Skip to content

Methylphenidate to Improve Balance and Walking in MS

Methylphenidate to Improve Balance and Walking in MS

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01896700
Enrollment
24
Registered
2013-07-11
Start date
2013-07-31
Completion date
2016-04-30
Last updated
2018-04-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis

Keywords

Multiple sclerosis, postural balance, walking

Brief summary

Methylphenidate is an amphetamine-like psychomotor stimulant drug currently approved for the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), postural orthostasis tachycardia syndrome and narcolepsy. It is also often prescribed off label to people with MS to improve fatigue. It is proposed that methylphenidate may also improve imbalance and walking deficits in MS by improving concentration and central integration, one of the primary mechanisms thought to underlie imbalance and walking deficits in MS.

Detailed description

The proposed pilot study will examine the effects of methylphenidate on imbalance and walking in 24 subjects with MS and imbalance. The subjects will be randomly assigned to receive either an escalating does of methylphenidate, 20mg, 40mg or 60mg, divided into two doses each day, or matched placebo for 2 weeks at each dose. If a subject does not tolerate dose escalation they will be instructed to discontinue use of the drug. The maximum safely tolerated dose for each subject will be noted. Changes from baseline in subject's walking speed, balance, vestibular function, cognitive function, and fatigue will be assessed at each dose.

Interventions

DRUGMethylphenidate

Escalating dose of methylphenidate, 20mg, 40mg, 60mg/day, for 2 weeks each

DRUGPlacebo

Escalating matched dose of placebo

Sponsors

Portland VA Medical Center
CollaboratorFED
Oregon Health and Science University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 20-65 * Able to walk at least 100m without an aide or with unilateral assistance * Poor static balance, specifically prolonged APR latencies (≥ 1 standard deviation (SD) \> mean for healthy people in this age range), OR * Reduced balance-related activity (ABC scores ≤ 85%) * Walking difficulties, specifically T25FW \> 6 seconds, OR reduced self perceived walking (MSWS-12 scores ≥ 50/60)

