Skip to content

Low Dose Molecular Breast Imaging as a Screening Tool for Women With Dense Breasts

Evaluation of Low-dose Molecular Breast Imaging as a Screening Tool in Women With Mammographically Dense Breasts and Increased Risk of Breast Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01925170
Enrollment
1638
Registered
2013-08-19
Start date
2009-04-30
Completion date
2013-06-30
Last updated
2014-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Keywords

Dense breast tissue, Breast Cancer Screening, Molecular Breast Imaging, Breast Cancer, Breast

Brief summary

A new test for breast cancer screening, molecular breast imaging (MBI) may be more sensitive than mammography for detecting breast cancer in women with dense breasts. The purpose of this study is to see if MBI using a low dose of gamma radiation can find cancers not seen on mammography. Hypotheses: 1. Low-Dose MBI has a significantly higher sensitivity and specificity and equal or higher positive predictive value than SM in women age 40 and older with mammographically dense breasts. 2. Low-dose MBI has comparable sensitivity and specificity to that previously achieved with MBI using a higher dose of radiation. 3. MBI produces a low false positive rate (specificity \>90%) that permits its use as a screening tool in this patient population.

Detailed description

A previous study demonstrated that the addition of MBI using 20 mCi Tc-99m sestamibi to screening mammography (SM) increased diagnostic yield for breast cancer in dense breasts (supplemental yield of 7.5/1000 screened). After implementing radiation dose reduction techniques, the performance of incident SM and prevalent screen MBI in women with dense breasts will be compared. Methods: Women presenting for SM with heterogeneously or extremely dense breasts on past prior SM were enrolled and underwent digital SM and MBI. Study information was sent to all eligible patients in advance of their scheduled SM explaining the study and offering them participation. Eligible patients who requested to participate were offered an MBI on the same day as their SM or within 21 days of the SM. Participants may have participated in this screening study up to two times provided at least 24 months had elapsed since the initial MBI scan. This time period was selected as the average time for a tumor to double in size is approximately 20 months. Hence a 24 month time interval between MBI studies was to enable detection of interval cancers or cancers that were too small to be detected in the initial MBI scan. MBI was performed with 8 mCi Tc-99m sestamibi and dual-head cadmium zinc telluride detectors. SMs were read independently; MBIs were read in comparison with SM. MBIs were assigned an assessment score of 1-5 which parallels BI-RADS; scores of 3-5 on MBI were considered positive.

Interventions

Molecular breast imaging is a new nuclear medicine technique for imaging the breast. It uses small field of view semiconductor-based gamma cameras that use Cadmium Zinc Telluride detectors. These have superior spatial and energy resolution to conventional sodium iodide detectors.

Mammography is the process of using low-energy X-rays (usually around 30 kVp) to examine the human breast and is used as a diagnostic and a screening tool.

Technetium (99mTc) sestamibi is a pharmaceutical agent used in nuclear medicine imaging. The drug is a coordination complex consisting of the radioisotope technetium-99m bound to six methoxyisobutylisonitrile (MIBI) ligands.

Sponsors

Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Past prior SM interpreted as negative or benign \[Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Category 1 or 2\] * Past prior SM interpreted as heterogeneously dense or extremely dense

