Skip to content

Attitudes and Understanding of Plant Sterol Claims on Food Labels

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01932840
Enrollment
1017
Registered
2013-08-30
Start date
2011-09-30
Completion date
2011-10-31
Last updated
2013-08-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Consumer Research, General Population

Keywords

attitudes and understanding of plant sterol claims, general Canadian population

Brief summary

Daily consumption of plant sterols have been demonstrated to lower blood cholesterol. The Canadian government has recently allowed plant sterols to be added to certain foods and has also approved a disease risk reduction claim to be allowed on products containing plant sterols. However, it is unknown how Canadian consumers respond to plant sterol claims. The objective of this study was to evaluate the attitudes and understanding of different types of plant sterol claims on food labels

Interventions

Within a online questionnaire we exposed participants randomly to 4 mock margarine packages differing only by the claim it carried and asked participants to answer several questions on attitudes and understanding after each mock package.

Sponsors

Advance Foods and Materials Network
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Toronto
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
ECOLOGIC_OR_COMMUNITY
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 69 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Primary grocery shoppers * Canadian adults between the ages 20 to 69 years

Exclusion criteria

* Did not have an active email address or access to internet

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Response to survey questions measuring attitudes towards plant sterol claims using 5-point likert rating scalesOn average the survey took 25 min to completeWithin a online survey, participants were exposed to 4 mock margarine packages that differed only by the claim it carried. After being exposed to each mock package, participants were asked to rate their perceived attractiveness, healthiness, credibility, usefulness of the tested plant sterol claims using 5-point likert scales. Participants were also asked to rate their purchasing intentions of the mock margarine product with the different plant sterol claims.
Response to survey questions evaluating participants understanding of plant sterol claimsOn average the survey took 25 minutes to completeAfter each mock package, understanding of plant sterol claims was evaluated using various survey methods. First, participants were asked to rate their perceived clarity of the wording of the claim using a 5-point likert scale (a subjective measure of understanding). Second, participants were ask to rate, on 5-point likert scales, the perceived benefit of consuming the mock margarine package for subgroups with different health conditions (an indirect measure of understanding). Finally we asked participants, in an open ended question, to explain what a claim means to a friend (an objective measure of understanding).

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026