Skip to content

A Study to Compare Denosumab With Zoledronic Acid in Subjects With Bone Metastases From Solid Tumors

DCA114273: A Study Comparing Denosumab With Zoledronic Acid in Subjects of Asian Ancestry With Bone Metastases From Solid Tumors

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01920568
Enrollment
487
Registered
2013-08-12
Start date
2013-08-31
Completion date
2016-04-30
Last updated
2017-01-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fractures, Bone

Keywords

GSK2371746, Denosumab, China, skeletal-related events, bone metastases, bridging study, solid tumors

Brief summary

This is a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study designed to provide bridging data in an Asian population to Amgen's studies of denosumab in subjects with bone metastases from solid tumors. The study is designed to provide data to a large global dataset of phase-III studies including breast cancer, prostate cancer, and all solid tumors, plus multiple myeloma, to support the regulatory approval for marketing and patient access to denosumab for the prevention of SREs in Chinese subjects with bone metastases from solid tumors. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the percent change from baseline to Week 13 in the bone marker urinary amino-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen (uNTx) corrected for urine creatinine (uNTx/uCr) in subjects treated with denosumab to those treated with zoledronic acid. The study is designed to test the superiority of denosumab over zoledronic acid.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALDenosumab 70 mg/mL

Denosumab will be given as a SC injection of 120 mg by administering a 1.7 mL volume in a single injection

Zoledronic acid 4 mg (or equivalent clearance-adjusted dose in subjects with baseline creatinine clearance \<=60 ml/min) will be diluted in either 0.9% sodium chloride or 5% dextrose injection and administered IV.

DRUGPlacebo IV

The placebo will consist of 1.7 mL 0.9% w/v sodium chloride

DRUGPlacebo SC

The placebo will consist of either 0.9% w/v sodium chloride or 5% dextrose injection

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTCalcium supplement

Subjects are strongly recommended to take daily supplements of at least 500 mg calcium from the day of consent and until completion of the Week 73 follow-up visit.

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTVitamin D supplement

Subjects are strongly recommended to take daily supplements of at least 400 IU of vitamin D from the day of consent and until completion of the Week 73 follow-up visit.

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY
Amgen
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject understands the nature and purpose of this study and the study procedures, which have been explained by the Investigator or delegate, and subject has signed the written informed consent for the overall study. The subject must sign a separate written informed consent to be eligible for enrolment in the pharmacokinetic substudy. * Adult (aged \>=18 years) of Asian ancestry with a histologically or cytologically confirmed solid tumor. In addition, subjects who are enrolled at a center in mainland China or at an SFDA-certified center in Hong Kong including the approximately 33 subjects in the pharmacokinetic substudy must be of Chinese race, ancestry, or heritage. Subjects enrolled in other regions or countries, such as Taiwan and Singapore, or at a non-SFDA-certified center in Hong Kong, are not required to be of Chinese race or ancestry. * Current or prior documented radiographic evidence (i.e., x-ray, computer tomography \[CT\], or magnetic resonance imaging \[MRI\]) of at least 1 bone metastasis. * Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test within 7 days of first dose of study treatment and agree to use effective contraception, as defined below, during the study and for 6 months after end of study treatment. Women who report having a pregnancy during this study will be followed for birth outcomes. GSK acceptable contraceptive methods, when used consistently and in accordance with both the product label and the instructions of the physician, are as follows: An intrauterine device or intrauterine system with a documented failure rate of less than 1% per year; Male partner sterilization prior to the female subject's enrollment and the male is the sole sexual partner for that subject; the information on the male sterility can come from the site personnel's review of subject's medical records; medical examination of the subject and/or semen analysis; or interview with the subject on his medical history; complete abstinence from sexual intercourse for 14 days prior to first dose of study treatment, through the dosing period, and for at least 7 months after the last dose of study treatment; double-barrier contraception: male condom combined with a female diaphragm, either with or without a vaginal spermicide (foam, gel, film, cream, or suppository); implants of levonorgestrel or etonogestrel where not contraindicated for this patient population or per local practice; injectable progesterone where not contraindicated for this patient population or per local practice; percutaneous contraceptive patches where not contraindicated for this patient population or per local practice; Oral contraceptives (either combined or progesterone only) where not contraindicated for this patient population or per local practice. Females of child bearing potential who do not have male partners as part of their preferred and usual lifestyle are not required to use contraception. * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1, or 2 (refer protocol for details). * Adequate baseline organ function as defined by the following criteria: Serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \<=2.0 x upper limit of normal (ULN); Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \<=2.0 x ULN; Serum total bilirubin \<=1.0 x ULN; creatinine clearance (calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault formula) \>=30 milliliter per minute (mL/min); serum calcium or albumin-adjusted serum calcium \>=2.0 millimole per liter (mmol/L) (8.0 mg/dL) and \<=2.9 mmol/L (11.5 miligram per deciliter \[mg/dL\]). Subjects must not have taken supplemental calcium for at least 8 hours prior to collection of the blood sample for screening serum calcium determination. * Life expectancy of at least 6 months, in the opinion of the Investigator.

