Breast Cancer
Conditions
Keywords
BYL719, alpelisib, Breast Cancer, BKM120, buparlisib, Pathological Complete Response, neoadjuvant, hormone receptor-positive, HER2 negative, Objective Response Rate
Brief summary
The purpose of the study was to determine whether treatment with a PI3K inhibitor plus letrozole led to an increase in pathologic clinical response and Objective Response Rate compared to treatment with placebo plus letrozole in patients with Breast cancer.
Interventions
BYL719 + Letrozole
BKM120 + Letrozole
Placebo (of BYL719 or BKM120) + Letrozole
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Patient is an adult, female ≥ 18 years old at the time of informed consent 2. Patient has a histologically and/or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of breast cancer 3. Patient is postmenopausal. 4. Patient has T1c-T3, any N, M0, operable breast cancer 5. Patients must have measurable disease 6. Patient has diagnostic biopsy available for the analysis of PIK3CA mutation and Ki67 level. 7. Patient has estrogen-receptor and/or progesterone positive breast cancer as per local laboratory testing 8. Patient has HER2 negative breast cancer defined as a negative in situ hybridization test or an IHC status of 0 or 1+ as per local laboratory testing
Exclusion criteria
1. Patient has locally recurrent or metastatic disease 2. Patient has received any systemic therapy (e.g. chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy) or radiotherapy for current breast cancer disease before randomization. 3. Patient with type 1 diabetes mellitus or not adequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus 4. History of acute pancreatitis within 1 year of study entry 5. Uncontrolled hypertension
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Pathological Complete Response (pCR) Per Investigator Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo for PIK3CA Mutant Cohort | After 24 weeks of treatment | Pathologic complete response (pCR) defined as absence of any residual invasive cancer on hematoxylin and eosin evaluation of the resected breast specimen and all sampled ipsilateral lymph nodes following completion of 24 weeks of treatment by local assessment (ypT0/Tis ypN0). Patients who experienced progression of disease while undergoing neoadjuvant therapy, or who did not receive surgery for any reason, or received antineoplastic treatment other than study drug(s) before surgery were considered as non-responders for the calculation of pCR rate. |
| Pathological Complete Response (pCR) Per Investigator Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo for PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort | After 24 weeks of treatment | Pathologic complete response (pCR) defined as absence of any residual invasive cancer on hematoxylin and eosin evaluation of the resected breast specimen and all sampled ipsilateral lymph nodes following completion of 24 weeks of treatment by local assessment (ypT0/Tis ypN0). Patients who experienced progression of disease while undergoing neoadjuvant therapy, or who did not receive surgery for any reason, or received antineoplastic treatment other than study drug(s) before surgery were considered as non-responders for the calculation of pCR rate. |
| Objective Response Rate Per Investigator Assessment According to RECIST 1.1 for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort | After 24 weeks of treatment | Objective Response Rate (ORR) defined as the proportion of patients with a Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) based on local investigator's assessment according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST) 1.1. BOR was assessed per MRI or Ultrasound and defined as per RECIST 1.1 as CR for a disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions (TL)/non-target lesions (NTL) and a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes assigned as TL/NTL and no new lesion; as PR if not qualifying for CR but with a decrease from baseline ≥ 30% in the sum of diameter of all TL, no progression of NTL and no new lesion. |
| Objective Response Rate According to RECIST 1.1 Per Investigator Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort | After 24 weeks of treatment | Objective Response Rate (ORR) defined as the proportion of patients with a Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) based on local investigator's assessment according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST) 1.1. BOR was assessed per MRI or Ultrasound and defined as per RECIST 1.1 as CR for a disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions (TL)/non-target lesions (NTL) and a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes assigned as TL/NTL and no new lesion; as PR if not qualifying for CR but with a decrease from baseline ≥ 30% in the sum of diameter of all TL, no progression of NTL and no new lesion. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort: Responders as Per pCR | Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 15 (each cycle is 28 days) and surgery (End of Treatment (EOT) expected after 24 weeks of treatment) | Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort: Responders as Per pCR |
| Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort: Non-responders as Per pCR | Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 15 (each cycle is 28 days ) and surgery (End of Treatment (EOT) expected after 24 weeks of treatment) | Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort: Non-responders as Per pCR. |
| Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort: Responders as Per pCR | Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 15 (each cycle is 28 days) and surgery (End of Treatment (EOT) expected after 24 weeks of treatment) | Association between pCR and changes in Ki67 from baseline for alpelisib vs. placebo - PIK3CA wild-type cohort: responders as per pCR |
| Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort: Non-responders as Per pCR | Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 15 (each cycle is 28 days) and surgery (End of Treatment (EOT) expected after 24 weeks of treatment) | Association between pCR and changes in Ki67 from baseline for alpelisib vs. placebo - PIK3CA wild-type cohort: non-responders as per pCR |
| Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index (PEPI) Response as Per Central Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort | At the time of surgery (expected after 24 weeks of treatment) | Preoperative endocrine prognostic index (PEPI) response as per central assessment for alpelisib vs. placebo - PIK3CA mutant cohort. The total PEPI score assigned to each patient is the sum of the risk points derived from the pT stage, pN stage, Ki67 level, and ER status of the surgical specimen (Ellis et al, Contemp Clin Trials 2008). The PEPI score ranges from 0 to to 12, and a higher score means a worse outcome. PEPI response is defined as a PEPI score of 0. |
| Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index (PEPI) Response as Per Central Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort | At the time of surgery (expected after 24 weeks of treatment) | Preoperative endocrine prognostic index (PEPI) response as per central assessment for alpelisib vs. placebo - PIK3CA wild-type cohort. The total PEPI score assigned to each patient is the sum of the risk points derived from the pT stage, pN stage, Ki67 level, and ER status of the surgical specimen (Ellis et al, Contemp Clin Trials 2008). The PEPI score ranges from 0 to to 12, and a higher score means a worse outcome. PEPI response is defined as a PEPI score of 0. |
| Alpelisib PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 1 Day 1 | 0, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 24 hours post-dose at Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days) | Summary of primary PK parameters for alpelisib plasma concentration |
| Alpelisib PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 1 Day 1 | Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days) | Summary of primary PK parameters for alpelisib plasma concentration |
| Alpelisib and PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 1 Day 1 | Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days) | Summary of primary PK parameters for alpelisib plasma concentration |
| Alpelisib PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 4 Day 1 | 0, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 24 hours post-dose at Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days) | Summary of primary PK parameters for alpelisib plasma concentration |
| Alpelisib PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 4 Day 1 | Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days) | Summary of primary PK parameters for alpelisib plasma concentration |
| Alpelisib PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 4 Day 1 | Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days) | Summary of primary PK parameters for alpelisib plasma concentration |
| pCR and Objective Response Rate According to RECIST 1.1 Criteria Per Investigator Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo in PIK3CA Mutant Cohort Based on ctDNA | After 24 weeks of treatment | pCR and Objective response rate according to RECIST 1.1 per investigator assessment after 24 weeks of treatment |
| Letrozole PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 1 Day 1 | Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days) | Summary of primary PK parameters for letrozole plasma concentration |
| Letrozole PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 1 Day 1 | Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days) | Summary of primary PK parameters for letrozole plasma concentration |
| Letrozole PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 4 Day 1 | 0, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 24 hours post-dose at Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days) | Summary of primary PK parameters for Letrozole plasma concentration |
| Letrozole PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 4 Day 1 | Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days) | Summary of primary PK parameters for letrozole plasma concentration |
| Letrozole PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 4 Day 1 | Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days) | Summary of primary PK parameters for letrozole plasma concentration |
| Buparlisib PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 1 Day 1 | 0, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 24 hours post-dose at Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days) | Summary of primary PK parameters for Buparlisib plasma concentration |
| Buparlisib PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 1 Day 1 | Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days) | Summary of primary PK parameters for buparlisib plasma concentration |
| Buparlisib PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 1 Day 1 | Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days) | Summary of primary PK parameters for buparlisib plasma concentration |
| Buparlisib PK Parameter: AUClast at Cycle 4 Day 1 | 0, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 24 hours post-dose at Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days) | Summary of primary PK parameters for Buparlisib plasma concentration |
| Buparlisb PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 4 Day 1 | Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days) | Summary of primary PK parameters for buparlisib plasma concentration |
| Buparlisib PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 4 Day 1 | Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days) | Summary of primary PK parameters for buparlisib plasma concentration |
| Letrozole and PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 1 Day 1 | 0, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 24 hours post-dose at Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days) | Summary of primary PK parameters for Letrozole plasma concentration |
