Skip to content

Study of Letrozole With or Without BYL719 or Buparlisib, for the Neoadjuvant Treatment of Postmenopausal Women

A Phase II Randomized, Double-blind Placebo Controlled, Study of Letrozole With or Without BYL719 or Buparlisib, for the Neoadjuvant Treatment of Postmenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor-positive HER2-negative Breast Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01923168
Enrollment
340
Registered
2013-08-15
Start date
2014-03-11
Completion date
2017-07-08
Last updated
2018-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Keywords

BYL719, alpelisib, Breast Cancer, BKM120, buparlisib, Pathological Complete Response, neoadjuvant, hormone receptor-positive, HER2 negative, Objective Response Rate

Brief summary

The purpose of the study was to determine whether treatment with a PI3K inhibitor plus letrozole led to an increase in pathologic clinical response and Objective Response Rate compared to treatment with placebo plus letrozole in patients with Breast cancer.

Interventions

DRUGalpelisib

BYL719 + Letrozole

BKM120 + Letrozole

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo (of BYL719 or BKM120) + Letrozole

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patient is an adult, female ≥ 18 years old at the time of informed consent 2. Patient has a histologically and/or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of breast cancer 3. Patient is postmenopausal. 4. Patient has T1c-T3, any N, M0, operable breast cancer 5. Patients must have measurable disease 6. Patient has diagnostic biopsy available for the analysis of PIK3CA mutation and Ki67 level. 7. Patient has estrogen-receptor and/or progesterone positive breast cancer as per local laboratory testing 8. Patient has HER2 negative breast cancer defined as a negative in situ hybridization test or an IHC status of 0 or 1+ as per local laboratory testing

Exclusion criteria

1. Patient has locally recurrent or metastatic disease 2. Patient has received any systemic therapy (e.g. chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy) or radiotherapy for current breast cancer disease before randomization. 3. Patient with type 1 diabetes mellitus or not adequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus 4. History of acute pancreatitis within 1 year of study entry 5. Uncontrolled hypertension