Exclusion criteria

* Subject is unable to understand and sign the consent form * Subject is pregnant or lactating * Subject is physically unable to sit upright and still for 40 minutes * Subject has self-reported signs or symptoms of breast cancer (palpable mass, bloody nipple discharge, axillary mass, etc.) * Subject has had needle biopsy within 3 months, or breast surgery within 1 year prior to the study * Subject is currently taking tamoxifen, Evista (raloxifene), Zoladex or an aromatase inhibitor for adjuvant therapy or chemoprevention.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cancer Detection Rate Per 1000 Women Screened, by Breast DensityWithin 21 days of mammographyThe cancer detection rate per 1000 women screened is the estimate of the number of women with positive results from a screening test.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SpecificityWithin 21 days of mammographySpecificity measures the percentage of negatives which are correctly identified as such.
Sensitivity for All Cancers DiagnosedWithin 21 days of mammographySensitivity measures the percentage of actual positives which are correctly identified as such.
Recall Rate12 months after mammography and MBIRecall rate was defined as the percentage of participants recalled for follow-up studies initiated because of abnormal findings with mammography or MBI.
Biopsy Rate12 months after mammography and MBIBiopsy rate = number of participants who had a biopsy/number of number of participants analyzed.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Women for the Part B low dose study were enrolled between 5/11/2009 and 3/8/2012.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Mammography and Molecular Breast Imaging
Participants underwent conventional mammography and molecular breast imaging after a 740-millibecquerel (mBQ) (8-mCi) Technetium (99mTc) sestamibi injection. Molecular Breast Imaging: Molecular breast imaging is a new nuclear medicine technique for imaging the breast. It uses small field of view semiconductor-based gamma cameras that use Cadmium Zinc Telluride detectors. These have superior spatial and energy resolution to conventional sodium iodide detectors. Conventional Mammography: Mammography is the process of using low-energy X-rays (usually around 30 kVp) to examine the human breast and is used as a diagnostic and a screening tool. Technetium (99mTc) sestamibi: Technetium (99mTc) sestamibi is a pharmaceutical agent used in nuclear medicine imaging. The drug is a coordination complex consisting of the radioisotope technetium-99m bound to six methoxyisobutylisonitrile (MIBI) ligands.
1,638
Total1,638

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyUnverified cancer status53

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMammography and Molecular Breast Imaging
Age, Continuous58.1 years
Breast Density of Participants with No Prior Mammogram
Heterogeneously dense breasts
5 participants
Breast Density of Participants with No Prior Mammogram
Participants with Prior Mammogram
1631 participants
Breast Density of Participants with No Prior Mammogram
Scattered fibroglandular densities
2 participants
Mammogram Prior to Study Entry
425-730 days
301 participants
Mammogram Prior to Study Entry
< 425 days
1310 participants
Mammogram Prior to Study Entry
>730 days
20 participants
Mammogram Prior to Study Entry
None
7 participants
Mammographic Breast Density
Almost entirely fat
0 participants
Mammographic Breast Density
Extremely dense
230 participants
Mammographic Breast Density
Heterogeneously dense
1259 participants
Mammographic Breast Density
Scattered fibroglandular densities
149 participants
Menopausal Status
Peri-menopausal
186 participants
Menopausal Status
Postmenopausal
1021 participants
Menopausal Status
Premenopausal
355 participants
Menopausal Status
Surgical Menopause
76 participants
Molecular Breast Imaging Prior to Study Entry
415- 730 days
8 participants
Molecular Breast Imaging Prior to Study Entry
< 425 days
0 participants
Molecular Breast Imaging Prior to Study Entry
> 730 days
171 participants
Molecular Breast Imaging Prior to Study Entry
None
1459 participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
14 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
1605 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
1638 participants
Risk Factors
1 first-deg relative with history of breast cancer
53 participants
Risk Factors
2 2nd-deg relatives with history of breast cancer
56 participants
Risk Factors
Chest, mediastinal, or axillary irradiation
5 participants
Risk Factors
Gail model 5 year risk ≥ 1.7%
360 participants
Risk Factors
Gail model 5 year risk ≥ 2.5%
203 participants
Risk Factors
Gail or Claus model lifetime risk ≥ 20%
78 participants
Risk Factors
Known mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes
3 participants
Risk Factors
None of the above risk factors
693 participants
Risk Factors
Personal history of breast cancer
166 participants
Risk Factors
Prior biopsy showing hyperplasia, etc.
21 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1638 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1,585
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1,585

Outcome results

Primary

Cancer Detection Rate Per 1000 Women Screened, by Breast Density

The cancer detection rate per 1000 women screened is the estimate of the number of women with positive results from a screening test.

