Skip to content

Immobilization Versus Observation in Children With Toddler's Fractures: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Immobilization Versus Observation in Children With Toddler's Fractures: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01926795
Enrollment
21
Registered
2013-08-21
Start date
2013-06-30
Completion date
2015-02-28
Last updated
2015-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tibial Fractures

Keywords

toddler's fracture, tibial fracture, children

Brief summary

Toddler's fractures of the tibia are by definition non-displaced and of a stable pattern. Children have thickened periosteum compared with adults, which therefore may impart stability to the fracture without the need for additional immobilization. The goal of the study is to evaluate whether or not there is a difference in children treated with and without cast immobilization in regards to time to ambulation; perceived pain; difficulty in dressing & bathing; radiographic displacement or angulation; and time missed from work or daycare. Our null hypothesis is that there will be no difference in clinical or radiographic outcomes between the groups.

Interventions

Sponsors

Prisma Health-Upstate
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Years to 5 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* • Children ages 1-5 years old with radiographic evidence of a non-displaced spiral or oblique fracture of the tibial shaft or metaphysis.

Exclusion criteria

* • Children with clinical suspicion but lack of radiographic evidence for toddler's fracture * Fractures displaced \>2mm * Open fractures * Pathologic fracture * Fractures involving the physis * Previous fracture of the ipsilateral extremity * Concomitant fracture involving the ipsilateral or contralateral leg * Concomitant head injury * Non-ambulatory children (i.e., those who have not yet begun to walk) * Children with bone-metabolism disorders (i.e., osteogenesis imperfect, rickets) * Children who are geographically prohibited from following up in our system * Children whose caregivers are not proficient in English * Presentation \>7 days from injury * Cases considered to be non-accidental trauma

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Days to Ambulation12 weeksRecorded in parent journal, date of first ambulation without assistance.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fracture displacement12 weeksDisplacement of the fracture greater than 2 mm in any direction.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026