Exclusion criteria

* Currently taking methylphenidate, modafinil, or armodafinil.(any within the last 2 weeks) * Cause(s) of imbalance other than MS * Systolic pressure consistently greater than 150 mm Hg or diastolic pressure consistently greater than 90 mm Hg * Contraindications to methylphenidate (Anxiety, tension, agitation, thyrotoxicosis, tachyarrhythmias, severe angina pectoris or glaucoma, hypersensitivity to methylphenidate, motor tics or a family history or diagnosis of Tourette's syndrome, seizures, severe or poorly controlled hypertension, treatment with monoamine oxidase inhibitors currently or within the last 14 days, current use of guanethidine, pressors, coumarin anticoagulants, anticonvulsants, phenylbutazone, or tricyclic antidepressants, history of drug abuse or alcoholism) * Pregnancy or breastfeeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test Time at 6 Weeks6 weeksThe primary outcome of this study will be the difference between mean change in TUG time between methylphenidate and placebo treated subjects at 6 weeks. Mean changes will be compared for active and placebo treated subjects using Bayesian analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Timed 25 Foot Walk (T25FW) at 6 Weeks6 weeksMean changes in Timed 25 Foot Walk (T25FW) at 6 weeks will be compared for active and placebo treated subjects using Bayesian analysis.
Change From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Assessment Questionnaire Score at 6 Weeks6 weeksMean changes in the score attained on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Assessment Questionnaire at 6 weeks will be compared for active and placebo treated subjects using Bayesian analysis. Scale ranges from 0-21 points, with higher numbers indicating poorer sleep quality.
Change From Baseline in Modified Fatigue Index Scale Score at 6 Weeks6 weeksMean changes in the score attached on the Modified Fatigue Index Scale at 6 weeks will be compared for active and placebo treated subjects using Bayesian analysis. Scale ranges from 0-84 points, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue.
Change From Baseline in Automatic Postural Response (APR) Latency at 6 Weeks6 weeksMean changes in APR latency at 6 weeks will be compared for active and placebo treated subjects using Bayesian analysis.
Change From Baseline in Vestibular Ocular Reflex (VOR) Asymmetry (Percentage Asymmetric) at 6 Weeks6 weeksMean changes in VOR asymmetry, which is a measure of the strength of the eye responses in one direction compared with the other as measured by rotary chair testing at 6 weeks, will be compared for active and placebo treated subjects using t-tests, or other appropriate statistical analyses. A range of frequencies was tested from 0.04 Hz to 0.64 Hz, as is standard for rotary chair testing. The range of frequencies (i.e. chair speeds) assesses the vestibular system across a range of head movements. This helps to identify abnormality, which may manifest at different frequencies of movement. The measurement outcomes for rotary chair testing are gain, phase and asymmetry of the eye movements.
Change From Baseline in Vestibular Ocular Reflex (VOR) Phase (in Degrees) at 6 Weeks6 weeksMean changes in VOR phase, which is a measure of the timing (in degrees) of the eye movements relative to the chair movement, as measured by rotary chair testing at 6 weeks, will be compared for active and placebo treated subjects using t-tests, or other appropriate statistical analyses. A range of frequencies was tested from 0.04 Hz to 0.64 Hz, as is standard for rotary chair testing. The range of frequencies (i.e. chair speeds) assesses the vestibular system across a range of head movements. This helps to identify abnormality, which may manifest at different frequencies of movement. The measurement outcomes for rotary chair testing are gain, phase and asymmetry of the eye movements.
Change From Baseline in Vestibular-Ocular Reflex (VOR) Gain at 6 Weeks6 weeksThe most common rotary chair testing is a battery of subtests, each at a specific rate (Hz) of chair rotation from side to side. The participant is secured in the chair in total darkness while the eyes are monitored by infrared cameras. We completed tests from 0.04 to 0.64 Hz to assess the vestibular system across a range of head movements. The chair and participant's head move together while the cameras track the velocity of the eyes; eye velocity reveals how the vestibular system responds to head velocity. VOR gain is the ratio of average chair (i.e. head) velocity to average eye velocity, and is represented on a unitless scale from 0 to 1. VOR gain close to 1 indicates that eye velocity is nearly equal and opposite to head velocity. While there are normative ranges for VOR gain, we are most interested in is change in mean gain (6-week tests minus baseline tests) for the active and placebo groups.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

24 people with MS and imbalance from the MS clinics in the Portland, OR metropolitan area were enrolled into this study between September 2013 and March 2016 .

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Methylphenidate
Intervention: An escalating dose of methylphenidate taken by mouth: 20mg for 2 weeks, 40mg for 2 weeks, 60mg for 2 weeks. All doses divided twice/day. Other name: Ritalin Methylphenidate: Escalating dose of methylphenidate, 20mg, 40mg, 60mg/day, for 2 weeks each
12
Placebo
Placebo pill, bid for 6 weeks Placebo: Escalating matched dose of placebo
12
Total24

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event45
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMethylphenidateTotalPlacebo
Age, Continuous46.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9
49.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
51.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
10 Participants21 Participants11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 Participants24 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants19 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants5 Participants2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
12 / 1211 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test Time at 6 Weeks

The primary outcome of this study will be the difference between mean change in TUG time between methylphenidate and placebo treated subjects at 6 weeks. Mean changes will be compared for active and placebo treated subjects using Bayesian analysis.

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MethylphenidateChange From Baseline in Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test Time at 6 Weeks-0.7 change in seconds from baslineStandard Error 0.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test Time at 6 Weeks-1.3 change in seconds from baslineStandard Error 0.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Automatic Postural Response (APR) Latency at 6 Weeks

Mean changes in APR latency at 6 weeks will be compared for active and placebo treated subjects using Bayesian analysis.

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: Population discrepancy: One participant in the intervention group and two participants in the placebo group contributed unusable APR data; due to their balance deficits, the machine could not get an accurate reading for this test. One participant in the intervention group declined this test. These four participants were not included in analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MethylphenidateChange From Baseline in Automatic Postural Response (APR) Latency at 6 Weeks-9.2 change in milliseconds from baselineStandard Error 2.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Automatic Postural Response (APR) Latency at 6 Weeks-5.3 change in milliseconds from baselineStandard Error 1.8
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Modified Fatigue Index Scale Score at 6 Weeks

Mean changes in the score attached on the Modified Fatigue Index Scale at 6 weeks will be compared for active and placebo treated subjects using Bayesian analysis. Scale ranges from 0-84 points, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue.

