Benign Prostate Hyperplasia, Erectile Dysfunction
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to see whether tadalafil can reduce the signs and symptoms in men with Erectile Dysfunction (ED) and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia-Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (BPH-LUTS) and improve their quality of life.
Interventions
Administered orally
Administered orally
Administered orally
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Main Inclusion Criteria: * Present with a history of ED and signs and symptoms of BPH. * Are sexually active with an adult female partner, and expect to remain sexually active with the same adult female partner for the duration of the study. Main
Exclusion criteria
* Current treatment with nitrates. * Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) greater than 10.0 nanogram (ng)/mL at 1st screening. * PSA greater than or equal to 4.0 to less than or equal to 10.0 ng/mL at 1st screening if prostate malignancy has not been ruled out to the satisfaction of a urologist * Suffering from other urinary disease like cancer, or infection * Serious cardiovascular disease * History of significant renal insufficiency
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 | IPSS Total Score is the sum of Questions 1 through 7 of the IPSS questionnaire. Each question was scored from 0 (none/no symptoms) to 5 (frequent symptoms) for an IPSS Total Score ranging from 0 to 35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM).The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, prior alpha-blocker therapy, baseline Erectile dysfunction (ED) severity (mild/moderate/severe),visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment.The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 2 of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Questionnaire at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 | Participant-assessed diary assesses the mean change from baseline in the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q2, Were you able to insert your penis into your partner's vagina?. The SEP Q2 score was determined as the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q2 out of all sexual attempts recorded during the time period. Change is defined as the percentage of yes responses at endpoint minus the percentage of yes responses at baseline. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment, country/region, baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe), centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), the centered baseline-by-treatment and the treatment-by-country/region interactions. The interaction terms are removed if p \>= 0.10. |
| Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 3 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 | Participant-assessed diary assesses the mean change from baseline in the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q3, Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse?.The SEP Q3 score is determined as the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q3 out of all sexual attempts recorded during the time period. Change was defined as the percentage of yes responses at endpoint minus percentage of yes responses at baseline. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment, country/region, baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe), centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), the centered baseline-by-treatment and the treatment-by-country/region interactions. The interaction terms are removed if p \>= 0.10. |
| Change From Baseline in IPSS at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 | IPSS Total Score is the sum of Questions 1 through 7 of the IPSS questionnaire. Each question is scored from 0 (none/no symptoms) to 5 (frequent symptoms) for an IPSS Total Score ranging from 0 to 35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM).The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, prior alpha-blocker therapy, baseline Erectile dysfunction (ED) severity (mild/moderate/severe),visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10. |
| Change From Baseline in Uroflowmetry Measures at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 | Qmax is defined as the peak urine flow rate (measured in milliliters per second \[mL/sec\] using standard calibrated flowmeter). At each visit, a uroflowmetry assessment was considered valid and the data were included only if the prevoid total bladder volume (assessed by ultrasound) was \>=150 to \<=550 milliliters (mL) and the voided volume (Vcomp) was \>=125 mL. Changes in Qmax from baseline to endpoint in the double-blind treatment period were analyzed using Type III sums of squares ANOVA on rank-transformed data with a term for treatment group. |
| Change From Baseline in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR) at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 | The amount of urine remaining in the bladder after void completion. |
| Change From Baseline in IPSS Storage (Irritative) Subscore at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 | IPSS Storage (Irritative) subscore is the sum of Questions 2, 4 and 7 of the IPSS questionnaire. Scores ranged from 0 (no irritative symptoms) to 5 (frequent irritative symptoms), with total subscore of the 3 questions for irritative subscore ranging from 0 to 15; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM). The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, prior alpha-blocker therapy, baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe), visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions. |
| Change From Baseline in IPSS Voiding (Obstructive) Subscore at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 | IPSS voiding (obstructive) subscore is the sum of Questions 1, 3, 5 and 6 of the IPSS questionnaire. Scores ranged from 0 (no obstructive symptoms) to 5 (frequent obstructive symptoms), with total subscore of the 4 questions of the obstructive score ranging from 0 to 20; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM). The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, prior alpha-blocker therapy, baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe),visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions. |
| Change From Baseline in IPSS Quality of Life (QoL) Index at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 | IPSS QoL assess participant response to the following question:If you were to spend the rest of your life with your urinary condition just the way it is now, how would you feel about that?. Response options are Delighted(0),Pleased(1);Mostly satisfied(2);mixed about equally satisfied and dissatisfied(3);Mostly dissatisfied(4);Unhappy(5);Terrible(6),with a total ranging from 0 to 6; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares(LS) mean of change from baseline(bl) to endpoint is from MMRM.The model includes effects for treatment,country/region, prior alpha-blocker therapy,baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe),visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered bl value (defined as the bl value for a participant -the overall bl mean value),placebo lead-in total IPSS change(change from Visit 2 at Visit 3),centered bl-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions. |
| Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12 | Week 12 | PGI-I measures a participant's perception of improvement at the time of assessment compared with the start of treatment. Score ranges from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). |
| Number of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12 | Week 12 | CGI-I measures clinician's perception of participant improvement at the time of assessment (compared with the start of treatment) with scores ranging from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). |
| Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Erectile Function (EF) Domain at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 | IIEF is a 15 item self-reported questionnaire to assess overall erectile function and satisfaction during the past 4 weeks. IIEF- EF is the sum of Questions 1-5 and 15 of the IIEF. Questions 1-5 are scored 0(low/no erectile function) to 5(high erectile function) and Question 15 is scored 1(very low confidence) to 5(very high confidence) with a total score ranging from 1 to 30.Higher scores represent better erectile function.LS mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from MMRM.The model includes effects for treatment,country/region,baseline lower urinary tract symptoms(LUTS) severity (moderate/severe),visit,treatment-by-visit interaction,centered baseline value(defined as the baseline value for a participant-the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change(change from Visit 2 at Visit 3),centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions.The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10. |
| Change From Baseline in IIEF Intercourse Satisfaction at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 | IIEF is a 15 item self-reported questionnaire used to assess overall erectile function and satisfaction during the past 4 weeks. IIEF-IS is the sum of Questions 6,7 and 8 of the IIEF. Scores range from 0(low/no satisfaction) to 5(high satisfaction) for each question, with the total possible score for the 3 questions ranging from 0 to 15.Higher scores were indicative of an increase in intercourse satisfaction. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from MMRM. The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, baseline LUTS severity (moderate/severe), visit, treatment-by-visit interaction,centered baseline value(defined as the baseline value for a participant- the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10. |
| Change From Baseline in IIEF Orgasmic Function at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 | IIEF is a 15 item self-reported questionnaire used to assess overall erectile function and satisfaction during the past 4 weeks. IIEF orgasmic function is the sum of Q9 and Q10 of the IIEF. Scores ranged from 0 (no stimulation) to 5 (almost always) for each question, with the total possible score for the 2 questions ranging from 0 to 10. Higher scores were indicative of better orgasmic function. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from MMRM. The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, baseline LUTS severity (moderate/severe), visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10. |
| Change From Baseline in IIEF Sexual Desire at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 | IIEF is a 15 item self-reported questionnaire used to assess overall erectile function and satisfaction during the past 4 weeks. IIEF sexual desire is the sum of Q11 and Q12. Scores ranged from 1 (low/almost never) to 5 (very high/almost always) for each question, with the total possible score for the 2 questions ranging from 2 to 10. Higher scores were indicative of increased sexual desire. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from MMRM. The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, baseline LUTS severity (moderate/severe), visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10. |
| Change From Baseline in IIEF Subscores at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 | IIEF Question 3 asks how often a participant was able to penetrate his partner over the past 4 weeks. Scores range from 0 (did not attempt intercourse) to 5 (almost always or always). IIEF Question 4 asks whether/how often a participant was able to maintain an erection after penetration over the past 4 weeks. Scores range from 0 (did not attempt intercourse) to 5 (almost always or always). Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from MMRM. The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, baseline LUTS severity (moderate/severe), visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10. |
| Change From Baseline in Total IPSS at Week 4 and Week 8 | Baseline, Week 4; Baseline, Week 8 | IPSS Total Score is the sum of Questions 1 through 7 of the IPSS questionnaire. Each question is scored from 0 (none/no symptoms) to 5 (frequent symptoms) for an IPSS Total Score ranging from 0 to 35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM). The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, prior alpha-blocker therapy, baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe),visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10. |
| Change From Baseline in IIEF EF at Week 4 and Week 8 | Baseline, Week 4; Baseline, Week 8 | IIEF is a 15 item self-reported questionnaire used to assess overall erectile function and satisfaction during the past 4 weeks. IIEF- EF is the sum of Questions 1-5 and 15 of the IIEF. Questions 1-5 were scored 0 (low/no erectile function) to 5 (high erectile function) and Question 15 was scored 1 (very low confidence) to 5 (very high confidence) with a total score ranging from 1 to 30. Higher scores represent better erectile function. LS mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from MMRM. The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, baseline LUTS severity (moderate/severe), visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10. |
| Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 2 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 4 and Week 8 | Baseline, Week 4; Baseline, Week 8 | Participant-assessed diary assesses the mean change from baseline in the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q2, Were you able to insert your penis into your partner's vagina?. The SEP Q2 score is determined as the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q2 out of all sexual attempts recorded during the time period. Change was defined as the percentage of yes responses at endpoint minus the percentage of yes responses at baseline. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment, country/region, baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe), centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), the centered baseline-by-treatment and the treatment-by-country/region interactions. The interaction terms are removed if p \>= 0.10. |
| Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 3 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 4 and Week 8 | Baseline, Week 4; Baseline, Week 8 | Participant-assessed diary assesses the mean change from baseline in the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q3, Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse?. The SEP Q3 score is determined as the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q3 out of all sexual attempts recorded during the time period. Change was defined as the percentage of yes responses at endpoint minus percentage of yes responses at baseline. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment, country/region, baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe), centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), the centered baseline-by-treatment and the treatment-by-country/region interactions. The interaction terms are removed if p \>= 0.10. |
| Change From Baseline in Modified International Prostate Symptom Score (mIPSS) at Week 2 | Baseline, Week 2 | The modified IPSS is the total IPSS collected at 2 weeks post-baseline.The total IPSS is obtained by combining the scores of the responses to component questions 1 through 7. Each question is scored from 0-5 for a total IPSS range of 0-35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from ANCOVA. The model includes terms for treatment, country/region, prior alpha-blocker use and baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe), centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), the centered baseline-by-treatment and the treatment-by-country/region interactions. The interaction terms are removed if p \>= 0.10. |
| Change From Baseline in IIEF Overall Satisfaction (OS) at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 | IIEF is a 15 item self-reported questionnaire used to assess overall erectile function and satisfaction during the past 4 weeks. IIEF-OS is the sum of Questions 13 and 14. Scores range from 1 (low/no satisfaction) to 5 (high satisfaction) for each question, with a total subscore ranging from 2 to 10;higher scores represent better erectile function. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM). The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, baseline LUTS severity (moderate/severe), visit, treatment-by-visit interaction,centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10. |
Countries
China
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Placebo Placebo matching tadalafil or tamsulosin administered once daily by mouth for 16 weeks. | 361 |
| 5 mg Tadalafil Placebo administered once daily by mouth for 4 weeks during the single-blind placebo run-in period.
Tadalafil 5 milligram (mg) tablet administered once daily by mouth for 12 weeks during the double-blind treatment period. | 363 |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin Placebo administered once daily by mouth for 4 weeks during the single-blind placebo run-in period.
