Skip to content

Evaluating Pharmacokinetic Interactions With Vaginal Ring Contraceptives and ART

Evaluating Pharmacokinetic Interactions With Vaginal Ring Contraceptives and Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01903031
Enrollment
84
Registered
2013-07-19
Start date
2014-12-30
Completion date
2016-10-10
Last updated
2018-06-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV-1 Infection

Brief summary

This study was done to look at a method of hormonal birth control, called the NuvaRing, and specific anti-HIV medications, called antiretrovirals (ARVs). Some studies of women who use a hormonal birth control method (specifically oral pills, patches, and injections) and take ARVs have shown that ARVs interact with the hormones released by the birth control medication. These interactions may cause the birth control to be less effective at preventing pregnancy. There is also concern that hormonal birth control can increase HIV spreading to others, but more studies are needed to determine if this is true. The investigators did not know whether the NuvaRing and ARVs interact when they are used together, so this study looked to see if certain ARVs (efavirenz and atazanavir/ritonavir) interact with the two hormones released by NuvaRing. This will help us to determine if NuvaRing is safe and effective for women with HIV infection who are taking ARVs. The study also included HIV-infected women who were not on ARVs but used the NuvaRing to show us what the hormone levels are like in a similar group of women not on ARVs. Vaginal rings are also currently being studied to deliver anti-HIV medications that may prevent HIV acquisition, and to provide birth control over a longer period of time (more than 1 month). Since vaginal rings will become more commonly used to administer medications, the investigators wanted to better understand the potential for drug interactions with drugs given vaginally. This study will also help us understand the potential for drug interactions between ARVs given orally, and other drugs given through vaginal rings, like the NuvaRing. Additionally, this study will help us understand how hormones released from a vaginal ring affect the amount of HIV virus in the genital tract, the bacterial make-up (microbiome) of the female genital tract, and the immune system within the genital tract, all of which may affect the chances of spreading HIV.

Detailed description

This was a 28 day study from study entry through the final clinic visit. Post-entry visits were scheduled at Days 7, 14, 21 and 28. The Nuvaring was put in place at study entry and removed on day 21. A single pharmacokinetic (PK) blood sample was collected for assay of etonogestrel (ENG) and ethinyl estradiol (EE) at entry (day 0, prior to NuvaRing placement), and on days 7, 14, and 21 after placement of the NuvaRing. For participants on the ARV arms, intensive, 8-hour PK sampling, for assay of efavirenz (EFV) and atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/RTV) respectively, was performed at study entry (day 0, prior to NuvaRing placement) and 21 days later. ARV sampling was performed at pre-dose (hour 0), and 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose. Safety was assessed at each study visit.

Interventions

DEVICENuvaring

NuvaRing is made of ethylene vinylacetate copolymers (28% and 9% vinylacetate) and magnesium stearate, is latex free, and contains 11.7 mg etonogestrel and 2.7 mg ethinyl estradiol. NuvaRing has an outer diameter of 54 mm and a cross-sectional diameter of 4mm. Once NuvaRing is inserted into the vagina, the ring should remain in place (not be removed) continuously for 3 weeks (21 days). After being in place for the first 21 days of the study, the ring may be removed after the day 21 study visit evaluations have been completed.

DRUGEFV

Participants received EFV 600 mg daily with two or more NRTIs

DRUGATV/r

Participants received ATV/r 300 mg/ 100 mg daily with tenofovir and one or more additional NRTIs

DRUGTDF

Participants received 300 mg of tenofovir in Arm C

DRUGNRTIs

Participants received two or more NRTIs in Arm B and one or more NRTIs in Arm C

Sponsors

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
CollaboratorNIH
Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Documented HIV-1 infection. * Participants must have been receiving either 1) EFV 600 mg daily with 2 or more NRTIs, 2) ATV/r 300 mg/ 100 mg daily with TDF 300 mg and 1 or more additional NRTIs, or 3) no ART. ART regimens should have been stable for 30 days prior to study entry with no plans to change therapy during the first 28 days of this study. Participants receiving no ART should have had no plans to initiate ART during the first 28 days of the study. NOTE: Participants must have had access to their ART regimens through their primary care providers. ART medications were not supplied by this study. * For participants on ART, documentation of plasma HIV-1 RNA ≤400 copies/mL was obtained within 60 days prior to study entry. * For participants not on ART, CD4+ cell count must have been ≥350 cells/mm\^3, obtained within 60 days prior to study entry. * Laboratory values within 60 days prior to study entry: * Platelet count ≥50,000 platelets/mm\^3 * Hemoglobin ≥8.0 g/dL * Aspartate transaminase (SGOT) and alanine aminotransferase (SGPT) \<5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) * Creatinine ≤1.5 x ULN * Total bilirubin ≤2.0 x ULN * Last menstrual period ≤6 months prior to study entry. If last menstrual period \>6 months prior to study entry without another cause for amenorrhea, such as recent pregnancy, serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) must have been checked and be ≤40 mIU/mL to be eligible for enrollment. * Premenopausal females with at least one functioning ovary. * Documentation of Pap smear within 1 year prior to study entry. * Negative serum or urine-HCG pregnancy test with a sensitivity of ≤25 mIU/mL within 60 days prior to study entry and within 24 hours prior to study entry * All participants must have agreed not to participate in a conception process (eg, active attempt to become pregnant or in vitro fertilization) for the duration of the study. Because it was unknown if ARVs adversely affect the efficacy of NuvaRing as a contraceptive method, participants of reproductive potential, who were participating in sexual activities that could lead to pregnancy, must have agreed to use an additional reliable form of contraception while in the study. Acceptable additional methods of contraception included: * Condoms (male or female) * Non-hormonal intrauterine device (IUD) Other hormonal forms of contraception were not allowed during the study period. Condoms should have been used to prevent transmission of HIV and sexually transmitted diseases between sexual partners. NOTE: Participants with bilateral tubal ligation or non-hormonal IUD were eligible to be enrolled.

