Skip to content

Efficacy Study of Cilostazol and Aspirin on Cerebral Small Vessel Disease

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind Study to Compare the Efficacy Between Cilostazol and Aspirin on White Matter Changes by Cerebral Small Vessel Disease

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01932203
Acronym
Challenge
Enrollment
255
Registered
2013-08-30
Start date
2013-07-17
Completion date
2019-08-31
Last updated
2019-08-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cerebral Small Vessel Disease

Keywords

Cerebral small vessel disease, Leukoaraiosis, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Diffusion Tensor Imaging

Brief summary

There may be a difference in efficacy of cilostazol and aspirin on progression of white matter changes in cerebral small vessel disease.

Detailed description

The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of aspirin and cilostazol on volume of white matter changes in cerebral small vessel disease. The secondary objectives are to compare the impact of aspirin and cilostazol on DTI parameters, lacune, microbleeds, brain atrophy, cognition, depression, neurologic signs, gait, urination, and activities of daily living. We also investigate risk factors associated with progression of cerebral small vessel disease.

Interventions

DRUGaspirin

100mg once a day

DRUGcilostazol

200mg once a day

Sponsors

Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Inha University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 50 to 85 years of age * He/She can walk to the hospital (walker or cane is permissible). * Cerebral small vessel disease is observed on brain MRI. 1\) presence of one or more lacunar infarction and 2) moderate or severe confluent leukoaraiosis (defined as grade 2 or 3 on a modified Fazekas scale): periventricular WMCs with cap or rims lager than 5mm and deep subcortical WMCs \>10 mm in maximum diameter * written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Any patient with contraindication of antiplatelets * Any patient with cardioembolic source * Carotid bruit or large cerebral artery stenosis \>50% * Cortical infarction or subcortical infarction lager than 1.5 cm * bleeding tendency * chronic liver disease (AST or ALT \>100 IL/L) * chronic renal disease (Creatinine \>3.0mg/dL) * active gastrointestinal ulcer * any patients with any severe or unstable medical disease that may prevent them from completing study requirements (i.e., unstable or severe asthma) * Anemia (Hb \<10g/dL) or thrombocytopenia * Cardiac pacemaker or contraindication to MRI * Pregnancy or breast-feeding * drug or alcohol addiction * Any other white matte disease (i.e., Multiple sclerosis, sarcoidosis, or brain irradiation, etc) or brain tumor * Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease or any other neurodegenerative disease * any hearing or visual impairment that can disturb the efficient evaluation of the patient * recent cerebral infarction with 3 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Volume of white matter changes (WMCs)baseline, week 104Measure change of WMC on brain MRI

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
brain volume and cortical thicknessbaseline and week 104Low score means tissue damage.
Mean diffusivity (MD) and Fraction Anisotropy (FA) on Diffusion Tensor Imagingbaseline and week 104High MD and low FA means tissue damage.
Number of lacunesbaseline and week 104High number means tissue damage.
number of microbleedsbaseline and week 104High number means tissue damage.
Mini-Mental State Examinationbaseline, week 52, and week 104Measure global cognition. Score range is 0-30. Higher score means good cognition.
Neurocognitive testbaseline, week 52, and week 104Seoul Verbal Learning Test, Boston Naming test-short form, ROCF copy, animal fluency, phonemic fluency, Stroop test, Digit-symbol test, Trail making test
Clinical Dementia Rating scale-sum of boxesbaseline, week 52, and week 104Measure global cognition. Score range is 0-18. Higher score means good cognition.
King's Health Questionnairebaseline, week 42, and week 104Measure voiding function. Higher score means bad function.
Timed UP and Go (TUG) testbasline, week 52, and week 104Measure gait. Higher score means bad gait.
Adverse eventbaseline, week 4, 16, 28, 40, 52, 64, 76, 88, and 104measure any adverse events
Geriatric Depression Scale-Short formbaseline, week 52, and week 104Measure depression. Score range is 0-15. Higher score means depression.
Caregiver-Administered Neuropsychiatric Inventory (CGA-NPI)baseline, week 52, and week 104Measure abnormal behavior. Score range is 0-144. Higher score means severe abnormal behavior.
Bayer Activities of Daily Livingbaseline, week 52, and week 104Measure instrumental activities of daily living (ADL). Score range is 1-10. Higher score means bad ADL.
Barthel Indexbaseline, week 52, and week 104Measure physical ADL. Score range is 0-20. Higher score means good physical ADL.
Pyramidal and Extrapyramidal Scale (PEPS)baseline, week 52, and week 104Measure neurologic signs. Score range is 0-60. Higher score means many abnormal neurologic signs.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
All ischemic stroke eventweek 104cerebral infarction and transient ischemic attack
All vascular eventsweek 104including ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, cerebral venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, symptomatic deep vein thrombosis, symptomatic peripheral artery occlusion, other vascular occlusion, and any revascularization procedure

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 22, 2026