Skip to content

Auditory Brainstem Implantation in Young Children

An Early Feasibility Study of the Safety and Efficacy of the Nucleus 24 Auditory Brainstem Implant in Children With Cochlear or Cochlear Nerve Disorders Not Resulting From Neurofibromatosis Type II

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01904448
Enrollment
5
Registered
2013-07-22
Start date
2012-09-30
Completion date
2017-10-01
Last updated
2018-07-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acquired Cochlear Nerve Deficiency, Cochlear Aplasia, Cochlear Malformation, Developmental Cochlear Nerve Deficiency, Post-meningitis Cochlear Ossification

Keywords

pediatric, profound hearing loss, auditory brainstem implant, cochlear implant, developmental or acquired cochlear nerve deficiency (CND), cochlear aplasia (Michel), post-meningitis cochlear ossification, cochlear malformation, CND

Brief summary

To purpose of this feasibility study is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the Nucleus 24 Multichannel Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI, Cochlear Corp, Sydney, AUS) in children without the diagnosis of neurofibromatosis type II (NFII) that have either experienced failed cochlear implantation (CI) or have been unable to receive a CI secondary to cochlear or cochlear nerve disorders. These conditions can include: developmental or acquired cochlear nerve deficiency (CND), cochlear aplasia (Michel), post-meningitic cochlear ossification or cochlear malformation. This study proposes to implant up to 10 young children (\<5 yrs. of age) with the Nucleus 24 Multichannel ABI (Sydney, AUS) in an attempt to demonstrate safety of the surgical procedure, tolerance of device stimulation, and the potential for auditory benefit beyond that experienced with their CI. This study will provide the preliminary experience for a larger scale clinical trial. Aim 1: Demonstrate the safety of ABI surgery in children. Aim 2: Demonstrate the development of sound awareness and improved speech understanding among children implanted with the ABI when compared to their baseline skills. Aim 3: Demonstrate the development of oral language skills following the use of the ABI that were not evident prior to its use.

Interventions

DEVICEAuditory Brainstem Implantation in Children

Sponsors

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Months to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Pre-linguistic hearing loss (birth-5 yrs.; age at ABI 18 months-5yrs) with both: * MRI +/- CT evidence of one of the following: Cochlear nerve deficiency, Cochlear aplasia or severe hypoplasia, Severe inner ear malformation, Post-meningitis ossification * When a cochlea is present or patent, lack of significant benefit from CI despite consistent use (\>6 mo.) * Post-linguistic hearing loss (\<18 yrs. of age) with both: * Loss or lack of benefit from appropriate CI without the possibility for revision or contralateral implantation. Examples might include: Post-meningitis ossification, Bilateral temporal bone fractures with cochlear nerve avulsion, Failed revision CI without benefit * Previously developed open set speech perception and auditory-oral language skills * No medical contraindications * Willing to receive the appropriate meningitis vaccinations * No or limited cognitive/developmental delays which would be expected to interfere with the child's ability to cooperate in testing and/or programming of the device, in developing speech and oral language, or which would make an implant and subsequent emphasis on aural/oral communication not in the child's best interest * Strong family support including language proficiency of the parent(s) in the child's primary mode of communication as well as written and spoken English. * Reasonable expectations from parents including a thorough understanding: * of potential benefits and limitations of ABI * of parental role in rehabilitation * that the child may not develop spoken language as a primary communication mode or even sufficient spoken language to make significant academic progress in an aural/oral environment * Involvement in an educational program that emphasizes development of auditory skills with or without the use of supplementary visual communication. * Able to comply with study requirements including travel to investigation sites. * Informed consent for the procedure from the child's parents/legal guardian.