Exclusion criteria

* Received depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) within 4 months prior to study entry. * Received other hormonal therapies (eg, oral contraceptive agents, hormone- containing vaginal ring, contraceptive patch, hormone replacement therapy, anabolic therapies, including nandrolone decanoate or megestrol acetate) within 30 days prior to study entry. * Breastfeeding. * Less than 6 weeks postpartum at study entry. * Use of any prohibited medications within 30 days prior to study entry. * Initiated, discontinued, or changed doses of drugs that are CYP substrates or known to have drug interactions with ethinyl estradiol or etonogestrel within 30 days prior to study entry. * Bilateral oophorectomy. * For women older than 35 years of age, smoking 15 or more cigarettes per day. * History of invasive cancer of the reproductive tract; known or suspected malignancy of the breast, or known increased risk for breast cancer; undiagnosed abnormal vaginal bleeding; liver tumors; or serious ocular disorders at any time prior to study entry. * Chronic immunosuppressive conditions other than HIV. * Use of systemic or inhaled corticosteroids such as for acute therapy for Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) or asthma exacerbation and prednisone ≥10 mg (or equivalent) for any reason other than a stable or tapering dose. * History of deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. * History of cerebral vascular or coronary artery disease. * Severe uncontrolled hypertension within 60 days prior to study entry. * Diabetes with vascular involvement. * Clinically active cervical or vaginal infection at study entry. NOTE: Gonorrhea, chlamydia, and trichomonas testing was performed during screening using techniques available at the local sites and documented in source documentation and case report forms (CRFs). Testing for bacterial vaginosis, performed using techniques available at the local sites, was only necessary if the participant was symptomatic and the provider felt treatment might be necessary. Women with genital herpes lesions waited to be screened until the herpetic lesions had healed. * Acute infections or other opportunistic diseases requiring medication within 14 days prior to study entry.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Etonogestrel Concentrations at Study Day 21Day 21This evaluates the effect of EFV and ATV/r on etonogestrel by measuring etonogestrel concentrations on all three study arms 21 days after NuvaRing administration. The pharmacokinetic (PK) blood sample for measurement of etonogestrel on study day 21 was taken before the NuvaRing was removed. The assay lower limit of quantification for etonogestrel was 250 pg/mL; values \< 250 were assigned a value of half the lower limit (ie, 125 pg/mL).
Ethinyl Estradiol Concentrations at Study Day 21Day 21This evaluates the effect of EFV and ATV/r on ethinyl estradiol by measuring ethinyl estradiol concentrations on all three study arms 21 days after NuvaRing administration. The PK blood sample for measurement of ethinyl estradiol on study day 21 was taken before the NuvaRing was removed. The assay lower limit of quantification for ethinyl estradiol was 5 pg/mL ; values \< 5 were assigned a value of half the lower limit (ie, 2.5 pg/mL).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
EFV PK Parameter Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC0-24hours) Calculated Based on Intensive EFV PK Samples Obtained From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm BIntensive EFV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement).This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the PK parameter AUC(0-24h) of EFV before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. AUC(0-24h) defines area under the concentration-time curve over the period of 24 hours (pre-dose concentration was used to impute concentration at 24h).
EFV PK Parameter Minimum Plasma Concentration (Cmin) Determined Based on EFV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm BIntensive EFV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement).This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the EFV PK parameter Cmin obtained from both sampling periods, before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Cmin defines minimum concentration observed within the first 8 hours of the 24 hour dosing interval.
EFV PK Parameter Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) Determined Based on EFV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm BIntensive EFV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement).This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the EFV PK parameter Cmax obtained from both sampling periods, before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Cmax defines maximum concentration observed within the first 8 hours of the 24 hour dosing interval.
EFV PK Parameter Clearance (CLss/F) Determined Based on EFV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm BIntensive EFV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement).This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the EFV PK parameter CLss/F obtained from both sampling periods, before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. CLss/F defines apparent oral clearance
ATV PK Parameter AUC(0-24h) Calculated Based on Intensive Atazanavir (ATV) PK Samples Obtained From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm CIntensive ATV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement)This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the PK parameter AUC(0-24h) of ATV before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. AUC(0-24h) defines area under the concentration-time curve over the period of 24 hours (pre-dose concentration was used to impute concentration at 24h).