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MethylphenidateChange From Baseline in Modified Fatigue Index Scale Score at 6 Weeks-3.8 change in score from baselineStandard Error 3.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Modified Fatigue Index Scale Score at 6 Weeks-9.8 change in score from baselineStandard Error 4.4
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Assessment Questionnaire Score at 6 Weeks

Mean changes in the score attained on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Assessment Questionnaire at 6 weeks will be compared for active and placebo treated subjects using Bayesian analysis. Scale ranges from 0-21 points, with higher numbers indicating poorer sleep quality.

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MethylphenidateChange From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Assessment Questionnaire Score at 6 Weeks0.3 change in score from baselineStandard Error 0.9
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Assessment Questionnaire Score at 6 Weeks-0.3 change in score from baselineStandard Error 0.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Timed 25 Foot Walk (T25FW) at 6 Weeks

Mean changes in Timed 25 Foot Walk (T25FW) at 6 weeks will be compared for active and placebo treated subjects using Bayesian analysis.

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MethylphenidateChange From Baseline in Timed 25 Foot Walk (T25FW) at 6 Weeks-0.3 change in seconds from baselineStandard Error 0.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Timed 25 Foot Walk (T25FW) at 6 Weeks-0.6 change in seconds from baselineStandard Error 0.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Vestibular Ocular Reflex (VOR) Asymmetry (Percentage Asymmetric) at 6 Weeks

Mean changes in VOR asymmetry, which is a measure of the strength of the eye responses in one direction compared with the other as measured by rotary chair testing at 6 weeks, will be compared for active and placebo treated subjects using t-tests, or other appropriate statistical analyses. A range of frequencies was tested from 0.04 Hz to 0.64 Hz, as is standard for rotary chair testing. The range of frequencies (i.e. chair speeds) assesses the vestibular system across a range of head movements. This helps to identify abnormality, which may manifest at different frequencies of movement. The measurement outcomes for rotary chair testing are gain, phase and asymmetry of the eye movements.

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: Explanation of population discrepancy: One participant in the active group declined this test, so was not analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MethylphenidateChange From Baseline in Vestibular Ocular Reflex (VOR) Asymmetry (Percentage Asymmetric) at 6 WeeksVOR Asymmetry at 0.04 Hz0.9927 change in % of asymmetry from baselineStandard Deviation 5.6664
MethylphenidateChange From Baseline in Vestibular Ocular Reflex (VOR) Asymmetry (Percentage Asymmetric) at 6 WeeksVOR Asymmetry at 0.32 Hz1.9157 change in % of asymmetry from baselineStandard Deviation 5.1153
MethylphenidateChange From Baseline in Vestibular Ocular Reflex (VOR) Asymmetry (Percentage Asymmetric) at 6 WeeksVOR Asymmetry at 0.08 Hz-0.0572 change in % of asymmetry from baselineStandard Deviation 5.6678
MethylphenidateChange From Baseline in Vestibular Ocular Reflex (VOR) Asymmetry (Percentage Asymmetric) at 6 WeeksVOR Asymmetry at 0.64 Hz0.3104 change in % of asymmetry from baselineStandard Deviation 4.0893
MethylphenidateChange From Baseline in Vestibular Ocular Reflex (VOR) Asymmetry (Percentage Asymmetric) at 6 WeeksVOR Asymmetry at 0.16 Hz2.5833 change in % of asymmetry from baselineStandard Deviation 3.1565
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Vestibular Ocular Reflex (VOR) Asymmetry (Percentage Asymmetric) at 6 WeeksVOR Asymmetry at 0.64 Hz-1.5111 change in % of asymmetry from baselineStandard Deviation 3.7015
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Vestibular Ocular Reflex (VOR) Asymmetry (Percentage Asymmetric) at 6 WeeksVOR Asymmetry at 0.04 Hz-1.7291 change in % of asymmetry from baselineStandard Deviation 2.3367
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Vestibular Ocular Reflex (VOR) Asymmetry (Percentage Asymmetric) at 6 WeeksVOR Asymmetry at 0.16 Hz-5.2852 change in % of asymmetry from baselineStandard Deviation 4.9239
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Vestibular Ocular Reflex (VOR) Asymmetry (Percentage Asymmetric) at 6 WeeksVOR Asymmetry at 0.32 Hz-4.1203 change in % of asymmetry from baselineStandard Deviation 5.4695
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Vestibular Ocular Reflex (VOR) Asymmetry (Percentage Asymmetric) at 6 WeeksVOR Asymmetry at 0.08 Hz-6.5209 change in % of asymmetry from baselineStandard Deviation 1.9883
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Vestibular-Ocular Reflex (VOR) Gain at 6 Weeks

