Skip to content

Root Coverage Comparing Suturing Techniques

Root Coverage With Acellular Dermal Matrix Using the Coronally Positioned Tunnel Technique Comparing Two Different Suturing Techniques.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01901822
Enrollment
16
Registered
2013-07-17
Start date
2013-09-30
Completion date
2014-07-31
Last updated
2016-12-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Root Coverage

Keywords

acellular dermal matrix

Brief summary

The hypothesis of this study is that coronally positioned tunnel with acellular dermal matrix using a continuous sling suture to secure both the graft and the flap will result in better percent root coverage compared to the continuous sling suturing technique to secure the graft and the flap separately.

Detailed description

Thirty patients will be selected by meeting the following criteria: Inclusion Criteria: A. At least one Miller Class I or II mucogingival defect ≥ 3 mm (Miller 1985). B. The mucogingival defect must be on a non-molar tooth. C. Patients must be between ≥ 18 years of age. Exclusion Criteria: A. Patients with debilitating systemic or diseases that significantly affect the periodontium. B. Patients with a known allergy to any of the materials that will be used in the study, including systemic antibiotics (tetracycline and doxycycline). C. Patients requiring antibiotic prophylaxis. D. Root surface restorations at the site of recession. E. No detectable cemento-enamel junction. F. Patients who fail to maintain oral hygiene levels of at least 80% plaque free surfaces. G. Patients who are pregnant or lactating. H. Patients who use tobacco products (smoking or smokeless tobacco). I. Patients with alcohol abuse problems. J. Patients undergoing long-term steroid therapy. K. History of previous root coverage procedures, graft or guided tissue regeneration, on the test teeth. L. Patients who fail to complete the informed consent form.

Interventions

PROCEDURESutured together

The soft tissue and the allograft will be sutured together using a continuous sling suture.

PROCEDURESutured separately

The soft tissue and the allograft will be sutured separately using a continuous sling suture.

Sponsors

University of Louisville
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* At least one Miller Class I or II mucogingival defect ≥ 3 mm (Miller 1985). * The mucogingival defect must be on a non-molar tooth. * Patients must be between ≥ 18 years of age.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with a known allergy to any of the materials that will be used in the study, including systemic antibiotics (tetracycline and doxycycline). * Patients requiring antibiotic prophylaxis. * Root surface restorations at the site of recession. * No detectable cemento-enamel junction. * Patients who fail to maintain oral hygiene levels of at least 80% plaque free surfaces. * Patients who are pregnant or lactating. * Patients who use tobacco products (smoking or smokeless tobacco). * Patients with alcohol abuse problems. * Patients undergoing long-term steroid therapy. * History of previous root coverage procedures, graft or guided tissue regeneration, on the test teeth. * Patients who fail to complete the informed consent form.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent root coverage6 monthsThe amount of root coverage will be measured and converted to a percent.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026