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pathological Complete Response (pCR) Per Investigator Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo for PIK3CA Mutant CohortAfter 24 weeks of treatmentPathologic complete response (pCR) defined as absence of any residual invasive cancer on hematoxylin and eosin evaluation of the resected breast specimen and all sampled ipsilateral lymph nodes following completion of 24 weeks of treatment by local assessment (ypT0/Tis ypN0). Patients who experienced progression of disease while undergoing neoadjuvant therapy, or who did not receive surgery for any reason, or received antineoplastic treatment other than study drug(s) before surgery were considered as non-responders for the calculation of pCR rate.
Pathological Complete Response (pCR) Per Investigator Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo for PIK3CA Wild-type CohortAfter 24 weeks of treatmentPathologic complete response (pCR) defined as absence of any residual invasive cancer on hematoxylin and eosin evaluation of the resected breast specimen and all sampled ipsilateral lymph nodes following completion of 24 weeks of treatment by local assessment (ypT0/Tis ypN0). Patients who experienced progression of disease while undergoing neoadjuvant therapy, or who did not receive surgery for any reason, or received antineoplastic treatment other than study drug(s) before surgery were considered as non-responders for the calculation of pCR rate.
Objective Response Rate Per Investigator Assessment According to RECIST 1.1 for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant CohortAfter 24 weeks of treatmentObjective Response Rate (ORR) defined as the proportion of patients with a Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) based on local investigator's assessment according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST) 1.1. BOR was assessed per MRI or Ultrasound and defined as per RECIST 1.1 as CR for a disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions (TL)/non-target lesions (NTL) and a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes assigned as TL/NTL and no new lesion; as PR if not qualifying for CR but with a decrease from baseline ≥ 30% in the sum of diameter of all TL, no progression of NTL and no new lesion.
Objective Response Rate According to RECIST 1.1 Per Investigator Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type CohortAfter 24 weeks of treatmentObjective Response Rate (ORR) defined as the proportion of patients with a Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) based on local investigator's assessment according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST) 1.1. BOR was assessed per MRI or Ultrasound and defined as per RECIST 1.1 as CR for a disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions (TL)/non-target lesions (NTL) and a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes assigned as TL/NTL and no new lesion; as PR if not qualifying for CR but with a decrease from baseline ≥ 30% in the sum of diameter of all TL, no progression of NTL and no new lesion.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort: Responders as Per pCRBaseline, Cycle 1 Day 15 (each cycle is 28 days) and surgery (End of Treatment (EOT) expected after 24 weeks of treatment)Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort: Responders as Per pCR
Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort: Non-responders as Per pCRBaseline, Cycle 1 Day 15 (each cycle is 28 days ) and surgery (End of Treatment (EOT) expected after 24 weeks of treatment)Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort: Non-responders as Per pCR.
Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort: Responders as Per pCRBaseline, Cycle 1 Day 15 (each cycle is 28 days) and surgery (End of Treatment (EOT) expected after 24 weeks of treatment)Association between pCR and changes in Ki67 from baseline for alpelisib vs. placebo - PIK3CA wild-type cohort: responders as per pCR
Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort: Non-responders as Per pCRBaseline, Cycle 1 Day 15 (each cycle is 28 days) and surgery (End of Treatment (EOT) expected after 24 weeks of treatment)Association between pCR and changes in Ki67 from baseline for alpelisib vs. placebo - PIK3CA wild-type cohort: non-responders as per pCR
Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index (PEPI) Response as Per Central Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant CohortAt the time of surgery (expected after 24 weeks of treatment)Preoperative endocrine prognostic index (PEPI) response as per central assessment for alpelisib vs. placebo - PIK3CA mutant cohort. The total PEPI score assigned to each patient is the sum of the risk points derived from the pT stage, pN stage, Ki67 level, and ER status of the surgical specimen (Ellis et al, Contemp Clin Trials 2008). The PEPI score ranges from 0 to to 12, and a higher score means a worse outcome. PEPI response is defined as a PEPI score of 0.
Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index (PEPI) Response as Per Central Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type CohortAt the time of surgery (expected after 24 weeks of treatment)Preoperative endocrine prognostic index (PEPI) response as per central assessment for alpelisib vs. placebo - PIK3CA wild-type cohort. The total PEPI score assigned to each patient is the sum of the risk points derived from the pT stage, pN stage, Ki67 level, and ER status of the surgical specimen (Ellis et al, Contemp Clin Trials 2008). The PEPI score ranges from 0 to to 12, and a higher score means a worse outcome. PEPI response is defined as a PEPI score of 0.
Alpelisib PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 1 Day 10, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 24 hours post-dose at Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)Summary of primary PK parameters for alpelisib plasma concentration
Alpelisib PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)Summary of primary PK parameters for alpelisib plasma concentration
Alpelisib and PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)Summary of primary PK parameters for alpelisib plasma concentration
Alpelisib PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 4 Day 10, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 24 hours post-dose at Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)Summary of primary PK parameters for alpelisib plasma concentration
Alpelisib PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 4 Day 1Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)Summary of primary PK parameters for alpelisib plasma concentration
Alpelisib PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 4 Day 1Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)Summary of primary PK parameters for alpelisib plasma concentration
pCR and Objective Response Rate According to RECIST 1.1 Criteria Per Investigator Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo in PIK3CA Mutant Cohort Based on ctDNAAfter 24 weeks of treatmentpCR and Objective response rate according to RECIST 1.1 per investigator assessment after 24 weeks of treatment
Letrozole PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)Summary of primary PK parameters for letrozole plasma concentration
Letrozole PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)Summary of primary PK parameters for letrozole plasma concentration
Letrozole PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 4 Day 10, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 24 hours post-dose at Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)Summary of primary PK parameters for Letrozole plasma concentration
Letrozole PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 4 Day 1Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)Summary of primary PK parameters for letrozole plasma concentration
Letrozole PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 4 Day 1Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)Summary of primary PK parameters for letrozole plasma concentration
Buparlisib PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 1 Day 10, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 24 hours post-dose at Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)Summary of primary PK parameters for Buparlisib plasma concentration
Buparlisib PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)Summary of primary PK parameters for buparlisib plasma concentration
Buparlisib PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)Summary of primary PK parameters for buparlisib plasma concentration
Buparlisib PK Parameter: AUClast at Cycle 4 Day 10, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 24 hours post-dose at Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)Summary of primary PK parameters for Buparlisib plasma concentration
Buparlisb PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 4 Day 1Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)Summary of primary PK parameters for buparlisib plasma concentration
Buparlisib PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 4 Day 1Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)Summary of primary PK parameters for buparlisib plasma concentration
Letrozole and PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 1 Day 10, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 24 hours post-dose at Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)Summary of primary PK parameters for Letrozole plasma concentration
pCR and Objective Response Rate According to RECIST 1.1 Criteria Per Investigator Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo in PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort Based on ctDNAAfter 24 weeks of treatmentpCR and Objective response rate according to RECIST 1.1 per investigator assessment after 24 weeks of treatment
Rate of Breast Conserving Surgery for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant CohortAfter 24 weeks of treatmentBreast conserving surgery is defined for participants who underwent surgery and did not have a mastectomy. The row no surgery provides the number of patients who did not undergo surgery at all for various reasons.
Rate of Breast Conserving Surgery for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type CohortAfter 24 weeks of treatmentBreast conserving surgery is defined as the percentage of participants with no mastectomy following completion of 24 weeks of treatment. Breast conserving surgery is defined for participants who underwent surgery and did not have a mastectomy. The row no surgery provides the number of patients who did not undergo surgery at all for various reasons.

