Skip to content

Study of Efficacy and Safety of Brodalumab Compared With Placebo in Adults With Inadequately Controlled Asthma With High Bronchodilator Reversibility

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Brodalumab in Subjects With Inadequately Controlled Asthma and High Bronchodilator Reversibility

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01902290
Enrollment
421
Registered
2013-07-18
Start date
2013-05-22
Completion date
2015-05-15
Last updated
2022-09-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Keywords

Inadequately controlled asthma, brodalumab, AMG 827

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if brodalumab (AMG 827) is safe and effective compared to placebo as measured by change in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) composite scores.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALPlacebo

Placebo administered subcutaneously

BIOLOGICALBrodalumab

Brodalumab administered subcutaneously

Sponsors

Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
AstraZeneca
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Amgen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of asthma, and presently has reversibility over pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of ≥ 20% at screening * Percent of predicted FEV1 ≥ 40% and ≤ 80% at screening * Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) ≥ 200 and ≤ 1000/μg/day fluticasone powder or equivalent * Ongoing asthma symptoms with asthma control questionnaire (ACQ) composite score at screening and baseline ≥ 1.5 points

Exclusion criteria

* History of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or other chronic pulmonary condition other than asthma * History of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis * Respiratory infection within 4 weeks of screening or 1 week of baseline visit * Subject has known history of Crohn's disease * Subject has any other significant concurrent medical condition of laboratory abnormalities, as defined in the study protocol * Subject has previously used any anti-interleukin-17 (IL17) biologic therapy * Subject is pregnant or breastfeeding, or planning to become pregnant while enrolled in the study * Female subject is unwilling to use highly effective methods of birth control unless 2 years post-menopausal or surgically sterile * Subject has severe depression measured by Personal Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8) or suicidal ideation/behavior as measured by and Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (e-CSSRS) * Subject has a history or evidence of psychiatric disorder or substance abuse considered by the Investigator to pose a risk to subject safety