Exclusion criteria

* Any serious and/or unstable pre-existing medical, psychiatric disorder, or other conditions that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could interfere with subject's safety, obtaining informed consent or compliance to the study procedures; The Investigator should consult the GSK Medical Monitor prior to enrolling a subject if s/he is unsure if a condition might interfere with the subject's safety or participation in this study. * Any prior treatment with intravenous (IV) or oral bisphosphonates. * Prior treatment with denosumab. * Planned radiation therapy or surgery to bone. * Known brain metastases. * Prior history or current evidence of osteomyelitis or osteonecrosis of the jaws (ONJ), an active dental or jaw condition that requires oral surgery, non-healed dental or oral surgery, or planned invasive dental procedure over the course of the study. * Evidence of any of the following conditions per subject self report or medical chart review: any prior or current malignancy (other than the cancer under study in this protocol) with active disease within 3 years before randomization; unstable liver disease (as defined by the presence of ascites, encephalopathy, coagulopathy, hypoalbuminemia, esophageal or gastric varices, or persistent jaundice), known biliary abnormalities (with the exception of Gilbert's syndrome or asymptomatic gallstones); known infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); active infection with hepatitis B or hepatitis C virus. * Pregnant women, women planning to become pregnant within 7 months after end of study treatment, and women who are breastfeeding. Women who are breast feeding should discontinue nursing prior to the first dose of study treatment and should refrain from nursing throughout the treatment period and for 7 months following their last dose of study treatment. * Male subjects unable or unwilling to use adequate contraception methods during the study and for 6 months after end of study treatment should be excluded. * Subject is currently enrolled in another investigational device or investigational product study, or has not completed at least 30 days, 5 half lives, or the duration of biological effect, whichever is longer, since ending such a study. * Known sensitivity to any of the investigational products or supplements to be administered during the study (i.e., zoledronic acid, mammalian derived products, calcium, or vitamin D).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change (Chg) From Baseline (BL) to Week (Wk)13 in Urinary Amino-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen Corrected for Urine Creatinine (uNTx/uCr)Baseline (BL) and Week (Wk) 13uNTx/uCr is the bone turnover marker correlated with the presence and extent of metastases, and the prognosis and response to bone targeted treatment (trt). uNTx/uCr was expressed in nanomoles bone collagen equivalent per millimole (nM BCE/mM). Primary objective: to compare the effect of denosumab with that of zoledronic acid on % chg from BL in uNTx/uCr at Wk 13 in par. of Asian ancestry with bone metastases from solid tumors. BL value is the most recent, non-missing value prior to or on the 1st study trt dose date. Chg from BL is the value at Wk13 minus BL value. Percent chg from BL is the chg from BL / BL value \* 100. For missing Wk 13 observations, the last post-BL value was carried forward to obtain the Wk 13 value.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 13 in Urinary Amino-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen of Type I Collagen Corrected for Urine Creatinine (uNTx/uCr) in Participants With Advanced Breast Cancer.Baseline and Week 13uNTx/uCr is the bone turnover marker correlated with the presence and extent of metastases, and the prognosis and response to bone targeted treatment. uNTx/uCr was expressed in nanomoles bone collagen equivalent per millimole (nM BCE/mM). Secondary objective: to compare the effect of denosumab with that of zoledronic acid on % chg from BL in uNTx/uCr at Wk 13 in breast cancer par. with bone metastases from solid tumors. Baseline value is the most recent, non-missing value prior to or on the first study treatment dose date. Change from Baseline is the value at Week 13 minus Baseline value. Percent chg from BL is the chg from BL / BL value \* 100. For missing Wk 13 observations, the last post-BL value was carried forward to obtain the Wk 13 value.