| pCR and Objective Response Rate According to RECIST 1.1 Criteria Per Investigator Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo in PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort Based on ctDNA | After 24 weeks of treatment | pCR and Objective response rate according to RECIST 1.1 per investigator assessment after 24 weeks of treatment |
| Rate of Breast Conserving Surgery for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort | After 24 weeks of treatment | Breast conserving surgery is defined for participants who underwent surgery and did not have a mastectomy. The row no surgery provides the number of patients who did not undergo surgery at all for various reasons. |
| Rate of Breast Conserving Surgery for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort | After 24 weeks of treatment | Breast conserving surgery is defined as the percentage of participants with no mastectomy following completion of 24 weeks of treatment. Breast conserving surgery is defined for participants who underwent surgery and did not have a mastectomy. The row no surgery provides the number of patients who did not undergo surgery at all for various reasons. |
Countries
Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Colombia, Czechia, Germany, Hong Kong, Israel, Italy, Japan, Lebanon, Netherlands, Spain, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
A total of approximately 320 patients were planned to be randomized: this was based on 60 patients per arm in each cohort (PIK3CA mutant and PIK3CA wild-type) for the alpelisib+letrozole and placebo+letrozole arms, plus the estimated number of patients randomized to buparlisib+letrozole arm at the time this arm was discontinued.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Letrozole Participants took alpelisib 300 mg once daily plus letrozole 2.5 mg once daily. | 131 |
| Buparlisib + Letrozole Participants took buparlisib 100 mg once daily or 5 days on/2 days off plus letrozole 2.5 mg once daily. | 83 |
| Placebo + Letrozole Participants took matching Placebo (of alpelisib 300 mg once daily/buparlisib 100 mg once daily or 5 days on/2 days off) plus Letrozole 2.5 mg once daily. | 126 |
| Total | 340 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 12 | 12 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Death | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Physician Decision | 6 | 9 | 5 |
| Overall Study | Progressive disease | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Subject/guardian decision | 14 | 14 | 4 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Alpelisib + Letrozole | Buparlisib + Letrozole | Placebo + Letrozole | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 64.3 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.53 | 65.2 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.61 | 63.1 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.31 | 64.1 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.49 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 7 Participants | 4 Participants | 10 Participants | 21 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black or African American | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 5 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 3 Participants | 6 Participants | 3 Participants | 12 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Unknown | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 117 Participants | 68 Participants | 105 Participants | 290 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 131 Participants | 83 Participants | 126 Participants | 340 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 1 / 130 | 0 / 81 | 1 / 125 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 126 / 130 | 80 / 81 | 106 / 125 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 21 / 130 | 22 / 81 | 6 / 125 |
Outcome results
Objective Response Rate According to RECIST 1.1 Per Investigator Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort
Objective Response Rate (ORR) defined as the proportion of patients with a Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) based on local investigator's assessment according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST) 1.1. BOR was assessed per MRI or Ultrasound and defined as per RECIST 1.1 as CR for a disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions (TL)/non-target lesions (NTL) and a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes assigned as TL/NTL and no new lesion; as PR if not qualifying for CR but with a decrease from baseline ≥ 30% in the sum of diameter of all TL, no progression of NTL and no new lesion.
Time frame: After 24 weeks of treatment
Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) for the PIK3CA wild-type cohort comprised all randomized participants who were assigned to the PIK3CA wild-type cohort based on tumor tissue for the randomization.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Objective Response Rate According to RECIST 1.1 Per Investigator Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort | 63.4 Percentage of Participants |
| Placebo + Letrozole | Objective Response Rate According to RECIST 1.1 Per Investigator Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort | 61.0 Percentage of Participants |
Objective Response Rate Per Investigator Assessment According to RECIST 1.1 for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort
Objective Response Rate (ORR) defined as the proportion of patients with a Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) based on local investigator's assessment according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST) 1.1. BOR was assessed per MRI or Ultrasound and defined as per RECIST 1.1 as CR for a disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions (TL)/non-target lesions (NTL) and a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes assigned as TL/NTL and no new lesion; as PR if not qualifying for CR but with a decrease from baseline ≥ 30% in the sum of diameter of all TL, no progression of NTL and no new lesion.
