Skip to content

A Safety and Efficacy Study of OnabotulinumtoxinA in Premature Ejaculation

An Exploratory Study of the Safety and Efficacy of BOTOX® for the Treatment of Premature Ejaculation

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01917006
Enrollment
59
Registered
2013-08-06
Start date
2013-08-07
Completion date
2017-08-15
Last updated
2018-10-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Premature Ejaculation

Brief summary

This is a safety and efficacy study of OnabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of premature ejaculation (PE) in male participants.

Detailed description

This is a phase 2, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study to assess a range of doses of OnabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of male participants with PE. Participants will attend a minimum of 6 or 7 clinic visits and also have 1 or 2 telephone visits. Partners will need to attend a clinic visit during the screening period to provide informed consent and to receive training on measurement and recording of the intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT). Participants will be enrolled in cohorts. Within the first 5 cohorts, 8 participants are to receive OnabotulinumtoxinA and 2 participants to receive placebo. For cohort 6, 12 participants will receive OnabotulinumtoxinA and 12 participants will receive placebo. Participants will receive a single treatment of study medication delivered bilaterally to the bulbospongiosus muscle. The initial OnabotulinumtoxinA total dose in this dose escalation study will be 5 U and the maximum OnabotulinumtoxinA total dose will be 100 U. Upon request and if eligible, participants in cohort 6, will have the option to receive a second injection of OnabotulinumtoxinA (Open-label).

Interventions

DRUGOnabotulinumtoxinA

OnabotulinumtoxinA injected into specified muscle per protocol on Day 1.

DRUGNormal Saline

Placebo (normal saline) injected into specified muscle per protocol on Day 1.

Sponsors

Allergan
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* History of premature ejaculation * Stable monogamous sexual relationship with female partner for at least 6 months, and intends to continue with the same partner for the duration of the study * Participant has ability to follow study instructions and complete study assessment tools

Exclusion criteria

* Premature ejaculation caused by medical or surgical issues, or is related to stress or other issues (eg, relationship problems) * Pain with ejaculation * Planned use of topical penile treatments (eg, anesthetics, herbal treatments) or penile injections during the study * Prior genital, prostatic or lower urinary tract surgery (other than vasectomy or circumcision) * Previous or current usage of botulinum toxin therapy of any serotype for any urological condition * Use of botulinum toxin therapy of any serotype for any nonurological condition (eg, cosmetic, chronic migraine) during the 12 weeks prior to screening, or planned usage during the study * Diagnosis of Myasthenia gravis, Eaton-Lambert Syndrome, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT)Baseline (Day 1) to Week 12IELT, the time from vaginal penetration to ejaculation, was measured by a stopwatch and was recorded in the sexual intercourse diary (SID). The Logarithm Value of the Geometric Mean of each individual participant's IELT recorded in the SID up to each time point was calculated. The mean and standard deviation (SD) of log-transformed geometric mean IELTs are then calculated for each treatment group. An Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) Model with treatment as the fixed effect and baseline geometric mean IELT as the covariate was used for analyses. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Average IELTBaseline (Day 1) to Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12IELT, the time from vaginal penetration to ejaculation, was measured by a stopwatch and was recorded in the SID. The average of each individual participant's IELT recorded in the SID up to each time point was calculated. The mean and SD of average IELTs were then calculated for each treatment group. An ANCOVA Model with treatment as the fixed effect and baseline average mean IELT as the covariate was used for analyses. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTBaseline (Day 1) to Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10IELT, the time from vaginal penetration to ejaculation, was measured by a stopwatch and was recorded in the SID. The Logarithm Value of the Geometric Mean of each individual participant's IELT recorded in the SID up to each time point was calculated. The mean and SD of log-transformed geometric mean IELTs were then calculated for each treatment group. An ANCOVA Model with treatment as the fixed effect and baseline geometric mean IELT as the covariate was used for analyses. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Countries

United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Participants received a single treatment of either placebo or OnabotulinumtoxinA (Doses 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6), delivered bilaterally to the bulbospongiosus muscle in randomized-treatment period. Participants who completed 12 weeks of randomized period were eligible to receive second injection with OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 2 in Open-label Period.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 1
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 1 injected into specified muscle per protocol on Day 1.
5
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 2
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 2 injected into specified muscle per protocol on Day 1. Participants were eligible for another treatment after 12 weeks.
7
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 3
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 3 injected into specified muscle per protocol on Day 1.
8
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 4
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 4 injected into specified muscle per protocol on Day 1.
7
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 5
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 5 injected into specified muscle per protocol on Day 1.
8
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 6
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 6 injected into specified muscle per protocol on Day 1.
7
Placebo
Placebo (normal saline) injected into specified muscle per protocol on Day 1.
15
Total57

