Skip to content

Cosmetic Outcome Study of Lid Laceration Repair With Suture Versus Tissue Adhesive

Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Tissue Adhesive (Octyl-2-Cyanoacrylate) vs. Traditional Suture in Traumatic Lid Laceration Repair

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01918059
Enrollment
4
Registered
2013-08-07
Start date
2013-08-31
Completion date
2014-11-30
Last updated
2014-12-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Eyelid Laceration

Keywords

Trauma, Eyelid, Laceration, Tissue adhesive, suture, cosmetic, octyl-2-cyanoacrylate

Brief summary

This project is a randomized, controlled trial investigating wound cosmetic appearance after repair of traumatic lid lacerations with three different approaches to skin closure: absorbable sutures, non-absorbable sutures, and tissue adhesive. Photographs will be taken at two intervals after repair and later blindly assessed using standard cosmetic assessment scales. The investigators hypothesize that cosmetic wound outcome will be equivalent in across all three treatment arms.

Detailed description

This project is a randomized, controlled trial investigating the cosmetic appearance after repair of traumatic lid lacerations with three different approaches to skin closure: absorbable sutures (surgical gut suture), non-absorbable sutures (polypropylene suture), and tissue adhesive (octyl-2-cyanoacrylate). The population will include patients presenting to Memorial Hermann Hospital requiring repair of traumatic lid lacerations. The study will include partial thickness, full-thickness, and margin-involving lacerations where first standard layered tarsal and marginal suture repair will be performed if necessary, and then the patient will be randomized to superficial skin closure with either polypropylene suture closure, surgical gut suture closure, or tissue adhesive closure. Subjects will be followed in an outpatient setting at 1 week and 1 month post-repair at which time standardized photographs will be taken and later assessed using two standardized appearance assessment tools: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Hollander Wound Evaluation Score (HWES).

Interventions

PROCEDURETissue Adhesive skin closure

The approach to repair will follow standard technique. If eyelid marginal component is present, margin repair will be performed with two 6-0 interrupted silk sutures: one at the gray line and one at the lash line. If the tarsus requires reapproximation, this will carefully be done using interrupted polyglactin vicryl sutures. The superficial skin will then be repaired with tissue adhesive (octyl-2-cyanoacrylate).

PROCEDUREAbsorbable suture skin closure

The approach to repair will follow standard technique. If eyelid marginal component is present, margin repair will be performed with two 6-0 interrupted silk sutures: one at the gray line and one at the lash line. If the tarsus requires reapproximation, this will carefully be done using interrupted polyglactin vicryl sutures. The superficial skin will then be repaired with absorbable sutures (surgical gut).

PROCEDURENon-absorbable suture skin closure

The approach to repair will follow standard technique. If eyelid marginal component is present, margin repair will be performed with two 6-0 interrupted silk sutures: one at the gray line and one at the lash line. If the tarsus requires reapproximation, this will carefully be done using interrupted polyglactin vicryl sutures. The superficial skin will then be repaired with either non-absorbable sutures (6-0 polypropylene).

Sponsors

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years of age or older. * Any laceration caused by trauma and involving the skin of the upper and/or lower eyelid. * Must be able to understand and sign an informed consent when applicable and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act(HIPAA) form that has been approved by an Institutional Review Board (IRB) or follow standard informed consent procedure of the IRB

Exclusion criteria

* Eyelid lacerations that include avulsion or missing eyelid tissue * Patients with known hypersensitivity to octyl-2-cyanoacrylate or previous poor reaction to octyl-2-cyanoacrylate * Eyelid lacerations resulting in necrosis or ischemia of tissue prior to repair * Patients who demonstrate intoxication or mental status changes that would make them unfit to provide informed consent for repair

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cosmetic wound appearance1 month after repairCosmetic appearance will be assessed using two wound assessment methods: the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Hollander Wound Evaluation Scale (HWES).

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026