Skip to content

Real-world Effectiveness of Combination Therapies in Primary Care Asthma Management

REACH Fostair vs Seretide - Real-world Effectiveness of Combination Therapies in Primary Care Asthma Management

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01908075
Acronym
REACH
Enrollment
194723
Registered
2013-07-25
Start date
2011-01-31
Completion date
2013-03-31
Last updated
2013-07-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Keywords

Primary care, Asthma management, Real-world, Observational, Fostair, Seretide

Brief summary

To evaluate whether beclomethasone dipropionate / formoterol (BDP/FOR; Fostair® 100/6) is at least equivalent in terms of exacerbation prevention to fluticasone dipropionate / salmeterol (FP/SAL; Seretide® 125) in matched asthma patients switching to BDP/FOR following treatment with FP/SAL in normal clinical practice compared with patients not switched.

Detailed description

To evaluate whether beclomethasone dipropionate / formoterol (BDP/FOR; Fostair® 100/6) is at least equivalent in terms of exacerbation prevention to fluticasone dipropionate / salmeterol (FP/SAL; Seretide®) in matched asthma patients switching to BDP/FOR following treatment with FP/SAL in normal clinical practice compared with patients not switched. To evaluate respiratory outcomes for Fostair in comparison to Seretide using a UK primary care database (in patients switched for cost rather than clinical reasons).

Interventions

DRUGFP/SAL
DRUGBDP/FOR

Sponsors

Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Research in Real-Life Ltd
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged: 18-80 years 61-80 years to be non-smokers only * Evidence of asthma: a diagnostic code for asthma or two scripts for asthma.. * Baseline FP/SAL therapy: ≥2 prescription for ICS/LABA therapy as FP/SAL * Evidence of Continuing Therapy: Include only patients who receive ≥2 prescriptions for the therapy under study during the outcome year (i.e. ≥1 prescription at the index date and ≥1 other). UK average is 3-4 prescriptions refilled per year, so ≥2 ensures capture of real-life data. * Evidence of Switching for economic reasons: FP/SAL patients from practices with ≥5 switches to Fostair in a 3 month period to minimise data taken from switching of anomalous patients; optimal practices for inclusion are those switching wholesale for economic reasons.

Exclusion criteria

* Any chronic respiratory disease other than asthma * Are receiving maintenance oral steroid therapy during baseline period

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Exacerbations : rate ratio1 yearWhere an exacerbation is defined as: (i) Asthma-related 1. Hospital attendance / admissions OR 2. Accident & Emergency (A&E) attendance OR (ii) Use of acute oral steroids. Where: * ≥1 oral steroid prescription occurs within 2 weeks of another, or * ≥1 hospitalisation occurs within 2 weeks of another, or * ≥1 hospitalisation occurs within 2 weeks of an oral steroid prescription

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proxy asthma control + SABA1 yearAs above, but with an additional criterion that limits controlled patients to those who use ≤200mcg salbutamol daily
Treatment success1 yearNo exacerbation and no change in therapy during the outcome year, where changes are: •≥50% increase in ICS dose relative to IPD dose, and/or * Change in ICS/LABA drug within class, and/or * Change in delivery device, and/or * Use of additional (defined as not received during baseline year) therapy as defined by: theophylline, leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs).
Exacerbation control1 yearProxy Asthma Control. The absence of exacerbation and the absence of antibiotic prescribing for lower respiratory tract infections (often a pragmatic prescribing decision taken by GPs in real world practice). Controlled: (i) No Asthma-related: 1. Hospital attendance or admission 2. A&E attendance, OR 3. Out of hours attendance, OR 4. Out-patient department attendance (ii) GP consultations for lower respiratory tract infection (iii) Prescriptions for acute courses of oral steroids Uncontrolled: (i) All others. a. Proxy Asthma Control + SABA As above, but with an additional criterion that limits controlled patients to those who use ≤200mcg salbutamol daily.
Hospitalisations1 yearAsthma-related hospitalizations * Definite: Hospitalisations coded with an asthma read code * Definite + Probable: Hospitalisations with an asthma read code + uncoded hospitalisations occurring within a 7-day window (either side of the hospitalisation date) of an asthma read code Respiratory hospitalisations * Definite: Hospitalisations coded with a lower respiratory code relevant for Paeds (for example J450) * Definite + Probable: Hospitalisations with an asthma read code + uncoded hospitalisations occurring within a 7-day window (either side of the hospitalisation date) of a lower respiratory read code
Medication possession ratio1 yearFor ICS, defined as the number of days supply of ICS / 365 x 100% Controller/reliever ratio: number of controller units/ number of controller units + number of reliever units. Controllers are defined as ICS (including fixed combination ICS/LABA) and LTRA, while relievers are SABA. For ICS a unit is taken to be one inhaler; for LTRA a unit is one prescription.
Asthma Control (including SABA)1 yearDefined as proxy asthma control (above) plus: Average daily prescribed dose of ≤200mcg salubtamol / ≤500mcg terbutaline

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026