Time frame: After 24 weeks of treatment
Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) for the PIK3CA mutant cohort comprised all randomized participants who were assigned to the PIK3CA mutant cohort based on tumor tissue for the randomization.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Objective Response Rate Per Investigator Assessment According to RECIST 1.1 for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort | 43.3 Percentage of Participants |
| Placebo + Letrozole | Objective Response Rate Per Investigator Assessment According to RECIST 1.1 for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort | 44.8 Percentage of Participants |
Pathological Complete Response (pCR) Per Investigator Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo for PIK3CA Mutant Cohort
Pathologic complete response (pCR) defined as absence of any residual invasive cancer on hematoxylin and eosin evaluation of the resected breast specimen and all sampled ipsilateral lymph nodes following completion of 24 weeks of treatment by local assessment (ypT0/Tis ypN0). Patients who experienced progression of disease while undergoing neoadjuvant therapy, or who did not receive surgery for any reason, or received antineoplastic treatment other than study drug(s) before surgery were considered as non-responders for the calculation of pCR rate.
Time frame: After 24 weeks of treatment
Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) for the PIK3CA mutant cohort comprised all randomized participants who were assigned to the PIK3CA mutant cohort based on tumor tissue for the randomization.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Pathological Complete Response (pCR) Per Investigator Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo for PIK3CA Mutant Cohort | 1.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Placebo + Letrozole | Pathological Complete Response (pCR) Per Investigator Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo for PIK3CA Mutant Cohort | 3.0 Percentage of Participants |
Pathological Complete Response (pCR) Per Investigator Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo for PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort
Pathologic complete response (pCR) defined as absence of any residual invasive cancer on hematoxylin and eosin evaluation of the resected breast specimen and all sampled ipsilateral lymph nodes following completion of 24 weeks of treatment by local assessment (ypT0/Tis ypN0). Patients who experienced progression of disease while undergoing neoadjuvant therapy, or who did not receive surgery for any reason, or received antineoplastic treatment other than study drug(s) before surgery were considered as non-responders for the calculation of pCR rate.
Time frame: After 24 weeks of treatment
Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) for the PIK3CA wild-type cohort comprised all randomized participants who were assigned to the PIK3CA wild-type cohort based on tumor tissue for the randomization.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Pathological Complete Response (pCR) Per Investigator Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo for PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort | 2.8 Percentage of Participants |
| Placebo + Letrozole | Pathological Complete Response (pCR) Per Investigator Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo for PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort | 1.7 Percentage of Participants |
Alpelisib and PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 1 Day 1
Summary of primary PK parameters for alpelisib plasma concentration
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Population: Alpelisib Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set (BYL PAS): The BYL PAS included all participants who received at least one dose of alpelisib and had at least one evaluable post-treatment alpelisib concentration measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Alpelisib and PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 1 Day 1 | 2.93 HR |
Alpelisib PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 1 Day 1
Summary of primary PK parameters for alpelisib plasma concentration
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Population: The BYL FPAS included participants who received at least 1 dose of alpelisib, had at least 1 evaluable post-treatment alpelisib concentration, received adequate doses of alpelisib and letrozole prior to full PK assessment, did not vomit within 4 hours of alpelisib or letrozole dosing on the day of full PK and had an evaluable full PK profile.
