Skip to content

Open-Label, Extension Study to Evaluate the Safety of Hydrocodone Bitartrate Extended-Release Tablets

A 6-Month, Open-Label, Extension Study to Evaluate the Safety of Hydrocodone Bitartrate Extended-Release Tablets (CEP-33237) at 15 to 90 mg Every 12 Hours for Relief of Moderate to Severe Pain in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain Who Require Opioid Treatment for an Extended Period of Time

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01922739
Enrollment
182
Registered
2013-08-14
Start date
2013-07-31
Completion date
2014-08-31
Last updated
2021-11-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Keywords

low back pain, hydrocodone bitartrate, opioids

Brief summary

This is a 6-month, nonrandomized, open-label extension study to assess the long-term safety of hydrocodone bitartrate extended-release (ER) tablets in patients with moderate to severe chronic low back pain who require continuous opioid treatment for an extended period of time. To be eligible for Study 3104, patients were required to have completed the entire double blind treatment period on study drug (either placebo or hydrocodone bitartrate ER tablets) through week 12 of Study 3103 (NCT01789970) and to have met the entry criteria for Study 3104.

Detailed description

Eligible patients from Study 3103 (NCT01789970) were enrolled for participation in this extension study. For these patients, the final study visit in Study 3103 was visit 1 for this study (also referred to as the titration or adjustment baseline visit, depending on whether the patient was enrolled under the original or amended protocol, respectively). The original protocol was amended after 26 patients had been enrolled in the study. Those who were enrolled under the original protocol participated in a double-blind titration period of up to approximately 4 weeks followed by an open-label treatment period of 22 weeks. Those patients who were enrolled under the amended protocol participated in an open-label adjustment period of up to approximately 3 weeks followed by an open-label treatment period of 22 weeks.

Interventions

Participants were instructed to take hydrocodone ER tablets orally with a glass of water on an empty stomach at least 1 hour before or 2 hours after eating.

DRUGPlacebo

During the double-blind titration period used in the original protocol, placebo tablets matching each dose of hydrocodone bitartrate ER tablets (active drug) were used to maintain the blind but not for purposes of comparison.

Sponsors

Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients must have participated in and completed the entire double-blind treatment period on study drug through the final study visit (week 12) of study 3103. NOTE: Patients who had a final on-treatment visit (i.e. prior to week 12) are not permitted to participate in study 3104. 2. The patient is able to speak English and is willing to provide written informed consent for study 3104, including re-signing a written opioid agreement, to participate in this study. 3. Women of childbearing potential (not surgically sterile or 2 years postmenopausal) must use a medically accepted method of contraception, agree to continue use of this method for the duration of the study and for 30 days after participation in the study, and have a negative pregnancy test at screening. Acceptable methods of contraception include barrier method with spermicide, intrauterine device (IUD), or steroidal contraceptive (oral, transdermal, implanted, and injected) in conjunction with a barrier method. NOTE: A woman will be considered surgically sterile if she has had a tubal ligation, hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy or bilateral oophorectomy, or hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. 4. The patient must be willing and able to successfully self-administer the study drug, comply with study restrictions, and return to the study center for scheduled study visits, as specified in the protocol. 5. The patient must not participate in any other study involving an investigational agent (excluding those who participated in study 3103) while enrolled in the present study.

Exclusion criteria

1. The patient's current source of pain is different from the low back pain the patient was experiencing at entry into study 3103. NOTE: Any additional source of pain for a patient must be discussed with the medical monitor. 2. The patient has current evidence of alcohol or other substance abuse with the exception of nicotine or caffeine. 3. The patient has developed, during study 3103, a medical or psychiatric disease (including suicidality) that, in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise collected data. 4. The patient is expected to have surgery during the study. 5. The patient is pregnant or lactating. 6. The patient has developed an active malignancy (excluding basal cell carcinoma) during study 3103. 7. The patient has known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). 8. In the judgment of the investigator, the patient has any clinically significant deviation from normal in the physical examination and/or clinical laboratory test values. 9. The patient has developed cardiopulmonary disease that would, in the opinion of the investigator, significantly increase the risk of treatment with opioids. 10. The patient is receiving a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI). * Other

