Skip to content

A Comparison of Efficacy and Safety During Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Between Dexmedetomidine-remifentanil and Propofol-remifentanil

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01920113
Enrollment
60
Registered
2013-08-09
Start date
2012-10-31
Completion date
2013-03-31
Last updated
2015-01-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Early Gastric Cancer Patients Who Were Scheduled for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Keywords

Endoscopic submucosal dissection, propofol, remifentanil, dexmedetomidine, efficacy, safeness

Brief summary

Adequate, safe sedation is essential for Endoscopic submucosal dissection. Dexmedetomidine is a potent and selective a2-adrenoceptor agonist used for sedative and analgesic effects, but it is limited to use alone. The investigators designed this study to compare the effect and safety of two sedatives, dexmedetomidine and propofol in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD), when sufficient analgesia-remifentanil is administered all throughout the procedure.

Interventions

DRUGDexmedetomidine - remifentanil group
DRUGPropofol - remifentanil group

Sponsors

Yonsei University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥20 * American Society of Anaesthesiologists(ASA) physical status classification I\ III * Early gastric cancer patients who were scheduled for Endoscopic submucosal dissection

Exclusion criteria

* Age \< 20 * American Society of Anaesthesiologists(ASA) physical status classification IV * those with end-organ diseases (i.e. heart failure, respiratory failure, hepatic failure, renal failure) * known drug allergies or history of drug abuse * psychological disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
A comparison of safety during endoscopic submucosal dissection between dexmedetomidine-remifentanil and propofol-remifentanilright after the drugs had administeredSafety : whether the complications as follows occur or not 1. systolic blood pressure under 90mmHg or 20% out of range of the baseline SBP 2. heart rate under 50bpm 3. oxygen saturation under 90%, respiratory rate under 7 per minute

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
A comparison of efficacy during endoscopic submucosal dissection between dexmedetomidine-remifentanil and propofol-remifentanilright after the drugs had administeredEfficacy : 1. whether a bolus injection of 10 mg of propofol was administered or not 2. evaluating the depth of sedation using MOAA/S scale all through the procedure 3. whether the en bloc resection, complete resection were done or not under the sedation

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
A comparison of patient's satisfaction during endoscopic submucosal dissection between dexmedetomidine-remifentanil and propofol-remifentanilwithin 24hrs after procedurePatients' satisfaction : investigate in four steps questionaire (very good, good, bearable and unbearable) when the patients' were discharged from PACU
A comparison of gastric motility, easiness for procedure, operator's satisfaction during endoscopic submucosal dissection between dexmedetomidine-remifentanil and propofol-remifentanilright after the drugs had administeredSubjects' motility grading during procedure, easiness of procedure, operator's satisfaction : investigate in four steps questionaires by the operator after the procedure

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026