Percent Change From Baseline in the Serum Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase (s-BALP) at Week 13.Baseline and Week 13Baseline value is the most recent, non-missing value prior to or on the first study treatment dose date. Change from Baseline is the value at Indicated visit minus Baseline value. Percent change from Baseline is the change from Baseline divided by Baseline value multiplied by 100.
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (Non-fatal Serious Adverse Events and Fatal Serious Adverse Events)From start of IP through the Study Phase (49 weeks post-dose) (assessed up to 73 weeks)An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or other events that may jeopardize the participant or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcome listed above, liver injury and impaired liver function and grade 4 laboratory abnormalities. Number of participants with any AEs, non-fatal SAEs, fatal SAEs have been presented.
Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 13 in Urinary Amino-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen of Type I Collagen Corrected for Urine Creatinine (uNTx/uCr) in Chinese Participants.Baseline and Week 13uNTx/uCr is the bone turnover marker correlated with the presence and extent of metastases, and the prognosis and response to bone targeted treatment. uNTx/uCr was expressed in nanomoles bone collagen equivalent per millimole (nM BCE/mM). Secondary objective: to compare the effect of denosumab with that of zoledronic acid on % chg from BL in uNTx/uCr at Wk 13 in par. of Chinese ancestry with bone metastases from solid tumors. Baseline value is the most recent, non-missing value prior to or on the first study treatment dose date. Change from Baseline is the value at Week 13 minus Baseline value. Percent chg from BL is the chg from BL / BL value \* 100. For missing Wk 13 observations, the last post-BL value was carried forward to obtain the Wk 13 value.
Number of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Hematology Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Baseline and up to last study-related visit (up to 53 weeks)Hematology parameters included hemoglobin, lymphocytes, platelet count, total neutrophils, white blood cell (WBC) count. All reported values are of participants with worst-case on-therapy increase to the specified grade: Any increase, that is, worst-case increase to grade 1, 2, 3, or 4 (any grade); worst-case increase to grade 3 (WC G3); and worst-case increase to grade 4 (WC G4). Participants with missing Baseline grade were assumed to have a Baseline grade of 0. The worst-case during the on-therapy period was determined taking into account both scheduled and unscheduled assessments.
Number of Participants With Confirmed Anti-denosumab Antibody Formation at Day 1, Week 25 and Week 53.Day 1, Week 25 and Week 53Anti-denosumab antibody formation was assessed at Day 1, Week 25 and Week 53. Binding antibody assay was used to assess number of participants with anti-denosumab antibody.
Serum Concentration of Denosumab on Day 1, at Week 2, Week 5, Week 9, Week 13, Week 17, Week 19, Week 21, Week 25 and Week 49Samples were collected at pre-dose (Day 1); 4 hours, 24 hours, 168 hours post-dose; pre-dose at Week 5, Week 9, Week 13, Week 17; Week 19 (at 336 hours); pre-dose at Week 21, Week 25, Week 49Blood samples were drawn on study Day 1, pre-dose; 4 hours, 24 hours, and at Week 2 (168 hours); then pre-dose at Week 5, Week 9, Week 13, Week 17, Week 19 (no dose), Week 21, Week 25, and Week 49.
Number of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Baseline and up to last study-related visit (up to 53 weeks)Clinical chemistry parameters were measured at the Screening and Weeks 2, 5, 9, 13, 25, 37, and 53 visits. Clinical chemistry parameters measured on-study included albumin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin, calcium (Ca), creatinine, magnesium, and phosphorous (P) inorganic. All reported values are of participants with worst-case on-therapy increase to the specified grade: Any increase, that is, worst-case increase to grade 1, 2, 3, or 4 (any grade); worst-case increase to grade 3 (WC G3); and worst-case increase to grade 4 (WC G4). The National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) was used for grading. Participants with missing Baseline grade were assumed to have a Baseline grade of 0. The worst-case during the on-therapy period was determined taking into account both scheduled and unscheduled assessments.

