Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Use of Supine MRI Images in Breast Conserving Surgery

A Study to Evaluate the Use of Supine MRI Images in Breast Conserving Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01929395
Enrollment
159
Registered
2013-08-27
Start date
2009-09-30
Completion date
2018-07-31
Last updated
2019-04-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Keywords

Breast Cancer, Breast Conserving Surgery, Breast diagnostics, Breast imaging

Brief summary

This is a 2 Phase study. In the first phase of the study, patients with palpable invasive breast cancer underwent pre-operative supine MRI and optical scanning in the surgical position. In the second phase of the study, patients with non-palpable invasive breast cancer or DCIS who desire breast conservation will be randomized to either a usual care group, or a group receiving a supine MRI in addition to conventional imaging (mammogram and prone MRI) and undergoing breast cancer resection without the wire localization technique.

Detailed description

We propose to use a novel technique (optical scanning) to correlate the supine MRI image to the surgical position in the OR and then to confirm and extend the Japanese study described above. In the first phase of the study, 5-25 patients with palpable invasive breast cancer will undergo pre-operative supine MRI and optical scanning in the surgical position. The purpose of this phase will be ensure that the images created from the optical scanner-adjusted supine MRI images closely correspond to the location of the palpable tumors in these breasts. All patients will then have their tumor resected using the standard method of either palpation or image guided wire localization. The first phase has been completed. In the second phase of the study, patients with non-palpable invasive breast cancer or DCIS who desire breast conservation will be randomized to either a usual care group, or a group receiving a supine MRI in addition to conventional imaging (mammogram and prone MRI) and undergoing breast cancer resection without the wire localization technique. Our secondary objectives will be to determine: 1. whether there are differences between the two groups in the volume of breast tissue removed. 2. whether diagnostic information obtained from a supine MRI is equivalent to that obtained from the prone MRI.

Interventions

A limitation of MRI studies of the breast is that MRI exams are performed with the patient prone and the breasts in a pendant position, which is markedly different than the position of the breast when the patient is supine on the Operating Room table. The spatial information the surgeon receives from the prone MRI about the site of the tumor in the breast is hard to mentally translate into the actual site of the tumor in the breast of a supine patient prepared for surgery.

Sponsors

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Phase 1 1. Age greater than/equal to 18 years 2. Histologic diagnosis of palpable invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ 3. Patient desire to undergo breast surgery 3\. Patients will have provided informed consent to participate, documented by their signature on the study consent form 4. The cancer enhances on breast MRI imaging. Inclusion Criteria Phase 2 1. Age greater than/equal to 18 years 2. Histologic diagnosis of invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ 3. The tumor is visible and enhances on prone MRI and is \>1 cm in greatest diameter. 4. . Determination by the surgeon that the neoplasm is non-palpable.A patient with a palpable hematoma from core biopsy, but a non-palpable neoplasm, will be eligible for study 5. Patient desire to undergo breast conserving surgery 6. Patients will have provided informed consent to participate, documented by their signature on the study consent form.The process of informed consent will be documented in the medical record and a copy of the signed consent form will be given to the patient.

