Rehabilitation Care for Hip Fracture

Effectiveness of Post Acute Rehabilitation Care for Hip Fracture

Status

UNKNOWN

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT01934946

Enrollment

150

Registered

2013-09-04

Start date

2013-09-30

Completion date

2014-07-31

Last updated

2013-09-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hip Fracture

Keywords

hip fracture

Brief summary

Purpose: Hip fracture is a common disease on elderly. They become disabled easily if no adequate rehabilitation was given. The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of different types of post acute rehabilitation care for hip fracture.

Detailed description

Method: This study will recruit 150 peoples with hip fracture from hospitals in Taipei from Jan 1, 2014 to Dec 31, 2014. The subjects from wards are randomly divided into group A, B and Group C. Each group includes 50 cases of hip fracture. Group C received 14 days hospitalization for comprehensive rehabilitation and 6 times home rehabilitation services within 3 months; Group B received 14 days hospitalization for comprehensive rehabilitation and Group A was control group.

Interventions

OTHERcomprehensive rehabilitation

received 14 days hospitalization for comprehensive rehabilitation

OTHERhome rehabilitation

6 times home rehabilitation services within 3 months

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

60 Years to 80 Years

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

1. more than 60 years old, 2. hip fracture s/p within 3 months, 3. potential for rehabilitation.

Exclusion criteria

1. Active infection, such as pneumonia, UTI, osteomyelitis, wound infection 2. Other uncontrolled medical condition, such as, dyspnea on exertion, acute renal failure, acute coronary syndrome, acute heart failure, uncontrolled diabetes, active malignancy, DVT, possibility of pulmonary embolism, acute psychosis 3. No caregiver 4. No potential for rehabilitation, such as severe dementia, poor cognition, poor cooperation and motivation, poor family support 5. ESRD on Hemodialysis

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Pain scale	2 weeks and 3 months after intervention	change

Secondary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Barthel Activity of Daily Living	2 weeks , 3 months after intervention	change

Other

Measure	Time frame	Description
Harris Hip Score	2 weeks , 3 months after intervention	change

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

Primary ContactMUJUNG KAO, MD

woodkao35@yahoo.com.tw0919060998

Backup ContactKUNHUA HUANG, BS

A2785@tpech.gov.tw0979309125

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026