Skip to content

School Breakfast Policy Initiative Study

Increasing Breakfast Consumption and Decreasing Childhood Obesity Among Low-income, Ethnically Diverse Youth.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01924130
Acronym
SBPI
Enrollment
2000
Registered
2013-08-16
Start date
2012-07-31
Completion date
2016-06-30
Last updated
2016-08-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Childhood Obesity, Hunger

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to develop and evaluate the effects of a school breakfast policy initiative (SBPI) on the incidence of overweight and obesity as well as breakfast patterns (both inside and outside of school) among 4th-6th grade children. The study integrates research, education and extension to promote healthy breakfast consumption among low-income children in urban schools and will leverage ongoing SNAP-Ed and the School Breakfast Program efforts.

Detailed description

Policy makers have promoted school breakfast participation as a tool to help prevent childhood obesity. No randomized controlled trials have examined the effects of a school breakfast feeding program on obesity. We propose to develop and evaluate a School Breakfast Policy Initiative (SBPI) that combines classroom feeding, in-school nutrition education, social marketing and parent outreach. Specifically, we will promote the benefits of a healthy breakfast at school or home and deter buying breakfast at corner stores where purchases are high in energy, solid fats and added sugars. This intervention will be evaluated in the real world of urban schools that make frequent use of the SNAP-Ed and the School Breakfast Program. The specific aims are: 1. To develop the SBPI intervention within the context of SNAP Ed and the National School Breakfast Program in the School District of Philadelphia. 2. To conduct a pilot feasibility study among 4 schools (2 intervention and 2 control) to assess feasibility and acceptability. 3. To compare participants in the intervention (n=8) and comparison schools (n=8) on the incidence of overweight and obesity. We predict that intervention schools, compared to the comparison schools, will have a significantly lower incidence rate of overweight and obesity over a 2 y period. 4. To compare participants in the intervention (n=8) and comparison schools (n=8) on eating one breakfast. We predict that intervention schools, compared to the comparison schools, will have significantly greater percentage of children eating one breakfast per day over a 2 y period.

Interventions

OTHERClassroom feeding

Students are fed breakfast in the classroom at the start of the school, rather than the cafeteria before school.

BEHAVIORALNutrition education lessons

Students receive breakfast specific nutrition education lessons.

A social marketing campaign designed to promote consumption of one healthy breakfast a day. The marketing includes a healthy breakfast points-based reward program designed by the students and promotional campaigns.

BEHAVIORALParent outreach

A variety of communication methods that engage families and offer education that meets their needs, including school breakfast menus, parent newsletters, and information tables at parent-teacher meetings.

Sponsors

The Food Trust
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
The School District of Philadelphia
CollaboratorOTHER
Temple University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
7 Years to 16 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 4th-8th grade Philadelphia public school students.

Exclusion criteria

\-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Body Mass IndexPilot Study: baseline (September-October 2012), 8-9 month follow up (May 2014). Main Trial: baseline (September-December 2013), 16 month follow up (January-March 2015), 32 month follow up (April-June 2016)BMI is calculated using students' height and weight measurements.
Breakfast Consumption habitsPilot Study: baseline (September-October 2012), 8-9 month follow up (May 2014). Main Trial: baseline (September-December 2013), 16 month follow up (January-March 2015), 32 month follow up (April-June 2016)Measured using a breakfast intake questionnaire.
HungerPilot Study: baseline (September-October 2012), 8-9 month follow up (May 2014). Main Trial: baseline (September-December 2013), 16 month follow up (January-March 2015), 32 month follow up (April-June 2016)Measured using a hunger scale questionnaire.
School meal participation ratesEvery month for 34 months (September 2013-June 2016)

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026