Skip to content

Registry of Patients With Acute Dyspnea in the Emergency Department

Prospective Registry for Quality Assurance of Medical Care of Patients With Acute Dyspnea in the Emergency Department

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01910233
Enrollment
947
Registered
2013-07-29
Start date
2013-05-31
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2016-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

COPD, Dyspnea, Heart Failure

Keywords

dyspnea, registry, baseline characteristics, mortality, risk assessment, emergency department

Brief summary

This is a prospective registry of patients presenting with acute dyspnea to the emergency department of the city hospital in Nuremberg. There is evidence that acute dyspnea is associated with a mortality rate of 10%, however acute dyspnea is not perceived as a life-threatening condition, both in public and in health care providers. Our aim is to describe the patient collective concerning their demographics, baseline characteristics, type of referral and disposition, medical care processes and prognosis. Secondly, we want to evaluate if the subjective risk assessment of emergency department personnel matches with objective risk stratification tools and the actual outcome of the studied patients.

Detailed description

This is a prospective registry of patients presenting with acute dyspnea to the emergency department of the city hospital in Nuremberg during May 23th 2013 and October 31th 2013. To be included into the registry the patient has to express acute dyspnea. Minor patients are not included. The admission documents of the studied patients are accompanied by a questionnaire that has to be completed by the triage nurse and the attending physician. The questionnaire includes items like professional experience and subjective assessment of patient's prognosis. In addition the attending physician has to state if the evaluation of medical history was difficult, if previous medication is known and how likely the presence of heart failure as underlying condition is. Data of the questionnaire, the patient record and the follow up contacts are entered in a SPSS database. Finally, we measure the OPTIMIZE-HF score (Abraham et al. 2008) and the PRIDE mortality score (Baggish et al. 2007) in a retrospective manner in order to compare the subjective assessments with objective criteria.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Klinikum Nürnberg
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* expression of acute dyspnea in the emergency department

Exclusion criteria

* age \< 18 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
all cause mortality6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
demographics and baseline characteristics1 monthbaseline characteristics as for example vital signs, medication, underlying disease condition (adjusted final diagnosis), medical history, concomitant diseases
medical care processes1 daytype of referral, disposition patterns, diagnostic and therapeutical measures
subjective and objective risk assessment1 monthdata from the questionnaire completed by triage nurse and attending physician, OPTIMIZE-HF and PRIDE mortality score

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026