Tamsulosin 0.2 mg capsule administered once daily by mouth for 12 weeks during the double-blind treatment period. | 185 |
| Total | 909 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 6 | 6 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Entry Criteria Not Met | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 8 | 2 | 4 |
| Overall Study | Physician Decision | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 9 | 6 | 4 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Placebo | 5 mg Tadalafil | 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 61.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.35 | 61.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.27 | 61.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.06 | 61.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.25 |
| Region of Enrollment China | 279 Participants | 277 Participants | 143 Participants | 699 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Korea, Republic of | 71 Participants | 71 Participants | 35 Participants | 177 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Taiwan | 11 Participants | 15 Participants | 7 Participants | 33 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 361 Participants | 363 Participants | 185 Participants | 909 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 62 / 361 | 64 / 362 | 21 / 185 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 5 / 361 | 7 / 362 | 2 / 185 |
Outcome results
Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Week 12
IPSS Total Score is the sum of Questions 1 through 7 of the IPSS questionnaire. Each question was scored from 0 (none/no symptoms) to 5 (frequent symptoms) for an IPSS Total Score ranging from 0 to 35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM).The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, prior alpha-blocker therapy, baseline Erectile dysfunction (ED) severity (mild/moderate/severe),visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment.The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline IPSS measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Week 12 | -4.08 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.402 |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Week 12 | -5.49 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.395 |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Week 12 | -4.92 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.493 |
Change From Baseline in IIEF EF at Week 4 and Week 8
IIEF is a 15 item self-reported questionnaire used to assess overall erectile function and satisfaction during the past 4 weeks. IIEF- EF is the sum of Questions 1-5 and 15 of the IIEF. Questions 1-5 were scored 0 (low/no erectile function) to 5 (high erectile function) and Question 15 was scored 1 (very low confidence) to 5 (very high confidence) with a total score ranging from 1 to 30. Higher scores represent better erectile function. LS mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from MMRM. The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, baseline LUTS severity (moderate/severe), visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4; Baseline, Week 8
Population: All randomized participants who had at least one dose of the study, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline IIEF measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in IIEF EF at Week 4 and Week 8 | Week 4 | 1.23 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.412 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in IIEF EF at Week 4 and Week 8 | Week 8 | 1.51 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.423 |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Change From Baseline in IIEF EF at Week 4 and Week 8 | Week 4 | 4.50 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.403 |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Change From Baseline in IIEF EF at Week 4 and Week 8 | Week 8 | 4.77 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.414 |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Change From Baseline in IIEF EF at Week 4 and Week 8 | Week 4 | 1.43 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.498 |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Change From Baseline in IIEF EF at Week 4 and Week 8 | Week 8 | 2.19 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.516 |
Change From Baseline in IIEF Intercourse Satisfaction at Week 12
IIEF is a 15 item self-reported questionnaire used to assess overall erectile function and satisfaction during the past 4 weeks. IIEF-IS is the sum of Questions 6,7 and 8 of the IIEF. Scores range from 0(low/no satisfaction) to 5(high satisfaction) for each question, with the total possible score for the 3 questions ranging from 0 to 15.Higher scores were indicative of an increase in intercourse satisfaction. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from MMRM. The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, baseline LUTS severity (moderate/severe), visit, treatment-by-visit interaction,centered baseline value(defined as the baseline value for a participant- the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline IIEF measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in IIEF Intercourse Satisfaction at Week 12 | -0.05 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.183 |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Change From Baseline in IIEF Intercourse Satisfaction at Week 12 | 1.08 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.179 |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Change From Baseline in IIEF Intercourse Satisfaction at Week 12 | 0.41 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.227 |
Change From Baseline in IIEF Orgasmic Function at Week 12
IIEF is a 15 item self-reported questionnaire used to assess overall erectile function and satisfaction during the past 4 weeks. IIEF orgasmic function is the sum of Q9 and Q10 of the IIEF. Scores ranged from 0 (no stimulation) to 5 (almost always) for each question, with the total possible score for the 2 questions ranging from 0 to 10. Higher scores were indicative of better orgasmic function. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from MMRM. The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, baseline LUTS severity (moderate/severe), visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline IIEF measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in IIEF Orgasmic Function at Week 12 | 0.28 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.169 |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Change From Baseline in IIEF Orgasmic Function at Week 12 | 1.31 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.165 |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Change From Baseline in IIEF Orgasmic Function at Week 12 | 0.57 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.207 |
Change From Baseline in IIEF Overall Satisfaction (OS) at Week 12
