Anxiety, Depression
Conditions
Keywords
Pregnancy, Mental Health, Screening, Computer, Feasibility
Brief summary
To compare e-screening versus usual screening on: 1) women's and healthcare providers' views on feasibility and acceptability; 2) rates of detection of prenatal and postpartum depression and anxiety; 3) perceived risk and benefit of disclosure; 4) cost-effectiveness; 5) psychometric properties. We also aim to identify factors associated with feasibility of e-screening.Compared to usual screening:1) e-screening is as feasible; 2) e-screening yields similar rates of prenatal and postpartum depression and anxiety; 3) the mean score for risk of disclosure is significantly lower and benefit of disclosure is significantly higher in the e-screening group; 4) e-screening is as or more cost effective in detecting prenatal and postpartum depression and anxiety; 5) features of e-screening are significantly associated with feasibility and acceptability, whereas demographic factors are not; and 6) reliability and validity indices of ALPHA and EPDS are strongly correlated for both administration modes.
Detailed description
Given that it is critical to conduct screening within a system that links referral and treatment, our IMPACT pilot trial is evaluating integrated screening and care (see Summary of Progress) versus usual prenatal care. The proposed trial engages 2 unique clinics with experienced staff who conduct routine screening (with referrals and treatment in place) to evaluate different modalities of screening. Since widespread screening is unlikely to be successfully implemented if it entails additional human resources, this trial assesses the potential for a sustainable, e-health alternative.
Interventions
OTHERE-screening
E-screening will be conducted on a computer tablet with wireless access. The tablet will be configured with the screening tool currently used in each clinic. The content and order of individual questions will be identical to the paper-pen version. Response options will be listed in full view under each question. Women select responses by touching the screen.
Sponsors
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
University of Calgary
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Pregnant and postpartum women will be eligible for this study if they: 1. receive care at the recruitment sites ; 2. can read/write English; and 3. are willing to complete e-screening
Exclusion criteria
1. do not receive care at the recruitment site; 2. cannot read/write English; 3. are not willing to complete e-screening
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The primary outcome is feasibility/acceptability of the process of e-screening (vs 'usual' screening). | 10 months | All women will complete: 1) the Computer Violence Assessment Evaluation (CVAE) 38 (originally designed The primary outcome is feasibility/acceptability of the process of e-screening (vs 'usual' screening).to evaluate the feasibility/acceptability aspects of e- screening of domestic violence -Appendix C); and 2) open-ended investigator-developed questions on e-screening feasibility currently being pre-tested in another study (Appendix D). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-effectiveness of e-screening | during recruitment | We will observe the clinic process for a morning to determine the length of time it takes staff to conduct the both the usual screening process as well as the e-screening process (e.g., distribute tablets, follow-up with women). We will also interview the clinic manager to determine the costs of current screening process (e.g., time to screen, physical resources). |
| Proportion of pregnant and postpartum women with clinical depression and anxiety. | on recruitment | Measured in in pregnant women using the Antenatal Psychosocial Health Assessment (ALPHA)and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Measured in pregnant women using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. self-reported |
| Depression and anxiety | Within one week of recruitment | Mini Diagnostic Interview -will be conducted either by telephone or in-person by a member of the research team who is a mental health expert |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mean scores on the Perceived Risk and Perceived Utility subscales of DES | on recruitment | Disclosure Expectations Scale (DES) Self-reported by women |
Countries
Canada
Outcome results
None listed