Skip to content

Evaluation of Benefit for Treatment of Single Sided Deafness (SSD) Between Two Bone Conduction Prosthetic Devices; Osseointegrated Implant Versus Maxilla Anchored Removable Oral Appliance (SoundBite)

Evaluation of Benefit for Treatment of Single Sided Deafness (SSD) Between Two Bone Conduction Prosthetic Devices; Osseointegrated Implant Versus Maxilla Anchored Removable Oral Appliance (SoundBite)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01933386
Enrollment
15
Registered
2013-09-02
Start date
2013-09-30
Completion date
2014-02-28
Last updated
2013-10-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Single Sided Deafness

Keywords

Single Sided Deafness, SSD, Unilateral hearing loss

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to compare the SoundBite™ Hearing System to surgically implanted BCD systems.

Interventions

DEVICESoundBite

Non-surgical removable bone conduction device via the teeth.

Sponsors

Sonitus Medical Inc
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Must be current users of a surgically implanted digitally programmable surgically implanted bone conduction device * Must be \>18, \<80 years old * Must be fluent in English, as determined by the PI * Must have diagnosis of SSD, time since onset (≥3 months) * Must have at least two contiguous molar or premolar teeth with no untreated tooth decay. Patients with tooth decay present are to first have restorations before being fitted for SoundBite * Healthy attachment to those teeth with tooth pockets limited to no more than 5mm

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects with known hypersensitivity to any of the components including allergies to polymers. * Subjects that are unable to use their hands such as quadriplegics or others that are unable to comply with the warnings in the product's labeling. * Subjects with known or active secondary medical conditions associated with variable sensorineural hearing loss

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
APHAB Questionnaire30 daysComparison of the SoundBite™ System and surgically implanted bone conduction devices

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Single Sided Deafness Questionnaire30 daysComparison of the SoundBite™ System and surgically implanted BCD systems.

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactLinda Galow, M.S.
linda@sonitusmedical.com1-650-581-5094

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026