Skip to content

Study on Early Stage Bulky Cervical Cancers

Randomised Phase III Clinical Trial on Concurent Chemoradiation vs. Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation and Surgery vs. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery in Early Stage Bulky Cervical Cancers (FIGO Stages IB2, IIA2 and IIB)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01917695
Enrollment
180
Registered
2013-08-07
Start date
2013-08-31
Completion date
2018-08-31
Last updated
2015-08-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma Cervix

Keywords

Bulky cervical cancers, Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to establish the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemo irradiation in carcinoma cervix and to compare its results with the concurrent chemo irradiation in terms of overall survival, disease free survival and quality of life.

Detailed description

Early stage bulky cancers of the cervix, (defined as FIGO Stages IB2, IIA2 and IIB) form a distinctive subset of curable cervical cancers with good 5 year survival rates with adequate treatment. Concurrent chemo radiation with or without salvage surgery is at present the standard of care for this group of cervical cancers. However, when pelvic recurrences occur, the morbidity of salvage surgery after radiotherapy, especially brachytherapy is often higher than the morbidity of salvage radiotherapy following radical surgery. The advantages of downsizing the disease without the use of brachytherapy are tempting and open a completely new philosophy in radical treatment for curable early stage bulky cancers of the cervix. This approach is appealing especially in developing countries where the load of cervical cancers is high and radiotherapy (brachytherapy) resources are scarce. The results of two Phase II trials conducted at Govt. Royapettah Hospital, Chennai (Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy followed by Radical Hysterectomy: Cisplatin + 5FU vs. Cisplatin +Paclitaxel) and at Govt. General Hospital,Chennai (Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation with weekly cisplatin and 50 EBRT followed by radical Hysterectomy) and one retrospective study ( Preoperative 50 GY EBRT followed by Radical Hysterectomy) have shown similar response rates and acceptable toxicity profiles when compared to concurrent chemoradiation (EBRT + Brachytherapy+ Chemotherapy). Similar studies have been published elsewhere with similar results. With this in mind we are planning to conduct a Phase III Randomised control trial comparing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy + Radical Hysterectomy and Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation + Radical Hysterectomy with concurrent chemoradiation in this subset of cervical cancers

Interventions

DRUGChemotherapy

cisplatin 75 mg/m2 Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2

RADIATIONExternal Beam Radiotherapy

50 Gy/2 Gy/25 # external beam RT to cervix. four field technique. given concurrently with chemotherapy weeks 1 - 5

RADIATIONBrachytherapy

Ir - 192 HDR Brachytherapy - intracavitary. 7Gy x 3#. given after completion of chemoRT.

Type III Radical Hysterectomy + Bilateral Pelvic Node Dissection

Sponsors

Rajkumar Kottayasamy Seenivasagam
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with histologically confirmed bulky cervical Squamous cell carcinoma (FIGO stage IB2, II A2, IIB). 2. Age 18-60 years 3. Karnofsky performance status of ≥70%; ECOG PS ≤ 2

Exclusion criteria

1. Nonsquamous Histologies 2. Other systemic diseases, comorbidities precluding full participation in the study 3. Concomitant treatment with any experimental drug 4. Pregnant or nursing women 5. Previous or concomitant malignant diseases other than non-melanoma skin cancer 6. Previous radiation to the pelvis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Overall and Disease free Survival3 year

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Acute Adverse reactions and complicationsLess than 10 weeks
SubAcute Adverse reactions and complications10 weeks - 6 months
Chronic Adverse reactions and complications6 months to 5 years

Other

MeasureTime frame
Quality of Life3,5 years

Countries

India

Contacts

Primary ContactRajaraman Ramamurthy, MS MCh
rajaanu1@rediffmail.com+919444046168
Backup ContactSubbiah Shanmugam, Ms MCh
subbiah_doctor@yahoo.co.uk+919360206030

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026