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Composite Score at Week 24Baseline and week 24The ACQ is a validated instrument used in clinical research and practice to evaluate asthma control/impairment. The ACQ assesses disease control by evaluating 7 questions: night time awakenings, asthma symptoms upon wakening, activity limitation, shortness of breath, wheeze frequency, short-acting bronchodilator use, and FEV1. All seven items are scored on a 7-point scale, with 0 indicating good control and 6 indicating poor control; the total score is the mean of the seven items and ranges from 0 (totally-controlled) to 6 (extremely poorly controlled). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. A change of 0.50 points is considered clinically meaningful and a total score of \< 1.0 indicates good asthma control.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Asthma Exacerbation RateBaseline to week 24The asthma exacerbation event rate is defined as the number of events per subject-year during the 24 week treatment period. An asthma exacerbation was defined as an asthma worsening that requires systemic corticosteroids for at least 3 days during the study; distinct asthma exacerbations were defined as events with start dates more than 10 days apart from each other.
Change From Baseline in ACQ Composite Score at Week 24 in ICS+LABA SubpopulationBaseline and week 24The ACQ is a validated instrument used in clinical research and practice to evaluate asthma control/impairment. The ACQ assesses disease control by evaluating 7 questions: night time awakenings, asthma symptoms upon wakening, activity limitation, shortness of breath, wheeze frequency, short-acting bronchodilator use, and FEV1. All seven items are scored on a 7-point scale, with 0 indicating good control and 6 indicating poor control; the total score is the mean of the seven items and ranges from 0 (totally-controlled) to 6 (extremely poorly controlled). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. A change of 0.50 points is considered clinically meaningful and a total score of \< 1.0 indicates good asthma control.
Asthma Exacerbation Rate in ICS+LABA SubpopulationBaseline to week 24The asthma exacerbation event rate is defined as the number of events per subject-year during the 24 week treatment period. An asthma exacerbation was defined as an asthma worsening that requires systemic corticosteroids for at least 3 days during the study; distinct asthma exacerbations were defined as events with start dates more than 10 days apart from each other.
Change From Baseline in Daily Asthma Symptom Score (7-day Average Score)Baseline and week 24The Asthma Symptom Diary (ASD) consists of 23 questions answered on a handheld device, including 10 asthma symptom-related items (5 answered in the morning and 5 in the evening). The morning diary comprises questions on 4 asthma-related symptoms (wheezing, shortness of breath, cough, chest tightness), rated on a 5-point severity scale from 0 (no symptom) to 4 (very severe symptoms), and 1 question on nocturnal awakenings, rated from 0 (did not wake up) to 4 (unable to sleep due to asthma). The evening diary has questions on the same 4 asthma-related symptoms and 1 question on limitations of activities, rated from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). The ASD daily score is computed by averaging the responses to the 10 symptom-related items, and the mean 7-day ASD score is calculated by averaging the 7 daily scores, with the final score ranging from 0 (minimal symptoms) to 4 (very severe symptoms).
Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)Baseline and week 24
Change From Baseline in Daily Rescue Short-acting Beta-agonist UseBaseline and week 24Participants were permitted allowed to use their inhaled rescue medication (SABA) as needed throughout the study and the use was captured in the daily electronic diary (eDiary).
Number of Participants Who Experienced an Asthma ExacerbationBaseline to week 24An asthma exacerbation is defined as an asthma worsening that requires systemic corticosteroids for at least 3 days during the study.
Change From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Overall ScoreBaseline and week 24The AQLQ is an asthma-specific instrument that includes evaluations of both symptoms and health-related quality of life measures. The 32-item instrument measures 4 domains affected by asthma including activity limitations, emotional function, exposure to environmental stimuli, and symptoms. Participants were asked to recall their experiences during the last 2 weeks and to respond to each question on a 7-point scale (7=no impairment, 1=severe impairment). The overall score was calculated as mean of the responses to the 32 questions and ranges from 1 (severe impairment) to 7 (no impairment). A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Morning and Evening Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR)Baseline and week 24Peak expiratory flow rate was measured by the participant twice daily at approximately the same time each day (eg, within 1 hour of waking and immediately before bedtime) using a peak flow meter.
Change From Baseline in Variation of Peak FlowBaseline and week 24Peak flow was measured by the participant twice daily at approximately the same time each day (eg, within 1 hour of waking and immediately before bedtime) using a peak flow meter. The variation of peak flow is defined as the absolute value of the difference between the A.M. and P.M. peak flow in one day for an individual participant.
Proportion of Asthma Symptom-free Days in 4-weeks Intervals Over the Treatment PeriodBaseline (the 4 weeks prior to first dose) and 4-week intervals up to week 24Asthma symptom-free days is defined as days that a participant had a score of zero in their daily asthma symptom diary score. The ASD consists of 23 questions answered on a handheld device, including 10 asthma symptom-related items (5 answered in the morning and 5 in the evening). The morning diary comprises questions on 4 asthma-related symptoms (wheezing, shortness of breath, cough, chest tightness), rated on a 5-point severity scale from 0 (no symptom) to 4 (very severe symptoms), and 1 question on nocturnal awakenings, rated from 0 (did not wake up) to 4 (unable to sleep due to asthma). The evening diary has questions on the same 4 asthma-related symptoms and 1 question on limitations of activities, rated from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). The daily score is the average of the responses to the 10 items.
Serum Brodalumab ConcentrationDay 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 22 at predose, week 2 + 3 days, week 22 + 3, 7, 10, and 14 daysSerum brodalumab concentrations were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) = 0.0500 µg/mL; values below the LLOQ were set to zero.
Time to First Asthma ExacerbationFrom first dose of study drug to week 24An asthma exacerbation is defined as an asthma worsening that requires systemic corticosteroids for at least 3 days during the study. Median time to first asthma exacerbation could not be estimated, the percentage of participants with an asthma exacerbation is reported.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)From first dose of study drug up to the end of study, 28 weeksAdverse events were graded for severity according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4. The investigator assessed whether the adverse event was possibly related to the investigational product. A serious adverse event is defined as an adverse event that meets at least 1 of the following serious criteria: * fatal; * life threatening; * requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; * results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; * congenital anomaly/birth defect; * other medically important serious event.

Countries

Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, Poland, Puerto Rico, Russia, South Korea, Taiwan, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted at 157 centers in Asia, Australia, Canada, Europe, and the United States.