Countries

China, Singapore, Taiwan

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study consisted of three phases: Screening period , 49-week Double-blind treatment period and Follow-up period. The total participation time in the study was approximately 77 weeks.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 487 participants (par.) were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive one of the two study treatments. A total of 485 participants received at least single dose of investigational products (IP).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Denosumab 120 mg
Participants received denosumab 120 mg as SC injection for a maximum of 13 doses and placebo as IV infusion over a minimum of 15 minutes once every 4 weeks up to 49 weeks. Participants also received daily oral supplementation of \>= 500 mg elemental calcium and \>=400 IU of vitamin D.
326
Zoledronic Acid 4 mg
Participants received zoledronic acid 4 mg as IV infusion over a minimum of 15 minutes for a maximum of 13 doses and placebo as SC once every 4 weeks up to 49 weeks. Participants also received daily oral supplementation of \>= 500 mg elemental calcium and \>=400 IU of vitamin D.
159
Total485

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event278
Overall StudyDeath due to disease progression2512
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up22
Overall StudyPhysician Decision134
Overall StudyProtocol Violation53
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject7955

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDenosumab 120 mgZoledronic Acid 4 mgTotal
Age, Continuous54.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.36
53.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.45
53.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.38
Gender
Female
222 Participants105 Participants327 Participants
Gender
Male
104 Participants54 Participants158 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - East Asian Heritage
312 Participants158 Participants470 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - South East Asian Heritage
14 Participants1 Participants15 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
268 / 326136 / 159
serious
Total, serious adverse events
46 / 32614 / 159

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change (Chg) From Baseline (BL) to Week (Wk)13 in Urinary Amino-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen Corrected for Urine Creatinine (uNTx/uCr)

uNTx/uCr is the bone turnover marker correlated with the presence and extent of metastases, and the prognosis and response to bone targeted treatment (trt). uNTx/uCr was expressed in nanomoles bone collagen equivalent per millimole (nM BCE/mM). Primary objective: to compare the effect of denosumab with that of zoledronic acid on % chg from BL in uNTx/uCr at Wk 13 in par. of Asian ancestry with bone metastases from solid tumors. BL value is the most recent, non-missing value prior to or on the 1st study trt dose date. Chg from BL is the value at Wk13 minus BL value. Percent chg from BL is the chg from BL / BL value \* 100. For missing Wk 13 observations, the last post-BL value was carried forward to obtain the Wk 13 value.

Time frame: Baseline (BL) and Week (Wk) 13

Population: Full-Analysis-Set Intent-to-Treat (FAS-ITT) Population: comprised of all randomized participants regardless of whether or not study treatment was administered. Only those participants with values at Baseline and Week 13 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Denosumab 120 mgPercent Change (Chg) From Baseline (BL) to Week (Wk)13 in Urinary Amino-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen Corrected for Urine Creatinine (uNTx/uCr)-81.9 Percent change
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgPercent Change (Chg) From Baseline (BL) to Week (Wk)13 in Urinary Amino-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen Corrected for Urine Creatinine (uNTx/uCr)-75.2 Percent change
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.44, -0.192]ANCOVA
Secondary

Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (Non-fatal Serious Adverse Events and Fatal Serious Adverse Events)

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or other events that may jeopardize the participant or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcome listed above, liver injury and impaired liver function and grade 4 laboratory abnormalities. Number of participants with any AEs, non-fatal SAEs, fatal SAEs have been presented.

Time frame: From start of IP through the Study Phase (49 weeks post-dose) (assessed up to 73 weeks)

Population: Full-Analysis-Set Safety (FAS-Safety) Population: comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment and was based on the actual study treatment received (if this differed from that to which the participant was randomized).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (Non-fatal Serious Adverse Events and Fatal Serious Adverse Events)Any Fatal SAEs25 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (Non-fatal Serious Adverse Events and Fatal Serious Adverse Events)Any AEs291 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (Non-fatal Serious Adverse Events and Fatal Serious Adverse Events)Any SAEs46 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (Non-fatal Serious Adverse Events and Fatal Serious Adverse Events)Any Non-Fatal SAEs25 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (Non-fatal Serious Adverse Events and Fatal Serious Adverse Events)Any Fatal SAEs7 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (Non-fatal Serious Adverse Events and Fatal Serious Adverse Events)Any SAEs14 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (Non-fatal Serious Adverse Events and Fatal Serious Adverse Events)Any Non-Fatal SAEs7 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (Non-fatal Serious Adverse Events and Fatal Serious Adverse Events)Any AEs145 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Confirmed Anti-denosumab Antibody Formation at Day 1, Week 25 and Week 53.

Anti-denosumab antibody formation was assessed at Day 1, Week 25 and Week 53. Binding antibody assay was used to assess number of participants with anti-denosumab antibody.