Countries

Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Colombia, Czechia, Germany, Hong Kong, Israel, Italy, Japan, Lebanon, Netherlands, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of approximately 320 patients were planned to be randomized: this was based on 60 patients per arm in each cohort (PIK3CA mutant and PIK3CA wild-type) for the alpelisib+letrozole and placebo+letrozole arms, plus the estimated number of patients randomized to buparlisib+letrozole arm at the time this arm was discontinued.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Alpelisib + Letrozole
Participants took alpelisib 300 mg once daily plus letrozole 2.5 mg once daily.
131
Buparlisib + Letrozole
Participants took buparlisib 100 mg once daily or 5 days on/2 days off plus letrozole 2.5 mg once daily.
83
Placebo + Letrozole
Participants took matching Placebo (of alpelisib 300 mg once daily/buparlisib 100 mg once daily or 5 days on/2 days off) plus Letrozole 2.5 mg once daily.
126
Total340

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event12120
Overall StudyDeath001
Overall StudyPhysician Decision695
Overall StudyProgressive disease437
Overall StudyProtocol Violation110
Overall StudySubject/guardian decision14144

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAlpelisib + LetrozoleBuparlisib + LetrozolePlacebo + LetrozoleTotal
Age, Continuous64.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.53
65.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.61
63.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.31
64.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.49
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
7 Participants4 Participants10 Participants21 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
3 Participants3 Participants5 Participants11 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
3 Participants6 Participants3 Participants12 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
117 Participants68 Participants105 Participants290 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
131 Participants83 Participants126 Participants340 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 1300 / 811 / 125
other
Total, other adverse events
126 / 13080 / 81106 / 125
serious
Total, serious adverse events
21 / 13022 / 816 / 125

Outcome results

Primary

Objective Response Rate According to RECIST 1.1 Per Investigator Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort

Objective Response Rate (ORR) defined as the proportion of patients with a Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) based on local investigator's assessment according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST) 1.1. BOR was assessed per MRI or Ultrasound and defined as per RECIST 1.1 as CR for a disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions (TL)/non-target lesions (NTL) and a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes assigned as TL/NTL and no new lesion; as PR if not qualifying for CR but with a decrease from baseline ≥ 30% in the sum of diameter of all TL, no progression of NTL and no new lesion.

Time frame: After 24 weeks of treatment

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) for the PIK3CA wild-type cohort comprised all randomized participants who were assigned to the PIK3CA wild-type cohort based on tumor tissue for the randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Alpelisib + LetrozoleObjective Response Rate According to RECIST 1.1 Per Investigator Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort63.4 Percentage of Participants
Placebo + LetrozoleObjective Response Rate According to RECIST 1.1 Per Investigator Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort61.0 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.61180% CI: [-8.4, 13.2]Posterior mean diff. & credible interval
Primary

Objective Response Rate Per Investigator Assessment According to RECIST 1.1 for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort

Objective Response Rate (ORR) defined as the proportion of patients with a Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) based on local investigator's assessment according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST) 1.1. BOR was assessed per MRI or Ultrasound and defined as per RECIST 1.1 as CR for a disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions (TL)/non-target lesions (NTL) and a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes assigned as TL/NTL and no new lesion; as PR if not qualifying for CR but with a decrease from baseline ≥ 30% in the sum of diameter of all TL, no progression of NTL and no new lesion.

