Skip to content

A Web-based Bystander Education Program

Preventing Violence Against Women: A Web-based Approach

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01903876
Acronym
RealConsent
Enrollment
743
Registered
2013-07-19
Start date
2010-02-28
Completion date
2011-05-31
Last updated
2014-07-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sexual Violence

Brief summary

This is a study to determine whether a theoretically-driven web-based 3-hour intervention designed for male college students called RealConsent is effective in increasing prosocial intervening behaviors and in preventing sexual violence perpetration. Sexual violence programs for this population have been implemented for decades in the United States, but a program that is web-based and incorporates the bystander education model has never been implemented or tested. In this study, male college students will be recruited online, enrolled and randomly assigned to RealConsent or to a comparison condition. Prior to the intervention, investigators will ask questions about their intervening and sexually coercive behaviors and other theoretical and empirical factors related to the study outcomes. Investigators will survey the young men again at post-intervention, and at 6-months follow-up to determine whether young men in the RealConsent program intervened more often and engaged in less sexual violence compared to young men in the comparison condition. The main hypotheses are: (1) college men in the RealConsent program will report more instances of prosocial intervening; and (2) college men in the RealConsent program will report less sexual violence against women.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALBystander & Sexual Violence Prevention

This 3-hour web-based program consists of six 30-minute modules that are interactive and range in number of segments (1-14) and types of activities. Each of the modules involves interactivity, didactic activities and two episodes of a serial drama, which allows for the modeling of positive behaviors and illustrate both positive and negative outcome expectations for intervening and for perpetrating abuse against women. Behaviors modeled include communicating with female sex partners, obtaining informed consent to have sex, and intervening to prevent abuse from taking place.

This general health promotion web-based program is 3-hours and provides a range of activities related to reducing day-to day stress and alleviating anxiety through meditation and exercise.

Sponsors

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
CollaboratorFED
Emory University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 24 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Student matriculated at Georgia State University * Male * 18 to 24 * Undergraduate * Self-identify as heterosexual or bisexual

Exclusion criteria

* Graduate student * Self-identify as homosexual

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Prosocial Intervening Behavior6 monthsThis scale is the Reactions to Offensive Language and Behavior (ROLB) index that measures whether or not men confronted inappropriate behaviors of other men. We used the 7-item self-behavior subscale plus an additional 8 items, which directly reflected the content of RealConsent. A series of 15 potential intervening situations were presented and participants were asked to indicate whether they had experienced this situation in past 6 months (yes/no), and whether they had intervened (yes/no). The scale ranged from 0% (did not intervene anytime) to 100% (intervened every time).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sexual Violence Perpetration6 monthsThis scale is the Conflict Tactics Scale revised, Sexual Coercion Subscale and assessed the number of sexually coercive/violent behaviors engaged in during the past 6 months. The index ranges from 0 (no engagement in any sexual violence) to 7 (engaged in all 7 sexually violent behaviors).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment took place between Feb 2010 - April 2010.

Pre-assignment details

N=368 participants completed the eligibility screener and provided informed consent in the study, but failed to complete the baseline assessment. Because our randomization occurred following completion of baseline assessment, these participants were not randomized to groups and were not included.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
General Health Promotion
A 3-hour general mental health web-based program. General Health Promotion: This general health promotion web-based program is 3-hours and provides a range of activities related to reducing day-to day stress and alleviating anxiety through meditation and exercise.
367
Bystander & Sexual Violence Prevention
A 3-hour web-based program designed to teach male college student bystanders to intervene. Bystander & Sexual Violence Prevention: This 3-hour web-based program consists of six 30-minute modules that are interactive and range in number of segments (1-14) and types of activities. Each of the modules involves interactivity, didactic activities and two episodes of a serial drama, which allows for the modeling of positive behaviors and illustrate both positive and negative outcome expectations for intervening and for perpetrating abuse against women. Behaviors modeled include communicating with female sex partners, obtaining informed consent to have sex, and intervening to prevent abuse from taking place.
376
Total743

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Baseline to Post-Intervention PeriodLost to Follow-up184108
Six-Month Follow-up PeriodLost to Follow-up91145

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBystander & Sexual Violence PreventionGeneral Health PromotionTotal
Age, Continuous20.42 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.69
20.33 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.66
20.38 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.67
Date rape attitudes128.85 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.07
128.45 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.84
128.65 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.95
Empathy for rape victims68.96 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.66
68.78 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.79
68.87 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.72
Frequency of vaginal intercourse7.55 vaginal sex acts/60 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.75
8.38 vaginal sex acts/60 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.03
7.96 vaginal sex acts/60 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.89
Hostility towards women3.42 scales on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.43
3.89 scales on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.54
3.66 scales on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.49
Hyper-gender ideology46.59 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.28
46.38 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
46.49 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.28
Intentions to intervene52.68 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.85
52.09 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.78
52.39 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
Knowledge of informed consent to have sex11.69 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.44
11.46 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.49
11.58 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.46
Legal knowledge of rape/assault4.54 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.73
4.61 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.78
4.57 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.75
Outcome expectancies for engaging in rape58.71 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.76
58.02 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.17
58.37 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.96
Outcome expectancies for intervening28.72 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.33
28.26 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.86
28.49 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6
Prosocial intervening72 percent scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25
72 percent scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24
72 percent scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
12 Participants11 Participants23 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
73 Participants73 Participants146 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
83 Participants83 Participants166 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
208 Participants200 Participants408 Participants
Rape myth acceptance35.88 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.43
36.69 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.29
36.28 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.36
Region of Enrollment
United States
376 participants367 participants743 participants
Relationship status
Divorced
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Relationship status
Engaged or committed
82 participants87 participants169 participants
Relationship status
Married or has a partner
1 participants6 participants7 participants
Relationship status
Separated
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Relationship status
Single
289 participants270 participants559 participants
Self-comfort with men's inappropriate behaviors32.68 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.82
33.55 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.71
33.11 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.76
Self-efficacy to intervene88.74 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.93
87.88 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.6
88.32 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.27
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
376 Participants367 Participants743 Participants
Sexual coercion perpetration.53 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.07
.76 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.03
.64 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.19

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 3670 / 376
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 3670 / 376

Outcome results

Primary

Prosocial Intervening Behavior

This scale is the Reactions to Offensive Language and Behavior (ROLB) index that measures whether or not men confronted inappropriate behaviors of other men. We used the 7-item self-behavior subscale plus an additional 8 items, which directly reflected the content of RealConsent. A series of 15 potential intervening situations were presented and participants were asked to indicate whether they had experienced this situation in past 6 months (yes/no), and whether they had intervened (yes/no). The scale ranged from 0% (did not intervene anytime) to 100% (intervened every time).

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
General Health PromotionProsocial Intervening Behavior72.2 percent score on a scaleStandard Error 0.031
Bystander & Sexual Violence PreventionProsocial Intervening Behavior81.1 percent score on a scaleStandard Error 0.028
p-value: 0.044ANCOVA
Secondary

Sexual Violence Perpetration

This scale is the Conflict Tactics Scale revised, Sexual Coercion Subscale and assessed the number of sexually coercive/violent behaviors engaged in during the past 6 months. The index ranges from 0 (no engagement in any sexual violence) to 7 (engaged in all 7 sexually violent behaviors).

Time frame: 6 months

Population: For some of the variables in this analysis, there were missing data. ANCOVA performed in SPSS will use a listwise deletion. This resulted in n=87 and n=115 for this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
General Health PromotionSexual Violence Perpetration.498 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.087
Bystander & Sexual Violence PreventionSexual Violence Perpetration.258 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.075
p-value: 0.042ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026