Exclusion criteria

* Pre- or post-linguistic child currently making significant progress with CI * MRI evidence of one of the following: * normal cochlea and cochlear nerves or NFII * brainstem or cortical anomaly that makes implantation unfeasible * Clear surgical reason for poor CI performance that can be remediated with revision CI or contralateral surgery rather than ABI. * Intractable seizures or progressive, deteriorating neurological disorder * Unable to participate in behavioral testing and mapping with their CI. If this appears to be an age effect, ABI will be delayed until we can be assured that the child will be able to participate, as reliable objective measures of mapping are currently not available for mapping these devices. * Lack of potential for spoken language development. This will be considered the case when evidence of the following exist: * Severe psychomotor retardation, autism, cerebral palsy, or developmental delays beyond speech that would preclude usage of the device and oral educational development. Autism is a special case where there is the potential for delayed presentation. When early signs are considered present, our group routinely requests a comprehensive developmental assessment for further evaluation prior to considering routine evaluation. A specialized group is readily available at our institution for such an evaluation. * Unable to tolerate general anesthesia (cardiac, pulmonary, bleeding diathesis, etc.). * Need for brainstem irradiation * Unrealistic expectations on the part of the subject/family regarding the possible benefits, risks and limitations that are inherent to the procedure and prosthetic device. * Unwilling to sign the informed consent. * Unwilling to make necessary follow-up appointments.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of ABI ComplicationsYear 3Complications and related outcomes will be tracked and recorded. These include bleeding, infection, neural injury, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, brain bleeding or bruising, stroke, death. Also, complications and sequelae related to the device such as non-auditory stimulation and device failure will be tracked.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Oral and Written Language Scales (OWLS) Oral Expression ScoreYear 3OWLS-II: Oral Expression measures oral language expression, which is the use of spoken language. The examiner presents a verbal prompt along with a picture and the participant must respond orally to the prompt with increasingly difficult language. The derived mean standard score for this test is 100 with a standard deviation of 15. Higher scores indicate better oral expression. Scores of 85 to 115 are within normal limits. Scores that fall 2 standard deviations below the mean are considered to be severely delayed.
Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation Scores (GFTA)Year 3The GFTA-2 is a standardized, norm-based articulation measure that samples spontaneous sound production. Children are asked to respond to picture plates and verbal cues from the examiner with single words that test consonant accuracy in initial, medial, and final positions. This measure has norms based on the performance of normal-hearing children from age 2 years to 21 years.
MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories (CDIs) ScoreYear 3MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories (CDIs)
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vocalize on DemandYear 1, Year 2, Year 3This is a measure of the child's ability to vocalize on demand elicited by pictures of objects. Scores are derived from the percentage of time the child vocalized for 25 words.
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-SyllablesYear 1, Year 2, Year 3Measure of percent correct for use of syllables elicited from pictures of single word items. Scores are derived from the percentage of time the child produced the correct number of syllables on 25 items.
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Initial ConsonantsYear 1, Year 2, Year 3Measure of percent correct on initial consonant production elicited from pictures of single word items. Scores are derived from the percentage of time the child produced an initial consonant on 25 items.
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-VowelsYear 1, Year 2, Year 3Measure of percent correct on vowel production elicited from pictures of single word items. Scores are derived from the percentage of time the child produced the correct vowel on 25 items.
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Manner CuesYear 1, Year 2, Year 3Measure of percent correct on consonant manner cues production elicited from pictures of single word items. Scores are derived from the percentage of time the child produced the correct manner of consonant production on 25 items.
The Oral and Written Language Scales (OWLS) Listening Comprehension ScoreYear 3OWLS-II: Listening Comprehension measures oral language reception, which is the understanding of spoken language. The examiner orally presents increasingly difficult words, phrases, and sentences to the participant and he/she responds by pointing to or stating which of four pictures is correct. The derived mean standard score for this test is 100 with a standard deviation of 15. Higher scores indicate better listening comprehension. Scores of 85 to 115 are within normal limits. Scores that fall 2 standard deviations below the mean are considered to be severely delayed.