ATV PK Parameter Cmin Determined Based on ATV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm CIntensive ATV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement).This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the ATV PK parameter Cmin obtained from both sampling periods, before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Cmin defines minimum concentration observed within the first 8 hours of the 24 hour dosing interval.
ATV PK Parameter Cmax Determined Based on ATV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm CIntensive ATV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement).This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the ATV PK parameter Cmax obtained from both sampling periods, before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Cmax defines maximum concentration observed within the first 8 hours of the 24 hour dosing interval.
ATV PK Parameter Time to Cmax (Tmax) Determined Based on ATV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm CIntensive ATV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement).This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the ATV PK parameter Tmax obtained from both sampling periods, before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Tmax defines time to maximum concentration since dose is initiated.
Etonogestrel Concentrations Obtained on Study Days 7 and 14Study days 7 and 14This evaluates the effect of EFV and ATV/r on etonogestrel by measuring etonogestrel concentrations on all three study arms 7 and 14 days after NuvaRing administration. The assay lower limit of quantification for etonogestrel was 250 pg/mL; values \< 250 were assigned a value of half the lower limit (ie, 125 pg/mL).
Ritonavir (RTV) PK Parameter AUC(0-24h) Calculated Based on Intensive RTV PK Samples Obtained From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm CIntensive RTV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement)This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the PK parameter AUC(0-24h) of RTV before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. AUC(0-24h) defines area under the concentration-time curve over the period of 24 hours (pre-dose concentration was used to impute concentration at 24h).
RTV PK Parameter Cmin Determined Based on RTV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm CIntensive RTV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement)This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the PK parameter Cmin of RTV before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Cmin defines minimum concentration observed within the first 8 hours of the 24 hour dosing interval.
RTV PK Parameter Cmax Determined Based on RTV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm CIntensive RTV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement)This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the PK parameter Cmax of RTV before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Cmax defines maximum concentration observed within the first 8 hours of the 24 hour dosing interval.
RTV PK Parameter Tmax Determined Based on RTV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm CIntensive RTV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement)This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the PK parameter Tmax of RTV before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Tmax defines time to maximum concentration since dose is initiated.
RTV PK Parameter CLss/F Determined Based on RTV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm CIntensive RTV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement)This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the PK parameter CLss/F of RTV before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. CLss/F defines apparent oral clearance.
Proportion of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Levels <40 Copies/mLStudy day 0 and study day 21This evaluates the short-term impact of Nuvaring on virologic suppression in participants who have been administered Nuvaring alone or together with EFV or ATV/r by measuring proportion of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels \<40 copies/mL at study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and study day 21 (three weeks after vaginal ring placement). An FDA-approved HIV-1 RNA assay was required.
Percentage of Participants With Signs and Symptoms of Grade 2 or Higher Deemed Possibly, Probably or Definitely Related to Study TreatmentFrom day 0 to day 28This evaluates toxicity and safety of NuvaRing alone, NuvaRing with EFV, and NuvaRing with ATV/r. Signs/symptoms were graded using the DAIDS AE Grading Table was used. Participants with sign(s)/symptom(s) of grade 2 (moderate), 3 (severe), 4 (potentially life-threatening) or 5 (death) are included in the percentage. Relationship to study treatment was determined by the study co-chairs and DAIDS clinical representative.
Proportion of Participants With Progesterone Levels Greater Than 5 ng/mL.Study days 0, 7, 14, 21 and 28This evaluates alterations in progesterone levels due to the potential PK interaction between NuvaRing and the ARVs EFV and ATV/r by examining progesterone levels at study days 0 (before vaginal ring placement), 7, 14, and 21 (before vaginal ring removal), and study day 28, without regard to menstrual cycle status at study entry.
ATV PK Parameter CLss/F Determined Based on ATV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm CIntensive ATV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement).This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the ATV PK parameter CLss/F obtained from both sampling periods, before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. CLss/f defines apparent oral clearance.
Ethinyl Estradiol Concentrations Obtained on Study Days 7 and 14.Study days 7 and 14This evaluates the effect of EFV and ATV/r on ethinyl estradiol by measuring ethinyl estradiol concentrations on all three study arms 7 and 14 days after NuvaRing administration. The assay lower limit of quantification for ethinyl estradiol was 5 pg/mL; values \< 5 were assigned a value of half the lower limit (ie, 2.5 pg/mL).

