Skip to content

Mandibular Implants in Elderly Patients

Implant-supported Mandibular Overdentures in Very Old Adults - a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01928004
Enrollment
45
Registered
2013-08-23
Start date
2007-09-30
Completion date
2019-04-30
Last updated
2021-04-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Edentulous Complete Denture Wearers

Keywords

edentulous, complete denture

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate denture satisfaction following the conversion of existing mandibular complete dentures to implant-overdentures (IOD) in very old edentulous patients who depend on help for activities of daily living (ADL) and evaluate secondary endpoints such as functional, structural, nutritional, cognitive and patient-centered outcome measures.

Interventions

DEVICEImplant placement

Participants received two Straumann Standard Implants® in the interforaminal region using the recommended surgical protocol. The implants were loaded using Locator® attachments after six to eight weeks healing time by transforming the existing lower denture to an IOD.

PROCEDUREConventional reline

conventional reline of the existing mandibular complete denture

Sponsors

University of Geneva, Switzerland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
75 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 75 years or older * living institutionalized or receiving help for the ADL * edentulous * wearing complete dentures * the lower denture had to cause discomfort to the degree that the patients were seeking treatment

Exclusion criteria

* severe clinical depression * dementia * poorly controlled diabetes * immunosuppression * treatment with bisphosphonates * condition precluding the surgical intervention for implant placement

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from Baseline in Denture satisfactionat 3, 12, 24 and 36 monthsVAS-scale score to evaluate the subjective satisfaction with the denture

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from Baseline in cognitive functionat 12, 24 and 36 monthsMini-Mental State Examination, to evaluate cognitive function (Folstein et al. 1975) Trail-making test A and B Verbal fluency test
Change from Baseline in Independenceat 12, 24 and 36 monthsIADL Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (Lawton and Brody, 1969) MIF Measure of functional independence
Change from Baseline in MNAat 3, 12, 24 and 36 monthsMini-nutritional Assessement questionnaire (Guigoz 1994)
Change from Baseline in Blood markersat 3, 12, 24 and 36 monthsAlbumin, Folic acid, Vitamin B12 (VitB12), Hemoglobin (Hb), C-reactive protein (CRP)
Change from Baseline in BMIat 12, 24 and 36 monthsBody Mass Index kg/m2
Change from Insertion in implant survivalat 3, 12, 24 and 36 monthsinserted implants in vivo
Change from Baseline in OHRQoLat 3, 12, 24 adn 36 monthsOHIP-Edent questionnaire, 20 questions
Change from Insertion in Plaque indexat 3, 12, 24 and 36 monthsPlaque index on implants (Silness & Loe 1963) Denture plaque index
Change from Insertion in peri-implant bone lossat 3, 12, 24 and 36 monthsmesial and distal peri-implant bone loss, as evaluated on intraoral radiographs or OPTs
Change from Baseline in Chewing efficiencyat Intervention, 3, 12, 24 and 36 monthstwo color mixing test with bi-colored chewing gum (Schimmel et al 2007)
Change from Baseline in Maximum bite forceat Intervention, 3, 12, 24 and 36 monthsunilateral maximal bite force measured with force gauge
Change from Baseline in Stimulated Saliva Flow Rateat Intervention, 3, 12, 24 and 36 monthswhole saliva collected after chewing wax for 2 minutes on one side
Changes from Baseline in Masseter Muscle Thicknessat 3, 12, 24 and 36 monthsultrasound measurements of the masseter muscle thickness in contracted and relaxed state
Change from Insertion in Pocket depthat 3, 12, 24 and 36 monthsmesial and distal peri-implant probing depth

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026