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Place CuesYear 1, Year 2, Year 3Measure of percent correct on consonant place cue production elicited from pictures of single word items. Scores are derived from the percentage of time the child produced the correct place of consonant production on 25 items.
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Voice CuesYear 1, Year 2, Year 3Measure of percent correct on consonant voicing cue production elicited from pictures of single word items. Scores are derived from the percentage of time the child produced the correct voicing of consonant production on 25 items.
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Detection AudiogramYear 1, Year 2, Year 3Sound detection for octave frequencies of 250 Hz through 8k Hz were collected and a 4 frequency average was calculated for each annual test interval
Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAISPre-ABI, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3A hierarchy of tests were chosen that capture auditory skills from sound awareness to open set word and sentence understanding. Participants did not advance to the next level of difficulty until demonstrating a minimum performance on the previous measure. The Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (IT-MAIS) is a parent questionnaire consisting of ten questions regarding a young infant or toddler's auditory behavior, e.g., Does the child spontaneously respond to his/her name in quiet with auditory cues? Each question is scored on a five point scale: 0 = never, 1 = rarely, 2 = occasionally, 3 = frequently, and 4 = always. The aim of this tool is to assess the benefit of the child's personal amplification device(s) and is used to assess hearing aid benefit. Higher scores reflect more consistent auditory response. Scores reported are the percentage of correctly answered questions of the total asked.
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Ling Sound TestYear 1, Year 2, Year 3A hierarchy of tests were chosen that capture auditory skills from sound awareness to open set word and sentence understanding. Participants did not advance to the next level of difficulty until they demonstrated a minimum performance on the previous measure. The Ling- 6 sounds test is a speech sound detection measurement of detection thresholds performed by an audiologist. Six sound files of ah, ee, oo, sh, s, and m are presented one at a time in varying order for measurement of hearing threshold groups, per sound. The selected sounds tested validate hearing device fitting across the frequency range important for understanding speech. If the child can detect the stimuli a point is given and if they can not detect, no point is given. A total of 3 trials per sound were presented for a total of 18 presentations. The score reflects a percent of the total sounds that were detected.
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low VerbalYear 1, Year 2, Year 3A hierarchy of tests were chosen that capture auditory skills from sound awareness to open set word and sentence understanding. Participants did not advance to the next level of difficulty until they demonstrated a minimum performance on the previous measure. The Early Speech Perception (ESP) low verbal version estimates speech perception abilities in very young children who have limited verbal abilities. Stimuli consist of words varying in pattern as well as spondees and monosyllabic words presented in sets of four. The format is four item closed-set. Test materials consist of objects (toys) instead of pictures. It is scored by the percent of correctly identified items from the set of 4; 3 repetitions of each item are given for a total of 12 trials.
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP StandardYear 1, Year 2, Year 3A hierarchy of tests were chosen that capture auditory skills from sound awareness to open set word and sentence understanding. Participants did not advance to the next level of difficulty until they demonstrated a minimum performance on the previous measure. This may have been due to child's age or inability to complete task. The Early Speech Perception (ESP) Standard measures the progression of speech discrimination skills in children (age 5+) with profound hearing loss as they develop. The stimuli consist of 3 subtests \[1) patterns and words, 2) monosyllable, 3) spondees\] of 12 pictured words each presented in an auditory-only condition. The format is a closed-set. Two repetitions of each item are given for a total of 24 items for each subtest. Each subtest is scored by the percent of correctly identified items from the set of pictured words.
Pre-School Language Scale (PLS-5) ScoresYear 1, Year 2, Year 3The PLS-5 is a standardized language test designed for infants and young children. The Auditory Comprehension subscale targets skills known to precede language development, including: attention to speakers, appropriate object play, basic vocabulary, concepts, grammatical markers, and complex sentences. The Expressive Communication subscale assesses vocal development, social communication, naming of common objects, phonological awareness, sequencing skills, as well as use of concepts, prepositions, grammatical markers, and varying sentence structures.
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Final ConsonantsYear 1, Year 2, Year 3Measure of percent correct on final consonant production elicited from pictures of single word items. Scores are derived from the percentage of time the child produced a final consonant on 25 items.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Pediatric ABI
Single-arm study of Auditory Brainstem Implantation (ABI) in children
5
Total5