Time frame: After 24 weeks of treatment

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) for the PIK3CA mutant cohort comprised all randomized participants who were assigned to the PIK3CA mutant cohort based on tumor tissue for the randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Alpelisib + LetrozoleObjective Response Rate Per Investigator Assessment According to RECIST 1.1 for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort43.3 Percentage of Participants
Placebo + LetrozoleObjective Response Rate Per Investigator Assessment According to RECIST 1.1 for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort44.8 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.43580% CI: [-12.5, 9.7]Posterior mean diff. & credible interval
Primary

Pathological Complete Response (pCR) Per Investigator Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo for PIK3CA Mutant Cohort

Pathologic complete response (pCR) defined as absence of any residual invasive cancer on hematoxylin and eosin evaluation of the resected breast specimen and all sampled ipsilateral lymph nodes following completion of 24 weeks of treatment by local assessment (ypT0/Tis ypN0). Patients who experienced progression of disease while undergoing neoadjuvant therapy, or who did not receive surgery for any reason, or received antineoplastic treatment other than study drug(s) before surgery were considered as non-responders for the calculation of pCR rate.

Time frame: After 24 weeks of treatment

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) for the PIK3CA mutant cohort comprised all randomized participants who were assigned to the PIK3CA mutant cohort based on tumor tissue for the randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Alpelisib + LetrozolePathological Complete Response (pCR) Per Investigator Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo for PIK3CA Mutant Cohort1.7 Percentage of Participants
Placebo + LetrozolePathological Complete Response (pCR) Per Investigator Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo for PIK3CA Mutant Cohort3.0 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.28280% CI: [-4.5, 1.7]Posterior mean diff. & credible interval
Primary

Pathological Complete Response (pCR) Per Investigator Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo for PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort

Pathologic complete response (pCR) defined as absence of any residual invasive cancer on hematoxylin and eosin evaluation of the resected breast specimen and all sampled ipsilateral lymph nodes following completion of 24 weeks of treatment by local assessment (ypT0/Tis ypN0). Patients who experienced progression of disease while undergoing neoadjuvant therapy, or who did not receive surgery for any reason, or received antineoplastic treatment other than study drug(s) before surgery were considered as non-responders for the calculation of pCR rate.

Time frame: After 24 weeks of treatment

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) for the PIK3CA wild-type cohort comprised all randomized participants who were assigned to the PIK3CA wild-type cohort based on tumor tissue for the randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Alpelisib + LetrozolePathological Complete Response (pCR) Per Investigator Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo for PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort2.8 Percentage of Participants
Placebo + LetrozolePathological Complete Response (pCR) Per Investigator Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo for PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort1.7 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.69780% CI: [-1.9, 4.2]Posterior mean difference
Secondary

Alpelisib and PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 1 Day 1

Summary of primary PK parameters for alpelisib plasma concentration

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)

Population: Alpelisib Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set (BYL PAS): The BYL PAS included all participants who received at least one dose of alpelisib and had at least one evaluable post-treatment alpelisib concentration measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Alpelisib + LetrozoleAlpelisib and PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 1 Day 12.93 HR
Secondary

Alpelisib PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 1 Day 1

Summary of primary PK parameters for alpelisib plasma concentration

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)

Population: The BYL FPAS included participants who received at least 1 dose of alpelisib, had at least 1 evaluable post-treatment alpelisib concentration, received adequate doses of alpelisib and letrozole prior to full PK assessment, did not vomit within 4 hours of alpelisib or letrozole dosing on the day of full PK and had an evaluable full PK profile.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Alpelisib + LetrozoleAlpelisib PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 1 Day 13160 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 25.3
Secondary

Alpelisib PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 4 Day 1

Summary of primary PK parameters for alpelisib plasma concentration

Time frame: Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)

Population: Alpelisib Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set (BYL PAS): The BYL PAS included all participants who received at least one dose of alpelisib and had at least one evaluable post-treatment alpelisib concentration measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Alpelisib + LetrozoleAlpelisib PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 4 Day 13260 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 26.7
Secondary

Alpelisib PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 1 Day 1

Summary of primary PK parameters for alpelisib plasma concentration

Time frame: 0, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 24 hours post-dose at Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)

Population: The BYL FPAS included participants who received at least 1 dose of alpelisib, had at least 1 evaluable post-treatment alpelisib concentration, received adequate doses of alpelisib and letrozole prior to full PK assessment, did not vomit within 4 hours of alpelisib or letrozole dosing on the day of full PK and had an evaluable full PK profile.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Alpelisib + LetrozoleAlpelisib PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 1 Day 1AUClast27300 ng*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 68.6
Alpelisib + LetrozoleAlpelisib PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 1 Day 1AUC0-2430800 ng*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 20.6
Secondary

