Hypersensitivity, Food
Conditions
Brief summary
The objective of this research is to evaluate the effectiveness of a handbook for parents of children newly diagnosed with food allergy. The handbook was developed to provide information and strategies to support families in effectively managing food allergies while maintaining positive quality of life. Parents of children newly diagnosed with food allergy (within the past year) will be randomized into either the treatment condition (handbook) or a control condition (management of food allergy as usual). Participants will complete study questionnaires online at three time points: baseline (this will be before receiving the handbook for the treatment group), post-intervention (2-3 weeks after baseline), and follow-up (2-3 months after baseline). Data will be analyzed for change on study outcome measures and satisfaction with the handbook. Parents in the control group will receive the handbook following the conclusion of their participation in the study.
Interventions
OTHERFood allergy handbook for parents
The food allergy handbook was designed to be a reliable resource to supplement physician management of food allergy, addressing key topics central to effective allergy management and maintenance of positive quality of life. The handbook includes evidence-based information about food allergies and their management, practical strategies for transferring allergy management skills into daily life, strategies for educating others about allergies, strategies for coping with common emotional challenges associated with food allergy, and strategies for teaching children and involving them in allergy management.
OTHERFood allergy treatment as usual
Sponsors
McMaster University
Boston Children's Hospital
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Parents of children ages 0 to 18 years newly diagnosed with food allergy (within the past 12 months) * Child's food allergy has been diagnosed by a physician * Child has been prescribed an epinephrine auto-injector
Exclusion criteria
* Non-English speakers, as the handbook (study intervention) is only available in English at this time.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in food allergy-specific quality of life score | 2 week and 2-month follow-up | Food Allergy-specific quality of life measured on the Food Allergy Quality of Life-Parental Burden Questionnaire (total score) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in food allergy knowledge score | 2-week and 2-month follow-up | Food allergy knowledge questions will include a subset of questions from the Chicago Food Allergy Research Survey for Parents of Children with Food Allergy (CFAR-PRNT) and questions developed by the investigators |
| Change in confidence in allergy management skills score | 2-week and 2-month follow-up | This questionnaire was developed for the current study, to assess parent's level of confidence in various allergy management skills (e.g., understanding food labels, knowing the symptoms of an allergic reaction, teaching babysitters, relatives and other caregivers how to take care of your child's allergies, etc) |
| Change in food allergy outcome expectations score | 2-week and 2-month follow-up | The Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) consists of four questions assessing the parents' expectations of outcomes related to a child's food allergy (i.e., likelihood of the child accidentally ingesting an allergenic food, experiencing a severe reaction, dying following accidental ingestion, and receiving effective treatment in the event of accidental ingestion), which have been associated with health-related quality of life associated with food allergy. |
| Parent satisfaction with study handbook (study intervention) | 2-week follow-up | Defined by at least 80% of parents indicating positive ratings of usefulness, novelty of content, clarity of content, and \[lack of\] distress associated with content, \[lack of\] distress associated with content, and \[lack of\] barriers to use of the handbook. |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed