Skip to content

Rituximab Maintenance Therapy in Aggressive CD20 (Cluster of Differentiation Antigen 20) Positive Lymphoma and Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Rituximab Maintenance Therapy Versus Observation in Aggressive CD20+ Lymphoma and Mantle Cell Lymphoma - a Prospective Randomized Phase III Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01933711
Enrollment
328
Registered
2013-09-02
Start date
2002-07-31
Completion date
2018-12-31
Last updated
2016-05-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

CD20+ Aggressive Lymphoma, Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Keywords

CD20+ aggressive lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, rituximab, maintenance

Brief summary

Clinical and pharmacokinetic data suggest that the effect of rituximab could be improved by prolonged exposure to the drug. To test for this hypothesis we performed a prospective randomized trial of rituximab maintenance therapy versus observation in patients (pts) with aggressive CD20+ B-cell lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma.

Detailed description

After completion of standard treatment, pts with aggressive CD20+ B-cell lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma were randomized to either observation or maintenance therapy with rituximab (375 mg/m2) administered every 3 months for 2 years. Both pts after first line therapy and pts after relapse treatment were included in the study. Pts with aggressive lymphoma were enrolled if they had achieved a complete response (CR) after initial treatment. Pts with aggressive lymphoma with residual tumor mass underwent positron emission tomography (PET) and qualified for randomization if this examination showed no signs of tumor activity. Pts with mantle cell lymphoma were eligible for the study if at least a partial response (PR) was achieved. Primary endpoint of the study was progression free survival (PFS), secondary endpoints were time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS) and response to treatment. Differences between PFS and OS were analysed using the logrank test and the proportional hazard model of Cox. TTP was analyzed using a competing risk model with death as competing event.

Interventions

DRUGrituximab

Sponsors

University Hospital Heidelberg
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* aggressive B-cell lymphoma or mantle cell lymphoma * CR (complete remission) oder CRu (complete remission unconfirmed) after previous therapy * PR (partial remission) only when PET is negative * minimal age 18 years * CD20+ expression on tumor cells * effective contraception * Karnofsky status \> 60 * written informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression free survival24 months after randomizationPrimary endpoint of the study was progression free survival (PFS)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
time to progression (TTP)24 months after randomization
overall survival (OS)24 months after randomization
response to treatment24 months after randomization

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026