Alpelisib PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 4 Day 1

Summary of primary PK parameters for alpelisib plasma concentration

Time frame: 0, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 24 hours post-dose at Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)

Population: The BYL FPAS included participants who received at least 1 dose of alpelisib, had at least 1 evaluable post-treatment alpelisib concentration, received adequate doses of alpelisib and letrozole prior to full PK assessment, did not vomit within 4 hours of alpelisib or letrozole dosing on the day of full PK and had an evaluable full PK profile.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Alpelisib + LetrozoleAlpelisib PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 4 Day 1AUC0-2438000 ng*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 13.2
Alpelisib + LetrozoleAlpelisib PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 4 Day 1AUClast38000 ng*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 13.1
Secondary

Alpelisib PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 4 Day 1

Summary of primary PK parameters for alpelisib plasma concentration

Time frame: Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)

Population: Alpelisib Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set (BYL PAS): The BYL PAS included all participants who received at least one dose of alpelisib and had at least one evaluable post-treatment alpelisib concentration measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Alpelisib + LetrozoleAlpelisib PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 4 Day 12.99 hr
Secondary

Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort: Non-responders as Per pCR

Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort: Non-responders as Per pCR.

Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 15 (each cycle is 28 days ) and surgery (End of Treatment (EOT) expected after 24 weeks of treatment)

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) for the PIK3CA mutant cohort comprised all randomized participants who were assigned to the PIK3CA mutant cohort based on tumor tissue for the randomization. Only non-responders as per pCR are considered for this analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Alpelisib + LetrozoleAssociation Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort: Non-responders as Per pCRBaseline14.0 Percentage of positive cells
Alpelisib + LetrozoleAssociation Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort: Non-responders as Per pCRC1D15 % change from Baseline-62.5 Percentage of positive cells
Alpelisib + LetrozoleAssociation Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort: Non-responders as Per pCREOT % change from Baseline-51.2 Percentage of positive cells
Placebo + LetrozoleAssociation Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort: Non-responders as Per pCRBaseline13.0 Percentage of positive cells
Placebo + LetrozoleAssociation Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort: Non-responders as Per pCRC1D15 % change from Baseline-60.0 Percentage of positive cells
Placebo + LetrozoleAssociation Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort: Non-responders as Per pCREOT % change from Baseline-60.0 Percentage of positive cells
Secondary

Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort: Responders as Per pCR

Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort: Responders as Per pCR

Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 15 (each cycle is 28 days) and surgery (End of Treatment (EOT) expected after 24 weeks of treatment)

Population: The FAS for the PIK3CA mutant cohort comprised all randomized participants who were assigned to the PIK3CA mutant cohort based on tumor tissue for the randomization. Only responders as per pCR were considered for this analysis. No patient had data reported at end of trial (EOT), hence the percent change from baseline at EOT could not be reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Alpelisib + LetrozoleAssociation Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort: Responders as Per pCRBaseline5.0 Percentage of positive cells
Alpelisib + LetrozoleAssociation Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort: Responders as Per pCRC1D15: % change from Baseline-80.0 Percentage of positive cells
Placebo + LetrozoleAssociation Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort: Responders as Per pCRBaseline11.0 Percentage of positive cells
Placebo + LetrozoleAssociation Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort: Responders as Per pCRC1D15: % change from Baseline80.0 Percentage of positive cells
Secondary

Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort: Non-responders as Per pCR

Association between pCR and changes in Ki67 from baseline for alpelisib vs. placebo - PIK3CA wild-type cohort: non-responders as per pCR

Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 15 (each cycle is 28 days) and surgery (End of Treatment (EOT) expected after 24 weeks of treatment)

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) for the PIK3CA wild-type cohort comprised all randomized participants who were assigned to the PIK3CA wild-type cohort based on tumor tissue for the randomization. Only non-responders as per pCR are considered for this analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Alpelisib + LetrozoleAssociation Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort: Non-responders as Per pCRBaseline16.0 Percentage of positive cells
Alpelisib + LetrozoleAssociation Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort: Non-responders as Per pCRC1D15 % change from Baseline-60.0 Percentage of positive cells
Alpelisib + LetrozoleAssociation Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort: Non-responders as Per pCREOT % change from Baseline-60.0 Percentage of positive cells
Placebo + LetrozoleAssociation Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort: Non-responders as Per pCRBaseline18.0 Percentage of positive cells
Placebo + LetrozoleAssociation Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort: Non-responders as Per pCRC1D15 % change from Baseline-52.0 Percentage of positive cells
Placebo + LetrozoleAssociation Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort: Non-responders as Per pCREOT % change from Baseline-71.1 Percentage of positive cells
Secondary

