Skip to content

Clinical Assessment of a Novel Microprobe Array Continuous Glucose Monitor for Type 1 Diabetes

Clinical Assessment of a Novel Microprobe Array Continuous Glucose Monitor for Type 1 Diabetes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01908530
Enrollment
26
Registered
2013-07-25
Start date
2013-11-30
Completion date
2018-06-30
Last updated
2019-11-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

Diabetes, Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Microprobes

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to assess the safety and efficacy of the Imperial College Microprobe Array Continuous Glucose Sensor in healthy volunteers and in subjects with type 1 diabetes.

Detailed description

Continuous knowledge of ambient glucose levels will be of benefit to patients with T1DM, especially those with troublesome hypoglycaemia. Existing monitors require skin puncture to access interstitial fluid and sense its glucose content. Despite their clinical benefits, their use is associated with discomfort and their accuracy is questionable in hypoglycaemia. The development of a painless continuous glucose monitor is regarded as the top research priority by patients with diabetes. A novel continuous glucose monitoring device has been developed at Imperial College based on microprobe technology. It consists of a small, wearable patch (\ 1 cm2), the size of a conventional postage stamp, containing microscopic projections (microprobes) that penetrate only the outermost skin layer. It accesses interstitial fluid to sense its glucose content without stimulating skin nerve fibres or reaching blood vessels within skin layers. The microprobe surface has the consistency of sandpaper. It is pushed into the skin with an applicator allowing it to penetrate through the skin layers and access the interstitial fluid in a minimally invasive manner. The device is disposable and optimum performance will be assessed over five days. The advantages of microprobe technology have been demonstrated in other clinical situations and include painless insertion, absence of bleeding and a low infection risk. The large surface area utilised in our microprobe device has the potential to improve device sensitivity and accuracy. Pre-clinical validation tests have demonstrated the ability of the device to respond accurately to variable glucose concentrations and to penetrate the outermost skin layer without fracture. We aim now to further develop the device through clinical studies in non-diabetic subjects and subjects with type 1 diabetes to allow painless accurate continuous glucose monitoring. The study will recruit 16 non-diabetic subjects and 20 subjects with type 1 diabetes. It will be conducted over four phases; oPhase 1 will assess safety, as a primary outcome, and efficacy, as a secondary outcome, in non-diabetic subjects over six hours in the clinical research facility where the device will be fitted and a cannula inserted for venous sampling every 15 minutes to measure venous blood glucose (YSI). Safety will be assessed with regards to skin inflammation and pain. Efficacy will be assessed in this phase by assessing magnitude of current measured by the microprobe array sensor and comparison of measured ISF glucose concentrations to simultaneous venous blood glucose samples (YSI). oPhase 2 will also assess safety, as a primary outcome, and efficacy, as a secondary outcome, in non-diabetic subjects over a period of 24 hours. The first six hours in the clinical research facility (same as phase 1), then subject will be allowed to go home with the device to assess safety over that period. oPhase 3 aims to assess efficacy of the device as a primary outcome and safety as a secondary outcome. This will be in subjects with type 1 diabetes over 24 hours as inpatients. Efficacy will be assessed mechanically (by the ability to penetrate the stratum corneum) and functionally (by the ability to accurately sense ISF glucose). The derived ISF glucose levels will be compared with simultaneous venous glucose samples (YSI) and with a commercially available CGM device (iPro2, Medtronic). Assessment of microprobe penetration of the stratum corneum will be performed using confocal microscopy, optical coherence tomography and in skin biopsies. oPhase 4 aims to assess efficacy of the device as a primary outcome and safety as a secondary outcome. This will be in subjects with type 1 diabetes over 5 days in ambulatory situation. Efficacy will be assessed by comparing microprobe sensor derived ISF glucose levels against ISF glucose levels measured using a commercially available CGM device (iPro2, Medtronic).

Interventions

DEVICEMicroprobe glucose sensor

Assessment of safety and accuracy of a novel continuous glucose monitor based on microprobe technology.