Countries

Botswana, Brazil, Kenya, Peru, Puerto Rico, South Africa, Thailand, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The first participant enrolled in December 2014 and final participant enrolled in September 2016. Enrollment took place at 21 US and non-US clinical research sites.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
NuvaRing and no ART
Participants who were not on ART were prescribed NuvaRing, to be inserted at entry and removed at Day 21.
27
NuvaRing With EFV Plus ≥2 NRTIs
NuvaRing was inserted at entry and removed at Day 21. Participants also received EFV 600 mg daily with two or more NRTIs.
28
NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF and ≥1 NRTIs
NuvaRing was inserted at entry and removed at Day 21. Participants also received ATV/r 300 mg/ 100 mg daily with tenofovir (TDF) 300 mg and 1 or more additional NRTIs.
29
Total84

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event010
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up001
Overall StudyMissed Day 21 Primary Endpoint Visit100
Overall StudyNot Able to Attend Clinic110
Overall StudyNuvaRing removed prior to Day 21 visit001
Overall StudyProtocol Violation002
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject011

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF and ≥1 NRTIsTotalNuvaRing and no ARTNuvaRing With EFV Plus ≥2 NRTIs
Age, Continuous36 years35 years32 years36 years
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian, Pacific Islander
5 Participants8 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black Non-Hispanic
14 Participants44 Participants12 Participants18 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic (Regardless of Race)
9 Participants29 Participants11 Participants9 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White Non-Hispanic
1 Participants3 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Botswana
0 Participants5 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
5 Participants14 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Kenya
2 Participants8 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Peru
0 Participants10 Participants6 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Puerto Rico
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Thailand
5 Participants8 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
15 Participants34 Participants5 Participants14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
29 Participants84 Participants27 Participants28 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 270 / 280 / 28
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 2720 / 2818 / 28
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 270 / 280 / 28

Outcome results

Primary

Ethinyl Estradiol Concentrations at Study Day 21

This evaluates the effect of EFV and ATV/r on ethinyl estradiol by measuring ethinyl estradiol concentrations on all three study arms 21 days after NuvaRing administration. The PK blood sample for measurement of ethinyl estradiol on study day 21 was taken before the NuvaRing was removed. The assay lower limit of quantification for ethinyl estradiol was 5 pg/mL ; values \< 5 were assigned a value of half the lower limit (ie, 2.5 pg/mL).

Time frame: Day 21

Population: Participants who provided the Ethinyl Estradiol PK sample at day 21 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
NuvaRing and no ARTEthinyl Estradiol Concentrations at Study Day 2121.30 pg/mL
NuvaRing With EFV Plus ≥2 NRTIsEthinyl Estradiol Concentrations at Study Day 2111.40 pg/mL
NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF and ≥1 NRTIsEthinyl Estradiol Concentrations at Study Day 2116.05 pg/mL
Comparison: Null hypothesis: There is no difference in concentrations of Ethinyl Estradiol on day 21 between the control arm (NuvaRing and no ART) and NuvaRing with EFV plus ≥2 NRTIs.p-value: <0.001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Null hypothesis: There is no difference in concentrations of Ethinyl Estradiol on day 21 between the control arm (NuvaRing and no ART) and NuvaRing with ATV/r plus TDF and ≥1 NRTIs.p-value: 0.004Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Etonogestrel Concentrations at Study Day 21

This evaluates the effect of EFV and ATV/r on etonogestrel by measuring etonogestrel concentrations on all three study arms 21 days after NuvaRing administration. The pharmacokinetic (PK) blood sample for measurement of etonogestrel on study day 21 was taken before the NuvaRing was removed. The assay lower limit of quantification for etonogestrel was 250 pg/mL; values \< 250 were assigned a value of half the lower limit (ie, 125 pg/mL).

Time frame: Day 21

Population: Participants who provided the Etonogestrel PK sample at day 21 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
NuvaRing and no ARTEtonogestrel Concentrations at Study Day 211860.00 pg/mL
NuvaRing With EFV Plus ≥2 NRTIsEtonogestrel Concentrations at Study Day 21429.00 pg/mL
NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF and ≥1 NRTIsEtonogestrel Concentrations at Study Day 213290.00 pg/mL
Comparison: Null hypothesis: There is no difference in concentrations of Etonogestrel on day 21 between the control arm (NuvaRing and no ART) and NuvaRing with EFV plus ≥2 NRTIs.p-value: <0.001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Null hypothesis: There is no difference in concentrations of Etonogestrel on day 21 between the control arm (NuvaRing and no ART) and NuvaRing with ATV/r plus TDF and ≥1 NRTIs.p-value: <0.001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

ATV PK Parameter AUC(0-24h) Calculated Based on Intensive Atazanavir (ATV) PK Samples Obtained From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm C

This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the PK parameter AUC(0-24h) of ATV before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. AUC(0-24h) defines area under the concentration-time curve over the period of 24 hours (pre-dose concentration was used to impute concentration at 24h).

