Skip to content

A Phase 2a, Proof-of-Concept Study of GIC-1001 in the Management of Visceral Pain During Sedation-Free, Full Colonoscopy

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2a Proof-of-Concept Study of GIC-1001 for the Management of Visceral Pain in Subjects Undergoing Sedation-Free, Full Colonoscopy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01926444
Enrollment
308
Registered
2013-08-21
Start date
2013-07-31
Completion date
2014-03-31
Last updated
2019-05-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer, Colonic Diseases, Pain

Keywords

colonoscopy, sedation-free, colorectal cancer, CRC screening, prevention, analgesia, colonic, kappa, opioid agonist, pain management, oral, hydrogen sulfide, peripheral

Brief summary

GIC-1001 is a novel, orally-administered, colonic analgesic drug developed as an alternative to i.v. sedation during full colonoscopy. It will be evaluated for efficacy and safety in a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, dose-ranging, proof of concept Phase 2a trial. Up to 240 patients will receive one of 3 doses of GIC-1001 or its matching placebo. A pharmacokinetic evaluation will be carried out on a subset of patients (N: 24).

Detailed description

1. Study Objectives 1.1 Primary objective: The primary objective of this Phase IIa study is to establish clinical Proof-of-Concept (POC) by providing clinically and statistically significant evidence that GIC-1001 is safe and effective in managing visceral pain in male and female patients who undergo sedation-free, full colonoscopy for preventive purposes. 1.2 Secondary objectives: Secondary objectives will include the selection of the optimal dose of GIC-1001 from a safety/efficacy ratio point of view, establish a preliminary safety profile of the drug in patients, and obtain a preliminary general efficacy profile of GIC-1001 by assessing various secondary endpoints 2. Study Endpoints 2.1 Primary endpoints: Visceral pain will be assessed using a 100-mm VAS, measured at various times and anatomical segments (N: 8) throughout the colon, i.e.: 1. Prior to intra-rectal insertion of the endoscope; 2. After insertion through the anus; 3. After passage through the rectosigmoid segment; 4. Immediately after passage through the splenic flexure; 5. Immediately after passage through the hepatic flexure; 6. Once the caecum is reached; 7. Immediately after passage through the splenic flexure during scope withdrawal; and 8. At the end of the procedure, once the colonoscope has been completely removed. Any additional episodes of pain experienced by the patient will also be assessed using the 100-mm VAS scale. The area under the curve (AUC) calculated from all serial measurements made will be used for statistical purposes, where the length of inserted colonoscope determines the VAS measurement's location. 2.2 Secondary endpoints: 1. Overall pain perception (100-mm VAS) at the end of the procedure; 2. Time to reach the caecum with the endoscope (intubation time from rectum to caecum defined as time-to-caecum); 3. Total examination time, defined at the time from introduction to removal of the colonoscope; 4. Percentage of completed procedures; 5. Endoscopist's perception of the adequacy of analgesia, difficulty of insertion, and amount of colonic spasm on insertion and withdrawal (five-point Likert scale); 6. Use of rescue sedation (i.e. midazolam or midazolam followed by fentanyl) 7. Safety as assessed by the incidence of treatment emergent adverse effects during the procedure and for 30 days after; 8. Plasma determination of trimebutine and N-desmethyl-trimebutine moieties at GIC-1001 plasmatic steady state; 9. Patient satisfaction with treatment (five-point Likert scale); 10. Patient' willingness for repeat colonoscopy in the future (five-point Likert scale); and 11. Safety of GIC-1001. 3. Study Design This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel design 4-treatment arms study. Eligible patients will be randomized in a 1:1:1:2 ratio to one of 4 treatment arms: low (250 mg), mid (375 mg) or high (500 mg) dose of GIC-1001, or matching placebo. All potential study subjects will be screened and assessed for eligibility within maximum two (2) weeks prior to randomization. Bowel preparation will be performed using a polyethylene glycol (PEG) based regimen the night before the actual procedure. 4. Number of Clinical Sites: This trial will be conducted in both Canada and USA. Up to ten (10) clinical sites will participate in this trial. The lead Investigator for this trial is Dr Mark V. Larson MD, Head of Digestive Endoscopy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, USA 5. Study population and sample size: Approximately 240 patients will be randomized in this study. Male and female patients having an indication for full colonoscopy, mainly for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. Only naïve subjects, i.e. who never underwent colonoscopy before, will be eligible. 6. Inclusion Criteria See Eligibility Section 7. Exclusion Criteria See Eligibility Section 8. Study Drugs Administration and Schedule: GIC-1001, or its matching placebo will be administered as follows: 1. One tablet TID on an empty stomach for three (3) consecutive days prior to colonoscopy. 2. Last dose taken at the clinical site at least one (1) hour prior to beginning of procedure (endoscope insertion). 3. Bowel preparation to be performed using PEG based regimen the day before the actual procedure. 4. Three (3) different GIC-1001 dose levels will be studied: * 250 mg TID * 375 mg TID * 500 mg TID * Matching placebo TID 9. Concomitant Medications 9.1 Prior to colonoscopy, the following medication will be permitted: Aspirin (ASA) at low levels for cardiovascular health, if dose and regimen stable for the last 6 months prior to colonoscopy. 9.2 The following medications and foods will be prohibited: * Any prescription chronic analgesic narcotic, anti-spasmodic, anti-inflammatory medications are forbidden for 30 days prior to screening. (i.e. Washout ≥ 30 days) * Selective Serotonin Re-uptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) are forbidden for 30 days prior to screening, unless patient has been on a stable dose for 3 consecutive months prior to screening. * Over-the-counter analgesics, or anti-inflammatory medication, oral or topical used for acute pain treatment must be washed out for ≥ 7days prior to screening. * Acute or as needed prescription or non-prescription anti-inflammatory and/or analgesic treatment within one (1) week prior to colonoscopy. * Use of bowel stimulant laxatives, such bisacodyl, within one (1) week preceding randomization. * Use of antidiarrheic medication, such as diphenoxylate, loperamide, kaopectate or bismuth salts, within one (1) week preceding randomization. * Administration of barium enema within two (2) weeks preceding randomization. * Colonic irritant beverages or foods, such as caffeine-containing beverages (e.g. coffee, Coca-Cola), spices, as well as foods containing seeds (i.e. tomatoes, strawberries, kiwis, raspberries) within 24 hours preceding colonoscopy. * Use of any other investigational drug is prohibited unless discontinued, within at least 30 days prior to randomization. * Additionally, Prior and Concomitant Medications are to be recorded in the CRF starting 30 days prior to Screening Visit CLV1. 10. Efficacy Evaluation: Colonic analgesic clinical efficacy of GIC-1001 will be measured using a continuous, horizontal 100-mm VAS, at pre-determined times and colonic anatomical segments. At least 8 measurements will be done by the participating patients themselves (see Primary Endpoint section). Subjects will receive proper instructions on the use of the VAS prior to colonoscopy. Overall experience of visceral pain (if any) will be evaluated using the AUC constructed from all calculated VAS self-measurements for each patient. Additional, secondary, efficacy endpoints will also be measured, including time-to-caecum, colonoscopy completion rate and antispasmodic activity. 11. Safety Evaluation: Safety will be assessed using the performance of physical exams, ECG, various laboratory safety tests and the occurrence of adverse events. AEs will be mapped to MedDRA, version 16. 12. Sample Size Considerations: It has been reported in the medical literature that a MCID range of 10-15 mm on the 100-mm VAS is clinical significant in the evaluation of colonoscopy-related visceral pain. Using this value, with an alpha of 0.05 and a beta of 0.9, about 50 patients would be needed in each active arm considering a 90-patient placebo arm. Total study sample size is then estimated at approximately 240 randomized patients. 13. Statistical Analysis: The primary outcome measure will be the mean 100-mm VAS AUC in each treatment arm.