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participants With Clinically Significant (CS) Hearing Changes From Baseline to the Final Visit in Pure Tone Audiometry Test ResultsBaseline was within two weeks of the final study visit in study 3103; during study exam was within two weeks of the end of trial visit for study 3104 (up to study week 26)Pure tone audiometry was performed by trained personnel. Hearing loss was classified in degrees of hearing from normal to profound. This classification was determined by the hearing threshold (or the softest sound detected at a specific frequency). The exact ranges that classified hearing loss depended on the exact technique used during testing and on the patient's age. These values were provided by each audiology laboratory that performed the test. For serial audiograms, the criteria for a clinically significant hearing change were based on guidance from the American Speech Language Hearing Association (ASHA 1994, cited in \[Konrad-Martin et al 2005\]). These criteria included the following: greater than 20 decibels (dB) pure tone threshold shift at 1 frequency; greater than 10 dB shift at 2 consecutive test frequencies; or threshold response shifting to no response at 3 consecutive test frequencies.
Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs ValuesDay 1 of the Titration/Adjustment Period to Week 22 of the Treatment Period (total of 25-26 weeks)Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) vital sign values. Significance criteria * Pulse - high: \>=120 and increase of \>= 15 beats/minute from baseline * Pulse - low: \<=50 and decrease of \>=15 beats/minute * Systolic blood pressure - high: \>=180 and increase \>=20 mmHg * Systolic blood pressure - low: \<=90 and decrease \>=20 mmHg * Diastolic blood pressure - high: \>=105 and increase of \>=15 mmHg * Diastolic blood pressure - low: \<=50 and decrease of \>=15 mmHg
Participants With Shifts From Normal to Abnormal in Physical Examination FindingsEnd of trial visit (up to week 22 of Open-label Treatment Period which is up to week 26 including the titration/adjustment period)The endpoint visit or early termination visit was an abbreviated exam. Endpoint refers to the last observation carried forward.
Shifts From Baseline to Endpoint (Treatment Period) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) FindingsBaseline (final visit for study 3103), End of trial visit (up to week 22 of Open-label Treatment Period which is up to week 26 including the titration/adjustment period)A 12-lead ECG was conducted at the final visit for study 3103 which is used as baseline for this study, and at week 22 of the treatment period \[or early termination\]). A qualified physician at the study center was responsible for providing interpretation of the ECG. Endpoint refers to the last observation carried forward.
Participants With Adverse EventsDay 1 of the Titration/Adjustment Period to Week 22 of the Treatment Period (total of 25-26 weeks)An adverse event (AE) was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an inability to carry out usual activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes.
Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory ValuesEnd of trial visit (up to week 22 of Open-label Treatment Period which is up to week 26 including the titration/adjustment period)Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant abnormal serum chemistry, hematology and urinalysis values. Significance criteria: * Blood urea nitrogen: \>=10.71 mmol/L * Creatinine: \>=177 μmol/L * Uric acid: M\>=625, F\>=506 μmol/L * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST): \>=3\* upper limit of normal (ULN) * Alkaline phosphatase: \>=3\* upper limit of normal (ULN) * Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT): \>=3\* upper limit of normal (ULN) * Serum white blood cells: \>=20 \* 10\^9/L * Hemoglobin: M\<=115, F\<=95 g/dL * Hematocrit: M\<0.37, F\<0.32 L/L * Eosinophils: \>=10.0 % * Platelets: \<=75 \* 10\^9/L * Absolute neutrophils: \<=1.0 \* 10\^9/L * Urinalysis: Glucose, Ketones, and Total Protein: \>=2 unit increase from baseline

