Rectal Prolapse, Rectocele, Sensation of Inadequate Defecation
Conditions
Keywords
Obstructed Defecation, Rectal rectocele, Intussusception, STARR, Ventral Rectopexy
Brief summary
Obstructed Defecation is a profoundly disabling condition. Many different surgical procedures has been introduced to treat patients affected by this disease. The most used are STARR and ventral rectopexy. Because of the heterogenity of studies and overall the lack of comparison trials, there is no accepted standard surgical treatment.PRO-REST aimed to compare these two procedures (STARR and Ventral Rectopexy) evaluating functional and anatomical results.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Patients affected by Obstructed Defecation with ODS score \>11 * Symptomatic rectal Intussusception and/or defecographic finding of rectocele\>2 cm * Failure of at least 6 months of medical therapy * Exclusion of neoplasm by rectosigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy
Exclusion criteria
* Patients affected by complete rectal prolapse * Patients affected by slow transit constipation * Patients affected by anismus * Patients affected by pelvic organ prolapse * Patients with previous rectal or anal surgery
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Functional result | 12 months | comparison between Obstructed Defaecation Syndrome (ODS) score before and 12 months after surgery |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Anatomical result | 12 months | Comparison of clinical and radiological data before and 12 months after surgery |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Quality of life and safety | 12 months | Comparison of Constipation-Related Quality of Life questionnaire (CRQoL) before and 12 months after surgery Comparison of morbidity and mortality rate between the two procedures |
Countries
Italy