Time frame: Day 1, Week 25 and Week 53

Population: FAS-Safety Population. Only those participants on whom anti-denosumab antibody formation was analyzed at specified time point is presented (represented by n=X, X in the category titles).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Confirmed Anti-denosumab Antibody Formation at Day 1, Week 25 and Week 53.Day 1, n = 326, 1580 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Confirmed Anti-denosumab Antibody Formation at Day 1, Week 25 and Week 53.Week 25, n = 256, 1150 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Confirmed Anti-denosumab Antibody Formation at Day 1, Week 25 and Week 53.Week 53, n = 180, 760 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Confirmed Anti-denosumab Antibody Formation at Day 1, Week 25 and Week 53.Day 1, n = 326, 1580 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Confirmed Anti-denosumab Antibody Formation at Day 1, Week 25 and Week 53.Week 25, n = 256, 1150 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Confirmed Anti-denosumab Antibody Formation at Day 1, Week 25 and Week 53.Week 53, n = 180, 760 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Hematology Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.

Hematology parameters included hemoglobin, lymphocytes, platelet count, total neutrophils, white blood cell (WBC) count. All reported values are of participants with worst-case on-therapy increase to the specified grade: Any increase, that is, worst-case increase to grade 1, 2, 3, or 4 (any grade); worst-case increase to grade 3 (WC G3); and worst-case increase to grade 4 (WC G4). Participants with missing Baseline grade were assumed to have a Baseline grade of 0. The worst-case during the on-therapy period was determined taking into account both scheduled and unscheduled assessments.

Time frame: Baseline and up to last study-related visit (up to 53 weeks)

Population: FAS-Safety Population. Only participants whose indicated on-therapy lab values were available (represented by n=X, X in the category titles) were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Hematology Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Hemoglobin, WC G3, n=316, 14724 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Hematology Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Lymphocyte count increased, any grade, n=315, 1472 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Hematology Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Lymphocyte count decreased, WC G4, n=315, 1471 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Hematology Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Lymphocyte count increased, WC G3, n=315, 1470 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Hematology Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Lymphocyte count decreased, any grade, n=315, 14777 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Hematology Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Hemoglobin, WC G4, n=316, 1470 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Hematology Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Lymphocyte count increased, WC G4, n=315, 1470 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Hematology Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Platelet count, WC G4, n=314, 1442 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Hematology Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Platelet count, any grade, n=314, 14477 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Hematology Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Platelet count, WC G3, n=314, 1442 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Hematology Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Total neutrophils, WC G4, n=315, 14712 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Hematology Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Total neutrophils, any grade, n=315, 147124 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Hematology Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.WBC count, any grade, n=315, 147138 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Hematology Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Lymphocyte count decreased, WC G3, n=315, 14721 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Hematology Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.WBC count, WC G3, n=315, 14725 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Hematology Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Total neutrophils, WC G3, n=315, 14740 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Hematology Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.WBC count, WC G4, n=315, 1472 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Hematology Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Hemoglobin, any grade, n=316, 147139 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Hematology Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.WBC count, WC G4, n=315, 1471 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Hematology Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Hemoglobin, any grade, n=316, 14769 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Hematology Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Hemoglobin, WC G4, n=316, 1470 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Hematology Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Lymphocyte count decreased, any grade, n=315, 14747 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Hematology Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Lymphocyte count decreased, WC G3, n=315, 14714 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Hematology Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Lymphocyte count decreased, WC G4, n=315, 1471 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Hematology Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Lymphocyte count increased, WC G3, n=315, 1470 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Hematology Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Total neutrophils, any grade, n=315, 14758 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Hematology Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Hemoglobin, WC G3, n=316, 14711 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Hematology Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Lymphocyte count increased, any grade, n=315, 1472 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Hematology Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Lymphocyte count increased, WC G4, n=315, 1470 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Hematology Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Platelet count, any grade, n=314, 14448 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Hematology Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Platelet count, WC G3, n=314, 1445 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Hematology Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Platelet count, WC G4, n=314, 1441 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Hematology Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Total neutrophils, WC G3, n=315, 14719 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Hematology Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Total neutrophils, WC G4, n=315, 1478 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Hematology Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.WBC count, any grade, n=315, 14778 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Hematology Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.WBC count, WC G3, n=315, 14719 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.

Clinical chemistry parameters were measured at the Screening and Weeks 2, 5, 9, 13, 25, 37, and 53 visits. Clinical chemistry parameters measured on-study included albumin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin, calcium (Ca), creatinine, magnesium, and phosphorous (P) inorganic. All reported values are of participants with worst-case on-therapy increase to the specified grade: Any increase, that is, worst-case increase to grade 1, 2, 3, or 4 (any grade); worst-case increase to grade 3 (WC G3); and worst-case increase to grade 4 (WC G4). The National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) was used for grading. Participants with missing Baseline grade were assumed to have a Baseline grade of 0. The worst-case during the on-therapy period was determined taking into account both scheduled and unscheduled assessments.