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Average Pain Intensity (API) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitBaseline (Day 0 of Treatment Period), Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint during the Open-Label Treatment PeriodThe API was recorded daily by participants in an electronic diary using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS-11), a Likert-type scale in which 0=no pain and 10=the worst pain imaginable. Participants selected the number that best described their average pain intensity over the last 24 hours. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in pain control. Endpoint refers to the last observation carried forward.
Percentage of Participants Withdrawn From the Study For Lack of EfficacyDay 1 of the Titration/Adjustment Period to Week 22 of the Treatment Period (total of 25-26 weeks)Percentage of patients who withdrew from the study for lack of efficacy, as indicated on the early termination form of the case report form (CRF).
Change From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Worst Pain Intensity (WPI) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitBaseline (Day 0 of Treatment Period), Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint during the Open-Label Treatment PeriodThe WPI was recorded daily by participants in an electronic diary using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS-11), a Likert-type scale in which 0=no pain and 10=the worst pain imaginable. At each visit, participants selected the number that best described their worst pain intensity over the last 24 hours. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in pain control. Endpoint refers to the last observation carried forward.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 183 patients with moderate to severe chronic low back pain completed Study 3103 and were screened and eligible for enrollment into this study. One patient chose not to participate prior to enrollment.

Pre-assignment details

Of the 182 participants who enrolled into Study 3104, 26 participants enrolled under the original protocol and 156 participants enrolled under the amended protocol.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Hydrocodone ER - Opioid Naive
Participants were administered hydrocodone ER tablets at dosages of 15, 30, 45, 60, or 90 mg every 12 hours at the dosage deemed successful for managing their pain. Opioid-naïve participants were defined as those who were taking tramadol or less than 10 mg per day of oxycodone, or equivalent (including around-the-clock and rescue medication) for the 14 days before screening in the C33237/3103 (NCT01789970) study.
109
Hydrocodone ER - Opioid Experienced
Participants were administered hydrocodone ER tablets at dosages of 15, 30, 45, 60, or 90 mg every 12 hours at the dosage deemed successful for managing their pain. Opioid-experienced participants were defined as those who were taking 10 mg or more per day of oxycodone, or equivalent (including around-the-clock and rescue medication) for the 14 days before screening in the C33237/3103 (NCT01789970) study.
73
Total182

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Open-label Treatment PeriodAdverse Event6
Open-label Treatment PeriodLost to Follow-up2
Open-label Treatment PeriodNoncompliance to study medication3
Open-label Treatment PeriodNoncompliance to study procedures1
Open-label Treatment PeriodPhysician Decision1
Open-label Treatment PeriodPregnancy1
Open-label Treatment PeriodProtocol Violation5
Open-label Treatment PeriodSponsor request - investigator leaving1
Open-label Treatment PeriodWithdrawal by Subject14
Titration/Adjustment PeriodAdverse Event3
Titration/Adjustment PeriodLack of Efficacy3
Titration/Adjustment PeriodLost to Follow-up1
Titration/Adjustment PeriodWithdrawal by Subject5

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHydrocodone ER - Opioid NaiveHydrocodone ER - Opioid ExperiencedTotal
Age, Continuous49.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
55.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.37
52.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.22
Age Group
<=65 years
94 Participants53 Participants147 Participants
Age Group
>65 years
15 Participants20 Participants35 Participants
Average Pain Intensity (API)2.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.41
3.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.78
2.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.57
Body Mass Index32.9 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.41
31.8 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.27
32.5 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.35
Duration on Opioid Therapy2.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.72
4.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.06
3.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.65
Duration Since Diagnosis of Chronic Low Back Pain10.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.33
12.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.43
11.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8
Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino
24 Participants4 Participants28 Participants
Ethnicity
Non-Hispanic and non-Latino
85 Participants69 Participants154 Participants
Height169.3 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.77
172.1 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.18
170.4 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.99
Race
American Indian or Alaskan Native
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race
Asian
9 Participants1 Participants10 Participants
Race
Black
27 Participants12 Participants39 Participants
Race
Other
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race
Pacific Islander
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race
White
69 Participants58 Participants127 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
60 Participants40 Participants100 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
49 Participants33 Participants82 Participants
Weight94.2 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.56
94.2 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.07
94.2 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.69
Worst Pain Intensity (WPI) Score3.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.71
4.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.13
4.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.92

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
27 / 18220 / 170
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 18210 / 170

Outcome results

Primary

Participants With Adverse Events

An adverse event (AE) was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an inability to carry out usual activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes.