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007
Open-label PeriodAdverse Event00000001
Open-label PeriodLost to Follow-up00000001
Randomized-treatment PeriodLost to Follow-up10010000
Randomized-treatment PeriodOther Miscellaneous Reasons00000010
Randomized-treatment PeriodPersonal Reasons00000100
Randomized-treatment PeriodProtocol Violation10000000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTotalOnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 1OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 2OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 3OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 4OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 5OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 6
Age, Continuous41.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.08
40.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.41
41.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.83
41.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.65
39.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.62
39.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.05
40.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.53
39.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.96
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 participants4 participants0 participants1 participants0 participants1 participants1 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
3 participants9 participants1 participants2 participants1 participants1 participants1 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
9 participants37 participants3 participants4 participants5 participants5 participants5 participants6 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
2 participants5 participants1 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 participants2 participants0 participants0 participants2 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants57 Participants5 Participants7 Participants8 Participants7 Participants8 Participants7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 50 / 70 / 80 / 80 / 80 / 80 / 150 / 8
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 52 / 71 / 82 / 83 / 84 / 812 / 153 / 8
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 50 / 70 / 80 / 80 / 80 / 80 / 150 / 8

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT)

IELT, the time from vaginal penetration to ejaculation, was measured by a stopwatch and was recorded in the sexual intercourse diary (SID). The Logarithm Value of the Geometric Mean of each individual participant's IELT recorded in the SID up to each time point was calculated. The mean and standard deviation (SD) of log-transformed geometric mean IELTs are then calculated for each treatment group. An Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) Model with treatment as the fixed effect and baseline geometric mean IELT as the covariate was used for analyses. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 12

Population: The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population included all randomized participants who received study treatment and had post-baseline intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) data available based on the dose actually received by the participant. Number analyzed is the number of participants with available data at the given time-point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 1Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT)Baseline3.57 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.283
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 1Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT)Change from Baseline to Week 120.55 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 1.037
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 2Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT)Baseline3.50 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.631
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 2Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT)Change from Baseline to Week 120.69 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 1.426
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 3Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT)Baseline3.46 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.371
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 3Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT)Change from Baseline to Week 120.05 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.856
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 4Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT)Baseline3.52 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.531
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 4Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT)Change from Baseline to Week 120.30 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.472
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 5Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT)Baseline3.53 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.475
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 5Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT)Change from Baseline to Week 120.31 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.525
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 6Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT)Baseline3.54 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.505
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 6Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT)Change from Baseline to Week 120.59 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.719
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Geometric Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT)Baseline3.46 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.61
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Geometric Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT)Change from Baseline to Week 120.44 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.615
p-value: 0.393ANCOVA
p-value: 0.263ANCOVA
p-value: 0.861ANCOVA
p-value: 0.647ANCOVA
p-value: 0.645ANCOVA
p-value: 0.343ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Average IELT

IELT, the time from vaginal penetration to ejaculation, was measured by a stopwatch and was recorded in the SID. The average of each individual participant's IELT recorded in the SID up to each time point was calculated. The mean and SD of average IELTs were then calculated for each treatment group. An ANCOVA Model with treatment as the fixed effect and baseline average mean IELT as the covariate was used for analyses. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12