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPediatric ABI
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants
Age, Continuous3.4 years
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 5
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 5
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 5

Outcome results

Primary

Number of ABI Complications

Complications and related outcomes will be tracked and recorded. These include bleeding, infection, neural injury, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, brain bleeding or bruising, stroke, death. Also, complications and sequelae related to the device such as non-auditory stimulation and device failure will be tracked.

Time frame: Year 3

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pediatric ABINumber of ABI Complications2 Events
Secondary

Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Detection Audiogram

Sound detection for octave frequencies of 250 Hz through 8k Hz were collected and a 4 frequency average was calculated for each annual test interval

Time frame: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Detection AudiogramPTA Subject 4 Year 230 averaged decibel level
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Detection AudiogramPure Tone Average (PTA) Subject 1 Year 130 averaged decibel level
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Detection AudiogramPTA Subject 1 Year 242 averaged decibel level
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Detection AudiogramPTA Subject 1 Year 330 averaged decibel level
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Detection AudiogramPTA Subject 2 Year 1120 averaged decibel level
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Detection AudiogramPTA Subject 2 Year 247 averaged decibel level
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Detection AudiogramPTA Subject 2 Year 335 averaged decibel level
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Detection AudiogramPTA Subject 3 Year 133 averaged decibel level
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Detection AudiogramPTA Subject 3 Year 232 averaged decibel level
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Detection AudiogramPTA Subject 3 Year 330 averaged decibel level
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Detection AudiogramPTA Subject 4 Year 132 averaged decibel level
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Detection AudiogramPTA Subject 4 Year 333 averaged decibel level
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Detection AudiogramPTA Subject 5 Year 135 averaged decibel level
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Detection AudiogramPTA Subject 5 Year 233 averaged decibel level
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Detection AudiogramPTA Subject 5 Year 332 averaged decibel level
Secondary

Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low Verbal

A hierarchy of tests were chosen that capture auditory skills from sound awareness to open set word and sentence understanding. Participants did not advance to the next level of difficulty until they demonstrated a minimum performance on the previous measure. The Early Speech Perception (ESP) low verbal version estimates speech perception abilities in very young children who have limited verbal abilities. Stimuli consist of words varying in pattern as well as spondees and monosyllabic words presented in sets of four. The format is four item closed-set. Test materials consist of objects (toys) instead of pictures. It is scored by the percent of correctly identified items from the set of 4; 3 repetitions of each item are given for a total of 12 trials.

Time frame: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

Population: Missing values indicate test was not administered at that interval and ESP-Standard was administered.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low VerbalPattern Subject 1 Year 125 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low VerbalMonosyllable Subject 1 Year 158 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low VerbalSpondee Subject 1 Year 125 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low VerbalPattern Subject 1 Year 2100 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low VerbalMonosyllable Subject 1 Year 275 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low VerbalSpondee Subject 1 Year 267 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low VerbalPattern Subject 2 Year 125 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low VerbalMonosyllable Subject 2 Year 125 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low VerbalSpondee Subject 2 Year 125 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low VerbalPattern Subject 2 Year 225 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low VerbalMonosyllable Subject 2 Year 225 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low VerbalSpondee Subject 2 Year 225 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low VerbalPattern Subject 2 Year 325 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low VerbalMonosyllable Subject 2 Year 325 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low VerbalSpondee Subject 2 Year 325 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low VerbalPattern Subject 3 Year 125 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low VerbalMonosyllable Subject 3 Year 125 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low VerbalSpondee Subject 3 Year 125 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low VerbalPattern Subject 3 Year 283 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low VerbalMonosyllable Subject 3 Year 225 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low VerbalSpondee Subject 3 Year 225 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low VerbalPattern Subject 5 Year 125 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low VerbalMonosyllable Subject 5 Year 125 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low VerbalSpondee Subject 5 Year 125 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low VerbalPattern Subject 5 Year 225 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low VerbalMonosyllable Subject 5 Year 225 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low VerbalSpondee Subject 5 Year 225 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low VerbalPattern Subject 5 Year 325 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low VerbalMonosyllable Subject 5 Year 325 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low VerbalSpondee Subject 5 Year 325 percentage of correct answers
Secondary

Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Standard

A hierarchy of tests were chosen that capture auditory skills from sound awareness to open set word and sentence understanding. Participants did not advance to the next level of difficulty until they demonstrated a minimum performance on the previous measure. This may have been due to child's age or inability to complete task. The Early Speech Perception (ESP) Standard measures the progression of speech discrimination skills in children (age 5+) with profound hearing loss as they develop. The stimuli consist of 3 subtests \[1) patterns and words, 2) monosyllable, 3) spondees\] of 12 pictured words each presented in an auditory-only condition. The format is a closed-set. Two repetitions of each item are given for a total of 24 items for each subtest. Each subtest is scored by the percent of correctly identified items from the set of pictured words.