Association Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort: Responders as Per pCR

Association between pCR and changes in Ki67 from baseline for alpelisib vs. placebo - PIK3CA wild-type cohort: responders as per pCR

Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 15 (each cycle is 28 days) and surgery (End of Treatment (EOT) expected after 24 weeks of treatment)

Population: FAS for PIK3CA wild-type cohort comprised all rand. Parts. assigned to PIK3CA wild-type cohort based on tumor tissue for rand. Only responders as per pCR were considered for this analysis. No patient had data reported at C1D15 \& EOT for Placebo, hence percent change from baseline could not be reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Alpelisib + LetrozoleAssociation Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort: Responders as Per pCRBaseline16.5 Percentage of positive cells
Alpelisib + LetrozoleAssociation Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort: Responders as Per pCRC1D15: % change from Baseline-80.0 Percentage of positive cells
Alpelisib + LetrozoleAssociation Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort: Responders as Per pCREOT % change from Baseline-45.0 Percentage of positive cells
Placebo + LetrozoleAssociation Between pCR and Changes in Ki67 From Baseline for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort: Responders as Per pCRBaseline20.0 Percentage of positive cells
Secondary

Buparlisb PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 4 Day 1

Summary of primary PK parameters for buparlisib plasma concentration

Time frame: Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)

Population: Buparlisib Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set (BKM PAS): The BKM PAS included all participants who received at least one dose of buparlisib and had at least one evaluable post-treatment buparlisib concentration measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Alpelisib + LetrozoleBuparlisb PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 4 Day 1610 ng/mL
Secondary

Buparlisib PK Parameter: AUClast at Cycle 4 Day 1

Summary of primary PK parameters for Buparlisib plasma concentration

Time frame: 0, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 24 hours post-dose at Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)

Population: BKM FPAS: The BKM FPAS included participants who received at least 1 dose of buparlisib, had at least 1 evaluable post-treatment concentration, received adequate doses of buparlisib and letrozole prior to full PK assessment, did not vomit within 4 hours of buparlisib or letrozole dosing on the day of full PK and had an evaluable full PK profile.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Alpelisib + LetrozoleBuparlisib PK Parameter: AUClast at Cycle 4 Day 110400 ng*hr/mL
Secondary

Buparlisib PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 1 Day 1

Summary of primary PK parameters for buparlisib plasma concentration

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)

Population: The BKM FPAS included participants who received at least 1 dose of buparlisib, had at least 1 evaluable post-treatment concentration, received adequate doses of buparlisib and letrozole prior to full PK assessment, did not vomit within 4 hours of buparlisib or letrozole dosing on the day of full PK and had an evaluable full PK profile.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Alpelisib + LetrozoleBuparlisib PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 1 Day 1760 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 86.7
Secondary

Buparlisib PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 1 Day 1

Summary of primary PK parameters for Buparlisib plasma concentration

Time frame: 0, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 24 hours post-dose at Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)

Population: The BKM FPAS included participants who received at least 1 dose of buparlisib, had at least 1 evaluable post-treatment concentration, received adequate doses of buparlisib and letrozole prior to full PK assessment, did not vomit within 4 hours of buparlisib or letrozole dosing on the day of full PK and had an evaluable full PK profile.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Alpelisib + LetrozoleBuparlisib PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 1 Day 1AUC0-246420 ng*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 60
Alpelisib + LetrozoleBuparlisib PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 1 Day 1AUClast4820 ng*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 123
Secondary

Buparlisib PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 1 Day 1

Summary of primary PK parameters for buparlisib plasma concentration

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)

Population: Buparlisib Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set (BKM PAS): The BKM PAS included all participants who received at least one dose of buparlisib and had at least one evaluable post-treatment buparlisib concentration measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Alpelisib + LetrozoleBuparlisib PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 1 Day 11.03 hr
Secondary

Buparlisib PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 4 Day 1

Summary of primary PK parameters for buparlisib plasma concentration

Time frame: Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)

Population: Buparlisib Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set (BKM PAS): The BKM PAS included all participants who received at least one dose of buparlisib and had at least one evaluable post-treatment buparlisib concentration measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Alpelisib + LetrozoleBuparlisib PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 4 Day 13 hr
Secondary

Letrozole and PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 1 Day 1

Summary of primary PK parameters for Letrozole plasma concentration

Time frame: 0, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 24 hours post-dose at Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)