Pre-assignment details

Participants underwent 3 run-in visits over 4 weeks after completing screening assessments and meeting eligibility criteria. After the run-in visits, eligibility of asthma control questionnaire (ACQ), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), and reversibility were confirmed. Eligible participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to 1 of 2 arms, stratified based on the current use of long acting β-agonist (LABAs) and number of prior exacerbations (≤ 2 or \> 2) in the past year before screening.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received placebo subcutaneous injections on day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, and 22.
207
Brodalumab 210 mg
Participants received brodalumab 210 mg administered by subcutaneous injection on day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, and 22.
208
Total415

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up22
Overall StudySponsor Decision2624
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1927

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboBrodalumab 210 mgTotal
Age, Continuous47.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
47.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
47.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
Duration of Asthma22.20 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.89
22.92 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.44
22.56 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.66
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants13 Participants21 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
199 Participants195 Participants394 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
10 Participants13 Participants23 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
29 Participants19 Participants48 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiple
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
3 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
162 Participants174 Participants336 Participants
Randomization Strata
LABA -No; ≤ 2 asthma exacerbation prior year
30 Participants37 Participants67 Participants
Randomization Strata
LABA -No; > 2 asthma exacerbation prior year
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Randomization Strata
LABA -Yes; ≤ 2 asthma exacerbation prior year
160 Participants153 Participants313 Participants
Randomization Strata
LABA -Yes; > 2 asthma exacerbation prior year
17 Participants17 Participants34 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
120 Participants122 Participants242 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
87 Participants86 Participants173 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
104 / 207129 / 208
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 2077 / 208

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Composite Score at Week 24

The ACQ is a validated instrument used in clinical research and practice to evaluate asthma control/impairment. The ACQ assesses disease control by evaluating 7 questions: night time awakenings, asthma symptoms upon wakening, activity limitation, shortness of breath, wheeze frequency, short-acting bronchodilator use, and FEV1. All seven items are scored on a 7-point scale, with 0 indicating good control and 6 indicating poor control; the total score is the mean of the seven items and ranges from 0 (totally-controlled) to 6 (extremely poorly controlled). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. A change of 0.50 points is considered clinically meaningful and a total score of \< 1.0 indicates good asthma control.

Time frame: Baseline and week 24

Population: Full analysis set with available data

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Composite Score at Week 24-0.815 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.073
Brodalumab 210 mgChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Composite Score at Week 24-0.865 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.074
p-value: 0.521995% CI: [-0.203, 0.103]Mixed-effect model
Secondary

Asthma Exacerbation Rate

The asthma exacerbation event rate is defined as the number of events per subject-year during the 24 week treatment period. An asthma exacerbation was defined as an asthma worsening that requires systemic corticosteroids for at least 3 days during the study; distinct asthma exacerbations were defined as events with start dates more than 10 days apart from each other.

Time frame: Baseline to week 24

Population: Full analysis set with available data

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboAsthma Exacerbation Rate0.57 exacerbations per subject-year
Brodalumab 210 mgAsthma Exacerbation Rate0.81 exacerbations per subject-year
p-value: 0.10295% CI: [0.93, 2.12]Generalized linear model
Secondary

Asthma Exacerbation Rate in ICS+LABA Subpopulation

The asthma exacerbation event rate is defined as the number of events per subject-year during the 24 week treatment period. An asthma exacerbation was defined as an asthma worsening that requires systemic corticosteroids for at least 3 days during the study; distinct asthma exacerbations were defined as events with start dates more than 10 days apart from each other.

Time frame: Baseline to week 24

Population: Full analysis set participants taking both ICS and LABA at baseline with available data

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboAsthma Exacerbation Rate in ICS+LABA Subpopulation0.60 exacerbations per subject-year
Brodalumab 210 mgAsthma Exacerbation Rate in ICS+LABA Subpopulation0.89 exacerbations per subject-year
p-value: 0.09695% CI: [0.94, 2.24]Generalized linear model
Secondary

Change From Baseline in ACQ Composite Score at Week 24 in ICS+LABA Subpopulation

The ACQ is a validated instrument used in clinical research and practice to evaluate asthma control/impairment. The ACQ assesses disease control by evaluating 7 questions: night time awakenings, asthma symptoms upon wakening, activity limitation, shortness of breath, wheeze frequency, short-acting bronchodilator use, and FEV1. All seven items are scored on a 7-point scale, with 0 indicating good control and 6 indicating poor control; the total score is the mean of the seven items and ranges from 0 (totally-controlled) to 6 (extremely poorly controlled). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. A change of 0.50 points is considered clinically meaningful and a total score of \< 1.0 indicates good asthma control.