Time frame: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

Population: Missing values indicate test was not administered at that interval and ESP-LV (Low Verbal) was administered.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP StandardPattern Subject 1 Year 370 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP StandardWord Subject 1 Year 362 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP StandardMonosyllable Subject 1 Year 350 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP StandardSpondee Subject 1 Year 341 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP StandardPattern Subject 3 Year 266 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP StandardWord Subject 3 Year 241 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP StandardMonosyllable Subject 3 Year 225 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP StandardSpondee Subject 3 Year 225 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP StandardPattern Subject 3 Year 346 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP StandardWord Subject 3 Year 329 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP StandardMonosyllable Subject 3 Year 325 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP StandardSpondee Subject 3 Year 325 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP StandardPattern Subject 4 Year 150 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP StandardWord Subject 4 Year 145 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP StandardMonosyllable Subject 4 Year 125 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP StandardSpondee Subject 4 Year 125 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP StandardPattern Subject 4 Year 245 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP StandardWord Subject 4 Year 241 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP StandardMonosyllable Subject 4 Year 216 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP StandardSpondee Subject 4 Year 225 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP StandardPattern Subject 4 Year 353 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP StandardWord Subject 4 Year 342 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP StandardMonosyllable Subject 4 Year 38 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP StandardSpondee Subject 4 Year 342 percentage of correct answers
Secondary

Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Ling Sound Test

A hierarchy of tests were chosen that capture auditory skills from sound awareness to open set word and sentence understanding. Participants did not advance to the next level of difficulty until they demonstrated a minimum performance on the previous measure. The Ling- 6 sounds test is a speech sound detection measurement of detection thresholds performed by an audiologist. Six sound files of ah, ee, oo, sh, s, and m are presented one at a time in varying order for measurement of hearing threshold groups, per sound. The selected sounds tested validate hearing device fitting across the frequency range important for understanding speech. If the child can detect the stimuli a point is given and if they can not detect, no point is given. A total of 3 trials per sound were presented for a total of 18 presentations. The score reflects a percent of the total sounds that were detected.

Time frame: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

Population: Single-arm study of Auditory Brainstem Implantation (ABI) in children

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Ling Sound TestLing 6 Subject 1 Year 1100 percent correct
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Ling Sound TestLing 6 Subject 1 Year 2100 percent correct
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Ling Sound TestLing 6 Subject 1 Year 3100 percent correct
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Ling Sound TestLing 6 Subject 2 Year 10 percent correct
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Ling Sound TestLing 6 Subject 2 Year 2100 percent correct
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Ling Sound TestLing 6 Subject 2 Year 3100 percent correct
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Ling Sound TestLing 6 Subject 3 Year 1100 percent correct
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Ling Sound TestLing 6 Subject 3 Year 2100 percent correct
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Ling Sound TestLing 6 Subject 3 Year 3100 percent correct
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Ling Sound TestLing 6 Subject 4 Year 1100 percent correct
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Ling Sound TestLing 6 Subject 4 Year 2100 percent correct
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Ling Sound TestLing 6 Subject 4 Year 3100 percent correct
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Ling Sound TestLing 6 Subject 5 Year 1100 percent correct
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Ling Sound TestLing 6 Subject 5 Year 2100 percent correct
Pediatric ABIChange in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Ling Sound TestLing 6 Subject 5 Year 3100 percent correct
Secondary

Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation Scores (GFTA)

The GFTA-2 is a standardized, norm-based articulation measure that samples spontaneous sound production. Children are asked to respond to picture plates and verbal cues from the examiner with single words that test consonant accuracy in initial, medial, and final positions. This measure has norms based on the performance of normal-hearing children from age 2 years to 21 years.

Time frame: Year 3

Population: Due to limited progress in spoken language development and test difficulty, this measure was replaced by Identifying Early Phonological Needs in children with hearing loss (IEPN). No data were collected for this measure.

Secondary

MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories (CDIs) Score

MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories (CDIs)

Time frame: Year 3

Population: Since spoken language skills did not progress as expected, this measure was inappropriate for use in the study and was unobtainable.

Secondary

Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Final Consonants

Measure of percent correct on final consonant production elicited from pictures of single word items. Scores are derived from the percentage of time the child produced a final consonant on 25 items.

