Skip to content

Safety Study of Gintuit™ in Subjects Requiring Socket Grafting

Phase 1/2, Randomized, Controlled Assessment of the Safety Of Gintuit™ Versus Bio-Gide® in Subjects Requiring Socket Grafting

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01929954
Enrollment
5
Registered
2013-08-28
Start date
2013-07-31
Completion date
2015-03-31
Last updated
2015-09-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Edentulous Alveolar Ridge

Brief summary

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, parallel group Phase 1/2 assessment of the safety of GINTUIT versus Bio-Gide in subjects who have a posterior tooth requiring extraction. The incidence and severity of adverse events will be summarized by group (GINTUIT and Bio-Gide).

Detailed description

This study will evaluate the safety of GINTUIT as compared with Bio-Gide in subjects who have a posterior tooth requiring extraction. The use of GINTUIT in this investigational clinical indication may eliminate/reduce the need for aggressive flap advancement with its concomitant morbidity, while, at the same time, obtaining stable closure over a grafted socket. It is anticipated that GINTUIT will facilitate tissue granulation, followed by tissue coverage with site appropriate tissue (ie, keratinized tissue) that is needed for long term stability of the final restoration.

Interventions

DEVICEBio-Gide

One time placement of Bio-Gide over socket graft.

BIOLOGICALGintuit

One time placement of Gintuit over socket graft.

Sponsors

Organogenesis
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject is at least 18 years of age but no more than 75 years of age. * Subject has a posterior (molar or premolar) socket created by atraumatic extraction with a post extraction socket of a minimum of 5 mm in both the mesial-distal (M-D) and buccal-lingual (B-L) dimensions that requires bone grafting. * Subject has sufficient buccal bone plate at the site of the planned tooth extraction (ie, the residual socket should be of a form that would retain bone graft material), as judged by the Principal Investigator. * Females of childbearing potential must have a documented negative urine pregnancy test. All subjects must agree to use acceptable methods of contraception for the duration of the study. * Subjects must have read, understood, and signed an institutional review board (IRB)-approved Informed Consent Form (ICF). * Subjects must be able and willing to comply with protocol requirements.

Exclusion criteria

* Subject with any systemic conditions that could compromise wound healing and preclude periodontal surgery (ie, bleeding disorder, cancer, except localized basal cell or squamous cell cancer of the skin with no metastasis; human immunodeficiency virus; or bone metabolic diseases \[ie, osteoporosis or Paget's disease\]). * Subject who is currently receiving, anticipates receiving or has received within 30 days prior to Day 0: inhaled or systemic corticosteroids (ie, oral, IV), immunosuppressive agents or radiation therapy, and/or chemotherapy, which could compromise wound healing and preclude periodontal surgery. * Subject who has had oral/periodontal surgery within 30 days prior to Day 0 or anticipates having oral/periodontal surgery within 30 days after Day 0. * Subject with acute mucosal infection, including suppuration or induration in the area of intended surgery. * Subject, who in the opinion of the Principal Investigator, will require a sinus lift procedure to place dental implants in the surgical area. * Subject without at least 1 tooth adjacent to the area to be treated. * Subject has a history of alcohol or substance abuse within the previous 12 months of Screening that could interfere with study compliance or protocol requirements. * Subject who has used any tobacco product within 6 months of Screening. * Subject with known hypersensitivity to porcine or bovine collagen, gentamicin or surfactants. * Subject who has received an investigational drug, device, or biological/bioactive treatment within 30 days prior to Day 0 (medical or dental). * Subject who was previously treated with Gintuit, or any other cell therapy at the target treatment site or immediately adjacent teeth. * Female subject that is lactating. * Subject, who in the opinion of the Principal Investigator, for any reason other than those listed above, will not be able to complete the study per protocol.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of participants with adverse eventsup to 12 months post treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Optimal product configuration (ie, single, folded, or z-folded)One month after placement of Gintuit in the last subject in the last successful cohortSubjective assessment based on the results of the analyses of safety, efficacy and product handling (from surgeon input) data
Number of participants reporting loose graft materialUp to 21 days post treatment
Percentage of participants with soft tissue closureUp to 4 weeks post treatment
Measurements of bone heightUp to 6 months post treatment
Gintuit product handlingAt Day 0Rated as excellent, very good, good, adequate, poor
Number of participants with visible loss of graft materialUp to 3 months post treatment
Percentage of participants with convex, normal and concave soft tissue contourUp to 6 months post treatment
Measurement of soft tissue ridge contourUp to 6 months post treatment
Measurement of soft tissue thicknessUp to 6 months post treatment
Percentage of participants with color and texture matchUp to 6 months post treatment
Percentage of participants with a clinically significant physical reduction of crestal ridge heightUp to 6 months post treatmentClinically significant defined as \> 2 mm loss at the crest of the ridge at the graft site compared to Day 0
Measurements of soft tissue ridge heightUp to 6 months post treatment
Measurements of ridge width of hard tissueUp to 6 months post treatment
Bone qualityUp to 6 months post treatmentRegularity and density of the cortical and trabecular bone using the system described by Norton and Gamble (Quality Levels 1, 2/3, 4 and 4 (failure zone))
Percentage of participants with acceptable implant stabilityUp to 12 months post treatmentAcceptable implant stability defined as an implant stability quotient of \>/= 55

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026