Time frame: Day 1 of the Titration/Adjustment Period to Week 22 of the Treatment Period (total of 25-26 weeks)

Population: Safety Analysis Set for the Titration/Adjustment period; Post-Titration/Post-Adjustment Safety Analysis Set for the Open-Label Treatment Period

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodParticipants With Adverse EventsAny AE4 Participants
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodParticipants With Adverse EventsDeaths0 Participants
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodParticipants With Adverse EventsSevere AE0 Participants
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodParticipants With Adverse EventsTreatment-related AE3 Participants
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodParticipants With Adverse EventsWithdrawals from treatment due to AE1 Participants
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodParticipants With Adverse EventsSerious AE0 Participants
Hydrocodone ER: Double-Blind Titration PeriodParticipants With Adverse EventsWithdrawals from treatment due to AE0 Participants
Hydrocodone ER: Double-Blind Titration PeriodParticipants With Adverse EventsAny AE2 Participants
Hydrocodone ER: Double-Blind Titration PeriodParticipants With Adverse EventsSerious AE0 Participants
Hydrocodone ER: Double-Blind Titration PeriodParticipants With Adverse EventsTreatment-related AE2 Participants
Hydrocodone ER: Double-Blind Titration PeriodParticipants With Adverse EventsSevere AE0 Participants
Hydrocodone ER: Double-Blind Titration PeriodParticipants With Adverse EventsDeaths0 Participants
Placebo: Open-Label Adjustment PeriodParticipants With Adverse EventsDeaths0 Participants
Placebo: Open-Label Adjustment PeriodParticipants With Adverse EventsAny AE34 Participants
Placebo: Open-Label Adjustment PeriodParticipants With Adverse EventsSerious AE0 Participants
Placebo: Open-Label Adjustment PeriodParticipants With Adverse EventsWithdrawals from treatment due to AE2 Participants
Placebo: Open-Label Adjustment PeriodParticipants With Adverse EventsTreatment-related AE21 Participants
Placebo: Open-Label Adjustment PeriodParticipants With Adverse EventsSevere AE1 Participants
Hydrocodone ER: Open-Label Adjustment PeriodParticipants With Adverse EventsSerious AE1 Participants
Hydrocodone ER: Open-Label Adjustment PeriodParticipants With Adverse EventsAny AE25 Participants
Hydrocodone ER: Open-Label Adjustment PeriodParticipants With Adverse EventsSevere AE2 Participants
Hydrocodone ER: Open-Label Adjustment PeriodParticipants With Adverse EventsTreatment-related AE10 Participants
Hydrocodone ER: Open-Label Adjustment PeriodParticipants With Adverse EventsWithdrawals from treatment due to AE1 Participants
Hydrocodone ER: Open-Label Adjustment PeriodParticipants With Adverse EventsDeaths0 Participants
Hydrocodone ER: Open-Label Treatment PeriodParticipants With Adverse EventsAny AE88 Participants
Hydrocodone ER: Open-Label Treatment PeriodParticipants With Adverse EventsDeaths0 Participants
Hydrocodone ER: Open-Label Treatment PeriodParticipants With Adverse EventsWithdrawals from treatment due to AE5 Participants
Hydrocodone ER: Open-Label Treatment PeriodParticipants With Adverse EventsSerious AE10 Participants
Hydrocodone ER: Open-Label Treatment PeriodParticipants With Adverse EventsSevere AE11 Participants
Hydrocodone ER: Open-Label Treatment PeriodParticipants With Adverse EventsTreatment-related AE26 Participants
Primary

Participants With Clinically Significant (CS) Hearing Changes From Baseline to the Final Visit in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results

Pure tone audiometry was performed by trained personnel. Hearing loss was classified in degrees of hearing from normal to profound. This classification was determined by the hearing threshold (or the softest sound detected at a specific frequency). The exact ranges that classified hearing loss depended on the exact technique used during testing and on the patient's age. These values were provided by each audiology laboratory that performed the test. For serial audiograms, the criteria for a clinically significant hearing change were based on guidance from the American Speech Language Hearing Association (ASHA 1994, cited in \[Konrad-Martin et al 2005\]). These criteria included the following: greater than 20 decibels (dB) pure tone threshold shift at 1 frequency; greater than 10 dB shift at 2 consecutive test frequencies; or threshold response shifting to no response at 3 consecutive test frequencies.

