Airway Complication of Anaesthesia
Conditions
Keywords
airway management
Brief summary
The investigators aimed to compare of the i-gel, supreme and proseal laryngeal mask airways in paralysed patients undergoing gynaecological laparoscopic surgery with oropharyngeal leak pressure. The investigators also studied their relative ease of insertion, time to insertion and complications of use as secondary outcome measures.
Detailed description
A total of 105 patients scheduled for elective gynaecological laparoscopic procedures in our Inonu University Medical Faculty Hospital were recruited.They were equally randomized into three groups: PLMA, supreme and i-gel groups. All three devices were compared with regard to oropharyngeal leak pressure, number and duration of insertion attempts and complications of airway. Oropharyngeal leak pressure will evaluate including to start,trendelenburg and postoperative at period. Fiberoptic evaluation of the LMA's position were performed after successful insertion and determination of the airway pressures. After one hour patients were evaluated by a blinded independent observer for postoperative complications ( sore throat, dysphonia and dysphagia).
Interventions
DEVICEPROSEAL LMA
Size 3,4 or 5 supraglottic device with orogastric drainage tube
DEVICESUPREMA LMA
Size 3,4 or 5, disposable supraglottic device with orogastric drainage tube
DEVICEI-GEL LMA
Size 3,4,5 disposable supraglottic device with noninflatable cuff
Sponsors
Inonu University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* 18- 60 YEARS
Exclusion criteria
* ASA 3-4 patients * BMI 40
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| change of oropharyngeal leak pressure | 10min, 30 min ,45 min | During intraoperative period, oropharyngeal leak pressure was measured at three times (10min, 30 min, and 45 min after insertion of devices) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| easiness of insertion of the device | 2 min | During insertion, easiness of the devices were evaluated by a scale |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| postoperative complication | 2 hour after operation | At the second hour of postoperative period, patients will visit and will examine about the complications (sore throat, dysphagia, dysphonia) |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Outcome results
None listed