Skip to content

Does Cap Assisted Colonoscopy Improve Detection of Adenomatous Polyps? (CAP Trial)

Does Cap Assisted Colonoscopy Improve Detection of Adenomatous Polyps? (CAP Trial)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01935180
Acronym
CAP
Enrollment
1148
Registered
2013-09-04
Start date
2010-12-31
Completion date
2012-05-31
Last updated
2018-09-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adenomatous Polyps

Keywords

colon polyps, adenoma resection, colon cancer screening, colonoscopy, polyp detection

Brief summary

Effectiveness of screening colonoscopy in cancer prevention relies on the detection and removal of adenomatous polyps. However, a substantial rate of adenomas is missed during a colonoscopy. It has been estimated that two thirds of missed adenomas are located on the proximal aspect of colonic folds. Attaching a transparent cap to the tip of a colonoscope may allow examination of the proximal aspect of colonic folds, and some early studies have suggested an increased polyp and adenoma detection using this technology. However, the studies have in part substantial methodological limitations (e.g. missing polyp histology, single endoscopist study, polyps not removed at the time of detection). Therefore, at this point it is unclear whether cap assisted colonoscopy may improve adenoma detection. The objective of this study is to evaluate whether cap assisted colonoscopy improves adenoma detection. The investigators propose a two-center multiple endoscopists randomized controlled trial. Patients will be randomized to cap assisted colonoscopy or standard high definition white light colonoscopy. The cap is a 4mm commercially available transparent cap that is attached to the tip of the colonoscopy. Primary outcome measure is the adenoma detection rate (mean number of adenoma per patient). The investigators will assess and adjust for possible variables that can affect adenoma detection, including withdrawal time and quality of colon preparation. As a secondary outcome of interest the investigators will evaluate a possible learning curve effect among all endoscopists (a minimum of six) new to this method. In addition the investigators will evaluate whether cap assisted endoscopy improves real time prediction of polyp histology.

Detailed description

All patients who present for a colonoscopy and meet inclusion and exclusion criteria will be asked to participate (see inclusion and exclusion criteria). All patients will undergo a regular bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol lavage (based on current standard of care) until clear rectal fluid is evacuated. Patients will be randomized to one of two groups: 1. Standard colonoscopy, or 2. Cap assisted colonoscopy. All colonoscopies will be performed using state of the art high-definition wide angle colonoscopy. The transparent cap, which is attached to the tip of the colonoscope, has a 4mm margin extending beyond the tip of the colonoscope. All patients will undergo a careful endoscopic examination. A timer will provide feedback on the time of insertion and the withdrawal time. Detected polyps will be assessed with standard white light and narrow band imaging to predict polyp histology (adenoma versus no adenoma), then resected and sent for histological evaluation according to standard of care. At least 8 experienced endoscopists at the participating centers will participate. Each endoscopist will perform at least 50 cap assisted colonoscopies as part of the study. Each endoscopist will be asked to complete a survey after 10 and after 50 cap assisted colonoscopies. Patients will be randomized in blocks of four allocated to each examiner. The order of randomization will be computer generated. Information on randomization will be contained in sealed envelopes assigned to each examiner and individually opened immediately before the procedure after a patient's All participating endoscopist will fill out a questionnaire regarding the use of cap assistance colonoscopy after the initial 10 cap assisted colonoscopies and after at least 50 cap assisted cap colonoscopies. Endoscopists will also undergo a training session with respect to real time polyp diagnosis before study commencement and after each 20 colonoscopies enrollment.

Interventions

DEVICEColonoscopy Cap

4mm transparent cap (Olympus) mounted to the tip of a colonoscope.

