Skip to content

Ridge Preservation Comparing a PTFE Nonresorbable Membrane to a Collagen Membrane

Ridge Preservation Comparing the Clinical and Histologic Healing of a PTFE Non-resorbable vs. a Collagen Membrane With an Intrasocket Mineralized Cancellous Allograft Plus a Facial Overlay Bovine Xenograft.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01900964
Enrollment
30
Registered
2013-07-17
Start date
2012-10-31
Completion date
2013-11-30
Last updated
2016-12-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Clinical Efficacy

Keywords

Regeneration, Bone regeneration, Grafting, Bone, Allograft, Xenograft

Brief summary

A non-resorbable PTFE (teflon) membrane will be compared to a resorbable collagen membrane when used for a post-extraction ridge preservation procedure to prevent the bone loss that typically occurs. The hypothesis is that there will be no difference in the clinical and histologic results between the two membranes.

Detailed description

Patient Selection 30 patients will be selected that meet the following criteria: Inclusion Criteria 1. Have one non-molar tooth requiring extraction that will be replaced by a dental implant. The site must be bordered by at least one tooth. 2. Healthy male or female who is at least 18 years old. 3. Patients must sign an informed consent approved by the University of Louisville Human Studies Committee. Exclusion Criteria 1. Patients with debilitating systemic diseases, or diseases that have a clinically significant effect on the periodontium. 2. Presence or history of osteonecrosis of jaws. 3. Patients who are currently taking IV bisphosphonates or who had IV treatment with bisphosphonates irrespective of duration. 4. Patients who have been treated with oral bisphosphonates for more than three years. 5. Patients with an allergy to any material or medication used in the study. 6. Patients who need prophylactic antibiotics. 7. Previous head and neck radiation therapy. 8. Chemotherapy in the previous 12 months. 9. Patients on long term NSAID or steroid therapy. 10. Pregnant patients.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPTFE membrane

The non-resorbable PTFE barrier membrane will be surgically placed in conjunction with a ridge preservation procedure.

A resorbable collagen membrane is surgically placed in conjunction with a ridge preservation procedure.

Sponsors

University of Louisville
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Have one non-molar tooth requiring extraction that will be replaced by a dental implant. The site must be bordered by at least one tooth. 2. Healthy male or female who is at least 18 years old. 3. Patients must sign an informed consent approved by the University of Louisville Human Studies Committee. \-

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with debilitating systemic diseases, or diseases that have a clinically significant effect on the periodontium. 2. Presence or history of osteonecrosis of jaws. 3. Patients who are currently taking IV bisphosphonates or who had IV treatment with bisphosphonates irrespective of duration. 4. Patients who have been treated with oral bisphosphonates for more than three years. 5. Patients with an allergy to any material or medication used in the study. 6. Patients who need prophylactic antibiotics. 7. Previous head and neck radiation therapy. 8. Chemotherapy in the previous 12 months. 9. Patients on long term NSAID (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug) or steroid therapy. 10. Pregnant patients. -

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Crestal ridge widthTime 4 monthsThe crestal ridge width will be measured with a digital caliper at the baseline exam and at the 4 month examination.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent vital boneTime 4 monthsA trephine core will be taken at 4 months immediately prior to implant placement from the implant osteotomy site.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026