Population: The mITT population included all randomized participants who received study treatment and had post-baseline IELT data available based on the dose actually received by the participants. Number analyzed is the number of participants with available data at the given time-point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 1Change From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 1253.65 secondsStandard Deviation 102.527
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 1Change From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 461.94 secondsStandard Deviation 100.446
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 1Change From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 1056.13 secondsStandard Deviation 101.447
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 1Change From Baseline in Average IELTBaseline37.25 secondsStandard Deviation 10.518
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 1Change From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 661.42 secondsStandard Deviation 100.446
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 1Change From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 266.25 secondsStandard Deviation 101.132
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 1Change From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 859.55 secondsStandard Deviation 100.896
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 2Change From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 6183.44 secondsStandard Deviation 374.404
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 2Change From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 12152.74 secondsStandard Deviation 295.219
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 2Change From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 4176.71 secondsStandard Deviation 367.665
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 2Change From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 2180.31 secondsStandard Deviation 317.657
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 2Change From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 8176.59 secondsStandard Deviation 349.777
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 2Change From Baseline in Average IELTBaseline39.42 secondsStandard Deviation 21.504
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 2Change From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 10170.65 secondsStandard Deviation 331.039
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 3Change From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 1015.55 secondsStandard Deviation 39.149
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 3Change From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 620.75 secondsStandard Deviation 55.85
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 3Change From Baseline in Average IELTBaseline34.41 secondsStandard Deviation 10.194
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 3Change From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 1212.95 secondsStandard Deviation 30.93
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 3Change From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 224.73 secondsStandard Deviation 59.725
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 3Change From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 817.08 secondsStandard Deviation 44.158
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 3Change From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 424.06 secondsStandard Deviation 59.472
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 4Change From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 1037.45 secondsStandard Deviation 71.782
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 4Change From Baseline in Average IELTBaseline38.00 secondsStandard Deviation 16.008
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 4Change From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 1228.32 secondsStandard Deviation 48.965
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 4Change From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 234.87 secondsStandard Deviation 74.842
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 4Change From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 837.69 secondsStandard Deviation 71.873
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 4Change From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 435.00 secondsStandard Deviation 73.475
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 4Change From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 636.95 secondsStandard Deviation 71.996
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 5Change From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 228.04 secondsStandard Deviation 31.298
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 5Change From Baseline in Average IELTBaseline40.88 secondsStandard Deviation 16.435
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 5Change From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 428.46 secondsStandard Deviation 36.881
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 5Change From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 629.35 secondsStandard Deviation 39.334
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 5Change From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 829.48 secondsStandard Deviation 44.505
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 5Change From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 1027.49 secondsStandard Deviation 45.365
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 5Change From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 1227.51 secondsStandard Deviation 48.72
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 6Change From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 464.97 secondsStandard Deviation 67.471
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 6Change From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 255.77 secondsStandard Deviation 65.549
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 6Change From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 664.49 secondsStandard Deviation 66.546
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 6Change From Baseline in Average IELTBaseline38.75 secondsStandard Deviation 15.596
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 6Change From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 1266.01 secondsStandard Deviation 71.489
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 6Change From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 1063.91 secondsStandard Deviation 67.725
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 6Change From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 865.19 secondsStandard Deviation 65.612
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 1068.26 secondsStandard Deviation 146.33
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 429.30 secondsStandard Deviation 69.073
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 211.25 secondsStandard Deviation 23.985
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 865.57 secondsStandard Deviation 128.47
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Average IELTBaseline37.92 secondsStandard Deviation 16.656
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 647.62 secondsStandard Deviation 89.847
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Average IELTChange from Baseline to Week 1268.49 secondsStandard Deviation 151.68
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 1 versus (vs) Placebo at Week 2p-value: 0.184ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 2 vs Placebo at Week 2p-value: 0.002ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 3 vs Placebo at Week 2p-value: 0.404ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 4 vs Placebo at Week 2p-value: 0.328ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 5 vs Placebo at Week 2p-value: 0.362ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 6 vs Placebo at Week 2p-value: 0.203ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 1 vs Placebo at Week 4p-value: 0.322ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 2 vs Placebo at Week 4p-value: 0.015ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 3 vs Placebo at Week 4p-value: 0.541ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 4 vs Placebo at Week 4p-value: 0.459ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 5 vs Placebo at Week 4p-value: 0.491ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 6 vs Placebo at Week 4p-value: 0.281ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 1 vs Placebo at Week 6p-value: 0.424ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 2 vs Placebo at Week 6p-value: 0.026ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 3 vs Placebo at Week 6p-value: 0.67ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 4 vs Placebo at Week 6p-value: 0.561ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 5 vs Placebo at Week 6p-value: 0.604ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 6 vs Placebo at Week 6p-value: 0.394ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 1 vs Placebo at Week 8p-value: 0.532ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 2 vs Placebo at Week 8p-value: 0.058ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 3 vs Placebo at Week 8p-value: 0.778ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 4 vs Placebo at Week 8p-value: 0.662ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 5 vs Placebo at Week 8p-value: 0.712ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 6 vs Placebo at Week 8p-value: 0.501ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 1 vs Placebo at Week 10p-value: 0.565ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 2 vs Placebo at Week 10p-value: 0.071ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 3 vs Placebo at Week 10p-value: 0.799ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 4 vs Placebo at Week 10p-value: 0.681ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 5 vs Placebo at Week 10p-value: 0.741ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 6 vs Placebo at Week 10p-value: 0.526ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 1 vs Placebo at Week 12p-value: 0.584ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 2 vs Placebo at Week 12p-value: 0.101ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 3 vs Placebo at Week 12p-value: 0.823ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 4 vs Placebo at Week 12p-value: 0.741ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 5 vs Placebo at Week 12p-value: 0.756ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 6 vs Placebo at Week 12p-value: 0.517ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELT

IELT, the time from vaginal penetration to ejaculation, was measured by a stopwatch and was recorded in the SID. The Logarithm Value of the Geometric Mean of each individual participant's IELT recorded in the SID up to each time point was calculated. The mean and SD of log-transformed geometric mean IELTs were then calculated for each treatment group. An ANCOVA Model with treatment as the fixed effect and baseline geometric mean IELT as the covariate was used for analyses. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10

Population: The mITT population included all randomized participants who received study treatment and had post-baseline IELT data available based on the dose actually received by the participant. Number analyzed is the number of participants with available data at the given time-point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 1Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTChange from Baseline to Week 100.60 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 1.009
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 1Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTBaseline3.57 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.283
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 1Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTChange from Baseline to Week 60.70 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.999
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 1Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTChange from Baseline to Week 80.67 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 1.007
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 1Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTChange from Baseline to Week 20.76 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 1.014
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 1Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTChange from Baseline to Week 40.70 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 1
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 2Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTChange from Baseline to Week 100.80 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 1.503
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 2Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTChange from Baseline to Week 40.77 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 1.505
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 2Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTBaseline3.50 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.631
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 2Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTChange from Baseline to Week 20.95 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 1.497
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 2Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTChange from Baseline to Week 80.79 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 1.525
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 2Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTChange from Baseline to Week 60.83 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 1.513
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 3Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTChange from Baseline to Week 80.05 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.968
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 3Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTBaseline3.46 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.371
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 3Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTChange from Baseline to Week 20.26 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.677
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 3Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTChange from Baseline to Week 40.18 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.879
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 3Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTChange from Baseline to Week 60.08 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.971
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 3Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTChange from Baseline to Week 100.07 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.905
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 4Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTBaseline3.52 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.531
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 4Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTChange from Baseline to Week 60.36 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.629
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 4Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTChange from Baseline to Week 100.37 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.624
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 4Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTChange from Baseline to Week 80.37 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.627
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 4Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTChange from Baseline to Week 40.33 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.616
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 4Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTChange from Baseline to Week 20.34 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.69
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 5Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTChange from Baseline to Week 100.32 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.512
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 5Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTChange from Baseline to Week 40.38 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.481
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 5Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTChange from Baseline to Week 20.47 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.604
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 5Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTChange from Baseline to Week 60.36 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.483
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 5Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTBaseline3.53 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.475
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 5Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTChange from Baseline to Week 80.36 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.522
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 6Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTBaseline3.54 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.505
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 6Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTChange from Baseline to Week 20.62 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.623
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 6Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTChange from Baseline to Week 60.59 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.722
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 6Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTChange from Baseline to Week 40.61 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.618
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 6Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTChange from Baseline to Week 80.61 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.682
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 6Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTChange from Baseline to Week 100.56 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.727
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTBaseline3.46 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.61
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTChange from Baseline to Week 100.44 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.603
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTChange from Baseline to Week 40.22 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.627
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTChange from Baseline to Week 20.19 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.486
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTChange from Baseline to Week 60.36 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.524
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Geometric Mean IELTChange from Baseline to Week 80.44 log(seconds)Standard Deviation 0.567
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 1 vs Placebo at Week 2p-value: 0.079ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 2 vs Placebo at Week 2p-value: 0.025ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 3 vs Placebo at Week 2p-value: 0.417ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 4 vs Placebo at Week 2p-value: 0.33ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 5 vs Placebo at Week 2p-value: 0.199ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 6 vs Placebo at Week 2p-value: 0.113ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 1 vs Placebo at Week 4p-value: 0.127ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 2 vs Placebo at Week 4p-value: 0.087ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 3 vs Placebo at Week 4p-value: 0.543ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 4 vs Placebo at Week 4p-value: 0.377ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 5 vs Placebo at Week 4p-value: 0.321ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 6 vs Placebo at Week 4p-value: 0.149ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 1 vs Placebo at Week 6p-value: 0.215ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 2 vs Placebo at Week 6p-value: 0.126ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 3 vs Placebo at Week 6p-value: 0.774ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 4 vs Placebo at Week 6p-value: 0.495ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 5 vs Placebo at Week 6p-value: 0.495ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 6 vs Placebo at Week 6p-value: 0.274ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 1 vs Placebo at Week 8p-value: 0.308ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 2 vs Placebo at Week 8p-value: 0.205ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 3 vs Placebo at Week 8p-value: 0.849ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 4 vs Placebo at Week 8p-value: 0.571ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 5 vs Placebo at Week 8p-value: 0.592ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 6 vs Placebo at Week 8p-value: 0.34ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 1 vs Placebo at Week 10p-value: 0.36ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 2 vs Placebo at Week 10p-value: 0.192ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 3 vs Placebo at Week 10p-value: 0.843ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 4 vs Placebo at Week 10p-value: 0.572ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 5 vs Placebo at Week 10p-value: 0.628ANCOVA
Comparison: OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose 6 vs Placebo at Week 10p-value: 0.38ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026