Skip to content

Anemia Management in Chronic Kidney Disease Not on Dialysis Patients After the European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) Working Group Recommendations

ANEMIA MANAGEMENT IN CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE NOT ON DIALYSIS PATIENTS AFTER THE ERBP WORKING GROUP RECOMMENDATIONS

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01903148
Acronym
ACERCA
Enrollment
455
Registered
2013-07-19
Start date
2011-10-31
Completion date
2012-06-30
Last updated
2014-01-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ANEMIA

Keywords

ANEMIA IN CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE PATIENTS NOT ON DIALYSIS

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of the last recommendations of the European Anemia Working Group ERBP in the anemia management in the achievement of the therapeutic goal of Hb 11-12 g/dL.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Fundación Senefro
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults patients with anemia secondary to chronic kidney disease (CKD) not on dialysis. * Patients starting anemia treatment (naïve) after six months of the last recommendations of the European Anemia Working Group ERBP (January 2011). * Patients in treatment who changed from previous ESA treatment since January 2011 (converted patients

Exclusion criteria

* Patients in Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents (ESA) dose adjustment period. * Kidney transplant patients.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
% Patients Achieving Target Hemoglobin Levels1 day because is a crosssectional study with only a visit% patients with Hb levels between 11-12 mg/dl

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hemoglobin Levels Per Type of Patients1 daylevels Hb and type of patients
Patients With Hb>121 day
% Patients With Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents (ESA) Therapy1 dayknow the treatments ESA for maintenance of hb levels
Iron Treatment1 dayPatients with supplementary Iron treatment to ESA
Patients With Hb<111 day

Countries

Spain

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Nephrology Units of 30 Spanish hospitals.

Pre-assignment details

14 patients were excluded because they didn't fulfill the eligibility criteria

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Converted Patients
Patients in treatment who changed from previous ESA treatment since January 2011
143
Naïve Patients
Patients starting anemia treatment (naïve) after six months of the last recommendations of the Anemia Working Group of ERBP (January 2011)
298
Total441

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicConverted PatientsNaïve PatientsTotal
Age Continuous73.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9
72.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5
73.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
Sex: Female, Male
Female
77 Participants152 Participants229 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
66 Participants146 Participants212 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 1431 / 298
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 1431 / 298

Outcome results

Primary

% Patients Achieving Target Hemoglobin Levels

% patients with Hb levels between 11-12 mg/dl

Time frame: 1 day because is a crosssectional study with only a visit

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
Converted Patients% Patients Achieving Target Hemoglobin Levels42.5 percentage of participants 1.3
Naïve Patients% Patients Achieving Target Hemoglobin Levels35.3 percentage of participants 1.3
Secondary

Hemoglobin Levels Per Type of Patients

levels Hb and type of patients

Time frame: 1 day

Population: n represents the number of participants analyzed for each category respectively (converted patients, naïve patients)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Converted PatientsHemoglobin Levels Per Type of PatientsHb levels in non diabetics patients, n=79, 16311.6 mg/dlStandard Deviation 1.2
Converted PatientsHemoglobin Levels Per Type of PatientsHb levels in diabetics patients, n=64, 13511.4 mg/dlStandard Deviation 1.3
Converted PatientsHemoglobin Levels Per Type of PatientsHb levels patients non cardiovasdisease, n=76, 15111.4 mg/dlStandard Deviation 1.2
Converted PatientsHemoglobin Levels Per Type of PatientsHb levels patients cardiovasculardisease, n=67,14711.7 mg/dlStandard Deviation 1.4
Converted PatientsHemoglobin Levels Per Type of PatientsHb levels patients noncerebrovadisease, n=125, 26511.6 mg/dlStandard Deviation 1.2
Converted PatientsHemoglobin Levels Per Type of PatientsHb levels patients with cerebrovadisease n=18, 3311.4 mg/dlStandard Deviation 1.7
Converted PatientsHemoglobin Levels Per Type of PatientsHb levels patients non cancer, n=129,25711.5 mg/dlStandard Deviation 1.3
Converted PatientsHemoglobin Levels Per Type of PatientsHb levels patients with cancer n=14, 4111.6 mg/dlStandard Deviation 1.2
Naïve PatientsHemoglobin Levels Per Type of PatientsHb levels patients with cancer n=14, 4111.3 mg/dlStandard Deviation 1.2
Naïve PatientsHemoglobin Levels Per Type of PatientsHb levels in non diabetics patients, n=79, 16311.5 mg/dlStandard Deviation 1.2
Naïve PatientsHemoglobin Levels Per Type of PatientsHb levels patients noncerebrovadisease, n=125, 26511.3 mg/dlStandard Deviation 1.3
Naïve PatientsHemoglobin Levels Per Type of PatientsHb levels in diabetics patients, n=64, 13511.1 mg/dlStandard Deviation 1.3
Naïve PatientsHemoglobin Levels Per Type of PatientsHb levels patients non cancer, n=129,25711.3 mg/dlStandard Deviation 1.3
Naïve PatientsHemoglobin Levels Per Type of PatientsHb levels patients non cardiovasdisease, n=76, 15111.5 mg/dlStandard Deviation 1.3
Naïve PatientsHemoglobin Levels Per Type of PatientsHb levels patients with cerebrovadisease n=18, 3311.4 mg/dlStandard Deviation 1.1
Naïve PatientsHemoglobin Levels Per Type of PatientsHb levels patients cardiovasculardisease, n=67,14711.2 mg/dlStandard Deviation 1.2
Secondary

Iron Treatment

Patients with supplementary Iron treatment to ESA

Time frame: 1 day

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Converted PatientsIron Treatment68 participants
Naïve PatientsIron Treatment175 participants
Secondary

% Patients With Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents (ESA) Therapy

know the treatments ESA for maintenance of hb levels

Time frame: 1 day

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Converted Patients% Patients With Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents (ESA) TherapyMircera74.1 percentage of participants
Converted Patients% Patients With Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents (ESA) TherapyDarbepoetin19.6 percentage of participants
Converted Patients% Patients With Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents (ESA) TherapyEpoetin alfa2.1 percentage of participants
Converted Patients% Patients With Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents (ESA) TherapyEpoetin beta4.2 percentage of participants
Naïve Patients% Patients With Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents (ESA) TherapyEpoetin beta1.7 percentage of participants
Naïve Patients% Patients With Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents (ESA) TherapyMircera83.4 percentage of participants
Naïve Patients% Patients With Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents (ESA) TherapyEpoetin alfa1.7 percentage of participants
Naïve Patients% Patients With Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents (ESA) TherapyDarbepoetin13.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Patients With Hb<11

Time frame: 1 day

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Converted PatientsPatients With Hb<1138 participants
Naïve PatientsPatients With Hb<1198 participants
Secondary

Patients With Hb>12

Time frame: 1 day

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Converted PatientsPatients With Hb>1252 participants
Naïve PatientsPatients With Hb>1271 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026