Population: The LZ FPAS included participants who received at least 1 dose of letrozole, had at least 1 evaluable post-treatment letrozole concentration, received adequate doses of letrozole prior to full PK assessment, did not vomit within 4 hours of letrozole dosing on the day of full PK and had an evaluable full PK profile.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Alpelisib + LetrozoleLetrozole and PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 1 Day 1AUC0-24433 ng*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 36.3
Alpelisib + LetrozoleLetrozole and PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 1 Day 1AUClast314 ng*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 96.9
Placebo + LetrozoleLetrozole and PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 1 Day 1AUC0-24427 ng*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 28.8
Placebo + LetrozoleLetrozole and PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 1 Day 1AUClast347 ng*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 49.6
Secondary

Letrozole PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 1 Day 1

Summary of primary PK parameters for letrozole plasma concentration

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)

Population: The LZ FPAS included participants who received at least 1 dose of letrozole, had at least 1 evaluable post-treatment letrozole concentration, received adequate doses of letrozole prior to full PK assessment, did not vomit within 4 hours of letrozole dosing on the day of full PK and had an evaluable full PK profile.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Alpelisib + LetrozoleLetrozole PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 1 Day 130.2 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 33.2
Placebo + LetrozoleLetrozole PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 1 Day 128 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 42.3
Secondary

Letrozole PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 4 Day 1

Summary of primary PK parameters for letrozole plasma concentration

Time frame: Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)

Population: The LZ FPAS included participants who received at least 1 dose of letrozole, had at least 1 evaluable post-treatment letrozole concentration, received adequate doses of letrozole prior to full PK assessment, did not vomit within 4 hours of letrozole dosing on the day of full PK and had an evaluable full PK profile.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Alpelisib + LetrozoleLetrozole PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 4 Day 175.6 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 6.84
Placebo + LetrozoleLetrozole PK Parameter: Cmax at Cycle 4 Day 1103 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 30
Secondary

Letrozole PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 4 Day 1

Summary of primary PK parameters for Letrozole plasma concentration

Time frame: 0, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 24 hours post-dose at Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)

Population: Letrozole Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set (LZ PAS): The LZ PAS included all participants who received at least one dose of letrozole and had at least one evaluable post-treatment letrozole concentration measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Alpelisib + LetrozoleLetrozole PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 4 Day 1AUC0-241280 ng*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18
Alpelisib + LetrozoleLetrozole PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 4 Day 1AUClast1280 ng*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 17.9
Placebo + LetrozoleLetrozole PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 4 Day 1AUC0-241810 ng*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 33.1
Placebo + LetrozoleLetrozole PK Parameters: AUC0-24, AUClast at Cycle 4 Day 1AUClast1440 ng*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 66.7
Secondary

Letrozole PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 1 Day 1

Summary of primary PK parameters for letrozole plasma concentration

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)

Population: The LZ FPAS included participants who received at least 1 dose of letrozole, had at least 1 evaluable post-treatment letrozole concentration, received adequate doses of letrozole prior to full PK assessment, did not vomit within 4 hours of letrozole dosing on the day of full PK and had an evaluable full PK profile.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Alpelisib + LetrozoleLetrozole PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 1 Day 11.03 hr
Placebo + LetrozoleLetrozole PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 1 Day 12.25 hr
Secondary

Letrozole PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 4 Day 1

Summary of primary PK parameters for letrozole plasma concentration

Time frame: Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)

Population: The LZ FPAS included participants who received at least 1 dose of letrozole, had at least 1 evaluable post-treatment letrozole concentration, received adequate doses of letrozole prior to full PK assessment, did not vomit within 4 hours of letrozole dosing on the day of full PK and had an evaluable full PK profile.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Alpelisib + LetrozoleLetrozole PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 4 Day 12 hr
Placebo + LetrozoleLetrozole PK Parameter: Tmax at Cycle 4 Day 11.17 hr
Secondary

pCR and Objective Response Rate According to RECIST 1.1 Criteria Per Investigator Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo in PIK3CA Mutant Cohort Based on ctDNA

pCR and Objective response rate according to RECIST 1.1 per investigator assessment after 24 weeks of treatment

Time frame: After 24 weeks of treatment

Population: The FAS comprised all randomized participants. This analysis was to be done in patients with PIK3CA mutation based on Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Data could not be reported as the ctDNA analysis was not done after the primary endpoint was negative.

