Skip to content

Impact of Fructose on Metabolism, Energy Homeostasis and Magnetic Resonance Biomarkers in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Impact of Fructose on Metabolism, Energy Homeostasis and Magnetic Resonance (MR) Biomarkers in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01930123
Enrollment
118
Registered
2013-08-28
Start date
2013-10-31
Completion date
2020-01-31
Last updated
2022-08-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD)

Keywords

Fructose, NASH, advanced fibrosis, biomarker, magnetic resonance

Brief summary

This study will advance several goals of the NIH Action Plan: 1) establish a multidisciplinary team to develop quantitative methodologies and imaging protocols for liver, 2) validate diagnostic criteria and methodologies for imaging in liver in both a cross-sectional and a longitudinal dietary intervention study of patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD), 3) create a liver tissue bank with correlative imaging data, 4) develop reliable non-invasive MR markers to distinguish simple steatosis from Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH), and 5) define the dynamic changes in metabolism, energy homeostasis, and MR biomarkers as they relate to fructose-related liver injury.

Detailed description

Like obesity, NAFLD and NASH are closely linked to nutrition and the Western diet which is rich in saturated fats and refined sugars. Although fat consumption has remained relatively stable, the marked increase in dietary fructose consumption (more than doubling in the past 30 years alone) supports the role of fructose in NAFLD and the metabolic syndrome. Although the mechanism(s) for fructose-related liver injury is not yet well defined, fructose-related hepatic adenosine triphosphate (ATP) depletion may contribute to liver injury. Observations in animals suggest that fructose induces metabolic syndrome and NAFLD independent of energy intake. One key difference in fructose metabolism (as opposed to glucose) relates to ATP depletion and the necessity of adenosine monophosphate (AMP) kinase to replenish ATP stores. As opposed to glucose, initial fructose metabolism involves phosphorylation of fructose to fructose-1-phosphate by fructokinase (ketohexokinase, KHK) using the substrate ATP. Unlike glucokinase, the phosphorylation of fructose by KHK is specific for fructose and not rate limited. Replenishment of ATP stores requires phosphorylation of AMP back to ATP via AMP kinase (which is inhibited in insulin resistance (common in patients with NAFLD) or conversion to uric acid via xanthine dehydrogenase resulting in hyperuricemia. The high activity of KHK in phosphorylating fructose to fructose-1-phosphate in the liver, could result in hepatic ATP depletion with habitual fructose consumption. Published animal and human studies support our hypothesis that fructose is a risk factor for NAFLD and NAFLD-related liver disease progression. In animal models, diets high in fructose induce features of the metabolic syndrome including weight gain, insulin resistance, hypertriglyceridemia, and hypertension. Similar effects are not observed with the administration of other simple sugars such as glucose. Fructose (or sucrose) administration to humans also causes features of metabolic syndrome which are quite typical of patients with NAFLD. Fructose is lipogenic, stimulates triglyceride synthesis and causes hepatic steatosis. As previously reported in animals, our group reported that increased fructose consumption (assessed as fructose-containing beverages only) is a risk factor of metabolic syndrome and biopsy-proven NAFLD and that patients with NAFLD consume 3-4 times more fructose than age, gender, and mass index (BMI) matched controls without liver disease. In addition to increased fructose consumption being a risk factor for NAFLD, fructose has been implicated in NAFLD disease progression. The administration of a diet with 25% of total energy as sucrose (which contains 50% fructose) resulted in a rise in liver aminotransferase levels within 18 days. This study, performed nearly 25 years ago, is all the more alarming as current sugar intake of Americans is in this same range. In our study of 427 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD, increased consumption of fructose-containing beverages was univariately associated with decreased age (P \< 0.0001), male sex (P \< 0.0001), hypertriglyceridemia (P \< 0.04), low high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (\<0.0001), decreased serum glucose (P \< 0.001), increased calorie intake (P \< 0.0001), and hyperuricemia (P \< 0.0001). After controlling for age, sex, BMI, and total calorie intake, daily fructose consumption was associated with lower steatosis grade and higher fibrosis stage (P \< 0.05 for each). Being that triglyceride synthesis requires ATP, we hypothesize that lower hepatic steatosis may reflect deceased ATP availability. Additionally, in older adults (age ≥ 48 years), daily fructose consumption was associated with increased hepatic inflammation (P \< 0.05), and hepatocyte ballooning (P\< 0.05). However, the mechanism(s) by which fructose causes liver injury remains unknown. In support of our hypothesis that ATP depletion underlies liver injury in patients with NAFLD, our group has demonstrated that patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD have increased hepatic mRNA (messenger ribonucleic acid) expression of KHK compared to matched controls. Indeed, in human pilot studies, intravenous (IV) fructose administration is associated with hepatic ATP depletion which can be assessed by 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). Reduced hepatic ATP stores are more prevalent in overweight and obese subjects than in lean subjects. Furthermore, recovery from fructose-induced ATP depletion was found to be delayed in patients with NAFLD (n=8). However, a limitation to this existing work is the small sample size and the inability to assess a cause-effect relationship(s) between BMI, NAFLD, energy homeostasis, and histologic features of liver injury. In liver cells, ATP depletion could perpetuate chronic liver injury by making fatty hepatocytes less proliferative. Hepatic ATP depletion also encourages the expansion of liver progenitor populations, causes arrest in protein synthesis, induces inflammatory and prooxidative changes, increases endoplasmic reticulum stress, promotes activation of stress-related kinases, induces mitochondrial dysfunction, and increases apoptotic activity. This supporting data suggests that fructose may be associated with NAFLD, NASH, and progressive fibrosis. Further, a study by Loguercio et al. demonstrated that increased uric acid levels above the basal level after IV fructose infusion was significantly higher (p \< 0.01) in patients with cirrhosis (3 mg/dl) and NASH (1.9 mg/dl) than in healthy controls (1.2 mg/dl). This effect was completely reversed by fructose 1,6-diphosphate which could replenish the ability to resynthesize ATP (adenosine triphosphate) from ADP (adenosine diphosphate). Therefore, an IV fructose challenge could effectively differentiate healthy subjects, from chronic hepatitis, from cirrhosis. NAFLD lacks accurate and robust non-invasive biomarkers to grade and stage histologic disease activity. This is a critical barrier to understanding the influence of this important environmental risk factor (increased/habitual fructose consumption) on the pathogenesis and progression of NAFLD. Currently, reliable assessment NAFLD requires liver biopsy and interpretation of histology. Serum aminotransferase levels and conventional imaging methods can detect liver fat but cannot grade or stage NAFLD. Furthermore, current developments in biomarker are cross-sectional in nature and do not characterize the dynamic changes which underlie liver injury in patients with NAFLD. In vivo 31P MRS permits the evaluation of dynamic changes of individual phosphorus-containing metabolites in the liver parenchyma, such as phosphomonoester (PME), ATP, and inorganic phosphate (Pi). Intravenous fructose load alters phosphorus metabolites and allows assessment of liver function by 31P MRS. Other investigators have demonstrated that fructose loading could be used effectively as a tool to investigate change in metabolic steps of hepatic metabolism in humans with alcohol-related liver disease. Further, IV fructose loading causes significantly higher ATP degradation and uric acid production in cirrhotic patients than in healthy controls. The associations between fructose, increased uric acid, and hepatic ATP depletion has been previously described. Increased uric acid is an independent risk factor for NAFLD and in keeping with our hypothesis, hyperuricemia may be a surrogate marker of impaired hepatic energy homeostasis in patients with NAFLD. The proposed mechanism for fructose-related hepatic ATP depletion, NAFLD, NASH and the associated hyperuricemia is depicted in Figure 1 is novel, innovative, scientifically rigorous and address an important public health concern-the impact of fructose on the rising epidemic of NAFLD.

