Skip to content

Micromechanical Modeling Using Low Magnitude Mechanical Stimulation

Osteoporosis Treatment Response Assessed by Micromechanical Modeling of MRI Data

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01921517
Acronym
LMMS
Enrollment
117
Registered
2013-08-13
Start date
2012-09-30
Completion date
2019-06-20
Last updated
2019-11-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bone Alteration

Keywords

Biomechanics, Osteogenesis

Brief summary

The response to a daily 10 minute session of low-magnitude mechanical stimulation (LMMS) on bone in 100 postmenopausal women ages 45-65 years will be evaluated at baseline and 12 months using high-resolution magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Subjects will be assigned to an active platform that produces vibrations or to a placebo platform that produces no vibrations. The investigators propose to evaluate the hypothesis that LMMS applied to postmenopausal women ages 45-65 improves the mechanical integrity of bone while lowering marrow adiposity. 1. The investigators will optimize an integrated imaging protocol for high-resolution structural MR imaging of the distal tibia and spectroscopic imaging-based quantification of bone marrow composition in the lumbar vertebrae. 2. The investigators will further develop and validate micro-finite-element (FE) analysis for quantitative assessment of trabecular and cortical bone stiffness and failure load from high-resolution MR images of the distal tibia. 3. The investigators will apply the methodology of Aims 1 and 2 (above) in a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study to a cohort of 100 healthy postmenopausal women in the age range of 45-65 years, studied at baseline and 12 months after having been subjected to 10 minutes daily of either 30 Hz/0.3g stimulation or placebo treatment, monitored rigorously via electronic feedback.

Detailed description

Weightbearing exercise has an osteogenic effect by reducing bone resorption and enhancing bone formation. During the past several years a number of articles have appeared demonstrating that low-magnitude mechanical stimulation (LMMS) is osteogenic in animals and also in humans. Preclinical studies have also demonstrated an effect of decrease in adiposity. The mechanobiology underlying these phenomena is beginning to emerge in terms of expression of genes stimulated by the action of the vibrations to which osteocytes and adipocytes are subjected. If successful, LMMS treatment, a non-pharmacologic intervention, could prevent bone loss and potentially stimulate bone formation and decreased adipocyte production resulting in increased bone strength and reduced fracture susceptibility in subjects at risk of developing osteoporosis. The proposed project focuses directly on measures of strength by evaluating the therapeutic response in terms of magnetic resonance (MR) image-based micro finite-element (FE) assessment of bone stiffness and failure strength, along with quantifying treatment-induced changes in marrow adiposity, as part of a single, integrated examination, conducted at baseline and 12 months of treatment in a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study of early postmenopausal women.

Interventions

Mechanical stimulation for 10 minutes daily for 12 months at a frequency of 30 Hz and acceleration of 0.3 g.

Mechanical stimulation for 10 minutes daily for 12 months using a sham device.

Sponsors

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Pennsylvania
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
45 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Females, ages 45-65 years and post menopausal, as defined by a history of amenorrhea for a minimum of 24 months and a serum FSH (follicle-stimulating hormone) concentration of 25 mIU/mL (milli-International unit per milliliter) and negative pregnancy test.

Exclusion criteria

* Current or prior use of medications known to affect bone (e.g. bisphosphonates, calcitonin, selective estrogen receptor modulators, denosumab, diphenylhydantoin, recent systemic glucocorticoid use), bone mineral density T score of less than -2.5 and greater than +2, Vitamin D level less then 12 ng/ml, BMI (body mass index) of greater than 32, current alcohol or drug abuse: more than 3 alcoholic beverages per day or current abuse of illicit drugs or prescription medication, uncontrolled or untreated cardiac or pulmonary disease liver disease: history of hepatitis or ALT (alanine aminotransferase) or AST (aspartate aminotransferase) greater than 2x ULN (upper limit of normal), renal disease: history of renal disease or serum creatinine greater than 2x ULN diabetes, pacemaker or metallic implants considered a contraindication to MR scanning.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Distal Tibia Bone QualityBaseline to 12 monthsDistal tibial bone quality is measured through MRI by calculating the ratio between bone volume to total volume. A lower value would indicate osteoporotic (weaker) bone; a higher value would indicate healthy (normal) bone.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Not all subjects enrolled (consented at screening visit) were randomized (randomized to intervention)

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Low Magnitude Mechanical Stimulation
10 minutes daily of 30 Hz/0.3g stimulation using a vibrating platform. Low Magnitude Mechanical Stimulation: Mechanical stimulation for 10 minutes daily for 12 months at a frequency of 30 Hz and acceleration of 0.3 g.
42
Sham Low Magnitude Mechanical Stimulation
10 minutes daily of placebo treatment using a sham vibrating platform. Sham Low Magnitude Mechanical Stimulation: Mechanical stimulation for 10 minutes daily for 12 months using a sham device.
38
Total80

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up50
Overall StudyNewly diagnosed health concern20
Overall StudyPhysician Decision02
Overall StudySubject missed final imaging14
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject73

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLow Magnitude Mechanical StimulationSham Low Magnitude Mechanical StimulationTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
42 Participants38 Participants80 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
10 Participants10 Participants20 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
27 Participants26 Participants53 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
42 participants38 participants80 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
42 Participants38 Participants80 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 420 / 38
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 422 / 38
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 420 / 38

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Distal Tibia Bone Quality

Distal tibial bone quality is measured through MRI by calculating the ratio between bone volume to total volume. A lower value would indicate osteoporotic (weaker) bone; a higher value would indicate healthy (normal) bone.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Low Magnitude Mechanical StimulationChange in Distal Tibia Bone Quality1.121 percentage of change
Sham Low Magnitude Mechanical StimulationChange in Distal Tibia Bone Quality-2.141 percentage of change
p-value: 0.0481t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026