IIEF is a 15 item self-reported questionnaire used to assess overall erectile function and satisfaction during the past 4 weeks. IIEF-OS is the sum of Questions 13 and 14. Scores range from 1 (low/no satisfaction) to 5 (high satisfaction) for each question, with a total subscore ranging from 2 to 10;higher scores represent better erectile function. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM). The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, baseline LUTS severity (moderate/severe), visit, treatment-by-visit interaction,centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline IIEF measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in IIEF Overall Satisfaction (OS) at Week 12 | 0.62 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.12 |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Change From Baseline in IIEF Overall Satisfaction (OS) at Week 12 | 1.54 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.118 |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Change From Baseline in IIEF Overall Satisfaction (OS) at Week 12 | 0.71 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.15 |
Change From Baseline in IIEF Sexual Desire at Week 12
IIEF is a 15 item self-reported questionnaire used to assess overall erectile function and satisfaction during the past 4 weeks. IIEF sexual desire is the sum of Q11 and Q12. Scores ranged from 1 (low/almost never) to 5 (very high/almost always) for each question, with the total possible score for the 2 questions ranging from 2 to 10. Higher scores were indicative of increased sexual desire. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from MMRM. The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, baseline LUTS severity (moderate/severe), visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline IIEF measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in IIEF Sexual Desire at Week 12 | 0.46 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.114 |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Change From Baseline in IIEF Sexual Desire at Week 12 | 1.12 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.111 |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Change From Baseline in IIEF Sexual Desire at Week 12 | 0.28 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.142 |
Change From Baseline in IIEF Subscores at Week 12
IIEF Question 3 asks how often a participant was able to penetrate his partner over the past 4 weeks. Scores range from 0 (did not attempt intercourse) to 5 (almost always or always). IIEF Question 4 asks whether/how often a participant was able to maintain an erection after penetration over the past 4 weeks. Scores range from 0 (did not attempt intercourse) to 5 (almost always or always). Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from MMRM. The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, baseline LUTS severity (moderate/severe), visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline IIEF measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in IIEF Subscores at Week 12 | IIEF Question 3 | 0.28 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.097 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in IIEF Subscores at Week 12 | IIEF Question 4 | 0.30 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.093 |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Change From Baseline in IIEF Subscores at Week 12 | IIEF Question 3 | 0.87 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.095 |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Change From Baseline in IIEF Subscores at Week 12 | IIEF Question 4 | 0.87 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.091 |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Change From Baseline in IIEF Subscores at Week 12 | IIEF Question 3 | 0.39 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.12 |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Change From Baseline in IIEF Subscores at Week 12 | IIEF Question 4 | 0.50 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.115 |
Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Erectile Function (EF) Domain at Week 12
IIEF is a 15 item self-reported questionnaire to assess overall erectile function and satisfaction during the past 4 weeks. IIEF- EF is the sum of Questions 1-5 and 15 of the IIEF. Questions 1-5 are scored 0(low/no erectile function) to 5(high erectile function) and Question 15 is scored 1(very low confidence) to 5(very high confidence) with a total score ranging from 1 to 30.Higher scores represent better erectile function.LS mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from MMRM.The model includes effects for treatment,country/region,baseline lower urinary tract symptoms(LUTS) severity (moderate/severe),visit,treatment-by-visit interaction,centered baseline value(defined as the baseline value for a participant-the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change(change from Visit 2 at Visit 3),centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions.The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: All randomized participants who had at least one dose of the study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline IIEF measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Erectile Function (EF) Domain at Week 12 | 1.88 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.448 |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Erectile Function (EF) Domain at Week 12 | 5.24 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.439 |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Erectile Function (EF) Domain at Week 12 | 2.64 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.556 |
Change From Baseline in IPSS at Week 12
IPSS Total Score is the sum of Questions 1 through 7 of the IPSS questionnaire. Each question is scored from 0 (none/no symptoms) to 5 (frequent symptoms) for an IPSS Total Score ranging from 0 to 35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM).The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, prior alpha-blocker therapy, baseline Erectile dysfunction (ED) severity (mild/moderate/severe),visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline IPSS measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in IPSS at Week 12 | -4.08 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.402 |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Change From Baseline in IPSS at Week 12 | -5.49 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.395 |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Change From Baseline in IPSS at Week 12 | -4.92 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.493 |
Change From Baseline in IPSS Quality of Life (QoL) Index at Week 12