Interventions

DRUGintravenous fructose challenge

Patients will be admitted to our Duke Clinical Research Unit (DCRU) at least 12 hours prior to morning intravenous fructose challenge. All patients will have a standard meal in order to control for dietary composition and calorie intake prior to intravenous fructose challenge. Patients will be NPO (nothing by mouth) after midnight for morning IV fructose MR biomarker measures. Patients with suspected NAFLD will have had an historical standard of care liver biopsy in the past and will have IV fructose Magnetic Resonance biomarker measures in the morning.

OTHERBlood Draw

Fasting bloodwork will be obtained before and after the IV fructose challenge.

Sponsors

Manal F Abdelmalek
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Patients must satisfy all of the following criteria to be eligible for enrollment: * Age greater than 18 years as of the initial screening interview and provision of consent * Healthy control as defined by: * normal liver aminotransferases AND * no evidence of NAFLD on radiologic imaging studies AND * no history of chronic liver disease OR * liver biopsy (if one had been historically performed for evaluation of suspected liver disease). OR • Patient with clinically suspected NAFLD as assessed by standard of care measures (risk factors for NAFLD, abnormal liver enzymes and/or fatty liver on imaging studies) who are scheduled to will undergo liver biopsy for the purpose of grading / staging the severity of their underlying liver disease