Interventions

DRUGGIC-1001

GIC-1001 oral tablet, white-coated, to be taken with water

Sponsors

JSS Medical Research Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Algorithme Pharma Inc
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
gicare Pharma Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Signed and dated written Informed Consent obtained. 2. Males or females. 3. Aged 40-75 years. 4. Indication for full colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening or investigation, including subjects presenting suggestive symptoms and who need a differential diagnosis. 5. Colonoscopy naïve subjects, i.e. who never underwent colonoscopy before, will be eligible, as well as non-naïve subjects who have previously undergone unsedated colonoscopy , or who had sedated colonoscopy at least 10 years prior (i.e. ≥ 10 years) to enrolment 6. Eligible for a procedure without sedation. 7. Able to complete questionnaires and use a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), including sufficient English, French or Spanish speaking skills as well as adequate eyesight and hearing 8. BMI ≥ 19, BMI ≤ 40 kg/m2.

Exclusion criteria

1. Known allergy or intolerance to trimebutine (Modulon® or generic). 2. Known allergy or intolerance to sulfur-containing drugs (e.g. N-acetylcysteine or captopril). 3. Previous gastrointestinal or gynecologic surgery, e.g. ileostomy, pelvic surgery,; however, patients with an appendectomy are eligible.Patients who have had a tubal ligation at least 10 years prior (i.e. ≥ 10 years) to enrolment are also eligible. 4. Diagnosed Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). 5. Visceral hypersensitivity conditions such as Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS). 6. Clinically significant renal and/or hepatic impairment. 7. History of peritonitis. 8. Known severe diverticular disease. 9. Severe diverticulosis as documented by prior imaging series 10. Known or suspected stenosis of the colon. 11. Chronic pain syndrome such as fibromyalgia and endometriosis. 12. Any clinically-relevant abnormality identified on the screening, history, physical examination, 12-lead ECG or laboratory examination, which would, in the Investigator's opinion, preclude the administration of investigational drug product, GIC1001 13. Unexpected and significant visceral pain reported by subject prior to colonoscopy. 14. Dementia. 15. Diagnosed clinically significant psychiatric illness, including severe anxiety disorders that may affect the subject's perception of visceral pain or ability to participate in the study. 16. Patient is a lactating female. 17. Female is of childbearing potential sexually active who are unwilling or unable to use an acceptable method of contraception (which includes oral or implanted contraceptives, IUD, female condom, diaphragm with spermicide, cervical cap, use of a condom by the sexual partner or sterile sexual partner) throughout the duration of the study and 1 month following study completion. 18. Female is of childbearing potential, sexually abstinent who does not agree to continue abstinence or to use one of the acceptable methods of birth control should sexual activity commence. 19. Any serious medical condition that could increase the risk of adverse reactions with trimebutine. 20. Participation in another experimental drug trial within 30 days of randomization.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Measurements of Visceral Pain, Using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Assessed at different anatomical locations: (1) before colonoscopy, (2) insertion of scope in anus, (3) at rectosigmoid flexure, (4) at splenic flexure, (5) at hepatic flexure, (6) at caecum, (7) at splenic flexure on way back, (8) after colonoscopy.The Primary Outcomes Measure was the pain VAS 100-mm AUC (0mm = no pain; 100mm = worst pain), constructed from serial pain VAS measurements performed during colonoscopy. At least 8 pain VAS measurements were made, and the length of the colonoscope inserted (or removed on the way out) was recorded at every measurement. The X-axis of the VAS versus anatomical locations was defined accordingly: each VAS value corresponded to a relative length of inserted colonoscope (d/2Lc) of the X axis, where d was the actual length of the inserted colonoscope and 2Lc represented twice the total length of the colon examined (Lc). Before scope insertion the X value equaled zero. Once the caecum was reached, the X value was 0.5. Upon complete removal of the endoscope, the X value was 1. This allowed standardization of colonic length between study subjects. Visceral pain AUC (mm) was calculated from all serial measurements, where the length of inserted colonoscope determined the VAS measurement's location