| Arm | Measure | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Alpelisib PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 1 Day 1 | 3160 ng/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 25.3 |
Alpelisib PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 4 Day 1
Summary of primary PK parameters for alpelisib plasma concentration
Time frame: Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Population: Alpelisib Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set (BYL PAS): The BYL PAS included all participants who received at least one dose of alpelisib and had at least one evaluable post-treatment alpelisib concentration measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Alpelisib PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 4 Day 1 | 3260 ng/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 26.7 |
Alpelisib PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 1 Day 1
Summary of primary PK parameters for alpelisib plasma concentration
Time frame: 0, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 24 hours post-dose at Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Population: The BYL FPAS included participants who received at least 1 dose of alpelisib, had at least 1 evaluable post-treatment alpelisib concentration, received adequate doses of alpelisib and letrozole prior to full PK assessment, did not vomit within 4 hours of alpelisib or letrozole dosing on the day of full PK and had an evaluable full PK profile.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Alpelisib PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 1 Day 1 | AUClast | 27300 ng*hr/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 68.6 |
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Alpelisib PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 1 Day 1 | AUC0-24 | 30800 ng*hr/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 20.6 |
Alpelisib PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 4 Day 1
Summary of primary PK parameters for alpelisib plasma concentration
Time frame: 0, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 24 hours post-dose at Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Population: The BYL FPAS included participants who received at least 1 dose of alpelisib, had at least 1 evaluable post-treatment alpelisib concentration, received adequate doses of alpelisib and letrozole prior to full PK assessment, did not vomit within 4 hours of alpelisib or letrozole dosing on the day of full PK and had an evaluable full PK profile.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Alpelisib PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 4 Day 1 | AUC0-24 | 38000 ng*hr/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 13.2 |
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Alpelisib PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 4 Day 1 | AUClast | 38000 ng*hr/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 13.1 |
Alpelisib PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 4 Day 1
Summary of primary PK parameters for alpelisib plasma concentration
Time frame: Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Population: Alpelisib Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set (BYL PAS): The BYL PAS included all participants who received at least one dose of alpelisib and had at least one evaluable post-treatment alpelisib concentration measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Alpelisib PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 4 Day 1 | 2.99 hr |
Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort: Non-responders as Per pCR
Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort: Non-responders as Per pCR.
Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 15 (each cycle is 28 days ) and surgery (End of Treatment (EOT) expected after 24 weeks of treatment)
Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) for the PIK3CA mutant cohort comprised all randomized participants who were assigned to the PIK3CA mutant cohort based on tumor tissue for the randomization. Only non-responders as per pCR are considered for this analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort: Non-responders as Per pCR | Baseline | 14.0 Percentage of positive cells |
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort: Non-responders as Per pCR | C1D15 % change from Baseline | -62.5 Percentage of positive cells |
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort: Non-responders as Per pCR | EOT % change from Baseline | -51.2 Percentage of positive cells |
| Placebo + Letrozole | Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort: Non-responders as Per pCR | Baseline | 13.0 Percentage of positive cells |
| Placebo + Letrozole | Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort: Non-responders as Per pCR | C1D15 % change from Baseline | -60.0 Percentage of positive cells |
| Placebo + Letrozole | Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort: Non-responders as Per pCR | EOT % change from Baseline | -60.0 Percentage of positive cells |
Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort: Responders as Per pCR
Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort: Responders as Per pCR
Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 15 (each cycle is 28 days) and surgery (End of Treatment (EOT) expected after 24 weeks of treatment)
Population: The FAS for the PIK3CA mutant cohort comprised all randomized participants who were assigned to the PIK3CA mutant cohort based on tumor tissue for the randomization. Only responders as per pCR were considered for this analysis. No patient had data reported at end of trial (EOT), hence the percent change from baseline at EOT could not be reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort: Responders as Per pCR | Baseline | 5.0 Percentage of positive cells |
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort: Responders as Per pCR | C1D15: % change from Baseline | -80.0 Percentage of positive cells |
| Placebo + Letrozole | Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort: Responders as Per pCR | Baseline | 11.0 Percentage of positive cells |
| Placebo + Letrozole | Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort: Responders as Per pCR | C1D15: % change from Baseline | 80.0 Percentage of positive cells |
Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort: Non-responders as Per pCR
Association between pCR and changes in Ki67 from baseline for alpelisib vs. placebo - PIK3CA wild-type cohort: non-responders as per pCR
Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 15 (each cycle is 28 days) and surgery (End of Treatment (EOT) expected after 24 weeks of treatment)
Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) for the PIK3CA wild-type cohort comprised all randomized participants who were assigned to the PIK3CA wild-type cohort based on tumor tissue for the randomization. Only non-responders as per pCR are considered for this analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort: Non-responders as Per pCR | Baseline | 16.0 Percentage of positive cells |
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort: Non-responders as Per pCR | C1D15 % change from Baseline | -60.0 Percentage of positive cells |
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort: Non-responders as Per pCR | EOT % change from Baseline | -60.0 Percentage of positive cells |
| Placebo + Letrozole | Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort: Non-responders as Per pCR | Baseline | 18.0 Percentage of positive cells |
| Placebo + Letrozole | Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort: Non-responders as Per pCR | C1D15 % change from Baseline | -52.0 Percentage of positive cells |