Secondary

pCR and Objective Response Rate According to RECIST 1.1 Criteria Per Investigator Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo in PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort Based on ctDNA

pCR and Objective response rate according to RECIST 1.1 per investigator assessment after 24 weeks of treatment

Time frame: After 24 weeks of treatment

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) comprised all randomized participants in the study. This analysis was to be done in PIK3CA wild-type patients based on Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Data could not be reported in this table as the ctDNA analysis was not done after the primary endpoint was negative.

Secondary

Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index (PEPI) Response as Per Central Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort

Preoperative endocrine prognostic index (PEPI) response as per central assessment for alpelisib vs. placebo - PIK3CA mutant cohort. The total PEPI score assigned to each patient is the sum of the risk points derived from the pT stage, pN stage, Ki67 level, and ER status of the surgical specimen (Ellis et al, Contemp Clin Trials 2008). The PEPI score ranges from 0 to to 12, and a higher score means a worse outcome. PEPI response is defined as a PEPI score of 0.

Time frame: At the time of surgery (expected after 24 weeks of treatment)

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) for the PIK3CA mutant cohort comprised all randomized participants who were assigned to the PIK3CA mutant cohort based on tumor tissue for the randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Alpelisib + LetrozolePreoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index (PEPI) Response as Per Central Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort1 Number of participants
Placebo + LetrozolePreoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index (PEPI) Response as Per Central Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort0 Number of participants
Secondary

Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index (PEPI) Response as Per Central Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort

Preoperative endocrine prognostic index (PEPI) response as per central assessment for alpelisib vs. placebo - PIK3CA wild-type cohort. The total PEPI score assigned to each patient is the sum of the risk points derived from the pT stage, pN stage, Ki67 level, and ER status of the surgical specimen (Ellis et al, Contemp Clin Trials 2008). The PEPI score ranges from 0 to to 12, and a higher score means a worse outcome. PEPI response is defined as a PEPI score of 0.

Time frame: At the time of surgery (expected after 24 weeks of treatment)

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) for the PIK3CA wild-type cohort comprised all randomized participants who were assigned to the PIK3CA wild-type cohort based on tumor tissue for the randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Alpelisib + LetrozolePreoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index (PEPI) Response as Per Central Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort1 Number of participants
Placebo + LetrozolePreoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index (PEPI) Response as Per Central Assessment for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort1 Number of participants
Secondary

Rate of Breast Conserving Surgery for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant Cohort

Breast conserving surgery is defined for participants who underwent surgery and did not have a mastectomy. The row no surgery provides the number of patients who did not undergo surgery at all for various reasons.

Time frame: After 24 weeks of treatment

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) for the PIK3CA mutant cohort comprised all randomized participants who were assigned to the PIK3CA mutant cohort based on tumor tissue for the randomization. PIK3CA mutation is based on tumor tissue.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Alpelisib + LetrozoleRate of Breast Conserving Surgery for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant CohortBreast conserving surgery56.7 Percentage of participants
Alpelisib + LetrozoleRate of Breast Conserving Surgery for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant CohortNo Surgery15.0 Percentage of participants
Placebo + LetrozoleRate of Breast Conserving Surgery for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant CohortBreast conserving surgery50.7 Percentage of participants
Placebo + LetrozoleRate of Breast Conserving Surgery for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Mutant CohortNo Surgery9.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Rate of Breast Conserving Surgery for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type Cohort

Breast conserving surgery is defined as the percentage of participants with no mastectomy following completion of 24 weeks of treatment. Breast conserving surgery is defined for participants who underwent surgery and did not have a mastectomy. The row no surgery provides the number of patients who did not undergo surgery at all for various reasons.

Time frame: After 24 weeks of treatment

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) for the PIK3CA wild-type cohort comprised all randomized participants who were assigned to the PIK3CA wild-type cohort based on tumor tissue for the randomization. PIK3CA mutation is based on tumor tissue.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Alpelisib + LetrozoleRate of Breast Conserving Surgery for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type CohortBreast conserving surgery50.7 Percentage of participants
Alpelisib + LetrozoleRate of Breast Conserving Surgery for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type CohortNo Surgery18.3 Percentage of participants
Placebo + LetrozoleRate of Breast Conserving Surgery for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type CohortBreast conserving surgery62.7 Percentage of participants
Placebo + LetrozoleRate of Breast Conserving Surgery for Alpelisib vs. Placebo - PIK3CA Wild-type CohortNo Surgery8.5 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026