Skip to content

Ganglionated Plexi Ablation vs Renal Denervation in Patients Undergoing Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Ganglionated Plexi Ablation vs Renal Denervation in Patients Undergoing Pulmonary Vein Isolation. A Randomized Comparison

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01898910
Enrollment
80
Registered
2013-07-15
Start date
2012-06-30
Completion date
2013-06-30
Last updated
2013-07-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation, Hypertension

Brief summary

The investigators have conducted a prospective, double-blind, randomized study to assess the comparative safety and efficacy of two different strategies, PVI plus Renal Denervation (RD) versus PVI plus GP ablation, in patients with atrial fibrillation. Results were assessed after follow-up of at least 1 year with the use of an implanted monitoring device (IMD).

Interventions

PROCEDUREPVI+renal denervation

After AF ablation procedure, the angiogram of both renal arteries is performed via femoral access. After that the treatment catheter is introduced into each renal artery and is applied discrete, radiofrequency ablations lasting up to 2 min each and of 8 watts or less to obtain up to six ablations separated both longitudinally and rotationally within each renal artery. During ablation, the catheter system monitored tip temperature and impedance, altering radiofrequency energy delivery in response to a predetermined algorithm. After the procedure the control arterial angiogram should be done.

PROCEDUREPVI + GP ablation

To accomplish ganglionated plexi ablation, LA target sites were identified as the anatomic locations where vagal reflexes were evoked by transcatheter high-frequency stimulation (HFS). Rectangular electrical stimuli were delivered at a frequency of 20-50 Hz, output amplitude 15 V and pulse duration of 10 ms, for 5 sec (Stimulator B-53, Biotok Inc, Russia).

DRUGOptimal medial therapy (OMT)

Antiarrhythmic and antihypertensive therapy will be administered according to the guidelines

Sponsors

Meshalkin Research Institute of Pathology of Circulation
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Symptomatic drug-refractory AF (with history of failure of ≥ 2 class I or III antiarrhythmic drugs) in patients referred for catheter ablation of AF * PAF with ≥1 monthly episodes or PersAF in patients who had already undergone ≥3 electrical cardioversions. PAF was defined as episodes lasting less than 7 days with spontaneous termination. PersAF was defined as lasting more than 7 days before being terminated pharmacologically or by electrical cardioversion. * History of significant hypertension (defined as SBP ≥ 160 mmHg and/or DBP ≥ 100 mmHg), receiving treatment with at least one antihypertensive medication * A glomerular filtration rate ≥45 mL/min/1⋅73 m2, with modification of diet using a renal disease formula

Exclusion criteria

* Previous atrial fibrillation ablation * Type 1 of diabetes mellitus * Structural heart disease * Secondary cause of atrial hypertension * Severe renal artery stenosis or renal arteries abnormalities * Previous operations on renal arteries * Pregnancy * Previous heart, kidney, liver, or lung transplantation * Unwillingness of participant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Freedom of AF or other atrial arrhythmias12 months

Countries

Russia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026