yes responsesStandard Error 3.557
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 3 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 4 and Week 8

Participant-assessed diary assesses the mean change from baseline in the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q3, Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse?. The SEP Q3 score is determined as the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q3 out of all sexual attempts recorded during the time period. Change was defined as the percentage of yes responses at endpoint minus percentage of yes responses at baseline. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment, country/region, baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe), centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), the centered baseline-by-treatment and the treatment-by-country/region interactions. The interaction terms are removed if p \>= 0.10.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4; Baseline, Week 8

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline SEP measurement. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) was used to impute missing post-baseline values.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 3 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 4 and Week 8Week 47.41 percentage of yes responsesStandard Error 2.701
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 3 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 4 and Week 8Week 814.08 percentage of yes responsesStandard Error 2.884
5 mg TadalafilChange From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 3 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 4 and Week 8Week 423.38 percentage of yes responsesStandard Error 2.622
5 mg TadalafilChange From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 3 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 4 and Week 8Week 832.27 percentage of yes responsesStandard Error 2.805
0.2 mg TamsulosinChange From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 3 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 4 and Week 8Week 49.57 percentage of yes responsesStandard Error 3.213
0.2 mg TamsulosinChange From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 3 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 4 and Week 8Week 814.98 percentage of yes responsesStandard Error 3.411
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12

CGI-I measures clinician's perception of participant improvement at the time of assessment (compared with the start of treatment) with scores ranging from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse).

Time frame: Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug and had a baseline and at least one post-baseline CGI-I measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12Much Worse2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12A Little Better130 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12No Change91 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12Very Much Worse0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12Very Much Better16 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12Much Better92 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12A Little Worse12 Participants
5 mg TadalafilNumber of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12No Change66 Participants
5 mg TadalafilNumber of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12Very Much Worse1 Participants
5 mg TadalafilNumber of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12Much Worse0 Participants
5 mg TadalafilNumber of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12A Little Worse5 Participants
5 mg TadalafilNumber of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12A Little Better140 Participants
5 mg TadalafilNumber of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12Much Better120 Participants
5 mg TadalafilNumber of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12Very Much Better21 Participants
0.2 mg TamsulosinNumber of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12A Little Better85 Participants
0.2 mg TamsulosinNumber of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12Much Worse0 Participants
0.2 mg TamsulosinNumber of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12Very Much Better10 Participants
0.2 mg TamsulosinNumber of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12Much Better41 Participants
0.2 mg TamsulosinNumber of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12No Change39 Participants
0.2 mg TamsulosinNumber of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12A Little Worse1 Participants
0.2 mg TamsulosinNumber of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12Very Much Worse0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12

PGI-I measures a participant's perception of improvement at the time of assessment compared with the start of treatment. Score ranges from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse).

Time frame: Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline PGI-I measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12Much Worse3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12A Little Better169 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12No Change87 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12Very Much Worse0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12Very Much Better5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12Much Better73 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12A Little Worse5 Participants
5 mg TadalafilNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12No Change53 Participants
5 mg TadalafilNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12Very Much Worse0 Participants
5 mg TadalafilNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12Much Worse2 Participants
5 mg TadalafilNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12A Little Worse2 Participants
5 mg TadalafilNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12A Little Better164 Participants
5 mg TadalafilNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12Much Better119 Participants
5 mg TadalafilNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12Very Much Better13 Participants
0.2 mg TamsulosinNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12A Little Better93 Participants
0.2 mg TamsulosinNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12Much Worse0 Participants
0.2 mg TamsulosinNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12Very Much Better6 Participants
0.2 mg TamsulosinNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12Much Better39 Participants
0.2 mg TamsulosinNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12No Change37 Participants
0.2 mg TamsulosinNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12A Little Worse1 Participants
0.2 mg TamsulosinNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12Very Much Worse0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026