| Placebo + Letrozole | Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort: Non-responders as Per pCR | EOT % change from Baseline | -71.1 Percentage of positive cells |
Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort: Responders as Per pCR
Association between pCR and changes in Ki67 from baseline for alpelisib vs. placebo - PIK3CA wild-type cohort: responders as per pCR
Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 15 (each cycle is 28 days) and surgery (End of Treatment (EOT) expected after 24 weeks of treatment)
Population: FAS for PIK3CA wild-type cohort comprised all rand. Parts. assigned to PIK3CA wild-type cohort based on tumor tissue for rand. Only responders as per pCR were considered for this analysis. No patient had data reported at C1D15 \& EOT for Placebo, hence percent change from baseline could not be reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort: Responders as Per pCR | Baseline | 16.5 Percentage of positive cells |
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort: Responders as Per pCR | C1D15: % change from Baseline | -80.0 Percentage of positive cells |
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort: Responders as Per pCR | EOT % change from Baseline | -45.0 Percentage of positive cells |
| Placebo + Letrozole | Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort: Responders as Per pCR | Baseline | 20.0 Percentage of positive cells |
Buparlisb PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 4 Day 1
Summary of primary PK parameters for buparlisib plasma concentration
Time frame: Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Population: Buparlisib Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set (BKM PAS): The BKM PAS included all participants who received at least one dose of buparlisib and had at least one evaluable post-treatment buparlisib concentration measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Buparlisb PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 4 Day 1 | 610 ng/mL |
Buparlisib PK Parameter: AUClast at Cycle 4 Day 1
Summary of primary PK parameters for Buparlisib plasma concentration
Time frame: 0, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 24 hours post-dose at Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Population: BKM FPAS: The BKM FPAS included participants who received at least 1 dose of buparlisib, had at least 1 evaluable post-treatment concentration, received adequate doses of buparlisib and letrozole prior to full PK assessment, did not vomit within 4 hours of buparlisib or letrozole dosing on the day of full PK and had an evaluable full PK profile.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Buparlisib PK Parameter: AUClast at Cycle 4 Day 1 | 10400 ng*hr/mL |
Buparlisib PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 1 Day 1
Summary of primary PK parameters for buparlisib plasma concentration
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Population: The BKM FPAS included participants who received at least 1 dose of buparlisib, had at least 1 evaluable post-treatment concentration, received adequate doses of buparlisib and letrozole prior to full PK assessment, did not vomit within 4 hours of buparlisib or letrozole dosing on the day of full PK and had an evaluable full PK profile.
| Arm | Measure | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Buparlisib PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 1 Day 1 | 760 ng/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 86.7 |
Buparlisib PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 1 Day 1
Summary of primary PK parameters for Buparlisib plasma concentration
Time frame: 0, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 24 hours post-dose at Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Population: The BKM FPAS included participants who received at least 1 dose of buparlisib, had at least 1 evaluable post-treatment concentration, received adequate doses of buparlisib and letrozole prior to full PK assessment, did not vomit within 4 hours of buparlisib or letrozole dosing on the day of full PK and had an evaluable full PK profile.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Buparlisib PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 1 Day 1 | AUC0-24 | 6420 ng*hr/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 60 |
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Buparlisib PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 1 Day 1 | AUClast | 4820 ng*hr/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 123 |
Buparlisib PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 1 Day 1
Summary of primary PK parameters for buparlisib plasma concentration
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Population: Buparlisib Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set (BKM PAS): The BKM PAS included all participants who received at least one dose of buparlisib and had at least one evaluable post-treatment buparlisib concentration measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Buparlisib PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 1 Day 1 | 1.03 hr |
Buparlisib PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 4 Day 1
Summary of primary PK parameters for buparlisib plasma concentration
Time frame: Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Population: Buparlisib Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set (BKM PAS): The BKM PAS included all participants who received at least one dose of buparlisib and had at least one evaluable post-treatment buparlisib concentration measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Buparlisib PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 4 Day 1 | 3 hr |
Letrozole and PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 1 Day 1
Summary of primary PK parameters for Letrozole plasma concentration
Time frame: 0, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 24 hours post-dose at Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Population: The LZ FPAS included participants who received at least 1 dose of letrozole, had at least 1 evaluable post-treatment letrozole concentration, received adequate doses of letrozole prior to full PK assessment, did not vomit within 4 hours of letrozole dosing on the day of full PK and had an evaluable full PK profile.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Letrozole and PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 1 Day 1 | AUC0-24 | 433 ng*hr/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 36.3 |
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Letrozole and PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 1 Day 1 | AUClast | 314 ng*hr/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 96.9 |
| Placebo + Letrozole | Letrozole and PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 1 Day 1 | AUC0-24 | 427 ng*hr/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 28.8 |
| Placebo + Letrozole | Letrozole and PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 1 Day 1 | AUClast | 347 ng*hr/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 49.6 |
Letrozole PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 1 Day 1
Summary of primary PK parameters for letrozole plasma concentration
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Population: The LZ FPAS included participants who received at least 1 dose of letrozole, had at least 1 evaluable post-treatment letrozole concentration, received adequate doses of letrozole prior to full PK assessment, did not vomit within 4 hours of letrozole dosing on the day of full PK and had an evaluable full PK profile.