Time frame: Baseline and up to last study-related visit (up to 53 weeks)

Population: FAS-Safety Population. Only participants whose indicated on-therapy laboratory values were available (represented by n=X, X in the category title) were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.ALT, WC G3, n=324, 1567 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Calcium (hypocalcemia), WC G3, n=324, 1565 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Calcium (hypocalcemia), WC G4, n=324, 1561 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Albumin (hypoalbuminemia), any grade, n=324, 15645 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Creatinine, any grade, n=324, 15616 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.ALT, WC G4, n=324, 1560 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Creatinine, WC G3, n=324, 1561 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.ALP, any grade, n=324, 15667 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Creatinine, WC G4, n=324, 1560 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.AST, any grade, n=323, 155117 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Magnesium (hypermagnesemia), any grade, n=324, 1564 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Albumin (hyperalbuminemia), WC G4, n=324, 1560 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Magnesium (hypermagnesemia), WC G3, n=324, 1562 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.AST, WC G3, n=323, 1557 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Magnesium (hypermagnesemia), WC G4, n=324, 1560 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.ALP, WC G3, n=324, 1567 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Magnesium (hypomagnesemia), any grade, n=324, 1568 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.AST, WC G4, n=323, 1550 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Total Bilirubin, any grade, n=324, 15534 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Albumin (hypoalbuminemia), WC G3, n=324, 1561 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.P,inorganic(hyperphosphatemia),any grade,n=323,1560 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Total Bilirubin, WC G4, n=324, 1552 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.P, inorganic (hyperphosphatemia),WC G3, n=323, 1560 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.ALP, WC G4, n=324, 1560 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.P, inorganic (hyperphosphatemia),WC G4, n=323, 1560 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.P,inorganic(hypophosphatemia),any grade,n=323, 156124 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.P, inorganic (hypophosphatemia),WC G3, n=323, 15635 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Calcium (hypercalcemia), any grade, n=324, 1564 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.P, inorganic (hypophosphatemia), WC G4, n=323, 1561 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Albumin (hyperalbuminemia), WC G3, n=324, 1560 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Albumin (hyperalbuminemia), any grade, n=324, 1560 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Calcium (hypercalcemia), WC G3, n=324, 1560 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.ALT, any grade, n=324, 156137 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Total Bilirubin, WC G3, n=324, 1552 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Calcium (hypercalcemia), WC G4, n=324, 1560 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Albumin (hypoalbuminemia), WC G4, n=324, 1560 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Magnesium (hypomagnesemia), WC G3, n=324, 1560 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Magnesium (hypomagnesemia), WC G4, n=324, 1560 Participants
Denosumab 120 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Calcium (hypocalcemia), any grade, n=324,15678 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.P,inorganic(hypophosphatemia),any grade,n=323, 15635 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Albumin (hyperalbuminemia), WC G3, n=324, 1560 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Albumin (hyperalbuminemia), WC G4, n=324, 1560 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Albumin (hypoalbuminemia), any grade, n=324, 15626 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Albumin (hypoalbuminemia), WC G3, n=324, 1560 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Albumin (hypoalbuminemia), WC G4, n=324, 1560 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.ALP, any grade, n=324, 15631 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.ALP, WC G3, n=324, 1562 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.ALP, WC G4, n=324, 1560 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.ALT, any grade, n=324, 15659 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.ALT, WC G3, n=324, 1564 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.ALT, WC G4, n=324, 1560 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.AST, any grade, n=323, 15561 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.AST, WC G3, n=323, 1554 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Total Bilirubin, WC G3, n=324, 1550 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Total Bilirubin, WC G4, n=324, 1551 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Calcium (hypercalcemia), any grade, n=324, 1563 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Calcium (hypercalcemia), WC G3, n=324, 1560 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Calcium (hypercalcemia), WC G4, n=324, 1561 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Calcium (hypocalcemia), any grade, n=324,15628 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Calcium (hypocalcemia), WC G4, n=324, 1560 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Creatinine, any grade, n=324, 15613 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Creatinine, WC G3, n=324, 1560 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Creatinine, WC G4, n=324, 1560 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Magnesium (hypermagnesemia), any grade, n=324, 1560 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Magnesium (hypermagnesemia), WC G3, n=324, 1560 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Magnesium (hypermagnesemia), WC G4, n=324, 1560 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Magnesium (hypomagnesemia), any grade, n=324, 1562 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Magnesium (hypomagnesemia), WC G3, n=324, 1560 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Magnesium (hypomagnesemia), WC G4, n=324, 1560 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.P,inorganic(hyperphosphatemia),any grade,n=323,1560 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.P, inorganic (hyperphosphatemia),WC G3, n=323, 1560 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.P, inorganic (hypophosphatemia),WC G3, n=323, 1569 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.P, inorganic (hypophosphatemia), WC G4, n=323, 1560 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.AST, WC G4, n=323, 1550 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Total Bilirubin, any grade, n=324, 15516 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Calcium (hypocalcemia), WC G3, n=324, 1560 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.P, inorganic (hyperphosphatemia),WC G4, n=323, 1560 Participants
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgNumber of Participants With Worst-case (WC) On-therapy Increase in the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters From Baseline Grade to the Indicated Grade.Albumin (hyperalbuminemia), any grade, n=324, 1560 Participants
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 13 in Urinary Amino-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen of Type I Collagen Corrected for Urine Creatinine (uNTx/uCr) in Chinese Participants.