IPSS QoL assess participant response to the following question:If you were to spend the rest of your life with your urinary condition just the way it is now, how would you feel about that?. Response options are Delighted(0),Pleased(1);Mostly satisfied(2);mixed about equally satisfied and dissatisfied(3);Mostly dissatisfied(4);Unhappy(5);Terrible(6),with a total ranging from 0 to 6; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares(LS) mean of change from baseline(bl) to endpoint is from MMRM.The model includes effects for treatment,country/region, prior alpha-blocker therapy,baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe),visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered bl value (defined as the bl value for a participant -the overall bl mean value),placebo lead-in total IPSS change(change from Visit 2 at Visit 3),centered bl-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline QoL measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in IPSS Quality of Life (QoL) Index at Week 12 | -0.85 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.099 |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Change From Baseline in IPSS Quality of Life (QoL) Index at Week 12 | -0.98 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.097 |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Change From Baseline in IPSS Quality of Life (QoL) Index at Week 12 | -1.00 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.121 |
Change From Baseline in IPSS Storage (Irritative) Subscore at Week 12
IPSS Storage (Irritative) subscore is the sum of Questions 2, 4 and 7 of the IPSS questionnaire. Scores ranged from 0 (no irritative symptoms) to 5 (frequent irritative symptoms), with total subscore of the 3 questions for irritative subscore ranging from 0 to 15; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM). The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, prior alpha-blocker therapy, baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe), visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline IPSS measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in IPSS Storage (Irritative) Subscore at Week 12 | -1.68 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.176 |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Change From Baseline in IPSS Storage (Irritative) Subscore at Week 12 | -2.01 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.173 |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Change From Baseline in IPSS Storage (Irritative) Subscore at Week 12 | -1.90 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.215 |
Change From Baseline in IPSS Voiding (Obstructive) Subscore at Week 12
IPSS voiding (obstructive) subscore is the sum of Questions 1, 3, 5 and 6 of the IPSS questionnaire. Scores ranged from 0 (no obstructive symptoms) to 5 (frequent obstructive symptoms), with total subscore of the 4 questions of the obstructive score ranging from 0 to 20; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM). The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, prior alpha-blocker therapy, baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe),visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline IPSS measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in IPSS Voiding (Obstructive) Subscore at Week 12 | -2.42 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.271 |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Change From Baseline in IPSS Voiding (Obstructive) Subscore at Week 12 | -3.49 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.266 |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Change From Baseline in IPSS Voiding (Obstructive) Subscore at Week 12 | -3.07 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.331 |
Change From Baseline in Modified International Prostate Symptom Score (mIPSS) at Week 2
The modified IPSS is the total IPSS collected at 2 weeks post-baseline.The total IPSS is obtained by combining the scores of the responses to component questions 1 through 7. Each question is scored from 0-5 for a total IPSS range of 0-35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from ANCOVA. The model includes terms for treatment, country/region, prior alpha-blocker use and baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe), centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), the centered baseline-by-treatment and the treatment-by-country/region interactions. The interaction terms are removed if p \>= 0.10.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline mIPSS measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Modified International Prostate Symptom Score (mIPSS) at Week 2 | -2.19 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.342 |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Change From Baseline in Modified International Prostate Symptom Score (mIPSS) at Week 2 | -3.40 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.336 |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Change From Baseline in Modified International Prostate Symptom Score (mIPSS) at Week 2 | -3.20 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.403 |
Change From Baseline in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR) at Week 12
The amount of urine remaining in the bladder after void completion.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline PVR measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR) at Week 12 | -6.3 milliliters (mL) | Standard Deviation 47.86 |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Change From Baseline in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR) at Week 12 | -3.8 milliliters (mL) | Standard Deviation 49.02 |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Change From Baseline in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR) at Week 12 | -9.5 milliliters (mL) | Standard Deviation 44.76 |
Change From Baseline in Total IPSS at Week 4 and Week 8
IPSS Total Score is the sum of Questions 1 through 7 of the IPSS questionnaire. Each question is scored from 0 (none/no symptoms) to 5 (frequent symptoms) for an IPSS Total Score ranging from 0 to 35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM). The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, prior alpha-blocker therapy, baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe),visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p \>= 0.10.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4; Baseline, Week 8
Population: All randomized participants who had at least one dose of the study, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline IPSS measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Total IPSS at Week 4 and Week 8 | Week 4 | -2.99 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.365 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Total IPSS at Week 4 and Week 8 | Week 8 | -3.50 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.385 |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Change From Baseline in Total IPSS at Week 4 and Week 8 | Week 4 | -4.10 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.359 |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Change From Baseline in Total IPSS at Week 4 and Week 8 | Week 8 | -4.85 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.378 |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Change From Baseline in Total IPSS at Week 4 and Week 8 | Week 4 | -3.92 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.434 |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Change From Baseline in Total IPSS at Week 4 and Week 8 | Week 8 | -4.44 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.465 |