Time frame: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Final ConsonantsSubject 1 Year 129 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Final ConsonantsSubject 1 Year 264 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Final ConsonantsSubject 1 Year 394 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Final ConsonantsSubject 2 Year 10 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Final ConsonantsSubject 2 Year 20 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Final ConsonantsSubject 2 Year 30 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Final ConsonantsSubject 3 Year 10 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Final ConsonantsSubject 3 Year 20 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Final ConsonantsSubject 3 Year 311 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Final ConsonantsSubject 4 Year 111 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Final ConsonantsSubject 4 Year 241 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Final ConsonantsSubject 4 Year 341 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Final ConsonantsSubject 5 Year 10 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Final ConsonantsSubject 5 Year 20 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Final ConsonantsSubject 5 Year 30 percentage of correct answers
Secondary

Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Initial Consonants

Measure of percent correct on initial consonant production elicited from pictures of single word items. Scores are derived from the percentage of time the child produced an initial consonant on 25 items.

Time frame: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Initial ConsonantsSubject 1 Year 163 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Initial ConsonantsSubject 1 Year 295 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Initial ConsonantsSubject 1 Year 3100 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Initial ConsonantsSubject 2 Year 10 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Initial ConsonantsSubject 2 Year 266 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Initial ConsonantsSubject 2 Year 375 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Initial ConsonantsSubject 3 Year 10 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Initial ConsonantsSubject 3 Year 20 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Initial ConsonantsSubject 3 Year 316 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Initial ConsonantsSubject 4 Year 171 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Initial ConsonantsSubject 4 Year 238 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Initial ConsonantsSubject 4 Year 360 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Initial ConsonantsSubject 5 Year 10 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Initial ConsonantsSubject 5 Year 20 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Initial ConsonantsSubject 5 Year 30 percentage of correct answers
Secondary

Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Manner Cues

Measure of percent correct on consonant manner cues production elicited from pictures of single word items. Scores are derived from the percentage of time the child produced the correct manner of consonant production on 25 items.

Time frame: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Manner CuesSubject 1 Year 118 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Manner CuesSubject 1 Year 254 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Manner CuesSubject 1 Year 356 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Manner CuesSubject 2 Year 10 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Manner CuesSubject 2 Year 224 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Manner CuesSubject 2 Year 324 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Manner CuesSubject 3 Year 10 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Manner CuesSubject 3 Year 24 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Manner CuesSubject 3 Year 34 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Manner CuesSubject 4 Year 135 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Manner CuesSubject 4 Year 225 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Manner CuesSubject 4 Year 337 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Manner CuesSubject 5 Year 10 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Manner CuesSubject 5 Year 20 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Manner CuesSubject 5 Year 30 percentage of correct answers
Secondary

Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Place Cues

Measure of percent correct on consonant place cue production elicited from pictures of single word items. Scores are derived from the percentage of time the child produced the correct place of consonant production on 25 items.

Time frame: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Place CuesSubject 1 Year 120 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Place CuesSubject 1 Year 258 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Place CuesSubject 1 Year 358 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Place CuesSubject 2 Year 10 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Place CuesSubject 2 Year 227 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Place CuesSubject 2 Year 327 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Place CuesSubject 3 Year 10 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Place CuesSubject 3 Year 20 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Place CuesSubject 3 Year 35 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Place CuesSubject 4 Year 128 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Place CuesSubject 4 Year 221 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Place CuesSubject 4 Year 338 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Place CuesSubject 5 Year 10 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Place CuesSubject 5 Year 20 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Place CuesSubject 5 Year 30 percentage of correct answers
Secondary

Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Syllables

Measure of percent correct for use of syllables elicited from pictures of single word items. Scores are derived from the percentage of time the child produced the correct number of syllables on 25 items.