uNTx/uCr is the bone turnover marker correlated with the presence and extent of metastases, and the prognosis and response to bone targeted treatment. uNTx/uCr was expressed in nanomoles bone collagen equivalent per millimole (nM BCE/mM). Secondary objective: to compare the effect of denosumab with that of zoledronic acid on % chg from BL in uNTx/uCr at Wk 13 in par. of Chinese ancestry with bone metastases from solid tumors. Baseline value is the most recent, non-missing value prior to or on the first study treatment dose date. Change from Baseline is the value at Week 13 minus Baseline value. Percent chg from BL is the chg from BL / BL value \* 100. For missing Wk 13 observations, the last post-BL value was carried forward to obtain the Wk 13 value.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 13

Population: FAS-ITT Population. Chinese participants.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Denosumab 120 mgPercentage Change From Baseline to Week 13 in Urinary Amino-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen of Type I Collagen Corrected for Urine Creatinine (uNTx/uCr) in Chinese Participants.-82.2 Percent change
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgPercentage Change From Baseline to Week 13 in Urinary Amino-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen of Type I Collagen Corrected for Urine Creatinine (uNTx/uCr) in Chinese Participants.-75.6 Percent change
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.444, -0.188]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 13 in Urinary Amino-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen of Type I Collagen Corrected for Urine Creatinine (uNTx/uCr) in Participants With Advanced Breast Cancer.

uNTx/uCr is the bone turnover marker correlated with the presence and extent of metastases, and the prognosis and response to bone targeted treatment. uNTx/uCr was expressed in nanomoles bone collagen equivalent per millimole (nM BCE/mM). Secondary objective: to compare the effect of denosumab with that of zoledronic acid on % chg from BL in uNTx/uCr at Wk 13 in breast cancer par. with bone metastases from solid tumors. Baseline value is the most recent, non-missing value prior to or on the first study treatment dose date. Change from Baseline is the value at Week 13 minus Baseline value. Percent chg from BL is the chg from BL / BL value \* 100. For missing Wk 13 observations, the last post-BL value was carried forward to obtain the Wk 13 value.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 13

Population: FAS-ITT Population. Participants with advanced breast cancer.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Denosumab 120 mgPercentage Change From Baseline to Week 13 in Urinary Amino-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen of Type I Collagen Corrected for Urine Creatinine (uNTx/uCr) in Participants With Advanced Breast Cancer.-80.9 Percent change
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgPercentage Change From Baseline to Week 13 in Urinary Amino-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen of Type I Collagen Corrected for Urine Creatinine (uNTx/uCr) in Participants With Advanced Breast Cancer.-72.4 Percent change
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.539, -0.193]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in the Serum Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase (s-BALP) at Week 13.