Time frame: Baseline was within two weeks of the final study visit in study 3103; during study exam was within two weeks of the end of trial visit for study 3104 (up to study week 26)

Population: Safety Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodParticipants With Clinically Significant (CS) Hearing Changes From Baseline to the Final Visit in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results11 Participants
Hydrocodone ER: Double-Blind Titration PeriodParticipants With Clinically Significant (CS) Hearing Changes From Baseline to the Final Visit in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results7 Participants
Placebo: Open-Label Adjustment PeriodParticipants With Clinically Significant (CS) Hearing Changes From Baseline to the Final Visit in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results18 Participants
Primary

Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values

Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant abnormal serum chemistry, hematology and urinalysis values. Significance criteria: * Blood urea nitrogen: \>=10.71 mmol/L * Creatinine: \>=177 μmol/L * Uric acid: M\>=625, F\>=506 μmol/L * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST): \>=3\* upper limit of normal (ULN) * Alkaline phosphatase: \>=3\* upper limit of normal (ULN) * Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT): \>=3\* upper limit of normal (ULN) * Serum white blood cells: \>=20 \* 10\^9/L * Hemoglobin: M\<=115, F\<=95 g/dL * Hematocrit: M\<0.37, F\<0.32 L/L * Eosinophils: \>=10.0 % * Platelets: \<=75 \* 10\^9/L * Absolute neutrophils: \<=1.0 \* 10\^9/L * Urinalysis: Glucose, Ketones, and Total Protein: \>=2 unit increase from baseline

Time frame: End of trial visit (up to week 22 of Open-label Treatment Period which is up to week 26 including the titration/adjustment period)

Population: The Full Analysis Set includes all participants who took at least one dose of study drug and who had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment. Participants with a post-baseline result for each test are counted as part of the number of participants analyzed for that test.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory ValuesAlkaline phosphatase1 Participants
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory ValuesUrine ketones1 Participants
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory ValuesHematocrit5 Participants
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory ValuesBlood urea nitrogen5 Participants
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory ValuesCreatinine1 Participants
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory ValuesUric acid5 Participants
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory ValuesAST1 Participants
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory ValuesEosinophils1 Participants
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory ValuesPlatelets1 Participants
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory ValuesAbsolute neutrophils1 Participants
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory ValuesUrine glucose4 Participants
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory ValuesUrine total protein1 Participants
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory ValuesSerum white blood cells1 Participants
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory ValuesGGT7 Participants
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory ValuesHemoglobin4 Participants
Primary

Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values

Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) vital sign values. Significance criteria * Pulse - high: \>=120 and increase of \>= 15 beats/minute from baseline * Pulse - low: \<=50 and decrease of \>=15 beats/minute * Systolic blood pressure - high: \>=180 and increase \>=20 mmHg * Systolic blood pressure - low: \<=90 and decrease \>=20 mmHg * Diastolic blood pressure - high: \>=105 and increase of \>=15 mmHg * Diastolic blood pressure - low: \<=50 and decrease of \>=15 mmHg

Time frame: Day 1 of the Titration/Adjustment Period to Week 22 of the Treatment Period (total of 25-26 weeks)

Population: The Full Analysis Set includes all participants who took at least one dose of study drug and who had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment. Participants with a post-baseline vital sign result are counted as part of the number of participants analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs ValuesSystolic blood pressure - low3 Participants
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs ValuesPulse - high1 Participants
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs ValuesPulse - low1 Participants
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs ValuesSystolic blood pressure - high1 Participants
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs ValuesDiastolic blood pressure - high1 Participants
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs ValuesDiastolic blood pressure - low2 Participants
Primary

Participants With Shifts From Normal to Abnormal in Physical Examination Findings

The endpoint visit or early termination visit was an abbreviated exam. Endpoint refers to the last observation carried forward.