Time frame: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-SyllablesSubject 1 Year 140 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-SyllablesSubject 1 Year 280 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-SyllablesSubject 1 Year 392 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-SyllablesSubject 2 Year 10 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-SyllablesSubject 2 Year 240 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-SyllablesSubject 2 Year 380 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-SyllablesSubject 3 Year 10 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-SyllablesSubject 3 Year 20 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-SyllablesSubject 3 Year 340 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-SyllablesSubject 4 Year 160 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-SyllablesSubject 4 Year 2100 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-SyllablesSubject 4 Year 360 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-SyllablesSubject 5 Year 10 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-SyllablesSubject 5 Year 20 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-SyllablesSubject 5 Year 30 percentage of correct answers
Secondary

Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vocalize on Demand

This is a measure of the child's ability to vocalize on demand elicited by pictures of objects. Scores are derived from the percentage of time the child vocalized for 25 words.

Time frame: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vocalize on DemandSubject 1 Year 1100 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vocalize on DemandSubject 1 Year 2100 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vocalize on DemandSubject 1 Year 3100 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vocalize on DemandSubject 2 Year 10 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vocalize on DemandSubject 2 Year 2100 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vocalize on DemandSubject 2 Year 3100 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vocalize on DemandSubject 3 Year 10 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vocalize on DemandSubject 3 Year 20 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vocalize on DemandSubject 3 Year 344 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vocalize on DemandSubject 4 Year 1100 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vocalize on DemandSubject 4 Year 2100 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vocalize on DemandSubject 4 Year 3100 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vocalize on DemandSubject 5 Year 10 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vocalize on DemandSubject 5 Year 20 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vocalize on DemandSubject 5 Year 30 percentage of correct answers
Secondary

Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Voice Cues

Measure of percent correct on consonant voicing cue production elicited from pictures of single word items. Scores are derived from the percentage of time the child produced the correct voicing of consonant production on 25 items.

Time frame: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Voice CuesSubject 1 Year 116 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Voice CuesSubject 1 Year 267 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Voice CuesSubject 1 Year 390 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Voice CuesSubject 2 Year 10 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Voice CuesSubject 2 Year 241 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Voice CuesSubject 2 Year 325 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Voice CuesSubject 3 Year 10 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Voice CuesSubject 3 Year 20 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Voice CuesSubject 3 Year 33 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Voice CuesSubject 4 Year 141 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Voice CuesSubject 4 Year 220 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Voice CuesSubject 4 Year 351 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Voice CuesSubject 5 Year 10 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Voice CuesSubject 5 Year 20 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Voice CuesSubject 5 Year 30 percentage of correct answers
Secondary

Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vowels

Measure of percent correct on vowel production elicited from pictures of single word items. Scores are derived from the percentage of time the child produced the correct vowel on 25 items.

Time frame: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-VowelsSubject 1 Year 112 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-VowelsSubject 1 Year 231 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-VowelsSubject 1 Year 353 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-VowelsSubject 2 Year 10 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-VowelsSubject 2 Year 212 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-VowelsSubject 2 Year 326 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-VowelsSubject 3 Year 10 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-VowelsSubject 3 Year 20 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-VowelsSubject 3 Year 320 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-VowelsSubject 4 Year 128 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-VowelsSubject 4 Year 217 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-VowelsSubject 4 Year 345 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-VowelsSubject 5 Year 10 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-VowelsSubject 5 Year 20 percentage of correct answers
Pediatric ABIPercentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-VowelsSubject 5 Year 30 percentage of correct answers
Secondary

Pre-School Language Scale (PLS-5) Scores

The PLS-5 is a standardized language test designed for infants and young children. The Auditory Comprehension subscale targets skills known to precede language development, including: attention to speakers, appropriate object play, basic vocabulary, concepts, grammatical markers, and complex sentences. The Expressive Communication subscale assesses vocal development, social communication, naming of common objects, phonological awareness, sequencing skills, as well as use of concepts, prepositions, grammatical markers, and varying sentence structures.

Time frame: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

Population: Since spoken language skills did not progress as expected, this measure was inappropriate for use in the study and was unobtainable.

Secondary

Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAIS

A hierarchy of tests were chosen that capture auditory skills from sound awareness to open set word and sentence understanding. Participants did not advance to the next level of difficulty until demonstrating a minimum performance on the previous measure. The Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (IT-MAIS) is a parent questionnaire consisting of ten questions regarding a young infant or toddler's auditory behavior, e.g., Does the child spontaneously respond to his/her name in quiet with auditory cues? Each question is scored on a five point scale: 0 = never, 1 = rarely, 2 = occasionally, 3 = frequently, and 4 = always. The aim of this tool is to assess the benefit of the child's personal amplification device(s) and is used to assess hearing aid benefit. Higher scores reflect more consistent auditory response. Scores reported are the percentage of correctly answered questions of the total asked.