Time frame: Intensive ATV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement)

Population: The analysis population is the 23 A5316 participants enrolled in Arm C (NuvaRing with ATV/r arm plus TDF and one or more NRTIs) eligible for the secondary outcome of ATV PK parameters.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
NuvaRing and no ARTATV PK Parameter AUC(0-24h) Calculated Based on Intensive Atazanavir (ATV) PK Samples Obtained From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm CAUC0-24h day 044313.7 h*ng/mL
NuvaRing and no ARTATV PK Parameter AUC(0-24h) Calculated Based on Intensive Atazanavir (ATV) PK Samples Obtained From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm CAUC0-24h day 2136764.7 h*ng/mL
Secondary

ATV PK Parameter CLss/F Determined Based on ATV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm C

This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the ATV PK parameter CLss/F obtained from both sampling periods, before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. CLss/f defines apparent oral clearance.

Time frame: Intensive ATV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement).

Population: The analysis population is the 23 A5316 participants enrolled in Arm C (NuvaRing with ATV/r arm plus TDF and one or more NRTIs) eligible for the secondary outcome of ATV PK parameters.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
NuvaRing and no ARTATV PK Parameter CLss/F Determined Based on ATV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm CCLss/F day 06.8 L/h
NuvaRing and no ARTATV PK Parameter CLss/F Determined Based on ATV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm CCLss/F day 218.2 L/h
Secondary

ATV PK Parameter Cmax Determined Based on ATV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm C

This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the ATV PK parameter Cmax obtained from both sampling periods, before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Cmax defines maximum concentration observed within the first 8 hours of the 24 hour dosing interval.

Time frame: Intensive ATV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement).

Population: The analysis population is the 23 A5316 participants enrolled in Arm C (NuvaRing with ATV/r arm plus TDF and one or more NRTIs) eligible for the secondary outcome of ATV PK parameters.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
NuvaRing and no ARTATV PK Parameter Cmax Determined Based on ATV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm CCmax day 04291.0 ng/mL
NuvaRing and no ARTATV PK Parameter Cmax Determined Based on ATV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm CCmax day 213583.0 ng/mL
Secondary

ATV PK Parameter Cmin Determined Based on ATV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm C

This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the ATV PK parameter Cmin obtained from both sampling periods, before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Cmin defines minimum concentration observed within the first 8 hours of the 24 hour dosing interval.

Time frame: Intensive ATV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement).

Population: The analysis population is the 23 A5316 participants enrolled in Arm C (NuvaRing with ATV/r arm plus TDF and one or more NRTIs) eligible for the secondary outcome of ATV PK parameters.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
NuvaRing and no ARTATV PK Parameter Cmin Determined Based on ATV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm CCmin day 0796.7 ng/mL
NuvaRing and no ARTATV PK Parameter Cmin Determined Based on ATV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm CCmin day 21599.4 ng/mL
Secondary

ATV PK Parameter Time to Cmax (Tmax) Determined Based on ATV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm C

This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the ATV PK parameter Tmax obtained from both sampling periods, before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Tmax defines time to maximum concentration since dose is initiated.

Time frame: Intensive ATV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement).

Population: The analysis population is the 23 A5316 participants enrolled in Arm C (NuvaRing with ATV/r arm plus TDF and one or more NRTIs) eligible for the secondary outcome of ATV PK parameters.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
NuvaRing and no ARTATV PK Parameter Time to Cmax (Tmax) Determined Based on ATV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm CTmax day 02.9 hour
NuvaRing and no ARTATV PK Parameter Time to Cmax (Tmax) Determined Based on ATV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm CTmax day 213.0 hour
Secondary

EFV PK Parameter Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC0-24hours) Calculated Based on Intensive EFV PK Samples Obtained From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm B

This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the PK parameter AUC(0-24h) of EFV before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. AUC(0-24h) defines area under the concentration-time curve over the period of 24 hours (pre-dose concentration was used to impute concentration at 24h).

Time frame: Intensive EFV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement).

Population: The analysis population is the 24 A5316 participants enrolled in Arm B (NuvaRing with EFV arm plus 2 or more NRTIs) eligible for the secondary outcome of EFV PK parameters.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
NuvaRing and no ARTEFV PK Parameter Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC0-24hours) Calculated Based on Intensive EFV PK Samples Obtained From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm BAUC0-24h day 068949.1 h*ng/mL
NuvaRing and no ARTEFV PK Parameter Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC0-24hours) Calculated Based on Intensive EFV PK Samples Obtained From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm BAUC0-24h day 2157795.9 h*ng/mL
Secondary

EFV PK Parameter Clearance (CLss/F) Determined Based on EFV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm B

This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the EFV PK parameter CLss/F obtained from both sampling periods, before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. CLss/F defines apparent oral clearance

Time frame: Intensive EFV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement).