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Colonoscopy Completion Rate (%)Number of patients during trial with a complete colonoscopy, where the scope has reached the caecum during the colonoscopy. Range of duration of colonoscopy 5.00- 50.10 minutes.Qualitative outcome: colonoscopy completion is defined as a procedure performed entirely, from initial anal insertion, reaching of caecum, and complete removal of the scope. Completion rate is then the number of patient (%) with a complete colonoscopy (up to the caecum) divided by the number of trial participants.
Safety-Plasma Concentrations of Trimebutine and N-Desmethyl-TrimebutineDay 4 prior to colonoscopy.A pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was carried out on the first 24 patients randomized, equally distributed between treatment groups; 18 patients were assigned to active treatment
Total Examination Time (Colonoscopy)From the time of introduction of the colonoscope, to removal of colonoscope. Range of duration of colonoscopy 5.00- 50.10 minutes.Defined as the time from endoscope insertion to complete removal of the endoscope; measured in minutes
Time to CaecumFrom the time of introduction of the colonoscope, to removal of colonoscope. Range of duration of colonoscopy 5.00- 50.10 minutes.Time to Caecum is the time taken by the physician to reach the caecum with the colonoscope, from the insertion in the anus. Time to Caecum was measured during colonoscopy, for which total duration of colonoscopy ranged between a minimum of 5.00 and a maximum of 50.10 minutes.
Endoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalFrom the time of introduction of the colonoscope, to removal of colonoscope. Range of duration of colonoscopy 5.00- 50.10 minutes.Endoscopist's perception of the amount of colonic spasm on insertion and withdrawal measured on five-point Likert scale according to the following: Strongly Agree, Agree, Agree nor Disagree, Disagree, Strongly Disagree
Patient's Willingness to Repeat ExperiencePost-colonoscopy- during subject recoveryPatients' willingness for repeat colonoscopy, was assessed with the Patient Willingness to Repeat Experience (P.W.R.E.) questionnaire (1 question), asking patients to rate their willingness to repeat the procedure according to a 5-point Likert scale: Strongly Agree, Agree, Agree nor Disagree, Disagree, Strongly Disagree. The P.W.R.E was administered after the colonoscopy during subject recovery.
Subject Satisfaction and Acceptability of the Colonic Analgesia - Patient's Global Impression of Abdominal PainPost-colonoscopy- during subject recoverySubject satisfaction and acceptability of the colonic analgesia modality offered by GIC-1001 was assessed with the Patient Global Impression of Abdominal Pain (P.G.I.A.P.) (1 question), asking patients to rate their pain during the procedure according to a 5-point Likert scale: Absent, Mild, Moderate, Severe, Intolerable. The P.G.I.A.P was administered after the colonoscopy during subject recovery.
Endoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalFrom the time of introduction of the colonoscope, to removal of colonoscope. Range of duration of colonoscopy 5.00- 50.10 minutes.Endoscopist's perception of the adequacy of analgesia, difficulty of insertion and withdrawal measured on a five-point Likert scale: Strongly Agree, Agree, Agree nor Disagree, Disagree, Strongly Disagree

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

First patient enrolled: 25 JULY 2013; Last patient completed: 03 MARCH 2014

Pre-assignment details

A total of N=37 subjects were screen failures and were not randomized (total randomized = 271/308). Of those randomized, N=268 subjects received at least one dose of study drug, and were included in the Safety Population.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
GIC-1001 Low Dose
GIC-1001 , 250 mg TID during 3 consecutive days + a last, 10th dose in the morning of Day 4 (colonoscopy day) GIC-1001: GIC-1001 oral tablet, white-coated, to be taken with water
56
GIC-1001 Mid-dose
GIC-1001 , 375 mg TID during 3 consecutive days + a 10th dose in the morning of day 4 (colonoscopy day) GIC-1001: GIC-1001 oral tablet, white-coated, to be taken with water
52
GIC-1001 , High Dose
GIC-1001 , 500 mg TID during 3 consecutive days + a 10th dose in the morning of day 4 (colonoscopy day) GIC-1001: GIC-1001 oral tablet, white-coated, to be taken with water
53
GIC-1001 Matching Placebo
Placebo, TID during 3 consecutive days, + a 10 th dose in the morning of day 4 (colonoscopy day) GIC-1001: GIC-1001 oral tablet, white-coated, to be taken with water
101
Total262

