Skip to content

Response to Supplement and Placebo in GERD

Response to Supplement and Placebo in GERD

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01915173
Enrollment
24
Registered
2013-08-02
Start date
2013-06-30
Completion date
2014-04-30
Last updated
2017-03-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dyspepsia, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD), Heartburn

Keywords

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), Heartburn, Dyspepsia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of a widely available over the counter supplement marketed for heartburn symptoms on symptoms and health-related quality of life in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This study is designed as a pilot trial to assess safety and feasibility and to provide preliminary estimates of effect sizes.

Interventions

DRUGSupplement

Abies nigra 4C, Carbo vegetabilis 4C, Nux vomica 4C, and Robinia pseudoacacia 4C

DRUGPlacebo

Lactose tablets

BEHAVIORALExpanded Interview

Sponsors

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult humans age 18-80. * Fluency in written and spoken English. * Heartburn symptoms 3 or more days per week for the past month.

Exclusion criteria

* Individuals taking a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or H2 receptor blocker with a dose change within 2 weeks of the initial study visit. * Individuals with Crohns disease, systemic sclerosis, known active ulcer disease, gastric cancer, Barrett's esophagitis * Significant pain or difficulty with swallowing * Heavy alcohol use (defined by \> 6 drinks/week for women and \> 13 drinks/week for men) * Concurrent pregnancy * Dementia * Uncontrolled psychiatric disease * Individuals unable to complete a paper symptom diary for 6 of 7 days prior to their baseline visit * Subjects whose symptoms are predominantly dyspeptic more than heartburn or reflux * Subjects who have used homeopathy for GI symptoms or have received constitutional homeopathic treatment within the past 2 weeks * Subjects taking herbal products or other supplements for GERD or dyspepsia related symptoms (includes peppermint oil) * Subjects who have taken \> 12 doses of NSAIDS within the prior 30 days (aspirin ≤ 325 mg daily is allowed) * Subjects with lactose intolerance

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety - Number of Participants Experiencing a Serious Adverse Event2 week follow-upSerious adverse events (as defined by the FDA) are events that are potentially life-threatening or result in death, hospitalization, an emergency room visit, disability or permanent damage, a congenital abnormality, require intervention to prevent permanent impairment, or seriously jeopardizes a patient's health.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Subjects With a 50% or Greater Decrease in GERD Symptom SeveritySecond week of the trial compared to pre-trial baselineAverage daily GERD symptom severity during the last 7 days of the study was compared to average daily GERD symptom severity at baseline using daily study diary entries. GERD symptom severity for each day was based on the sum of scores assessing the severity of daytime heartburn, nighttime heartburn, and acid reflux each on a 0-4 point scale (none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Higher scores signify worse symptoms. The number of subjects with a 50% or greater decrease in GERD symptom severity from baseline to end of study in each group was calculated.
GERD Health-Related Quality of Life at Follow-upTwo weeksThe GERD Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) scale is a validated instrument assessing GERD-specific health-related quality of life using 10 questions, each on a 0-5 point scale. Scale range is 0-50 with higher numbers signifying worse quality of life.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo + Standard Interview
Placebo, 2 tablets sublingually 3 times a day for 2 weeks. Placebo: Lactose tablets Standard Interview
6
Supplement + Standard Interview
Supplement, 2 tablets sublingually 3 times a day for 2 weeks. Supplement = Acidil: Abies nigra 4C, Carbo vegetabilis 4C, Nux vomica 4C, and Robinia pseudoacacia 4C Standard Interview
6
Placebo + Expanded Interview
Placebo, 2 tablets sublingually 3 times a day for 2 weeks. Placebo: Lactose tablets Expanded Interview
6
Supplement + Expanded Interview
Supplement, 2 tablets sublingually 3 times a day for 2 weeks. Supplement = Acidil: Abies nigra 4C, Carbo vegetabilis 4C, Nux vomica 4C, and Robinia pseudoacacia 4C Expanded Interview
6
Total24