Time frame: End of trial visit (up to week 22 of Open-label Treatment Period which is up to week 26 including the titration/adjustment period)

Population: Post-Titration Safety Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodParticipants With Shifts From Normal to Abnormal in Physical Examination FindingsNormal at baseline - Abnormal at Endpoint20 Participants
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodParticipants With Shifts From Normal to Abnormal in Physical Examination FindingsAbnormal findings reported as adverse events7 Participants
Primary

Shifts From Baseline to Endpoint (Treatment Period) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings

A 12-lead ECG was conducted at the final visit for study 3103 which is used as baseline for this study, and at week 22 of the treatment period \[or early termination\]). A qualified physician at the study center was responsible for providing interpretation of the ECG. Endpoint refers to the last observation carried forward.

Time frame: Baseline (final visit for study 3103), End of trial visit (up to week 22 of Open-label Treatment Period which is up to week 26 including the titration/adjustment period)

Population: Post-Titration Safety Analysis Set. Includes participants who have both baseline and endpoint data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodShifts From Baseline to Endpoint (Treatment Period) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) FindingsBaseline normal - Endpoint normal26 Participants
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodShifts From Baseline to Endpoint (Treatment Period) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) FindingsBaseline normal - Endpoint abnormal18 Participants
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodShifts From Baseline to Endpoint (Treatment Period) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) FindingsBaseline abnormal - Endpoint normal11 Participants
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodShifts From Baseline to Endpoint (Treatment Period) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) FindingsBaseline abnormal - Endpoint abnormal42 Participants
Hydrocodone ER: Double-Blind Titration PeriodShifts From Baseline to Endpoint (Treatment Period) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) FindingsBaseline abnormal - Endpoint abnormal22 Participants
Hydrocodone ER: Double-Blind Titration PeriodShifts From Baseline to Endpoint (Treatment Period) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) FindingsBaseline normal - Endpoint normal19 Participants
Hydrocodone ER: Double-Blind Titration PeriodShifts From Baseline to Endpoint (Treatment Period) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) FindingsBaseline abnormal - Endpoint normal8 Participants
Hydrocodone ER: Double-Blind Titration PeriodShifts From Baseline to Endpoint (Treatment Period) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) FindingsBaseline normal - Endpoint abnormal11 Participants
Placebo: Open-Label Adjustment PeriodShifts From Baseline to Endpoint (Treatment Period) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) FindingsBaseline abnormal - Endpoint abnormal64 Participants
Placebo: Open-Label Adjustment PeriodShifts From Baseline to Endpoint (Treatment Period) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) FindingsBaseline normal - Endpoint abnormal29 Participants
Placebo: Open-Label Adjustment PeriodShifts From Baseline to Endpoint (Treatment Period) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) FindingsBaseline abnormal - Endpoint normal19 Participants
Placebo: Open-Label Adjustment PeriodShifts From Baseline to Endpoint (Treatment Period) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) FindingsBaseline normal - Endpoint normal45 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Average Pain Intensity (API) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each Visit

The API was recorded daily by participants in an electronic diary using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS-11), a Likert-type scale in which 0=no pain and 10=the worst pain imaginable. Participants selected the number that best described their average pain intensity over the last 24 hours. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in pain control. Endpoint refers to the last observation carried forward.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0 of Treatment Period), Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint during the Open-Label Treatment Period