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyColonoscopy not performed0042

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGIC-1001 Low DoseGIC-1001 Mid-doseGIC-1001 , High DoseGIC-1001 Matching PlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous54.35 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.04
54.68 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.81
53.74 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.89
54.32 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.32
54.28 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.86
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian/Oriental
6 Participants1 Participants5 Participants5 Participants17 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
10 Participants10 Participants8 Participants23 Participants51 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
31 Participants28 Participants30 Participants51 Participants140 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
9 Participants13 Participants9 Participants20 Participants51 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants19 Participants19 Participants35 Participants89 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
40 Participants33 Participants34 Participants66 Participants173 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 560 / 520 / 570 / 103
other
Total, other adverse events
46 / 5641 / 5248 / 5785 / 103
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 560 / 520 / 570 / 103

Outcome results

Primary

Measurements of Visceral Pain, Using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

The Primary Outcomes Measure was the pain VAS 100-mm AUC (0mm = no pain; 100mm = worst pain), constructed from serial pain VAS measurements performed during colonoscopy. At least 8 pain VAS measurements were made, and the length of the colonoscope inserted (or removed on the way out) was recorded at every measurement. The X-axis of the VAS versus anatomical locations was defined accordingly: each VAS value corresponded to a relative length of inserted colonoscope (d/2Lc) of the X axis, where d was the actual length of the inserted colonoscope and 2Lc represented twice the total length of the colon examined (Lc). Before scope insertion the X value equaled zero. Once the caecum was reached, the X value was 0.5. Upon complete removal of the endoscope, the X value was 1. This allowed standardization of colonic length between study subjects. Visceral pain AUC (mm) was calculated from all serial measurements, where the length of inserted colonoscope determined the VAS measurement's location

Time frame: Assessed at different anatomical locations: (1) before colonoscopy, (2) insertion of scope in anus, (3) at rectosigmoid flexure, (4) at splenic flexure, (5) at hepatic flexure, (6) at caecum, (7) at splenic flexure on way back, (8) after colonoscopy.

Population: Primary endpoint assessed in the FAS (randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline VAS rating; N=262) and PP analysis sets (randomized patients in the FA population with ≥80% treatment compliance, who had at least 6/8 VAS ratings and no major protocol deviations; N=213)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GIC-1001 Low DoseMeasurements of Visceral Pain, Using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)AUC- censorsed (standardized); PP20.79 mmStandard Deviation 16.56
GIC-1001 Low DoseMeasurements of Visceral Pain, Using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)AUC LOCF (standardized); FAS25.5 mmStandard Deviation 19.77
GIC-1001 Low DoseMeasurements of Visceral Pain, Using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)AUC- censorsed (standardized); FAS22.27 mmStandard Deviation 16.31
GIC-1001 Low DoseMeasurements of Visceral Pain, Using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)AUC LOCF (standardized); PP20.96 mmStandard Deviation 16.41
GIC-1001 Mid-doseMeasurements of Visceral Pain, Using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)AUC LOCF (standardized); FAS23.44 mmStandard Deviation 18.7
GIC-1001 Mid-doseMeasurements of Visceral Pain, Using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)AUC- censorsed (standardized); FAS18.93 mmStandard Deviation 13.11
GIC-1001 Mid-doseMeasurements of Visceral Pain, Using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)AUC- censorsed (standardized); PP17.6 mmStandard Deviation 13.31
GIC-1001 Mid-doseMeasurements of Visceral Pain, Using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)AUC LOCF (standardized); PP17.63 mmStandard Deviation 13.29
GIC-1001 , High DoseMeasurements of Visceral Pain, Using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)AUC- censorsed (standardized); FAS23.31 mmStandard Deviation 16.12
GIC-1001 , High DoseMeasurements of Visceral Pain, Using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)AUC- censorsed (standardized); PP24.61 mmStandard Deviation 17.18
GIC-1001 , High DoseMeasurements of Visceral Pain, Using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)AUC LOCF (standardized); FAS27.73 mmStandard Deviation 18
GIC-1001 , High DoseMeasurements of Visceral Pain, Using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)AUC LOCF (standardized); PP24.8 mmStandard Deviation 17.17
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboMeasurements of Visceral Pain, Using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)AUC LOCF (standardized); FAS27.55 mmStandard Deviation 20
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboMeasurements of Visceral Pain, Using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)AUC- censorsed (standardized); PP22.03 mmStandard Deviation 16.35
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboMeasurements of Visceral Pain, Using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)AUC LOCF (standardized); PP22.00 mmStandard Deviation 16.28
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboMeasurements of Visceral Pain, Using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)AUC- censorsed (standardized); FAS22.22 mmStandard Deviation 16.44
Comparison: AUC- censorsed (standardized); FASp-value: 0.506ANOVA
Comparison: AUC LOCF (standardized); FASp-value: 0.299ANOVA
Comparison: AUC Censored (Standardized)- PP Populationp-value: 0.234ANOVA
Comparison: AUC LOCF (Standardized)- PP Populationp-value: 0.219ANOVA
Secondary

Colonoscopy Completion Rate (%)

Qualitative outcome: colonoscopy completion is defined as a procedure performed entirely, from initial anal insertion, reaching of caecum, and complete removal of the scope. Completion rate is then the number of patient (%) with a complete colonoscopy (up to the caecum) divided by the number of trial participants.

