Skip to content

Study of Personalized Sterile Humidification Device for Mucositis in Head and Neck Cancer Patients

A Phase II Study Monitoring Quality of Life and Correlative Biomarkers of Mucositis in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy Utilizing a Personalized Sterile Humidification Device

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01930435
Enrollment
20
Registered
2013-08-29
Start date
2013-07-31
Completion date
2014-08-31
Last updated
2017-08-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Head and Neck Cancer

Keywords

Quality of Life

Brief summary

This is a single arm study of the use of a personalized sterile humidification device for 12 weeks for head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy to determine if the usage of this humidification system will result in a decrease in severity in head and neck related quality of life as measured by the MDASI HN subscale following radiation therapy as compared with historical experience. In addition, we are exploring correlative measures using CRP, IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-alpha level measurements as these are directly related to mucositis and presumably related to quality of life as indicated by the patient.

Detailed description

The patients complete MDASI at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks. The MDASI is a validated instrument that measures symptom burden and we measure a subscale (HN) as our primary endpoint. The patients are asked to use a personal humidifier daily and complete a weekly diary showing compliance with the humidifier use.

Interventions

DEVICESterile Humidification Device

This is a personal humidification device. It is hand held and produces sterile warm vapor.

Sponsors

University of California, San Francisco
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

humidification feasibility and efficacy

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Receiving a dose of radiation therapy greater than or equal to 6000 cGy to one third of the oral cavity. * Receiving definitive or post-operative adjuvant radiotherapy. * Receiving radiotherapy or chemoradiation. * Of age greater than 18 years. * Life expectancy greater than 6 months. * Able to provide informed consent. * Participation of patients on other clinical trial protocols permitted, if not prohibited by trial guidelines.

Exclusion criteria

* Undergoing induction or neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to radiotherapy. * Treatment with amifostine or palifermin (keratinocyte growth factor) during radiotherapy. * High risk for poor compliance with radiotherapy, humidification, or follow-up as assessed by the investigator.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change in Quality of Life as Measured by the Subscale MDASI-HN Score.Mean value of [(MDASI-HN score at 6 weeks) - (MDASI-HN score at baseline)]The MDASI-HN assesses the severity of symptoms at their worst in the last 24 hours on a 0-10 NRS, with 0 being not present and 10 being as bad as you can imagine. There are 28 items in the MDASI-HN. There are 13 general inventory items, 6 general interference items, and the HN subscale adds 9 additional items assessing mucus in the mouth and throat, difficulty swallowing/chewing, choking/coughing, difficulty with voice/speech, skin pain/burning/rash, constipation, problems with tasting food, mouth/throat sores, and problems with teeth or gums. Scores for the subscales (general, interference, HN) are averaged so that a score is obtained from 0-10 for each subscale. The mean change in quality of life is calculated as the average scores at 6 weeks minus the average of the scores at baseline. Therefore a positive value represents a worsened quality of life and a negative value is an improvement in quality of life.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Patients Achieving Compliance With Use of Personalized Sterile Humidification.over entire 12 weeks durationCompliance was pre-specified in the protocol as self-reported usage of the device at a level equal to or greater than 60% of the formal recommended usage. This cut-off at 60% represented the median of the distribution of the usage of the device among all patients. The outcome measure is the percentage of participants who reported using the device at a level equal to or greater than 60% of the total prescribed usage.
Clinician Graded CTCAE-rated Mucositis Score Over 12 Weeksover 12 weeks durationThe maximum severity of clinician rating of mucositis observed over 12 weeks, as graded on a scale ranging from 1 (minimal mucositis) to 3 (confluent mucositis) to 5 (death) using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 4.0
Rate of Feeding Tube Placement Among Patients Using Personalized Sterile Humidificationover 12 weeks durationFeeding Tube Placement in Patients Who Use Personalized Sterile Humidification, as determined by placement of either nasogastric or gastrostomy tube. This was enumerated as the number of participants who had a feeding tube placed.
Rate of Hospitalization in Patients Who Use Personalized Sterile Humidificationduring 12 weeks durationRate of Hospitalization in Patients Who Use Personalized Sterile Humidification, determined based on admission to hospital over active study period

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Sterile Humidification Device, MyPurMist
Sterile Humidification Device Twice a day, 15 minutes each 12 weeks Sterile Humidification Device
20
Total20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSterile Humidification Device, MyPurMist
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
8 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
12 Participants
Age, Continuous62.2 years
Region of Enrollment
United States
20 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change in Quality of Life as Measured by the Subscale MDASI-HN Score.

The MDASI-HN assesses the severity of symptoms at their worst in the last 24 hours on a 0-10 NRS, with 0 being not present and 10 being as bad as you can imagine. There are 28 items in the MDASI-HN. There are 13 general inventory items, 6 general interference items, and the HN subscale adds 9 additional items assessing mucus in the mouth and throat, difficulty swallowing/chewing, choking/coughing, difficulty with voice/speech, skin pain/burning/rash, constipation, problems with tasting food, mouth/throat sores, and problems with teeth or gums. Scores for the subscales (general, interference, HN) are averaged so that a score is obtained from 0-10 for each subscale. The mean change in quality of life is calculated as the average scores at 6 weeks minus the average of the scores at baseline. Therefore a positive value represents a worsened quality of life and a negative value is an improvement in quality of life.

Time frame: Mean value of [(MDASI-HN score at 6 weeks) - (MDASI-HN score at baseline)]

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Sterile Humidification Device, MyPurMistMean Change in Quality of Life as Measured by the Subscale MDASI-HN Score.4.3 units on a scale
Secondary

Clinician Graded CTCAE-rated Mucositis Score Over 12 Weeks

The maximum severity of clinician rating of mucositis observed over 12 weeks, as graded on a scale ranging from 1 (minimal mucositis) to 3 (confluent mucositis) to 5 (death) using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 4.0

Time frame: over 12 weeks duration

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sterile Humidification Device, MyPurMistClinician Graded CTCAE-rated Mucositis Score Over 12 Weeks3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.75
Secondary

Percentage of Patients Achieving Compliance With Use of Personalized Sterile Humidification.

Compliance was pre-specified in the protocol as self-reported usage of the device at a level equal to or greater than 60% of the formal recommended usage. This cut-off at 60% represented the median of the distribution of the usage of the device among all patients. The outcome measure is the percentage of participants who reported using the device at a level equal to or greater than 60% of the total prescribed usage.

Time frame: over entire 12 weeks duration

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sterile Humidification Device, MyPurMistPercentage of Patients Achieving Compliance With Use of Personalized Sterile Humidification.65 percentage of participants
Secondary

Rate of Feeding Tube Placement Among Patients Using Personalized Sterile Humidification

Feeding Tube Placement in Patients Who Use Personalized Sterile Humidification, as determined by placement of either nasogastric or gastrostomy tube. This was enumerated as the number of participants who had a feeding tube placed.

Time frame: over 12 weeks duration

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sterile Humidification Device, MyPurMistRate of Feeding Tube Placement Among Patients Using Personalized Sterile Humidification3 participants
Secondary

Rate of Hospitalization in Patients Who Use Personalized Sterile Humidification

Rate of Hospitalization in Patients Who Use Personalized Sterile Humidification, determined based on admission to hospital over active study period

Time frame: during 12 weeks duration

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sterile Humidification Device, MyPurMistRate of Hospitalization in Patients Who Use Personalized Sterile Humidification5 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026