Population: The analysis population is the 24 A5316 participants enrolled in Arm B (NuvaRing with EFV arm plus 2 or more NRTIs) eligible for the secondary outcome of EFV PK parameters.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
NuvaRing and no ARTEFV PK Parameter Clearance (CLss/F) Determined Based on EFV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm BCLss/F day 08.7 L/h
NuvaRing and no ARTEFV PK Parameter Clearance (CLss/F) Determined Based on EFV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm BCLss/F day 2110.4 L/h
Secondary

EFV PK Parameter Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) Determined Based on EFV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm B

This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the EFV PK parameter Cmax obtained from both sampling periods, before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Cmax defines maximum concentration observed within the first 8 hours of the 24 hour dosing interval.

Time frame: Intensive EFV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement).

Population: The analysis population is the 24 A5316 participants enrolled in Arm B (NuvaRing with EFV arm plus 2 or more NRTIs) eligible for the secondary outcome of EFV PK parameters.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
NuvaRing and no ARTEFV PK Parameter Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) Determined Based on EFV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm BCmax day 04541.0 ng/mL
NuvaRing and no ARTEFV PK Parameter Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) Determined Based on EFV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm BCmax day 213786.0 ng/mL
Secondary

EFV PK Parameter Minimum Plasma Concentration (Cmin) Determined Based on EFV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm B

This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the EFV PK parameter Cmin obtained from both sampling periods, before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Cmin defines minimum concentration observed within the first 8 hours of the 24 hour dosing interval.

Time frame: Intensive EFV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement).

Population: The analysis population is the 24 A5316 participants enrolled in Arm B (NuvaRing with EFV arm plus 2 or more NRTIs) eligible for the secondary outcome of EFV PK parameters.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
NuvaRing and no ARTEFV PK Parameter Minimum Plasma Concentration (Cmin) Determined Based on EFV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm BCmin day 02121.5 ng/mL
NuvaRing and no ARTEFV PK Parameter Minimum Plasma Concentration (Cmin) Determined Based on EFV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm BCmin day 211766.0 ng/mL
Secondary

Ethinyl Estradiol Concentrations Obtained on Study Days 7 and 14.

This evaluates the effect of EFV and ATV/r on ethinyl estradiol by measuring ethinyl estradiol concentrations on all three study arms 7 and 14 days after NuvaRing administration. The assay lower limit of quantification for ethinyl estradiol was 5 pg/mL; values \< 5 were assigned a value of half the lower limit (ie, 2.5 pg/mL).

Time frame: Study days 7 and 14

Population: Participants who provided the Ethinyl estradiol PK samples at day 7 and at day 14 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
NuvaRing and no ARTEthinyl Estradiol Concentrations Obtained on Study Days 7 and 14.Concentration at Day 718.05 pg/mL
NuvaRing and no ARTEthinyl Estradiol Concentrations Obtained on Study Days 7 and 14.Concentration at Day 1419.70 pg/mL
NuvaRing With EFV Plus ≥2 NRTIsEthinyl Estradiol Concentrations Obtained on Study Days 7 and 14.Concentration at Day 79.98 pg/mL
NuvaRing With EFV Plus ≥2 NRTIsEthinyl Estradiol Concentrations Obtained on Study Days 7 and 14.Concentration at Day 1410.50 pg/mL
NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF and ≥1 NRTIsEthinyl Estradiol Concentrations Obtained on Study Days 7 and 14.Concentration at Day 715.70 pg/mL
NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF and ≥1 NRTIsEthinyl Estradiol Concentrations Obtained on Study Days 7 and 14.Concentration at Day 1416.55 pg/mL
Secondary

Etonogestrel Concentrations Obtained on Study Days 7 and 14

This evaluates the effect of EFV and ATV/r on etonogestrel by measuring etonogestrel concentrations on all three study arms 7 and 14 days after NuvaRing administration. The assay lower limit of quantification for etonogestrel was 250 pg/mL; values \< 250 were assigned a value of half the lower limit (ie, 125 pg/mL).

Time frame: Study days 7 and 14

Population: Participants who provided the Etonogestrel PK samples at day 7 and at day 14 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
NuvaRing and no ARTEtonogestrel Concentrations Obtained on Study Days 7 and 14Concentration at Day 71970.00 pg/mL
NuvaRing and no ARTEtonogestrel Concentrations Obtained on Study Days 7 and 14Concentration at Day 142070.00 pg/mL
NuvaRing With EFV Plus ≥2 NRTIsEtonogestrel Concentrations Obtained on Study Days 7 and 14Concentration at Day 7427.00 pg/mL
NuvaRing With EFV Plus ≥2 NRTIsEtonogestrel Concentrations Obtained on Study Days 7 and 14Concentration at Day 14437.00 pg/mL
NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF and ≥1 NRTIsEtonogestrel Concentrations Obtained on Study Days 7 and 14Concentration at Day 73250.00 pg/mL
NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF and ≥1 NRTIsEtonogestrel Concentrations Obtained on Study Days 7 and 14Concentration at Day 143530.00 pg/mL
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Signs and Symptoms of Grade 2 or Higher Deemed Possibly, Probably or Definitely Related to Study Treatment

This evaluates toxicity and safety of NuvaRing alone, NuvaRing with EFV, and NuvaRing with ATV/r. Signs/symptoms were graded using the DAIDS AE Grading Table was used. Participants with sign(s)/symptom(s) of grade 2 (moderate), 3 (severe), 4 (potentially life-threatening) or 5 (death) are included in the percentage. Relationship to study treatment was determined by the study co-chairs and DAIDS clinical representative.