| Arm | Measure | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Letrozole PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 1 Day 1 | 30.2 ng/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 33.2 |
| Placebo + Letrozole | Letrozole PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 1 Day 1 | 28 ng/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 42.3 |
Letrozole PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 4 Day 1
Summary of primary PK parameters for letrozole plasma concentration
Time frame: Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Population: The LZ FPAS included participants who received at least 1 dose of letrozole, had at least 1 evaluable post-treatment letrozole concentration, received adequate doses of letrozole prior to full PK assessment, did not vomit within 4 hours of letrozole dosing on the day of full PK and had an evaluable full PK profile.
| Arm | Measure | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Letrozole PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 4 Day 1 | 75.6 ng/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 6.84 |
| Placebo + Letrozole | Letrozole PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 4 Day 1 | 103 ng/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 30 |
Letrozole PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 4 Day 1
Summary of primary PK parameters for Letrozole plasma concentration
Time frame: 0, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 24 hours post-dose at Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Population: Letrozole Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set (LZ PAS): The LZ PAS included all participants who received at least one dose of letrozole and had at least one evaluable post-treatment letrozole concentration measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Letrozole PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 4 Day 1 | AUC0-24 | 1280 ng*hr/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 18 |
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Letrozole PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 4 Day 1 | AUClast | 1280 ng*hr/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 17.9 |
| Placebo + Letrozole | Letrozole PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 4 Day 1 | AUC0-24 | 1810 ng*hr/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 33.1 |
| Placebo + Letrozole | Letrozole PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 4 Day 1 | AUClast | 1440 ng*hr/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 66.7 |
Letrozole PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 1 Day 1
Summary of primary PK parameters for letrozole plasma concentration
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Population: The LZ FPAS included participants who received at least 1 dose of letrozole, had at least 1 evaluable post-treatment letrozole concentration, received adequate doses of letrozole prior to full PK assessment, did not vomit within 4 hours of letrozole dosing on the day of full PK and had an evaluable full PK profile.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Letrozole PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 1 Day 1 | 1.03 hr |
| Placebo + Letrozole | Letrozole PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 1 Day 1 | 2.25 hr |
Letrozole PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 4 Day 1
Summary of primary PK parameters for letrozole plasma concentration
Time frame: Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Population: The LZ FPAS included participants who received at least 1 dose of letrozole, had at least 1 evaluable post-treatment letrozole concentration, received adequate doses of letrozole prior to full PK assessment, did not vomit within 4 hours of letrozole dosing on the day of full PK and had an evaluable full PK profile.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Letrozole PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 4 Day 1 | 2 hr |
| Placebo + Letrozole | Letrozole PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 4 Day 1 | 1.17 hr |
pCR and Objective Response Rate According to RECIST 1.1 Criteria Per Investigator Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo in PIK3CA Mutant Cohort Based on ctDNA
pCR and Objective response rate according to RECIST 1.1 per investigator assessment after 24 weeks of treatment
Time frame: After 24 weeks of treatment
Population: The FAS comprised all randomized participants. This analysis was to be done in patients with PIK3CA mutation based on Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Data could not be reported as the ctDNA analysis was not done after the primary endpoint was negative.
pCR and Objective Response Rate According to RECIST 1.1 Criteria Per Investigator Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo in PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort Based on ctDNA
pCR and Objective response rate according to RECIST 1.1 per investigator assessment after 24 weeks of treatment
Time frame: After 24 weeks of treatment
Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) comprised all randomized participants in the study. This analysis was to be done in PIK3CA wild-type patients based on Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Data could not be reported in this table as the ctDNA analysis was not done after the primary endpoint was negative.
Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index (PEPI) Response as Per Central Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort
Preoperative endocrine prognostic index (PEPI) response as per central assessment for alpelisib vs. placebo - PIK3CA mutant cohort. The total PEPI score assigned to each patient is the sum of the risk points derived from the pT stage, pN stage, Ki67 level, and ER status of the surgical specimen (Ellis et al, Contemp Clin Trials 2008). The PEPI score ranges from 0 to to 12, and a higher score means a worse outcome. PEPI response is defined as a PEPI score of 0.
Time frame: At the time of surgery (expected after 24 weeks of treatment)
Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) for the PIK3CA mutant cohort comprised all randomized participants who were assigned to the PIK3CA mutant cohort based on tumor tissue for the randomization.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index (PEPI) Response as Per Central Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort | 1 Number of participants |
| Placebo + Letrozole | Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index (PEPI) Response as Per Central Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort | 0 Number of participants |
Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index (PEPI) Response as Per Central Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort
Preoperative endocrine prognostic index (PEPI) response as per central assessment for alpelisib vs. placebo - PIK3CA wild-type cohort. The total PEPI score assigned to each patient is the sum of the risk points derived from the pT stage, pN stage, Ki67 level, and ER status of the surgical specimen (Ellis et al, Contemp Clin Trials 2008). The PEPI score ranges from 0 to to 12, and a higher score means a worse outcome. PEPI response is defined as a PEPI score of 0.
Time frame: At the time of surgery (expected after 24 weeks of treatment)
Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) for the PIK3CA wild-type cohort comprised all randomized participants who were assigned to the PIK3CA wild-type cohort based on tumor tissue for the randomization.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index (PEPI) Response as Per Central Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort | 1 Number of participants |
| Placebo + Letrozole | Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index (PEPI) Response as Per Central Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort | 1 Number of participants |
Rate of Breast Conserving Surgery for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort
Breast conserving surgery is defined for participants who underwent surgery and did not have a mastectomy. The row no surgery provides the number of patients who did not undergo surgery at all for various reasons.
Time frame: After 24 weeks of treatment
Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) for the PIK3CA mutant cohort comprised all randomized participants who were assigned to the PIK3CA mutant cohort based on tumor tissue for the randomization. PIK3CA mutation is based on tumor tissue.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Rate of Breast Conserving Surgery for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort | Breast conserving surgery | 56.7 Percentage of participants |
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Rate of Breast Conserving Surgery for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort | No Surgery | 15.0 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo + Letrozole | Rate of Breast Conserving Surgery for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort | Breast conserving surgery | 50.7 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo + Letrozole | Rate of Breast Conserving Surgery for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort | No Surgery | 9.0 Percentage of participants |
Rate of Breast Conserving Surgery for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort
Breast conserving surgery is defined as the percentage of participants with no mastectomy following completion of 24 weeks of treatment. Breast conserving surgery is defined for participants who underwent surgery and did not have a mastectomy. The row no surgery provides the number of patients who did not undergo surgery at all for various reasons.
Time frame: After 24 weeks of treatment
Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) for the PIK3CA wild-type cohort comprised all randomized participants who were assigned to the PIK3CA wild-type cohort based on tumor tissue for the randomization. PIK3CA mutation is based on tumor tissue.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Rate of Breast Conserving Surgery for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort | Breast conserving surgery | 50.7 Percentage of participants |
| Alpelisib + Letrozole | Rate of Breast Conserving Surgery for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort | No Surgery | 18.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo + Letrozole | Rate of Breast Conserving Surgery for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort | Breast conserving surgery | 62.7 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo + Letrozole | Rate of Breast Conserving Surgery for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort | No Surgery | 8.5 Percentage of participants |