Time frame: Pre-ABI, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pediatric ABISpeech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAISSubject 1 Pre-ABI3 percent correct
Pediatric ABISpeech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAISSubject 1 Year 143 percent correct
Pediatric ABISpeech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAISSubject 1 Year 232 percent correct
Pediatric ABISpeech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAISSubject 1 Year 342 percent correct
Pediatric ABISpeech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAISSubject 2 Pre-ABI0 percent correct
Pediatric ABISpeech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAISSubject 2 Year 128 percent correct
Pediatric ABISpeech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAISSubject 2 Year 212 percent correct
Pediatric ABISpeech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAISSubject 2 Year 372 percent correct
Pediatric ABISpeech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAISSubject 3 Pre-ABI0 percent correct
Pediatric ABISpeech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAISSubject 3 Year 152 percent correct
Pediatric ABISpeech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAISSubject 3 Year 270 percent correct
Pediatric ABISpeech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAISSubject 3 Year 333 percent correct
Pediatric ABISpeech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAISSubject 4 Pre-ABI75 percent correct
Pediatric ABISpeech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAISSubject 4 Year 150 percent correct
Pediatric ABISpeech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAISSubject 4 Year 255 percent correct
Pediatric ABISpeech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAISSubject 4 Year 352 percent correct
Pediatric ABISpeech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAISSubject 5 Pre-ABI0 percent correct
Pediatric ABISpeech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAISSubject 5 Year 12 percent correct
Pediatric ABISpeech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAISSubject 5 Year 25 percent correct
Pediatric ABISpeech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAISSubject 5 Year 30 percent correct
Secondary

The Oral and Written Language Scales (OWLS) Listening Comprehension Score

OWLS-II: Listening Comprehension measures oral language reception, which is the understanding of spoken language. The examiner orally presents increasingly difficult words, phrases, and sentences to the participant and he/she responds by pointing to or stating which of four pictures is correct. The derived mean standard score for this test is 100 with a standard deviation of 15. Higher scores indicate better listening comprehension. Scores of 85 to 115 are within normal limits. Scores that fall 2 standard deviations below the mean are considered to be severely delayed.

Time frame: Year 3

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pediatric ABIThe Oral and Written Language Scales (OWLS) Listening Comprehension ScoreSubject 177 units on a scale
Pediatric ABIThe Oral and Written Language Scales (OWLS) Listening Comprehension ScoreSubject 246 units on a scale
Pediatric ABIThe Oral and Written Language Scales (OWLS) Listening Comprehension ScoreSubject 340 units on a scale
Pediatric ABIThe Oral and Written Language Scales (OWLS) Listening Comprehension ScoreSubject 440 units on a scale
Pediatric ABIThe Oral and Written Language Scales (OWLS) Listening Comprehension ScoreSubject 562 units on a scale
Secondary

The Oral and Written Language Scales (OWLS) Oral Expression Score

OWLS-II: Oral Expression measures oral language expression, which is the use of spoken language. The examiner presents a verbal prompt along with a picture and the participant must respond orally to the prompt with increasingly difficult language. The derived mean standard score for this test is 100 with a standard deviation of 15. Higher scores indicate better oral expression. Scores of 85 to 115 are within normal limits. Scores that fall 2 standard deviations below the mean are considered to be severely delayed.

Time frame: Year 3

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pediatric ABIThe Oral and Written Language Scales (OWLS) Oral Expression ScoreSubject 148 units on a scale
Pediatric ABIThe Oral and Written Language Scales (OWLS) Oral Expression ScoreSubject 250 units on a scale
Pediatric ABIThe Oral and Written Language Scales (OWLS) Oral Expression ScoreSubject 340 units on a scale
Pediatric ABIThe Oral and Written Language Scales (OWLS) Oral Expression ScoreSubject 440 units on a scale
Pediatric ABIThe Oral and Written Language Scales (OWLS) Oral Expression ScoreSubject 558 units on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026