Sponsors

Imperial College London
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

For phases 1 and 2: Inclusion Criteria: • Adults over 18 years of age

Exclusion criteria

* History of upper limb neuropathy or radiculopathy * History of pre-existing skin condition * Pregnant or planning pregnancy in next 12 months * Breastfeeding * Enrolled in other clinical trials * uncontrolled concurrent illness * Have active malignancy or under investigation for malignancy For phases 3 and 4: Inclusion Criteria: * Adults over 18 years of age. * Diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes for greater than 1 year. * HbA1c less than or equal to 9.0 % (75 mmol/mol). * Registered with a General Practitioner.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participant Developed the Skin Inflammation24 hoursThe study aims to assess safety of the use of microprobe array continuous glucose sensor with regards to skin inflammation.
Difference to the Venous Blood Glucose MARD24 hoursPhase 3 of the study aim to assess efficacy of the device in people with type 1 diabetes. This will be done in comparison to venous blood glucose using YSI machine in a controlled environment over 24 hours (phase 3). it was originally planned to then compare this to ISF glucose in ambulatory situation over five days (phase 4) however phase 4 did not go ahead. Measured using mean absolute relative difference with respect to venous blood glucose

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Detectable Signal24 hoursThis is a secondary outcome for phases 1 & 2.
Pain Score24 hoursThe study aims to assess safety of the device with regards to pain degree in comparison to venflon insertion and insertion of an existing continuous glucose monitor (Medtronic iPro2 CGM system, Northridge, California). This will be done at each phase of the four study phases.
Acceptability Questionnaire24 hoursThis is a secondary outcome for phases 3 and 4.
Correlation With Venous Blood Glucose24 hoursThis is a secondary outcome for phases 1 and 2. It is a primary outcome for phase 3. Using MARD.
Number of Participant Developed Skin Penetration24 hoursThis done using Optical Coherence Tomography and Confocal Microscopy. Measure = variation in penetration depth of microprobe needles over 24 hours

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Phase 4 did not go ahead

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Microprobe Glucose Sensor Phase 1
The microprobe array continuous glucose sensor applied to healthy volunteers for 6 h
8
Microprobe Glucose Sensor Phase 2
The microprobe array continuous glucose sensor will be applied to healthy volunteers for 24 h
8
Microprobe Glucose Sensor Phase 3
The microprobe array continuous glucose sensor applied to participants with type 1 diabetes
10
Total26

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMicroprobe Glucose Sensor Phase 1Microprobe Glucose Sensor Phase 2Microprobe Glucose Sensor Phase 3Total
Age, Continuous34.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.9
34.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.9
38 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
35.73 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.93
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Asian
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Caucasian
3 Participants3 Participants9 Participants15 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
European
3 Participants3 Participants0 Participants6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Mixed Race
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Other
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants4 Participants5 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants4 Participants5 Participants13 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 80 / 80 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 80 / 80 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 80 / 80 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Difference to the Venous Blood Glucose MARD

Phase 3 of the study aim to assess efficacy of the device in people with type 1 diabetes. This will be done in comparison to venous blood glucose using YSI machine in a controlled environment over 24 hours (phase 3). it was originally planned to then compare this to ISF glucose in ambulatory situation over five days (phase 4) however phase 4 did not go ahead. Measured using mean absolute relative difference with respect to venous blood glucose

Time frame: 24 hours

Population: Only for Phase 3 arm

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Microprobe Glucose Sensor Phase 3Difference to the Venous Blood Glucose MARD4 percentage
Primary

Number of Participant Developed the Skin Inflammation

The study aims to assess safety of the use of microprobe array continuous glucose sensor with regards to skin inflammation.

Time frame: 24 hours

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Microprobe Glucose Sensor Phase 1Number of Participant Developed the Skin Inflammation0 Participants
Microprobe Glucose Sensor Phase 2Number of Participant Developed the Skin Inflammation0 Participants
Microprobe Glucose Sensor Phase 3Number of Participant Developed the Skin Inflammation0 Participants
Secondary

Acceptability Questionnaire

This is a secondary outcome for phases 3 and 4.

Time frame: 24 hours

Population: Data not collected

Secondary

Correlation With Venous Blood Glucose

This is a secondary outcome for phases 1 and 2. It is a primary outcome for phase 3. Using MARD.

Time frame: 24 hours

Population: Data not collected

Secondary

Detectable Signal

This is a secondary outcome for phases 1 & 2.

Time frame: 24 hours

Population: Data not collected

Secondary

Number of Participant Developed Skin Penetration

This done using Optical Coherence Tomography and Confocal Microscopy. Measure = variation in penetration depth of microprobe needles over 24 hours

Time frame: 24 hours

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Microprobe Glucose Sensor Phase 1Number of Participant Developed Skin Penetration0 Participants
Microprobe Glucose Sensor Phase 2Number of Participant Developed Skin Penetration0 Participants
Microprobe Glucose Sensor Phase 3Number of Participant Developed Skin Penetration0 Participants
Secondary

Pain Score

The study aims to assess safety of the device with regards to pain degree in comparison to venflon insertion and insertion of an existing continuous glucose monitor (Medtronic iPro2 CGM system, Northridge, California). This will be done at each phase of the four study phases.

Time frame: 24 hours

Population: Data not collected

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026