Baseline value is the most recent, non-missing value prior to or on the first study treatment dose date. Change from Baseline is the value at Indicated visit minus Baseline value. Percent change from Baseline is the change from Baseline divided by Baseline value multiplied by 100.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 13

Population: FAS-ITT Population. All participants who were randomized and had a observed values at Baseline and Week 13 were used in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Denosumab 120 mgPercent Change From Baseline in the Serum Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase (s-BALP) at Week 13.-36.8 Percent change
Zoledronic Acid 4 mgPercent Change From Baseline in the Serum Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase (s-BALP) at Week 13.-30.3 Percent change
Secondary

Serum Concentration of Denosumab on Day 1, at Week 2, Week 5, Week 9, Week 13, Week 17, Week 19, Week 21, Week 25 and Week 49

Blood samples were drawn on study Day 1, pre-dose; 4 hours, 24 hours, and at Week 2 (168 hours); then pre-dose at Week 5, Week 9, Week 13, Week 17, Week 19 (no dose), Week 21, Week 25, and Week 49.

Time frame: Samples were collected at pre-dose (Day 1); 4 hours, 24 hours, 168 hours post-dose; pre-dose at Week 5, Week 9, Week 13, Week 17; Week 19 (at 336 hours); pre-dose at Week 21, Week 25, Week 49

Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Population: comprised of participants who signed informed consent to participate in the PK sub-study and who had their PK parameters evaluable according to GSK standards. Only those participants with evaluable parameters are included (represented by n=X in the category titles).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Denosumab 120 mgSerum Concentration of Denosumab on Day 1, at Week 2, Week 5, Week 9, Week 13, Week 17, Week 19, Week 21, Week 25 and Week 49Day 1, Pre-dose, n=260 micrograms per milliliter (µg/mL)
Denosumab 120 mgSerum Concentration of Denosumab on Day 1, at Week 2, Week 5, Week 9, Week 13, Week 17, Week 19, Week 21, Week 25 and Week 49Day 1, 4 hours post-dose, n=26777.1 micrograms per milliliter (µg/mL)
Denosumab 120 mgSerum Concentration of Denosumab on Day 1, at Week 2, Week 5, Week 9, Week 13, Week 17, Week 19, Week 21, Week 25 and Week 49Day 1, 24 hours post-dose, n=265521.6 micrograms per milliliter (µg/mL)
Denosumab 120 mgSerum Concentration of Denosumab on Day 1, at Week 2, Week 5, Week 9, Week 13, Week 17, Week 19, Week 21, Week 25 and Week 49Week 2, 168 hours post-dose, n=2611701.1 micrograms per milliliter (µg/mL)
Denosumab 120 mgSerum Concentration of Denosumab on Day 1, at Week 2, Week 5, Week 9, Week 13, Week 17, Week 19, Week 21, Week 25 and Week 49Week 5, Pre-dose, n=258658.1 micrograms per milliliter (µg/mL)
Denosumab 120 mgSerum Concentration of Denosumab on Day 1, at Week 2, Week 5, Week 9, Week 13, Week 17, Week 19, Week 21, Week 25 and Week 49Week 9, Pre-dose, n=2512086.4 micrograms per milliliter (µg/mL)
Denosumab 120 mgSerum Concentration of Denosumab on Day 1, at Week 2, Week 5, Week 9, Week 13, Week 17, Week 19, Week 21, Week 25 and Week 49Week 13, Pre-dose, n=2514867.5 micrograms per milliliter (µg/mL)
Denosumab 120 mgSerum Concentration of Denosumab on Day 1, at Week 2, Week 5, Week 9, Week 13, Week 17, Week 19, Week 21, Week 25 and Week 49Week 17, Pre-dose, n=2416543.3 micrograms per milliliter (µg/mL)
Denosumab 120 mgSerum Concentration of Denosumab on Day 1, at Week 2, Week 5, Week 9, Week 13, Week 17, Week 19, Week 21, Week 25 and Week 49Week 19, 336 hours, n=2220802.4 micrograms per milliliter (µg/mL)
Denosumab 120 mgSerum Concentration of Denosumab on Day 1, at Week 2, Week 5, Week 9, Week 13, Week 17, Week 19, Week 21, Week 25 and Week 49Week 21, Predose, n=2114508.0 micrograms per milliliter (µg/mL)
Denosumab 120 mgSerum Concentration of Denosumab on Day 1, at Week 2, Week 5, Week 9, Week 13, Week 17, Week 19, Week 21, Week 25 and Week 49Week 25, Predose, n=2216619.0 micrograms per milliliter (µg/mL)
Denosumab 120 mgSerum Concentration of Denosumab on Day 1, at Week 2, Week 5, Week 9, Week 13, Week 17, Week 19, Week 21, Week 25 and Week 49Week 49, Predose, n=1920029.2 micrograms per milliliter (µg/mL)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 6, 2026