Time frame: Number of patients during trial with a complete colonoscopy, where the scope has reached the caecum during the colonoscopy. Range of duration of colonoscopy 5.00- 50.10 minutes.

Population: FAS (randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline VAS rating; N=262)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GIC-1001 Low DoseColonoscopy Completion Rate (%)56 Participants
GIC-1001 Mid-doseColonoscopy Completion Rate (%)52 Participants
GIC-1001 , High DoseColonoscopy Completion Rate (%)51 Participants
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboColonoscopy Completion Rate (%)101 Participants
p-value: 0.047Chi-squared
Secondary

Endoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and Withdrawal

Endoscopist's perception of the adequacy of analgesia, difficulty of insertion and withdrawal measured on a five-point Likert scale: Strongly Agree, Agree, Agree nor Disagree, Disagree, Strongly Disagree

Time frame: From the time of introduction of the colonoscope, to removal of colonoscope. Range of duration of colonoscopy 5.00- 50.10 minutes.

Population: FAS (randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline VAS rating; N=262)

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GIC-1001 Low DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalAdequate AnalgesiaStrongly Agree20 Participants
GIC-1001 Low DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult WithdrawalAgree0 Participants
GIC-1001 Low DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult InsertionDisagree22 Participants
GIC-1001 Low DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalAdequate AnalgesiaAgree nor Disagree8 Participants
GIC-1001 Low DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult InsertionStrongly Disagree18 Participants
GIC-1001 Low DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult WithdrawalStrongly Agree0 Participants
GIC-1001 Low DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalAdequate AnalgesiaDisagree9 Participants
GIC-1001 Low DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalAdequate AnalgesiaAgree14 Participants
GIC-1001 Low DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult WithdrawalDisagree19 Participants
GIC-1001 Low DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalAdequate AnalgesiaStrongly Disagree5 Participants
GIC-1001 Low DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult InsertionStrongly Agree3 Participants
GIC-1001 Low DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult WithdrawalAgree nor Disagree0 Participants
GIC-1001 Low DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult InsertionAgree7 Participants
GIC-1001 Low DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult WithdrawalStrongly Disagree37 Participants
GIC-1001 Low DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult InsertionAgree nor Disagree6 Participants
GIC-1001 Mid-doseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult InsertionAgree nor Disagree5 Participants
GIC-1001 Mid-doseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult WithdrawalAgree1 Participants
GIC-1001 Mid-doseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalAdequate AnalgesiaStrongly Disagree4 Participants
GIC-1001 Mid-doseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult InsertionDisagree19 Participants
GIC-1001 Mid-doseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalAdequate AnalgesiaAgree21 Participants
GIC-1001 Mid-doseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult WithdrawalStrongly Agree0 Participants
GIC-1001 Mid-doseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult WithdrawalAgree nor Disagree1 Participants
GIC-1001 Mid-doseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult InsertionStrongly Disagree20 Participants
GIC-1001 Mid-doseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalAdequate AnalgesiaAgree nor Disagree3 Participants
GIC-1001 Mid-doseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult InsertionAgree6 Participants
GIC-1001 Mid-doseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult WithdrawalStrongly Disagree32 Participants
GIC-1001 Mid-doseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult WithdrawalDisagree18 Participants
GIC-1001 Mid-doseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult InsertionStrongly Agree2 Participants
GIC-1001 Mid-doseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalAdequate AnalgesiaDisagree6 Participants
GIC-1001 Mid-doseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalAdequate AnalgesiaStrongly Agree18 Participants
GIC-1001 , High DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult InsertionAgree nor Disagree4 Participants
GIC-1001 , High DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalAdequate AnalgesiaStrongly Agree16 Participants
GIC-1001 , High DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalAdequate AnalgesiaAgree17 Participants
GIC-1001 , High DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalAdequate AnalgesiaAgree nor Disagree4 Participants
GIC-1001 , High DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalAdequate AnalgesiaDisagree11 Participants
GIC-1001 , High DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalAdequate AnalgesiaStrongly Disagree5 Participants
GIC-1001 , High DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult InsertionStrongly Agree3 Participants
GIC-1001 , High DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult InsertionAgree7 Participants
GIC-1001 , High DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult InsertionDisagree21 Participants
GIC-1001 , High DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult InsertionStrongly Disagree18 Participants
GIC-1001 , High DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult WithdrawalStrongly Agree0 Participants
GIC-1001 , High DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult WithdrawalAgree2 Participants
GIC-1001 , High DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult WithdrawalAgree nor Disagree0 Participants
GIC-1001 , High DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult WithdrawalDisagree15 Participants
GIC-1001 , High DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult WithdrawalStrongly Disagree36 Participants
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult InsertionAgree24 Participants
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalAdequate AnalgesiaAgree30 Participants
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult WithdrawalAgree2 Participants
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult InsertionStrongly Agree5 Participants
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalAdequate AnalgesiaStrongly Disagree12 Participants
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalAdequate AnalgesiaStrongly Agree33 Participants
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult WithdrawalAgree nor Disagree1 Participants
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalAdequate AnalgesiaDisagree16 Participants
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalAdequate AnalgesiaAgree nor Disagree10 Participants
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult WithdrawalStrongly Disagree68 Participants
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult InsertionStrongly Disagree31 Participants
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult InsertionDisagree31 Participants
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult WithdrawalDisagree29 Participants
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult WithdrawalStrongly Agree1 Participants
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Adequacy of Analgesia, Difficulty of Insertion and WithdrawalDifficult InsertionAgree nor Disagree10 Participants
Secondary

Endoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and Withdrawal

Endoscopist's perception of the amount of colonic spasm on insertion and withdrawal measured on five-point Likert scale according to the following: Strongly Agree, Agree, Agree nor Disagree, Disagree, Strongly Disagree

Time frame: From the time of introduction of the colonoscope, to removal of colonoscope. Range of duration of colonoscopy 5.00- 50.10 minutes.

Population: FAS (randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline VAS rating; N=262)

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GIC-1001 Low DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm insertionAbsent33 Participants
GIC-1001 Low DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm insertionPresent and minimal # (1 spasm)11 Participants
GIC-1001 Low DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm insertionPresent and moderate #(2-3 spasms)8 Participants
GIC-1001 Low DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm insertionPresent and high # (4-5 spasms)2 Participants
GIC-1001 Low DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm insertionPresent and very high (>5 spasms)2 Participants
GIC-1001 Low DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm WIthdrawalAbsent41 Participants
GIC-1001 Low DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm WIthdrawalPresent and minimal # (1 spasm)11 Participants
GIC-1001 Low DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm WIthdrawalPresent and moderate #(2-3 spasms)2 Participants
GIC-1001 Low DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm WIthdrawalPresent and high # (4-5 spasms)2 Participants
GIC-1001 Low DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm WIthdrawalPresent and very high (>5 spasms)0 Participants
GIC-1001 Mid-doseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm insertionPresent and moderate #(2-3 spasms)10 Participants
GIC-1001 Mid-doseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm WIthdrawalPresent and high # (4-5 spasms)0 Participants
GIC-1001 Mid-doseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm insertionPresent and high # (4-5 spasms)2 Participants
GIC-1001 Mid-doseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm insertionPresent and very high (>5 spasms)0 Participants
GIC-1001 Mid-doseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm WIthdrawalAbsent40 Participants
GIC-1001 Mid-doseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm WIthdrawalPresent and minimal # (1 spasm)8 Participants
GIC-1001 Mid-doseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm WIthdrawalPresent and very high (>5 spasms)0 Participants
GIC-1001 Mid-doseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm WIthdrawalPresent and moderate #(2-3 spasms)4 Participants
GIC-1001 Mid-doseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm insertionAbsent33 Participants
GIC-1001 Mid-doseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm insertionPresent and minimal # (1 spasm)7 Participants
GIC-1001 , High DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm WIthdrawalPresent and moderate #(2-3 spasms)2 Participants
GIC-1001 , High DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm WIthdrawalPresent and minimal # (1 spasm)6 Participants
GIC-1001 , High DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm WIthdrawalPresent and very high (>5 spasms)0 Participants
GIC-1001 , High DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm insertionAbsent33 Participants
GIC-1001 , High DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm insertionPresent and high # (4-5 spasms)1 Participants
GIC-1001 , High DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm WIthdrawalAbsent45 Participants
GIC-1001 , High DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm WIthdrawalPresent and high # (4-5 spasms)0 Participants
GIC-1001 , High DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm insertionPresent and minimal # (1 spasm)11 Participants
GIC-1001 , High DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm insertionPresent and very high (>5 spasms)2 Participants
GIC-1001 , High DoseEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm insertionPresent and moderate #(2-3 spasms)6 Participants
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm insertionPresent and very high (>5 spasms)2 Participants
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm WIthdrawalPresent and moderate #(2-3 spasms)3 Participants
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm WIthdrawalAbsent83 Participants
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm WIthdrawalPresent and very high (>5 spasms)0 Participants
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm WIthdrawalPresent and minimal # (1 spasm)14 Participants
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm insertionPresent and minimal # (1 spasm)20 Participants
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm insertionPresent and moderate #(2-3 spasms)11 Participants
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm insertionPresent and high # (4-5 spasms)9 Participants
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm insertionAbsent59 Participants
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboEndoscopist's Perception of Colonoscopy- Amount of Colonic Spasm on Insertion and WithdrawalColonic Spasm WIthdrawalPresent and high # (4-5 spasms)1 Participants
Secondary

Patient's Willingness to Repeat Experience

Patients' willingness for repeat colonoscopy, was assessed with the Patient Willingness to Repeat Experience (P.W.R.E.) questionnaire (1 question), asking patients to rate their willingness to repeat the procedure according to a 5-point Likert scale: Strongly Agree, Agree, Agree nor Disagree, Disagree, Strongly Disagree. The P.W.R.E was administered after the colonoscopy during subject recovery.