Time frame: From day 0 to day 28

Population: All participants in whom NuvaRing was inserted

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
NuvaRing and no ARTPercentage of Participants With Signs and Symptoms of Grade 2 or Higher Deemed Possibly, Probably or Definitely Related to Study Treatment7.4 Percent of Participants
NuvaRing With EFV Plus ≥2 NRTIsPercentage of Participants With Signs and Symptoms of Grade 2 or Higher Deemed Possibly, Probably or Definitely Related to Study Treatment3.6 Percent of Participants
NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF and ≥1 NRTIsPercentage of Participants With Signs and Symptoms of Grade 2 or Higher Deemed Possibly, Probably or Definitely Related to Study Treatment3.6 Percent of Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Levels <40 Copies/mL

This evaluates the short-term impact of Nuvaring on virologic suppression in participants who have been administered Nuvaring alone or together with EFV or ATV/r by measuring proportion of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels \<40 copies/mL at study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and study day 21 (three weeks after vaginal ring placement). An FDA-approved HIV-1 RNA assay was required.

Time frame: Study day 0 and study day 21

Population: All participants in whom NuvaRing was inserted and with HIV-1 RNA data available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NuvaRing and no ARTProportion of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Levels <40 Copies/mLProportion with HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL at day 00.22 proportion of participants
NuvaRing and no ARTProportion of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Levels <40 Copies/mLProportion with HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL at day 210.17 proportion of participants
NuvaRing With EFV Plus ≥2 NRTIsProportion of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Levels <40 Copies/mLProportion with HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL at day 00.93 proportion of participants
NuvaRing With EFV Plus ≥2 NRTIsProportion of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Levels <40 Copies/mLProportion with HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL at day 210.85 proportion of participants
NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF and ≥1 NRTIsProportion of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Levels <40 Copies/mLProportion with HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL at day 00.89 proportion of participants
NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF and ≥1 NRTIsProportion of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Levels <40 Copies/mLProportion with HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL at day 210.85 proportion of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Participants With Progesterone Levels Greater Than 5 ng/mL.

This evaluates alterations in progesterone levels due to the potential PK interaction between NuvaRing and the ARVs EFV and ATV/r by examining progesterone levels at study days 0 (before vaginal ring placement), 7, 14, and 21 (before vaginal ring removal), and study day 28, without regard to menstrual cycle status at study entry.

Time frame: Study days 0, 7, 14, 21 and 28

Population: All participants included in the primary analyses who had progesterone data available. One participant on the EFV arm is excluded at day 14 visit because NuvaRing was out of the body for \>3 hours leading up to the visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NuvaRing and no ARTProportion of Participants With Progesterone Levels Greater Than 5 ng/mL.Proportion with progesterone >5 at day 210.00 proportion of participants
NuvaRing and no ARTProportion of Participants With Progesterone Levels Greater Than 5 ng/mL.Proportion with progesterone >5 at day 140.00 proportion of participants
NuvaRing and no ARTProportion of Participants With Progesterone Levels Greater Than 5 ng/mL.Proportion with progesterone >5 at day 00.08 proportion of participants
NuvaRing and no ARTProportion of Participants With Progesterone Levels Greater Than 5 ng/mL.Proportion with progesterone >5 at day 70.08 proportion of participants
NuvaRing and no ARTProportion of Participants With Progesterone Levels Greater Than 5 ng/mL.Proportion with progesterone >5 at day 280.00 proportion of participants
NuvaRing With EFV Plus ≥2 NRTIsProportion of Participants With Progesterone Levels Greater Than 5 ng/mL.Proportion with progesterone >5 at day 140.04 proportion of participants
NuvaRing With EFV Plus ≥2 NRTIsProportion of Participants With Progesterone Levels Greater Than 5 ng/mL.Proportion with progesterone >5 at day 00.04 proportion of participants
NuvaRing With EFV Plus ≥2 NRTIsProportion of Participants With Progesterone Levels Greater Than 5 ng/mL.Proportion with progesterone >5 at day 70.24 proportion of participants
NuvaRing With EFV Plus ≥2 NRTIsProportion of Participants With Progesterone Levels Greater Than 5 ng/mL.Proportion with progesterone >5 at day 210.00 proportion of participants
NuvaRing With EFV Plus ≥2 NRTIsProportion of Participants With Progesterone Levels Greater Than 5 ng/mL.Proportion with progesterone >5 at day 280.00 proportion of participants
NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF and ≥1 NRTIsProportion of Participants With Progesterone Levels Greater Than 5 ng/mL.Proportion with progesterone >5 at day 280.00 proportion of participants
NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF and ≥1 NRTIsProportion of Participants With Progesterone Levels Greater Than 5 ng/mL.Proportion with progesterone >5 at day 210.00 proportion of participants
NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF and ≥1 NRTIsProportion of Participants With Progesterone Levels Greater Than 5 ng/mL.Proportion with progesterone >5 at day 00.25 proportion of participants
NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF and ≥1 NRTIsProportion of Participants With Progesterone Levels Greater Than 5 ng/mL.Proportion with progesterone >5 at day 140.00 proportion of participants
NuvaRing With ATV/r Plus TDF and ≥1 NRTIsProportion of Participants With Progesterone Levels Greater Than 5 ng/mL.Proportion with progesterone >5 at day 70.08 proportion of participants
Secondary