Sponsors

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
White River Junction Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

• Any patient ≥ 50 years old and \< 85 years old who presents for a colonoscopy with a potential for polyp resection and who does not meet any of the

Exclusion criteria

mentioned below will be asked to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Number of Adenomasduration of colonoscopyMean number of adenomas per patient in each group.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Advanced Adenoma Detection Rateduration of colonoscopyProportion of patients with advanced adenomas
Quality of Bowel Preparationduration of colonoscopyProportion of patients with a bowel preparation that was rated as good or excellent (four point scale that distinguishes the bowel prep as poor, fair, good or excellent).
Adenoma Detection Rateduration of colonoscopy• Adenoma detection rate (ADR), % of patients with at least 1 adenoma
Ease of Terminal Ileum Intubationduring colonoscopy• Proportion of patients, for whom intubation of the terminal ileum with the colonoscope was rated as easy. Intubation could be rated by the endoscopist as easy, slightly difficult, difficult, or unable to intubate.
Real Time Prediction of Polyp Histologyduration of colonoscopyDifference in recommended surveillance interval between real time polyp diagnosis and pathological diagnosis among patients with at least one diminutive polyp
Withdrawal Timetime of colonoscope withdrawal• Time taken for the withdrawal of the colonoscope from the cecum to anus among patients, who did not have any polyps.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Standard Colonoscopy
Standard colonoscopy without an attachment cap
552
Cap Assisted Colonoscopy
A transparent cap will be affixed to tip of the high-definition wide angle colonoscope. Colonoscopy Cap: 4mm transparent cap (Olympus) mounted to the tip of a colonoscope.
561
Total1,113

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStandard ColonoscopyCap Assisted ColonoscopyTotal
Age, Continuous61.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4
62.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
61.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
Indication
Colonoscopy performed for cancer screening
291 Participants292 Participants583 Participants
Indication
Colonoscopy performed for polyp surveillance
168 Participants171 Participants339 Participants
Indication
Colonoscopy performed for symptoms (diagnostic)
93 Participants98 Participants191 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
552 participants561 participants1113 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
209 Participants195 Participants404 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
343 Participants366 Participants709 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 5520 / 561
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 5520 / 561

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Number of Adenomas

Mean number of adenomas per patient in each group.

Time frame: duration of colonoscopy

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard ColonoscopyMean Number of Adenomas0.82 adenoma per patientStandard Deviation 1.5
Cap Assisted ColonoscopyMean Number of Adenomas0.89 adenoma per patientStandard Deviation 1.6
Secondary

Adenoma Detection Rate

• Adenoma detection rate (ADR), % of patients with at least 1 adenoma

Time frame: duration of colonoscopy

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Standard ColonoscopyAdenoma Detection Rate219 Participants
Cap Assisted ColonoscopyAdenoma Detection Rate235 Participants
Secondary

Advanced Adenoma Detection Rate

Proportion of patients with advanced adenomas

Time frame: duration of colonoscopy

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Standard ColonoscopyAdvanced Adenoma Detection Rate49 Participants
Cap Assisted ColonoscopyAdvanced Adenoma Detection Rate55 Participants
Secondary

Ease of Terminal Ileum Intubation

• Proportion of patients, for whom intubation of the terminal ileum with the colonoscope was rated as easy. Intubation could be rated by the endoscopist as easy, slightly difficult, difficult, or unable to intubate.

Time frame: during colonoscopy

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Standard ColonoscopyEase of Terminal Ileum Intubation435 Participants
Cap Assisted ColonoscopyEase of Terminal Ileum Intubation473 Participants
Secondary

Quality of Bowel Preparation

Proportion of patients with a bowel preparation that was rated as good or excellent (four point scale that distinguishes the bowel prep as poor, fair, good or excellent).

Time frame: duration of colonoscopy

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Standard ColonoscopyQuality of Bowel Preparation518 Participants
Cap Assisted ColonoscopyQuality of Bowel Preparation502 Participants
Secondary

Real Time Prediction of Polyp Histology

Difference in recommended surveillance interval between real time polyp diagnosis and pathological diagnosis among patients with at least one diminutive polyp

Time frame: duration of colonoscopy

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Standard ColonoscopyReal Time Prediction of Polyp Histology246 Participants
Cap Assisted ColonoscopyReal Time Prediction of Polyp Histology281 Participants
Secondary

Withdrawal Time

• Time taken for the withdrawal of the colonoscope from the cecum to anus among patients, who did not have any polyps.

Time frame: time of colonoscope withdrawal

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Standard ColonoscopyWithdrawal Time8.9 minutes
Cap Assisted ColonoscopyWithdrawal Time8.4 minutes

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 12, 2026