Time frame: Baseline and week 24

Population: Full analysis set participants who were taking both inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and a long-acting β-agonist (LABA) at baseline with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in ACQ Composite Score at Week 24 in ICS+LABA Subpopulation-0.793 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.084
Brodalumab 210 mgChange From Baseline in ACQ Composite Score at Week 24 in ICS+LABA Subpopulation-0.831 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.088
p-value: 0.663295% CI: [-0.21, 0.134]Mixed-effect model
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Overall Score

The AQLQ is an asthma-specific instrument that includes evaluations of both symptoms and health-related quality of life measures. The 32-item instrument measures 4 domains affected by asthma including activity limitations, emotional function, exposure to environmental stimuli, and symptoms. Participants were asked to recall their experiences during the last 2 weeks and to respond to each question on a 7-point scale (7=no impairment, 1=severe impairment). The overall score was calculated as mean of the responses to the 32 questions and ranges from 1 (severe impairment) to 7 (no impairment). A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and week 24

Population: Full analysis set with available data

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Overall Score0.804 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.085
Brodalumab 210 mgChange From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Overall Score0.803 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.087
p-value: 0.98795% CI: [-0.174, 0.171]Mixed-effects model
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Daily Asthma Symptom Score (7-day Average Score)

The Asthma Symptom Diary (ASD) consists of 23 questions answered on a handheld device, including 10 asthma symptom-related items (5 answered in the morning and 5 in the evening). The morning diary comprises questions on 4 asthma-related symptoms (wheezing, shortness of breath, cough, chest tightness), rated on a 5-point severity scale from 0 (no symptom) to 4 (very severe symptoms), and 1 question on nocturnal awakenings, rated from 0 (did not wake up) to 4 (unable to sleep due to asthma). The evening diary has questions on the same 4 asthma-related symptoms and 1 question on limitations of activities, rated from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). The ASD daily score is computed by averaging the responses to the 10 symptom-related items, and the mean 7-day ASD score is calculated by averaging the 7 daily scores, with the final score ranging from 0 (minimal symptoms) to 4 (very severe symptoms).

Time frame: Baseline and week 24

Population: Full analysis set with available data

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Daily Asthma Symptom Score (7-day Average Score)-0.397 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.042
Brodalumab 210 mgChange From Baseline in Daily Asthma Symptom Score (7-day Average Score)-0.443 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.043
p-value: 0.32995% CI: [-0.137, 0.046]Mixed-effect model
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Daily Rescue Short-acting Beta-agonist Use

Participants were permitted allowed to use their inhaled rescue medication (SABA) as needed throughout the study and the use was captured in the daily electronic diary (eDiary).

Time frame: Baseline and week 24

Population: Full analysis set with available data

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Daily Rescue Short-acting Beta-agonist Use-1.359 puffsStandard Error 0.243
Brodalumab 210 mgChange From Baseline in Daily Rescue Short-acting Beta-agonist Use-1.231 puffsStandard Error 0.246
p-value: 0.631795% CI: [-0.396, 0.653]Mixed-effect model
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Morning and Evening Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR)

Peak expiratory flow rate was measured by the participant twice daily at approximately the same time each day (eg, within 1 hour of waking and immediately before bedtime) using a peak flow meter.

Time frame: Baseline and week 24

Population: Full analysis set with available data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Morning and Evening Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR)Morning peak flow0.072 L/minStandard Error 5.813
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Morning and Evening Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR)Evening peak flow-10.008 L/minStandard Error 5.719
Brodalumab 210 mgChange From Baseline in Morning and Evening Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR)Evening peak flow-4.089 L/minStandard Error 5.771
Brodalumab 210 mgChange From Baseline in Morning and Evening Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR)Morning peak flow0.706 L/minStandard Error 5.885
Comparison: Analysis of morning peak flowp-value: 0.905395% CI: [-9.82, 11.089]Mixed-effect model
Comparison: Analysis of evening peak flowp-value: 0.266195% CI: [-4.515, 16.354]Mixed-effects model
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)

Time frame: Baseline and week 24

Population: Full analysis set with available data

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)0.207 L/sStandard Error 0.045
Brodalumab 210 mgChange From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)0.237 L/sStandard Error 0.046
p-value: 0.454995% CI: [-0.049, 0.109]Mixed-effect model
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Variation of Peak Flow

Peak flow was measured by the participant twice daily at approximately the same time each day (eg, within 1 hour of waking and immediately before bedtime) using a peak flow meter. The variation of peak flow is defined as the absolute value of the difference between the A.M. and P.M. peak flow in one day for an individual participant.