Exclusion criteria

Patients who satisfy any of the following

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Blood Glucose Level From Pre-fructose Administration to Post-fructose Administration in Control CohortBaseline to approximately one hour post-fructose administration
Fructose-induced Change in Low Density Lipoproteins (LDL) LevelBaseline to approximately one hour post-fructose administrationComparison between participants with mild fibrosis and participants with advanced fibrosis per the NAFLD Fibrosis score. The NAFLD Fibrosis score is a non-invasive scoring system based on several laboratory tests that helps to estimate the amount of scarring in the liver. A score of F0 or F1 is considered mild, F2 is indeterminate, and F3 or F4 is considered advanced.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dynamic 31P Changes in Liver Beta-ATP Due to Fructose Injection6 Baseline measurements (~3 min), fructose injection and then approximately 30-50 minutes of 31P MRS with scans at 90 secondsPercent change of beta-ATP from baseline levels to lowest level (nadir) were evaluated in both controls and NAFLD subjects. 31P-MRS (magnetic resonance spectroscopy) measurements made every 90 seconds.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects recruited prior to liver biopsy between November 2014 and January 2020.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Patients With NAFLD
70 subjects with biopsy-proven NAFLD; subjects will be challenged with a fructose infusion after a period for 12 hours fasting. intravenous fructose challenge: Patients will be admitted to our Duke Clinical Research Unit (DCRU) at least 12 hours prior to morning intravenous fructose challenge. All patients will have a standard meal in order to control for dietary composition and calorie intake prior to intravenous fructose challenge. Patients will be NPO (nothing by mouth) after midnight for morning IV fructose MR biomarker measures. Patients with suspected NAFLD will have had an historical standard of care liver biopsy in the past and will have IV fructose Magnetic Resonance biomarker measures in the morning. Blood Draw: Fasting bloodwork will be obtained before and after the IV fructose challenge.
58
Healthy Controls
15 healthy controls for comparison with NAFLD patients.The 15 subjects will be challenged with a fructose infusion after a period for 12 hours fasting. intravenous fructose challenge: Patients will be admitted to our Duke Clinical Research Unit (DCRU) at least 12 hours prior to morning intravenous fructose challenge. All patients will have a standard meal in order to control for dietary composition and calorie intake prior to intravenous fructose challenge. Patients will be NPO (nothing by mouth) after midnight for morning IV fructose MR biomarker measures. Patients with suspected NAFLD will have had an historical standard of care liver biopsy in the past and will have IV fructose Magnetic Resonance biomarker measures in the morning. Blood Draw: Fasting bloodwork will be obtained before and after the IV fructose challenge.
29
Total87

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event10
Overall StudyPhysician Decision218
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPatients With NAFLDTotalHealthy Controls
Age, Continuous53.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
48.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9
38.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.9
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
56 Participants84 Participants28 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants5 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
8 Participants11 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
47 Participants69 Participants22 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
58 Participants87 Participants29 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
39 Participants55 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
19 Participants32 Participants13 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 810 / 37
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 810 / 37
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 810 / 37

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Blood Glucose Level From Pre-fructose Administration to Post-fructose Administration in Control Cohort

Time frame: Baseline to approximately one hour post-fructose administration

Population: Not applicable to the Patients with NAFLD arm. Data collected on 19 healthy controls.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Healthy ControlsChange in Blood Glucose Level From Pre-fructose Administration to Post-fructose Administration in Control Cohort6.26 mg/dLStandard Deviation 9.98
p-value: 0.01Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Fructose-induced Change in Low Density Lipoproteins (LDL) Level

Comparison between participants with mild fibrosis and participants with advanced fibrosis per the NAFLD Fibrosis score. The NAFLD Fibrosis score is a non-invasive scoring system based on several laboratory tests that helps to estimate the amount of scarring in the liver. A score of F0 or F1 is considered mild, F2 is indeterminate, and F3 or F4 is considered advanced.

Time frame: Baseline to approximately one hour post-fructose administration

Population: Participants with mild or advanced fibrosis. Not applicable to the healthy controls arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Patients With NAFLDFructose-induced Change in Low Density Lipoproteins (LDL) LevelNAFLD advanced fibrosis-1.13 mg/dLStandard Deviation 6.85
Patients With NAFLDFructose-induced Change in Low Density Lipoproteins (LDL) LevelNAFLD mild fibrosis5.47 mg/dLStandard Deviation 6.4
Comparison: Mild fibrosis vs. advanced fibrosisp-value: 0.006Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Dynamic 31P Changes in Liver Beta-ATP Due to Fructose Injection

Percent change of beta-ATP from baseline levels to lowest level (nadir) were evaluated in both controls and NAFLD subjects. 31P-MRS (magnetic resonance spectroscopy) measurements made every 90 seconds.

Time frame: 6 Baseline measurements (~3 min), fructose injection and then approximately 30-50 minutes of 31P MRS with scans at 90 seconds

Population: Participants who had sufficient quality of MRS data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Patients With NAFLDDynamic 31P Changes in Liver Beta-ATP Due to Fructose Injection56.7 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 2.6
Healthy ControlsDynamic 31P Changes in Liver Beta-ATP Due to Fructose Injection47.9 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 5.2
p-value: 0.09t-test, 1 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026