Exclusion criteria

(Phases 1 and 2) 1. Absolute contraindication to MRI, including presence of implanted electrical device (pacemaker or neurostimulator), aneurysm clip or metallic foreign body in or near eyes 2. Severe claustrophobia 3. Contraindication to use of gadolinium based intravenous contrast, including life threatening allergy or compromised renal function (creatinine \> 2.0) 4. History of median sternotomy 5. Pregnancy (Patient attestation that they are not pregnant will be acceptable, as per standard, as per standard policy for MRIs at DHMC). 6. Multicentric breast cancer, defined as two or more tumors in different quadrants of the breast. An eligibility worksheet will be completed for each patient prior to enrollment and will be signed and dated by the surgeon investigator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Mean Distance Between the Image-defined and Palpation-defined Edges of the Tumor.From baseline MRI to intraoperative measurements: 30 daysMean calculated from differences in precise distances from the nipple to the superior, inferior, medial and lateral edges of the tumor as determined from the adjusted MRI images and conventional MRI.
To Determine Whether the Addition of Supine MRI to Conventional Imaging With Mammography and Prone MRI Results in a Lower Positive Margin Rate in Patients Undergoing Breast-conserving Surgery.30 days from surgeryThe primary analysis consists of computing the positive margin rate observed in the two groups and comparing them with a chi-squared test and finally comparing the proportion of patients with positive margins in the two groups based on study criteria.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Differences Between the Two Groups in the Volume of Breast Tissue Removed30 days from surgeryThe mean specimen volumes to be compared using t - statistics. The concordance between lesion volumes identified on the supine MRI images and the prone MRI images will be evaluated through correlation and regression analysis.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

No participants from Phase 1 participated in Phase 2

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Phase 1: Addition of Supine MRI to Conventional Imaging
Pre-operative supine MRI with intraoperative optical scanning and tracking (group MRI)
18
Phase 2: Addition of Supine MRI to Conventional Imaging
Pre-operative supine MRI with intraoperative optical scanning and tracking (group MRI)
69
Phase 2: Conventional Imaging (SOC)
Wire localized (group WL) partial mastectomy
69
Total156

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyDid not complete - non-related toxicity100
Overall StudyScreen Fail001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject010

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPhase 1: Addition of Supine MRI to Conventional ImagingTotalPhase 2: Conventional Imaging (SOC)Phase 2: Addition of Supine MRI to Conventional Imaging
Age, Customized
>=18 years
18 Participants156 Participants69 Participants69 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
18 Participants156 Participants69 Participants69 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
18 participants156 participants69 participants69 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants156 Participants69 Participants69 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 180 / 690 / 69
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 180 / 690 / 69
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 181 / 691 / 69

Outcome results

Primary

The Mean Distance Between the Image-defined and Palpation-defined Edges of the Tumor.

Mean calculated from differences in precise distances from the nipple to the superior, inferior, medial and lateral edges of the tumor as determined from the adjusted MRI images and conventional MRI.

Time frame: From baseline MRI to intraoperative measurements: 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Phase 1: Addition of Supine MRI to Conventional ImagingThe Mean Distance Between the Image-defined and Palpation-defined Edges of the Tumor.7.2 mm
Primary

To Determine Whether the Addition of Supine MRI to Conventional Imaging With Mammography and Prone MRI Results in a Lower Positive Margin Rate in Patients Undergoing Breast-conserving Surgery.

The primary analysis consists of computing the positive margin rate observed in the two groups and comparing them with a chi-squared test and finally comparing the proportion of patients with positive margins in the two groups based on study criteria.

Time frame: 30 days from surgery

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Phase 1: Addition of Supine MRI to Conventional ImagingTo Determine Whether the Addition of Supine MRI to Conventional Imaging With Mammography and Prone MRI Results in a Lower Positive Margin Rate in Patients Undergoing Breast-conserving Surgery.8 Participants
Phase 2: Conventional Imaging (SOC)To Determine Whether the Addition of Supine MRI to Conventional Imaging With Mammography and Prone MRI Results in a Lower Positive Margin Rate in Patients Undergoing Breast-conserving Surgery.16 Participants
Secondary

Differences Between the Two Groups in the Volume of Breast Tissue Removed

The mean specimen volumes to be compared using t - statistics. The concordance between lesion volumes identified on the supine MRI images and the prone MRI images will be evaluated through correlation and regression analysis.

Time frame: 30 days from surgery

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phase 1: Addition of Supine MRI to Conventional ImagingDifferences Between the Two Groups in the Volume of Breast Tissue Removed74 mlStandard Deviation 33.9
Phase 2: Conventional Imaging (SOC)Differences Between the Two Groups in the Volume of Breast Tissue Removed69.8 mlStandard Deviation 25.1

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026