Time frame: Post-colonoscopy- during subject recovery

Population: FAS (randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline VAS rating; N=262)

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GIC-1001 Low DosePatient's Willingness to Repeat ExperienceStrongly Disagree4 Participants
GIC-1001 Low DosePatient's Willingness to Repeat ExperienceAgree16 Participants
GIC-1001 Low DosePatient's Willingness to Repeat ExperienceMissing0 Participants
GIC-1001 Low DosePatient's Willingness to Repeat ExperienceAgree nor Disagree8 Participants
GIC-1001 Low DosePatient's Willingness to Repeat ExperienceDisagree5 Participants
GIC-1001 Low DosePatient's Willingness to Repeat ExperienceStrongly Agree23 Participants
GIC-1001 Mid-dosePatient's Willingness to Repeat ExperienceAgree17 Participants
GIC-1001 Mid-dosePatient's Willingness to Repeat ExperienceStrongly Agree26 Participants
GIC-1001 Mid-dosePatient's Willingness to Repeat ExperienceAgree nor Disagree2 Participants
GIC-1001 Mid-dosePatient's Willingness to Repeat ExperienceStrongly Disagree2 Participants
GIC-1001 Mid-dosePatient's Willingness to Repeat ExperienceMissing0 Participants
GIC-1001 Mid-dosePatient's Willingness to Repeat ExperienceDisagree5 Participants
GIC-1001 , High DosePatient's Willingness to Repeat ExperienceStrongly Agree15 Participants
GIC-1001 , High DosePatient's Willingness to Repeat ExperienceAgree18 Participants
GIC-1001 , High DosePatient's Willingness to Repeat ExperienceStrongly Disagree8 Participants
GIC-1001 , High DosePatient's Willingness to Repeat ExperienceDisagree5 Participants
GIC-1001 , High DosePatient's Willingness to Repeat ExperienceMissing2 Participants
GIC-1001 , High DosePatient's Willingness to Repeat ExperienceAgree nor Disagree5 Participants
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboPatient's Willingness to Repeat ExperienceMissing2 Participants
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboPatient's Willingness to Repeat ExperienceStrongly Agree42 Participants
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboPatient's Willingness to Repeat ExperienceAgree32 Participants
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboPatient's Willingness to Repeat ExperienceAgree nor Disagree11 Participants
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboPatient's Willingness to Repeat ExperienceDisagree6 Participants
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboPatient's Willingness to Repeat ExperienceStrongly Disagree8 Participants
Secondary

Safety-Plasma Concentrations of Trimebutine and N-Desmethyl-Trimebutine

A pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was carried out on the first 24 patients randomized, equally distributed between treatment groups; 18 patients were assigned to active treatment

Time frame: Day 4 prior to colonoscopy.

Population: Trimebutine and N-Desmethyl-Trimebutine plasma concentrations were assessed in all arms, with the exception of placebo

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GIC-1001 Low DoseSafety-Plasma Concentrations of Trimebutine and N-Desmethyl-TrimebutinePlasma Concentration- Trimebutine5.17 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1.96
GIC-1001 Low DoseSafety-Plasma Concentrations of Trimebutine and N-Desmethyl-TrimebutinePlasma Concentration-N-Desmethyl-Trimebutine174.5 ng/mLStandard Deviation 130.1
GIC-1001 Mid-doseSafety-Plasma Concentrations of Trimebutine and N-Desmethyl-TrimebutinePlasma Concentration- Trimebutine8.80 ng/mLStandard Deviation 3.55
GIC-1001 Mid-doseSafety-Plasma Concentrations of Trimebutine and N-Desmethyl-TrimebutinePlasma Concentration-N-Desmethyl-Trimebutine440.98 ng/mLStandard Deviation 546.53
GIC-1001 , High DoseSafety-Plasma Concentrations of Trimebutine and N-Desmethyl-TrimebutinePlasma Concentration- Trimebutine16.22 ng/mLStandard Deviation 7.32
GIC-1001 , High DoseSafety-Plasma Concentrations of Trimebutine and N-Desmethyl-TrimebutinePlasma Concentration-N-Desmethyl-Trimebutine389.18 ng/mLStandard Deviation 166.42
Secondary

Subject Satisfaction and Acceptability of the Colonic Analgesia - Patient's Global Impression of Abdominal Pain

Subject satisfaction and acceptability of the colonic analgesia modality offered by GIC-1001 was assessed with the Patient Global Impression of Abdominal Pain (P.G.I.A.P.) (1 question), asking patients to rate their pain during the procedure according to a 5-point Likert scale: Absent, Mild, Moderate, Severe, Intolerable. The P.G.I.A.P was administered after the colonoscopy during subject recovery.

