Skip to content

Long-versus Short-Axis Ultrasound Guidance for Subclavian Vein Cannulation

Long-versus Short-Axis Ultrasound Guidance for Subclavian Vein Cannulation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01927185
Enrollment
190
Registered
2013-08-22
Start date
2013-06-30
Completion date
2016-03-31
Last updated
2017-01-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Perioperative/Postoperative Complications, Vascular Access Complication

Keywords

central venous access, ultrasonography, subclavian vein, pneumothorax, vessel view

Brief summary

Central venous catheterization is commonly applied in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The subclavian vein has lower risk of infection and provides more patients comfort. However central venous catheterization may results in complications such as pneumothorax, hemothorax or arterial puncture. It has been suggested that ultrasound (US) guidance could improve the success rate, reduce the number of needle passes and decrease complications. Two different real-time 2-dimensional US techniques can be employed in the insertion of central venous catheters. The first technique involves real-time US-guided cannulation of subclavian vein using a long axis/in-plane approach. The second one involves real-time US-guided using a short axis/out-off-plane approach. However to date no studies have compared their efficacy and safety. The purpose of this study was to compare the US-guided long-axis versus short-axis approach for the SCV catheterization in adult critical care patients.

Detailed description

The two techniques used for vessel visualization are far different: The Short-Axis (SA) approach attempts to view the vessel in cross-section while venous access is obtained. The strength of the SA approach is that the vein is centered under the transducer and that the midpoint of the transducer becomes a reference point for the insertion of the needle, and that at the same time is possible to visualize SC artery and the pleural line. SA approach is easy to learn by novice sonologists. The Long-Axis (LA) approach employs a technique that views the length of the vessel during cannulation.For this reason, with LA approach is possible to visualize the needle advance during the entire procedure from the soft tissues until the lumen of the vein, but SC artery and pleural line are not visualized in the same scan. For LA approach, practice is required to keep the needle precisely within the image and care must be taken to avoid the probe inadvertently moving away from the target structure.

Interventions

DEVICELong Axis strategy

With the long-axis approach the vein appeared in the longitudinal view. With this approach only the vein was visible on the screen. The needle was held at a 30° angle, oriented in-plane with the transducer and the skin punctured at the base of the transducer. The vessel alignment was maintained during the procedure and the entire length of the needle was visible during the progression through the tissues.

DEVICEShort Axis Strategy

With the short-axis approach the probe was positioned almost perpendicularly to the clavicle. The needle was held at an angle of 45° relative to the skin surface and sagittal to the plane of the probe (out-of-plane). During the progression to the vessel, the visualization of the needle was limited to the deformation of tissue and artefacts produced by needle advancement. When the tip abutted the vein wall, additional pressure produced transient vessel deformation, which disappeared once the wall was penetrated.

Sponsors

Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* aged =\>18 years * patients who needed central venous catheter for clinical reasons

Exclusion criteria

* aged \<18a years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Success rateup to 4 hours

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Access TimeHours: 0,1
Central line-associated blood stream infectiondays 0-21
Number of attemptshours: 0-2Overall number of skin penetration and number of withdraws and redirections of the needle
Complication rateHours: 0-6-12-24Pneumothorax, Haemothorax, Hydrothorax, Artery puncture, Hematoma, Malpositions

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026