Heart Failure
Conditions
Keywords
Discrepancy, Committee on Publication Ethics, Correction, Erratum, Retraction
Brief summary
Clinical research, like all science, is self-correcting, with errors detected by the scientific community and communicated to the publishing journals, which then relay the information (and its resolution) to its readers. If this relaying process fails, science grinds to a halt. In this study we are testing its integrity.
Detailed description
This prospective study documents the outcome of notification to journal editorial boards (or equivalent authorities) of factually incorrect or inconsistent claims, in reports they have published.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Report of a clinical trial in humans of treatment of heart disease with bone marrow derived stem cells * Report containing discrepancy by reference to same report or another report
Exclusion criteria
* Discrepancy has already been corrected by an erratum
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Time to correction, retraction, or other notification to the readership of discrepancy | 12 months |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Time to initial response from journal | 0-4 weeks |
Countries
United Kingdom