Adenomatous Polyps
Conditions
Keywords
colon polyps, adenoma resection, colon cancer screening, colonoscopy, polyp detection
Brief summary
Effectiveness of screening colonoscopy in cancer prevention relies on the detection and removal of adenomatous polyps. However, a substantial rate of adenomas is missed during a colonoscopy. It has been estimated that two thirds of missed adenomas are located on the proximal aspect of colonic folds. Attaching a transparent cap to the tip of a colonoscope may allow examination of the proximal aspect of colonic folds, and some early studies have suggested an increased polyp and adenoma detection using this technology. However, the studies have in part substantial methodological limitations (e.g. missing polyp histology, single endoscopist study, polyps not removed at the time of detection). Therefore, at this point it is unclear whether cap assisted colonoscopy may improve adenoma detection. The objective of this study is to evaluate whether cap assisted colonoscopy improves adenoma detection. The investigators propose a two-center multiple endoscopists randomized controlled trial. Patients will be randomized to cap assisted colonoscopy or standard high definition white light colonoscopy. The cap is a 4mm commercially available transparent cap that is attached to the tip of the colonoscopy. Primary outcome measure is the adenoma detection rate (mean number of adenoma per patient). The investigators will assess and adjust for possible variables that can affect adenoma detection, including withdrawal time and quality of colon preparation. As a secondary outcome of interest the investigators will evaluate a possible learning curve effect among all endoscopists (a minimum of six) new to this method. In addition the investigators will evaluate whether cap assisted endoscopy improves real time prediction of polyp histology.
Detailed description
All patients who present for a colonoscopy and meet inclusion and exclusion criteria will be asked to participate (see inclusion and exclusion criteria). All patients will undergo a regular bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol lavage (based on current standard of care) until clear rectal fluid is evacuated. Patients will be randomized to one of two groups: 1. Standard colonoscopy, or 2. Cap assisted colonoscopy. All colonoscopies will be performed using state of the art high-definition wide angle colonoscopy. The transparent cap, which is attached to the tip of the colonoscope, has a 4mm margin extending beyond the tip of the colonoscope. All patients will undergo a careful endoscopic examination. A timer will provide feedback on the time of insertion and the withdrawal time. Detected polyps will be assessed with standard white light and narrow band imaging to predict polyp histology (adenoma versus no adenoma), then resected and sent for histological evaluation according to standard of care. At least 8 experienced endoscopists at the participating centers will participate. Each endoscopist will perform at least 50 cap assisted colonoscopies as part of the study. Each endoscopist will be asked to complete a survey after 10 and after 50 cap assisted colonoscopies. Patients will be randomized in blocks of four allocated to each examiner. The order of randomization will be computer generated. Information on randomization will be contained in sealed envelopes assigned to each examiner and individually opened immediately before the procedure after a patient's All participating endoscopist will fill out a questionnaire regarding the use of cap assistance colonoscopy after the initial 10 cap assisted colonoscopies and after at least 50 cap assisted cap colonoscopies. Endoscopists will also undergo a training session with respect to real time polyp diagnosis before study commencement and after each 20 colonoscopies enrollment.
Interventions
4mm transparent cap (Olympus) mounted to the tip of a colonoscope.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
• Any patient ≥ 50 years old and \< 85 years old who presents for a colonoscopy with a potential for polyp resection and who does not meet any of the
Exclusion criteria
mentioned below will be asked to participate
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Number of Adenomas | duration of colonoscopy | Mean number of adenomas per patient in each group. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Advanced Adenoma Detection Rate | duration of colonoscopy | Proportion of patients with advanced adenomas |
| Quality of Bowel Preparation | duration of colonoscopy | Proportion of patients with a bowel preparation that was rated as good or excellent (four point scale that distinguishes the bowel prep as poor, fair, good or excellent). |
| Adenoma Detection Rate | duration of colonoscopy | • Adenoma detection rate (ADR), % of patients with at least 1 adenoma |
| Ease of Terminal Ileum Intubation | during colonoscopy | • Proportion of patients, for whom intubation of the terminal ileum with the colonoscope was rated as easy. Intubation could be rated by the endoscopist as easy, slightly difficult, difficult, or unable to intubate. |
| Real Time Prediction of Polyp Histology | duration of colonoscopy | Difference in recommended surveillance interval between real time polyp diagnosis and pathological diagnosis among patients with at least one diminutive polyp |
| Withdrawal Time | time of colonoscope withdrawal | • Time taken for the withdrawal of the colonoscope from the cecum to anus among patients, who did not have any polyps. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Standard Colonoscopy Standard colonoscopy without an attachment cap | 552 |
| Cap Assisted Colonoscopy A transparent cap will be affixed to tip of the high-definition wide angle colonoscope.
Colonoscopy Cap: 4mm transparent cap (Olympus) mounted to the tip of a colonoscope. | 561 |
| Total | 1,113 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Standard Colonoscopy | Cap Assisted Colonoscopy | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 61.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4 | 62.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3 | 61.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3 |
| Indication Colonoscopy performed for cancer screening | 291 Participants | 292 Participants | 583 Participants |
| Indication Colonoscopy performed for polyp surveillance | 168 Participants | 171 Participants | 339 Participants |
| Indication Colonoscopy performed for symptoms (diagnostic) | 93 Participants | 98 Participants | 191 Participants |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 552 participants | 561 participants | 1113 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 209 Participants | 195 Participants | 404 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 343 Participants | 366 Participants | 709 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 552 | 0 / 561 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 552 | 0 / 561 |
Outcome results
Mean Number of Adenomas
Mean number of adenomas per patient in each group.
Time frame: duration of colonoscopy
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard Colonoscopy | Mean Number of Adenomas | 0.82 adenoma per patient | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| Cap Assisted Colonoscopy | Mean Number of Adenomas | 0.89 adenoma per patient | Standard Deviation 1.6 |
Adenoma Detection Rate
• Adenoma detection rate (ADR), % of patients with at least 1 adenoma
Time frame: duration of colonoscopy
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Colonoscopy | Adenoma Detection Rate | 219 Participants |
| Cap Assisted Colonoscopy | Adenoma Detection Rate | 235 Participants |
Advanced Adenoma Detection Rate
Proportion of patients with advanced adenomas
Time frame: duration of colonoscopy
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Colonoscopy | Advanced Adenoma Detection Rate | 49 Participants |
| Cap Assisted Colonoscopy | Advanced Adenoma Detection Rate | 55 Participants |
Ease of Terminal Ileum Intubation
• Proportion of patients, for whom intubation of the terminal ileum with the colonoscope was rated as easy. Intubation could be rated by the endoscopist as easy, slightly difficult, difficult, or unable to intubate.
Time frame: during colonoscopy
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Colonoscopy | Ease of Terminal Ileum Intubation | 435 Participants |
| Cap Assisted Colonoscopy | Ease of Terminal Ileum Intubation | 473 Participants |
Quality of Bowel Preparation
Proportion of patients with a bowel preparation that was rated as good or excellent (four point scale that distinguishes the bowel prep as poor, fair, good or excellent).
Time frame: duration of colonoscopy
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Colonoscopy | Quality of Bowel Preparation | 518 Participants |
| Cap Assisted Colonoscopy | Quality of Bowel Preparation | 502 Participants |
Real Time Prediction of Polyp Histology
Difference in recommended surveillance interval between real time polyp diagnosis and pathological diagnosis among patients with at least one diminutive polyp
Time frame: duration of colonoscopy
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Colonoscopy | Real Time Prediction of Polyp Histology | 246 Participants |
| Cap Assisted Colonoscopy | Real Time Prediction of Polyp Histology | 281 Participants |
Withdrawal Time
• Time taken for the withdrawal of the colonoscope from the cecum to anus among patients, who did not have any polyps.
Time frame: time of colonoscope withdrawal
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Colonoscopy | Withdrawal Time | 8.9 minutes |
| Cap Assisted Colonoscopy | Withdrawal Time | 8.4 minutes |