Ritonavir (RTV) PK Parameter AUC(0-24h) Calculated Based on Intensive RTV PK Samples Obtained From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm C

This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the PK parameter AUC(0-24h) of RTV before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. AUC(0-24h) defines area under the concentration-time curve over the period of 24 hours (pre-dose concentration was used to impute concentration at 24h).

Time frame: Intensive RTV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement)

Population: The analysis population is the 23 A5316 participants enrolled in Arm C (NuvaRing with ATV/r arm plus TDF and one or more NRTIs) eligible for the secondary outcome of RTV PK parameters.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
NuvaRing and no ARTRitonavir (RTV) PK Parameter AUC(0-24h) Calculated Based on Intensive RTV PK Samples Obtained From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm CAUC0-24h day 010740.0 h*ng/mL
NuvaRing and no ARTRitonavir (RTV) PK Parameter AUC(0-24h) Calculated Based on Intensive RTV PK Samples Obtained From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm CAUC0-24h day 217210.7 h*ng/mL
Secondary

RTV PK Parameter CLss/F Determined Based on RTV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm C

This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the PK parameter CLss/F of RTV before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. CLss/F defines apparent oral clearance.

Time frame: Intensive RTV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement)

Population: The analysis population is the 23 A5316 participants enrolled in Arm C (NuvaRing with ATV/r arm plus TDF and one or more NRTIs) eligible for the secondary outcome of RTV PK parameters.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
NuvaRing and no ARTRTV PK Parameter CLss/F Determined Based on RTV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm CCLss/F day 09.3 hour
NuvaRing and no ARTRTV PK Parameter CLss/F Determined Based on RTV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm CCLss/F day 2113.9 hour
Secondary

RTV PK Parameter Cmax Determined Based on RTV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm C

This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the PK parameter Cmax of RTV before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Cmax defines maximum concentration observed within the first 8 hours of the 24 hour dosing interval.

Time frame: Intensive RTV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement)

Population: The analysis population is the 23 A5316 participants enrolled in Arm C (NuvaRing with ATV/r arm plus TDF and one or more NRTIs) eligible for the secondary outcome of RTV PK parameters.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
NuvaRing and no ARTRTV PK Parameter Cmax Determined Based on RTV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm CCmax day 01437.0 ng/mL
NuvaRing and no ARTRTV PK Parameter Cmax Determined Based on RTV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm CCmax day 211063.0 ng/mL
Secondary

RTV PK Parameter Cmin Determined Based on RTV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm C

This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the PK parameter Cmin of RTV before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Cmin defines minimum concentration observed within the first 8 hours of the 24 hour dosing interval.

Time frame: Intensive RTV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement)

Population: The analysis population is the 23 A5316 participants enrolled in Arm C (NuvaRing with ATV/r arm plus TDF and one or more NRTIs) eligible for the secondary outcome of RTV PK parameters.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
NuvaRing and no ARTRTV PK Parameter Cmin Determined Based on RTV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm CCmin day 070.0 ng/mL
NuvaRing and no ARTRTV PK Parameter Cmin Determined Based on RTV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm CCmin day 2151.9 ng/mL
Secondary

RTV PK Parameter Tmax Determined Based on RTV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm C

This evaluates the effect of NuvaRing on the PK parameter Tmax of RTV before NuvaRing placement (at study day 0) and three weeks later (on study day 21), prior to NuvaRing removal. Tmax defines time to maximum concentration since dose is initiated.

Time frame: Intensive RTV PK samples at pre-dose, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours post-dose on study day 0 (before vaginal ring placement) and on study day 21 (3 weeks after vaginal ring placement)

Population: The analysis population is the 23 A5316 participants enrolled in Arm C (NuvaRing with ATV/r arm plus TDF and one or more NRTIs) eligible for the secondary outcome of RTV PK parameters.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
NuvaRing and no ARTRTV PK Parameter Tmax Determined Based on RTV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm CTmax day 03.0 hour
NuvaRing and no ARTRTV PK Parameter Tmax Determined Based on RTV Levels From Individual Participants Enrolled in Arm CTmax day 213.0 hour

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026