Time frame: Post-colonoscopy- during subject recovery

Population: FAS (randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline VAS rating; N=262)

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GIC-1001 Low DoseSubject Satisfaction and Acceptability of the Colonic Analgesia - Patient's Global Impression of Abdominal PainAbsent6 Participants
GIC-1001 Low DoseSubject Satisfaction and Acceptability of the Colonic Analgesia - Patient's Global Impression of Abdominal PainMild21 Participants
GIC-1001 Low DoseSubject Satisfaction and Acceptability of the Colonic Analgesia - Patient's Global Impression of Abdominal PainModerate17 Participants
GIC-1001 Low DoseSubject Satisfaction and Acceptability of the Colonic Analgesia - Patient's Global Impression of Abdominal PainSevere12 Participants
GIC-1001 Low DoseSubject Satisfaction and Acceptability of the Colonic Analgesia - Patient's Global Impression of Abdominal PainIntolerable0 Participants
GIC-1001 Low DoseSubject Satisfaction and Acceptability of the Colonic Analgesia - Patient's Global Impression of Abdominal PainMissing0 Participants
GIC-1001 Mid-doseSubject Satisfaction and Acceptability of the Colonic Analgesia - Patient's Global Impression of Abdominal PainMissing0 Participants
GIC-1001 Mid-doseSubject Satisfaction and Acceptability of the Colonic Analgesia - Patient's Global Impression of Abdominal PainSevere7 Participants
GIC-1001 Mid-doseSubject Satisfaction and Acceptability of the Colonic Analgesia - Patient's Global Impression of Abdominal PainAbsent4 Participants
GIC-1001 Mid-doseSubject Satisfaction and Acceptability of the Colonic Analgesia - Patient's Global Impression of Abdominal PainModerate21 Participants
GIC-1001 Mid-doseSubject Satisfaction and Acceptability of the Colonic Analgesia - Patient's Global Impression of Abdominal PainMild17 Participants
GIC-1001 Mid-doseSubject Satisfaction and Acceptability of the Colonic Analgesia - Patient's Global Impression of Abdominal PainIntolerable3 Participants
GIC-1001 , High DoseSubject Satisfaction and Acceptability of the Colonic Analgesia - Patient's Global Impression of Abdominal PainMild15 Participants
GIC-1001 , High DoseSubject Satisfaction and Acceptability of the Colonic Analgesia - Patient's Global Impression of Abdominal PainModerate22 Participants
GIC-1001 , High DoseSubject Satisfaction and Acceptability of the Colonic Analgesia - Patient's Global Impression of Abdominal PainSevere8 Participants
GIC-1001 , High DoseSubject Satisfaction and Acceptability of the Colonic Analgesia - Patient's Global Impression of Abdominal PainMissing2 Participants
GIC-1001 , High DoseSubject Satisfaction and Acceptability of the Colonic Analgesia - Patient's Global Impression of Abdominal PainIntolerable3 Participants
GIC-1001 , High DoseSubject Satisfaction and Acceptability of the Colonic Analgesia - Patient's Global Impression of Abdominal PainAbsent3 Participants
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboSubject Satisfaction and Acceptability of the Colonic Analgesia - Patient's Global Impression of Abdominal PainIntolerable6 Participants
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboSubject Satisfaction and Acceptability of the Colonic Analgesia - Patient's Global Impression of Abdominal PainMissing2 Participants
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboSubject Satisfaction and Acceptability of the Colonic Analgesia - Patient's Global Impression of Abdominal PainMild30 Participants
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboSubject Satisfaction and Acceptability of the Colonic Analgesia - Patient's Global Impression of Abdominal PainSevere21 Participants
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboSubject Satisfaction and Acceptability of the Colonic Analgesia - Patient's Global Impression of Abdominal PainAbsent13 Participants
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboSubject Satisfaction and Acceptability of the Colonic Analgesia - Patient's Global Impression of Abdominal PainModerate29 Participants
Secondary

Time to Caecum

Time to Caecum is the time taken by the physician to reach the caecum with the colonoscope, from the insertion in the anus. Time to Caecum was measured during colonoscopy, for which total duration of colonoscopy ranged between a minimum of 5.00 and a maximum of 50.10 minutes.

Time frame: From the time of introduction of the colonoscope, to removal of colonoscope. Range of duration of colonoscopy 5.00- 50.10 minutes.

Population: FAS (randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline VAS rating; N=262)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GIC-1001 Low DoseTime to Caecum8.47 minutesStandard Deviation 4.75
GIC-1001 Mid-doseTime to Caecum6.51 minutesStandard Deviation 2.67
GIC-1001 , High DoseTime to Caecum9.22 minutesStandard Deviation 6.1
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboTime to Caecum8.04 minutesStandard Deviation 5.33
Comparison: Time to Caecump-value: 0.047Chi-squared
Secondary

Total Examination Time (Colonoscopy)

Defined as the time from endoscope insertion to complete removal of the endoscope; measured in minutes

Time frame: From the time of introduction of the colonoscope, to removal of colonoscope. Range of duration of colonoscopy 5.00- 50.10 minutes.

Population: FAS (randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug, had a baseline and at least one post-baseline VAS rating; N=262)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GIC-1001 Low DoseTotal Examination Time (Colonoscopy)15.82 minutesStandard Deviation 7.06
GIC-1001 Mid-doseTotal Examination Time (Colonoscopy)13.05 minutesStandard Deviation 6.22
GIC-1001 , High DoseTotal Examination Time (Colonoscopy)15.52 minutesStandard Deviation 8.08
GIC-1001 Matching PlaceboTotal Examination Time (Colonoscopy)14.61 minutesStandard Deviation 7.58

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026