Time frame: Within 21 days of mammography

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Mammography OnlyCancer Detection Rate Per 1000 Women Screened, by Breast DensityAll densities3.2 cancers per 1000 women screened
Mammography OnlyCancer Detection Rate Per 1000 Women Screened, by Breast DensityScattered fibroglandular densities0 cancers per 1000 women screened
Mammography OnlyCancer Detection Rate Per 1000 Women Screened, by Breast DensityHeterogeneously dense3.3 cancers per 1000 women screened
Mammography OnlyCancer Detection Rate Per 1000 Women Screened, by Breast DensityExtremely dense4.5 cancers per 1000 women screened
Mammography With Adjunct MBICancer Detection Rate Per 1000 Women Screened, by Breast DensityExtremely dense13.6 cancers per 1000 women screened
Mammography With Adjunct MBICancer Detection Rate Per 1000 Women Screened, by Breast DensityAll densities12.0 cancers per 1000 women screened
Mammography With Adjunct MBICancer Detection Rate Per 1000 Women Screened, by Breast DensityHeterogeneously dense10.6 cancers per 1000 women screened
Mammography With Adjunct MBICancer Detection Rate Per 1000 Women Screened, by Breast DensityScattered fibroglandular densities21.0 cancers per 1000 women screened
Molecular Breast Imaging AloneCancer Detection Rate Per 1000 Women Screened, by Breast DensityExtremely dense13.6 cancers per 1000 women screened
Molecular Breast Imaging AloneCancer Detection Rate Per 1000 Women Screened, by Breast DensityScattered fibroglandular densities21.0 cancers per 1000 women screened
Molecular Breast Imaging AloneCancer Detection Rate Per 1000 Women Screened, by Breast DensityHeterogeneously dense9.0 cancers per 1000 women screened
Molecular Breast Imaging AloneCancer Detection Rate Per 1000 Women Screened, by Breast DensityAll densities10.7 cancers per 1000 women screened
Comparison: Comparison of the two groups for all densities, significant difference p ≤ 0.05.p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Comparison of two groups for all densities; significant difference p ≤ 0.05.p-value: 0.004t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Biopsy Rate

Biopsy rate = number of participants who had a biopsy/number of number of participants analyzed.

Time frame: 12 months after mammography and MBI

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Mammography OnlyBiopsy Rate1.3 percentage of participants
Mammography With Adjunct MBIBiopsy Rate4.2 percentage of participants
Molecular Breast Imaging AloneBiopsy Rate3.2 percentage of participants
Comparison: Significant difference p ≤ 0.05p-value: <0.001McNemar
Comparison: Significant difference p ≤ 0.05p-value: <0.001McNemar
Secondary

Recall Rate

Recall rate was defined as the percentage of participants recalled for follow-up studies initiated because of abnormal findings with mammography or MBI.

Time frame: 12 months after mammography and MBI

Population: The analysis population only included participants with a verified cancer status at 12 months after the initial screening (mammography and MBI).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Mammography OnlyRecall Rate11.0 percentage of participants
Mammography With Adjunct MBIRecall Rate17.6 percentage of participants
Molecular Breast Imaging AloneRecall Rate7.5 percentage of participants
Comparison: Significant difference p ≤ 0.05p-value: <0.001McNemar
Comparison: Significant difference p ≤ 0.05p-value: <0.001McNemar
Secondary

Sensitivity for All Cancers Diagnosed

Sensitivity measures the percentage of actual positives which are correctly identified as such.

Time frame: Within 21 days of mammography

Population: The analysis population only included participants with a verified cancer status at 12 months after the initial screening. 21 participants out of the total study population of 1585 were diagnosed with cancer.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Mammography OnlySensitivity for All Cancers Diagnosed23.8 percentage of actual positives
Mammography With Adjunct MBISensitivity for All Cancers Diagnosed90.5 percentage of actual positives
Molecular Breast Imaging AloneSensitivity for All Cancers Diagnosed81.0 percentage of actual positives
Comparison: Significant difference p ≤ 0.05p-value: <0.001McNemar
Comparison: Significant difference p ≤ 0.05p-value: 0.004McNemar
Secondary

Specificity

Specificity measures the percentage of negatives which are correctly identified as such.

Time frame: Within 21 days of mammography

Population: The analysis population only included participants with a verified negative cancer status at 12 months after the initial screening (mammography and MBI).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Mammography OnlySpecificity89.1 percentage of true negatives
Mammography With Adjunct MBISpecificity83.4 percentage of true negatives
Molecular Breast Imaging AloneSpecificity93.5 percentage of true negatives
Comparison: Significant difference p ≤ 0.05p-value: <0.001McNemar
Comparison: Significant difference p ≤ 0.05p-value: <0.0001McNemar

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026