Change From Baseline in Uroflowmetry Measures at Week 12
Qmax is defined as the peak urine flow rate (measured in milliliters per second \[mL/sec\] using standard calibrated flowmeter). At each visit, a uroflowmetry assessment was considered valid and the data were included only if the prevoid total bladder volume (assessed by ultrasound) was \>=150 to \<=550 milliliters (mL) and the voided volume (Vcomp) was \>=125 mL. Changes in Qmax from baseline to endpoint in the double-blind treatment period were analyzed using Type III sums of squares ANOVA on rank-transformed data with a term for treatment group.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline Uroflowmetry measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Uroflowmetry Measures at Week 12 | 1.5 Milliliters/seconds (mL/sec) | Standard Deviation 5.46 |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Change From Baseline in Uroflowmetry Measures at Week 12 | 1.9 Milliliters/seconds (mL/sec) | Standard Deviation 5.68 |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Change From Baseline in Uroflowmetry Measures at Week 12 | 2.0 Milliliters/seconds (mL/sec) | Standard Deviation 5.37 |
Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 2 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 4 and Week 8
Participant-assessed diary assesses the mean change from baseline in the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q2, Were you able to insert your penis into your partner's vagina?. The SEP Q2 score is determined as the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q2 out of all sexual attempts recorded during the time period. Change was defined as the percentage of yes responses at endpoint minus the percentage of yes responses at baseline. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment, country/region, baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe), centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), the centered baseline-by-treatment and the treatment-by-country/region interactions. The interaction terms are removed if p \>= 0.10.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4; Baseline, Week 8
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline SEP measurement. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) was used to impute missing post-baseline values.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 2 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 4 and Week 8 | Week 4 | 5.43 percentage of yes responses | Standard Error 2.394 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 2 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 4 and Week 8 | Week 8 | 10.79 percentage of yes responses | Standard Error 2.51 |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 2 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 4 and Week 8 | Week 4 | 20.53 percentage of yes responses | Standard Error 2.325 |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 2 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 4 and Week 8 | Week 8 | 23.22 percentage of yes responses | Standard Error 2.441 |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 2 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 4 and Week 8 | Week 4 | 6.21 percentage of yes responses | Standard Error 2.827 |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 2 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 4 and Week 8 | Week 8 | 7.42 percentage of yes responses | Standard Error 2.95 |
Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 2 of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Questionnaire at Week 12
Participant-assessed diary assesses the mean change from baseline in the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q2, Were you able to insert your penis into your partner's vagina?. The SEP Q2 score was determined as the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q2 out of all sexual attempts recorded during the time period. Change is defined as the percentage of yes responses at endpoint minus the percentage of yes responses at baseline. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment, country/region, baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe), centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), the centered baseline-by-treatment and the treatment-by-country/region interactions. The interaction terms are removed if p \>= 0.10.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline SEP measurement. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) was used to impute missing post-baseline values.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 2 of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Questionnaire at Week 12 | 10.90 percentage of yes responses | Standard Error 2.618 |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 2 of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Questionnaire at Week 12 | 23.87 percentage of yes responses | Standard Error 2.548 |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 2 of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Questionnaire at Week 12 | 6.84 percentage of yes responses | Standard Error 3.074 |
Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 3 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 12
Participant-assessed diary assesses the mean change from baseline in the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q3, Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse?.The SEP Q3 score is determined as the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q3 out of all sexual attempts recorded during the time period. Change was defined as the percentage of yes responses at endpoint minus percentage of yes responses at baseline. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment, country/region, baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe), centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), the centered baseline-by-treatment and the treatment-by-country/region interactions. The interaction terms are removed if p \>= 0.10.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline SEP measurement. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) was used to impute missing post-baseline values.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 3 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 12 | 15.96 percentage of yes responses | Standard Error 3.016 |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 3 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 12 | 36.62 percentage of yes responses | Standard Error 2.935 |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 3 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 12 | 17.42 percentage of yes responses | Standard Error 3.557 |
Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 3 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 4 and Week 8