Time frame: Baseline and week 24

Population: Full analysis set with available data

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Variation of Peak Flow-0.872 L/minStandard Error 2.135
Brodalumab 210 mgChange From Baseline in Variation of Peak Flow-4.892 L/minStandard Error 2.169
p-value: 0.087195% CI: [-8.627, 0.586]Mixed-effect model
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Experienced an Asthma Exacerbation

An asthma exacerbation is defined as an asthma worsening that requires systemic corticosteroids for at least 3 days during the study.

Time frame: Baseline to week 24

Population: Full analysis set with available data

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Experienced an Asthma Exacerbation41 Participants
Brodalumab 210 mgNumber of Participants Who Experienced an Asthma Exacerbation49 Participants
p-value: 0.35195% CI: [0.78, 2.01]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Proportion of Asthma Symptom-free Days in 4-weeks Intervals Over the Treatment Period

Asthma symptom-free days is defined as days that a participant had a score of zero in their daily asthma symptom diary score. The ASD consists of 23 questions answered on a handheld device, including 10 asthma symptom-related items (5 answered in the morning and 5 in the evening). The morning diary comprises questions on 4 asthma-related symptoms (wheezing, shortness of breath, cough, chest tightness), rated on a 5-point severity scale from 0 (no symptom) to 4 (very severe symptoms), and 1 question on nocturnal awakenings, rated from 0 (did not wake up) to 4 (unable to sleep due to asthma). The evening diary has questions on the same 4 asthma-related symptoms and 1 question on limitations of activities, rated from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). The daily score is the average of the responses to the 10 items.

Time frame: Baseline (the 4 weeks prior to first dose) and 4-week intervals up to week 24

Population: Full analysis set with available data during each 4-week interval

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboProportion of Asthma Symptom-free Days in 4-weeks Intervals Over the Treatment PeriodWeek 80.174 proportion of daysStandard Deviation 0.302
PlaceboProportion of Asthma Symptom-free Days in 4-weeks Intervals Over the Treatment PeriodWeek 160.211 proportion of daysStandard Deviation 0.328
PlaceboProportion of Asthma Symptom-free Days in 4-weeks Intervals Over the Treatment PeriodWeek 40.122 proportion of daysStandard Deviation 0.239
PlaceboProportion of Asthma Symptom-free Days in 4-weeks Intervals Over the Treatment PeriodWeek 200.222 proportion of daysStandard Deviation 0.346
PlaceboProportion of Asthma Symptom-free Days in 4-weeks Intervals Over the Treatment PeriodWeek 120.191 proportion of daysStandard Deviation 0.319
PlaceboProportion of Asthma Symptom-free Days in 4-weeks Intervals Over the Treatment PeriodWeek 240.237 proportion of daysStandard Deviation 0.371
PlaceboProportion of Asthma Symptom-free Days in 4-weeks Intervals Over the Treatment PeriodBaseline0.071 proportion of daysStandard Deviation 0.179
Brodalumab 210 mgProportion of Asthma Symptom-free Days in 4-weeks Intervals Over the Treatment PeriodWeek 240.204 proportion of daysStandard Deviation 0.342
Brodalumab 210 mgProportion of Asthma Symptom-free Days in 4-weeks Intervals Over the Treatment PeriodBaseline0.041 proportion of daysStandard Deviation 0.125
Brodalumab 210 mgProportion of Asthma Symptom-free Days in 4-weeks Intervals Over the Treatment PeriodWeek 40.083 proportion of daysStandard Deviation 0.195
Brodalumab 210 mgProportion of Asthma Symptom-free Days in 4-weeks Intervals Over the Treatment PeriodWeek 80.132 proportion of daysStandard Deviation 0.268
Brodalumab 210 mgProportion of Asthma Symptom-free Days in 4-weeks Intervals Over the Treatment PeriodWeek 120.164 proportion of daysStandard Deviation 0.298
Brodalumab 210 mgProportion of Asthma Symptom-free Days in 4-weeks Intervals Over the Treatment PeriodWeek 160.194 proportion of daysStandard Deviation 0.335
Brodalumab 210 mgProportion of Asthma Symptom-free Days in 4-weeks Intervals Over the Treatment PeriodWeek 200.203 proportion of daysStandard Deviation 0.339
Secondary

Serum Brodalumab Concentration

Serum brodalumab concentrations were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) = 0.0500 µg/mL; values below the LLOQ were set to zero.