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo + Standard InterviewSupplement + Standard InterviewPlacebo + Expanded InterviewSupplement + Expanded InterviewTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
3 Participants2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants7 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
3 Participants4 Participants5 Participants5 Participants17 Participants
Age, Continuous60 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
64 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3
54 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants6 Participants6 Participants5 Participants23 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
GERD symptom severity4.2 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1
5.6 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6
3.6 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2
3.8 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3
4.3 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants2 Participants1 Participants2 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
4 Participants3 Participants3 Participants3 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants4 Participants4 Participants4 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants2 Participants2 Participants2 Participants8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 61 / 64 / 64 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 60 / 60 / 60 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Safety - Number of Participants Experiencing a Serious Adverse Event

Serious adverse events (as defined by the FDA) are events that are potentially life-threatening or result in death, hospitalization, an emergency room visit, disability or permanent damage, a congenital abnormality, require intervention to prevent permanent impairment, or seriously jeopardizes a patient's health.

Time frame: 2 week follow-up

Population: All enrolled study participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + Standard InterviewSafety - Number of Participants Experiencing a Serious Adverse Event0 participants
Supplement + Standard InterviewSafety - Number of Participants Experiencing a Serious Adverse Event0 participants
Placebo + Expanded InterviewSafety - Number of Participants Experiencing a Serious Adverse Event0 participants
Supplement + Expanded InterviewSafety - Number of Participants Experiencing a Serious Adverse Event0 participants
Secondary

GERD Health-Related Quality of Life at Follow-up

The GERD Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) scale is a validated instrument assessing GERD-specific health-related quality of life using 10 questions, each on a 0-5 point scale. Scale range is 0-50 with higher numbers signifying worse quality of life.

Time frame: Two weeks

Population: All enrolled study participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo + Standard InterviewGERD Health-Related Quality of Life at Follow-up18.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.5
Supplement + Standard InterviewGERD Health-Related Quality of Life at Follow-up26.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8
Placebo + Expanded InterviewGERD Health-Related Quality of Life at Follow-up17.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
Supplement + Expanded InterviewGERD Health-Related Quality of Life at Follow-up18.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.9
Secondary

Number of Subjects With a 50% or Greater Decrease in GERD Symptom Severity

Average daily GERD symptom severity during the last 7 days of the study was compared to average daily GERD symptom severity at baseline using daily study diary entries. GERD symptom severity for each day was based on the sum of scores assessing the severity of daytime heartburn, nighttime heartburn, and acid reflux each on a 0-4 point scale (none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Higher scores signify worse symptoms. The number of subjects with a 50% or greater decrease in GERD symptom severity from baseline to end of study in each group was calculated.

Time frame: Second week of the trial compared to pre-trial baseline

Population: All enrolled study participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + Standard InterviewNumber of Subjects With a 50% or Greater Decrease in GERD Symptom Severity2 participants
Supplement + Standard InterviewNumber of Subjects With a 50% or Greater Decrease in GERD Symptom Severity0 participants
Placebo + Expanded InterviewNumber of Subjects With a 50% or Greater Decrease in GERD Symptom Severity5 participants
Supplement + Expanded InterviewNumber of Subjects With a 50% or Greater Decrease in GERD Symptom Severity4 participants
Comparison: All 4 arms were combined to compare the Standard Interview groups to the Expanded Interview groups. We calculated that we had 45-74% power to detect a 30-40% difference in responders between groups in the pre-specified primary outcome measure, the percent of subjects with a 50% or greater improvement in GERD symptom severity.p-value: 0.01Regression, Logistic
Comparison: All 4 arms were combined to compare the Placebo groups to the Supplement groups. We calculated that we had 45-74% power to detect a 30-40% difference in responders between groups in the pre-specified primary outcome measure, the percent of subjects with a 50% or greater improvement in GERD symptom severity.p-value: 0.33Regression, Logistic

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026