Skip to content

Pilot Study Comparing Diagnostic Imaging Versus Tomosynthesis in Detection of Hip, Wrist or Tibia Injury

Pilot Study Comparing Diagnostic Imagining Versus FujiFilm's Digital Radiographic AcSellerate CsI System With Tomosynthesis

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01927575
Acronym
TOMO
Enrollment
1
Registered
2013-08-22
Start date
2013-09-30
Completion date
2014-04-30
Last updated
2020-06-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hip Injury, Tibial Fracture, Wrist Injury

Keywords

TOMOSYNTHESIS

Brief summary

To acquire and build a library of image sets to determine if Fuji's TOMO imaging device can replace or compliment current imaging standards to assess patients with hip, wrist or tibia injuries.

Detailed description

Subjects presenting with a wrist injury, tibial fracture, or hip injury that require protocol defined standard imaging will have an X-Ray, CT Scan (or MRI per site preference) and TOMO completed. Images will be assessed to determine if TOMO is appropriate to supplement or replace the need for the other standard images.

Interventions

DEVICEStandard X-Ray + CT

Standard of Care X-Ray Imaging + CT

DEVICEStandard X-Ray + MRI

Standard of Care X-Ray Imaging + MRI

DEVICETOMO

Fujifilm Digital Radiographic AcSelerate CsI System with Tomosynthesis

Sponsors

Fujifilm Medical Systems USA, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Physician request to have diagnostic imaging for condition areas

Exclusion criteria

* Under 18 * Pregnancy * Insufficient Anatomical Coverage or Potential Image Problems

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants for Whom Tibia Injury Was DetectedBaseline Imaging CollectionClinical utility where the DTS could replace and/or complement existing imaging procedures; for example, Computed Tomography for fractures of the tibial plateau or scaphoid - where radiation dose, access to modality and cost play a factor in planning initial diagnosis and/or follow-up imaging strategies. Subsequent independent review by the principal investigator (PI) \[or designee\] to show the ability of the Fujifilm DTS system to provide images of clinical equivalence compared to those acquired on other FDA cleared imaging systems.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects who present for, are undergoing, or have undergone 'standard of care' general x-ray and CT or MRI examinations, which meet all of the study enrollment criteria, may be approached and enrolled. Each subject would then have a 3rd image taken using Fujifilm's Digital Radiographic AcSelerate CsI System with Tomosynthesis.

Pre-assignment details

Subjects are recruited as long as they had either an x-ray and CT or an x-ray and MRI, and sign a consent to have a third image taken with Fujifilm's Digital Radiographic AcSelerate CsI System with Tomosynthesis.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Study Participants
Standard X-Ray + CT arm to be used as comparative arm for investigational imaging device. Investigators will determine standard of care to be used on a per subject basis. Standard X-Ray + CT: Standard of Care X-Ray Imaging + CT Followed by Tomo Imaging
1
Total1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Study Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
1 Participants
Age, Continuous54 years
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 10 / 10 / 1
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 10 / 10 / 1
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 10 / 10 / 1

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants for Whom Tibia Injury Was Detected

Clinical utility where the DTS could replace and/or complement existing imaging procedures; for example, Computed Tomography for fractures of the tibial plateau or scaphoid - where radiation dose, access to modality and cost play a factor in planning initial diagnosis and/or follow-up imaging strategies. Subsequent independent review by the principal investigator (PI) \[or designee\] to show the ability of the Fujifilm DTS system to provide images of clinical equivalence compared to those acquired on other FDA cleared imaging systems.

Time frame: Baseline Imaging Collection

Population: Three sets (1 - X-ray, 1- CT and 1 - Digital Tomosynthesis) of images of the tibia evaluated to confirm acceptable image quality and provided clinical and diagnostic value.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Standard X-RayNumber of Participants for Whom Tibia Injury Was Detected1 participants
Standard CTNumber of Participants for Whom Tibia Injury Was Detected1 participants
TomosynthesisNumber of Participants for Whom Tibia Injury Was Detected1 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026