Time frame: Day 1 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 22 at predose, week 2 + 3 days, week 22 + 3, 7, 10, and 14 days

Population: Participants who received brodalumab with available concentration data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboSerum Brodalumab ConcentrationDay 1 predose0 µg/mLStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboSerum Brodalumab ConcentrationWeek 1 predose8.48 µg/mLStandard Deviation 5.55
PlaceboSerum Brodalumab ConcentrationWeek 2 predose16.8 µg/mLStandard Deviation 9.85
PlaceboSerum Brodalumab ConcentrationWeek 2 day 324.9 µg/mLStandard Deviation 15.8
PlaceboSerum Brodalumab ConcentrationWeek 4 predose14.5 µg/mLStandard Deviation 9.28
PlaceboSerum Brodalumab ConcentrationWeek 8 predose11.1 µg/mLStandard Deviation 9.03
PlaceboSerum Brodalumab ConcentrationWeek 12 predose10.6 µg/mLStandard Deviation 9.86
PlaceboSerum Brodalumab ConcentrationWeek 16 predose8.93 µg/mLStandard Deviation 9.06
PlaceboSerum Brodalumab ConcentrationWeek 22 predose8.94 µg/mLStandard Deviation 9.32
PlaceboSerum Brodalumab ConcentrationWeek 22 day 318.0 µg/mLStandard Deviation 15.4
PlaceboSerum Brodalumab ConcentrationWeek 22 day 714.8 µg/mLStandard Deviation 13.3
PlaceboSerum Brodalumab ConcentrationWeek 22 day 1012.5 µg/mLStandard Deviation 12.2
PlaceboSerum Brodalumab ConcentrationWeek 22 day 149.06 µg/mLStandard Deviation 9.78
Secondary

Time to First Asthma Exacerbation

An asthma exacerbation is defined as an asthma worsening that requires systemic corticosteroids for at least 3 days during the study. Median time to first asthma exacerbation could not be estimated, the percentage of participants with an asthma exacerbation is reported.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug to week 24

Population: Full analysis set with available data

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboTime to First Asthma Exacerbation20.1 percentage of participants
Brodalumab 210 mgTime to First Asthma Exacerbation23.9 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.23895% CI: [0.843, 1.936]Log Rank
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Adverse events were graded for severity according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4. The investigator assessed whether the adverse event was possibly related to the investigational product. A serious adverse event is defined as an adverse event that meets at least 1 of the following serious criteria: * fatal; * life threatening; * requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; * results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; * congenital anomaly/birth defect; * other medically important serious event.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to the end of study, 28 weeks

Population: Randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Fatal adverse events1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Serious adverse events8 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events27 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment related fatal adverse events0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment-related TEAE ≥ 217 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to discontinuation of study drug9 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment-related serious adverse events4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment-related TEAE leading to discontinuation of study drug5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE ≥ 297 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment-related life-threatening adverse events1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Life-threatening adverse events2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any treatment-emergent adverse event134 Participants
Brodalumab 210 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment related fatal adverse events0 Participants
Brodalumab 210 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any treatment-emergent adverse event156 Participants
Brodalumab 210 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE ≥ 2103 Participants
Brodalumab 210 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Serious adverse events7 Participants
Brodalumab 210 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to discontinuation of study drug13 Participants
Brodalumab 210 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Life-threatening adverse events1 Participants
Brodalumab 210 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Fatal adverse events0 Participants
Brodalumab 210 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events44 Participants
Brodalumab 210 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment-related TEAE ≥ 214 Participants
Brodalumab 210 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment-related TEAE leading to discontinuation of study drug8 Participants
Brodalumab 210 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment-related life-threatening adverse events0 Participants
Brodalumab 210 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment-related serious adverse events0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026