Population: Full Analysis Set includes participants who had at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment. Participants contributing to each time point are counted as part of the number of participants analyzed for that test.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Average Pain Intensity (API) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitWeek 60.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.34
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Average Pain Intensity (API) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitWeek 18-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.35
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Average Pain Intensity (API) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitWeek 14-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.27
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Average Pain Intensity (API) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitWeek 2-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.95
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Average Pain Intensity (API) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitEndpoint-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.55
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Average Pain Intensity (API) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitWeek 22-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.54
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Average Pain Intensity (API) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitWeek 10-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.45
Hydrocodone ER: Double-Blind Titration PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Average Pain Intensity (API) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitWeek 14-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.54
Hydrocodone ER: Double-Blind Titration PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Average Pain Intensity (API) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitWeek 20.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.18
Hydrocodone ER: Double-Blind Titration PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Average Pain Intensity (API) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitWeek 60.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.52
Hydrocodone ER: Double-Blind Titration PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Average Pain Intensity (API) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitWeek 10-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.43
Hydrocodone ER: Double-Blind Titration PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Average Pain Intensity (API) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitWeek 18-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.57
Hydrocodone ER: Double-Blind Titration PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Average Pain Intensity (API) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitWeek 22-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.03
Hydrocodone ER: Double-Blind Titration PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Average Pain Intensity (API) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitEndpoint0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Placebo: Open-Label Adjustment PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Average Pain Intensity (API) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitWeek 18-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.44
Placebo: Open-Label Adjustment PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Average Pain Intensity (API) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitWeek 60.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.41
Placebo: Open-Label Adjustment PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Average Pain Intensity (API) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitEndpoint0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.82
Placebo: Open-Label Adjustment PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Average Pain Intensity (API) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitWeek 22-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.74
Placebo: Open-Label Adjustment PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Average Pain Intensity (API) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitWeek 14-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.37
Placebo: Open-Label Adjustment PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Average Pain Intensity (API) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitWeek 10-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.44
Placebo: Open-Label Adjustment PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Average Pain Intensity (API) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitWeek 20.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.05
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Worst Pain Intensity (WPI) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each Visit

The WPI was recorded daily by participants in an electronic diary using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS-11), a Likert-type scale in which 0=no pain and 10=the worst pain imaginable. At each visit, participants selected the number that best described their worst pain intensity over the last 24 hours. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in pain control. Endpoint refers to the last observation carried forward.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0 of Treatment Period), Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint during the Open-Label Treatment Period

Population: Full Analysis Set includes participants who had at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment. Participants contributing to each time point are counted as part of the number of participants analyzed for that test.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Worst Pain Intensity (WPI) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitWeek 10)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Worst Pain Intensity (WPI) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitWeek 60.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.63
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Worst Pain Intensity (WPI) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitWeek 14-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Worst Pain Intensity (WPI) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitEndpoint0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.87
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Worst Pain Intensity (WPI) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitWeek 18-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.73
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Worst Pain Intensity (WPI) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitWeek 22-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.91
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Worst Pain Intensity (WPI) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitWeek 20.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.23
Hydrocodone ER: Double-Blind Titration PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Worst Pain Intensity (WPI) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitWeek 14-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.82
Hydrocodone ER: Double-Blind Titration PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Worst Pain Intensity (WPI) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitWeek 22-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Hydrocodone ER: Double-Blind Titration PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Worst Pain Intensity (WPI) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitWeek 60.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.76
Hydrocodone ER: Double-Blind Titration PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Worst Pain Intensity (WPI) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitWeek 18-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.95
Hydrocodone ER: Double-Blind Titration PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Worst Pain Intensity (WPI) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitWeek 10)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.68
Hydrocodone ER: Double-Blind Titration PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Worst Pain Intensity (WPI) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitEndpoint0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.96
Hydrocodone ER: Double-Blind Titration PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Worst Pain Intensity (WPI) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitWeek 20.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.28
Placebo: Open-Label Adjustment PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Worst Pain Intensity (WPI) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitEndpoint0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Placebo: Open-Label Adjustment PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Worst Pain Intensity (WPI) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitWeek 14-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.74
Placebo: Open-Label Adjustment PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Worst Pain Intensity (WPI) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitWeek 60.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.68
Placebo: Open-Label Adjustment PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Worst Pain Intensity (WPI) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitWeek 10)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.69
Placebo: Open-Label Adjustment PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Worst Pain Intensity (WPI) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitWeek 18-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.81
Placebo: Open-Label Adjustment PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Worst Pain Intensity (WPI) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitWeek 20.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.25
Placebo: Open-Label Adjustment PeriodChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Worst Pain Intensity (WPI) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each VisitWeek 22-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Withdrawn From the Study For Lack of Efficacy

Percentage of patients who withdrew from the study for lack of efficacy, as indicated on the early termination form of the case report form (CRF).

Time frame: Day 1 of the Titration/Adjustment Period to Week 22 of the Treatment Period (total of 25-26 weeks)

Population: Safety Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo: Double-Blind Titration PeriodPercentage of Participants Withdrawn From the Study For Lack of Efficacy2 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026