Participant-assessed diary assesses the mean change from baseline in the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q3, Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse?. The SEP Q3 score is determined as the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q3 out of all sexual attempts recorded during the time period. Change was defined as the percentage of yes responses at endpoint minus percentage of yes responses at baseline. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment, country/region, baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe), centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), the centered baseline-by-treatment and the treatment-by-country/region interactions. The interaction terms are removed if p \>= 0.10.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4; Baseline, Week 8
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline SEP measurement. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) was used to impute missing post-baseline values.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 3 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 4 and Week 8 | Week 4 | 7.41 percentage of yes responses | Standard Error 2.701 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 3 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 4 and Week 8 | Week 8 | 14.08 percentage of yes responses | Standard Error 2.884 |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 3 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 4 and Week 8 | Week 4 | 23.38 percentage of yes responses | Standard Error 2.622 |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 3 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 4 and Week 8 | Week 8 | 32.27 percentage of yes responses | Standard Error 2.805 |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 3 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 4 and Week 8 | Week 4 | 9.57 percentage of yes responses | Standard Error 3.213 |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 3 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 4 and Week 8 | Week 8 | 14.98 percentage of yes responses | Standard Error 3.411 |
Number of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12
CGI-I measures clinician's perception of participant improvement at the time of assessment (compared with the start of treatment) with scores ranging from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse).
Time frame: Week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug and had a baseline and at least one post-baseline CGI-I measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12 | Much Worse | 2 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12 | A Little Better | 130 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12 | No Change | 91 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12 | Very Much Worse | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12 | Very Much Better | 16 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12 | Much Better | 92 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12 | A Little Worse | 12 Participants |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Number of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12 | No Change | 66 Participants |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Number of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12 | Very Much Worse | 1 Participants |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Number of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12 | Much Worse | 0 Participants |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Number of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12 | A Little Worse | 5 Participants |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Number of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12 | A Little Better | 140 Participants |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Number of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12 | Much Better | 120 Participants |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Number of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12 | Very Much Better | 21 Participants |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Number of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12 | A Little Better | 85 Participants |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Number of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12 | Much Worse | 0 Participants |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Number of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12 | Very Much Better | 10 Participants |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Number of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12 | Much Better | 41 Participants |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Number of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12 | No Change | 39 Participants |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Number of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12 | A Little Worse | 1 Participants |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Number of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12 | Very Much Worse | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12
PGI-I measures a participant's perception of improvement at the time of assessment compared with the start of treatment. Score ranges from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse).
Time frame: Week 12
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline PGI-I measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12 | Much Worse | 3 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12 | A Little Better | 169 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12 | No Change | 87 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12 | Very Much Worse | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12 | Very Much Better | 5 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12 | Much Better | 73 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12 | A Little Worse | 5 Participants |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12 | No Change | 53 Participants |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12 | Very Much Worse | 0 Participants |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12 | Much Worse | 2 Participants |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12 | A Little Worse | 2 Participants |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12 | A Little Better | 164 Participants |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12 | Much Better | 119 Participants |
| 5 mg Tadalafil | Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12 | Very Much Better | 13 Participants |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12 | A Little Better | 93 Participants |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12 | Much Worse | 0 Participants |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12 | Very Much Better | 6 Participants |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12 | Much Better | 39 Participants |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12 | No Change | 37 Participants |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12 | A Little Worse | 1 Participants |
| 0.2 mg Tamsulosin | Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12 | Very Much Worse | 0 Participants |