The most common rotary chair testing is a battery of subtests, each at a specific rate (Hz) of chair rotation from side to side. The participant is secured in the chair in total darkness while the eyes are monitored by infrared cameras. We completed tests from 0.04 to 0.64 Hz to assess the vestibular system across a range of head movements. The chair and participant's head move together while the cameras track the velocity of the eyes; eye velocity reveals how the vestibular system responds to head velocity. VOR gain is the ratio of average chair (i.e. head) velocity to average eye velocity, and is represented on a unitless scale from 0 to 1. VOR gain close to 1 indicates that eye velocity is nearly equal and opposite to head velocity. While there are normative ranges for VOR gain, we are most interested in is change in mean gain (6-week tests minus baseline tests) for the active and placebo groups.

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: Explanation of population discrepancy: One participant in the active group declined this test, so was not analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MethylphenidateChange From Baseline in Vestibular-Ocular Reflex (VOR) Gain at 6 WeeksVOR Gain at 0.16 Hz-0.0151 ratioStandard Deviation 0.0949
MethylphenidateChange From Baseline in Vestibular-Ocular Reflex (VOR) Gain at 6 WeeksVOR Gain at 0.08 Hz-0.0061 ratioStandard Deviation 0.0759
MethylphenidateChange From Baseline in Vestibular-Ocular Reflex (VOR) Gain at 6 WeeksVOR Gain at 0.32 Hz-0.0422 ratioStandard Deviation 0.1154
MethylphenidateChange From Baseline in Vestibular-Ocular Reflex (VOR) Gain at 6 WeeksVOR Gain at 0.64 Hz0.0221 ratioStandard Deviation 0.0894
MethylphenidateChange From Baseline in Vestibular-Ocular Reflex (VOR) Gain at 6 WeeksVOR Gain at 0.04 Hz-0.0107 ratioStandard Deviation 0.0868
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Vestibular-Ocular Reflex (VOR) Gain at 6 WeeksVOR Gain at 0.64 Hz0.0151 ratioStandard Deviation 0.0614
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Vestibular-Ocular Reflex (VOR) Gain at 6 WeeksVOR Gain at 0.04 Hz-0.0229 ratioStandard Deviation 0.0521
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Vestibular-Ocular Reflex (VOR) Gain at 6 WeeksVOR Gain at 0.08 Hz-0.283 ratioStandard Deviation 0.034
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Vestibular-Ocular Reflex (VOR) Gain at 6 WeeksVOR Gain at 0.16 Hz0.0871 ratioStandard Deviation 0.0702
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Vestibular-Ocular Reflex (VOR) Gain at 6 WeeksVOR Gain at 0.32 Hz0.0322 ratioStandard Deviation 0.068
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Vestibular Ocular Reflex (VOR) Phase (in Degrees) at 6 Weeks

Mean changes in VOR phase, which is a measure of the timing (in degrees) of the eye movements relative to the chair movement, as measured by rotary chair testing at 6 weeks, will be compared for active and placebo treated subjects using t-tests, or other appropriate statistical analyses. A range of frequencies was tested from 0.04 Hz to 0.64 Hz, as is standard for rotary chair testing. The range of frequencies (i.e. chair speeds) assesses the vestibular system across a range of head movements. This helps to identify abnormality, which may manifest at different frequencies of movement. The measurement outcomes for rotary chair testing are gain, phase and asymmetry of the eye movements.

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: Explanation of population discrepancy: One participant in the active group declined this test, so was not analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MethylphenidateChange From Baseline in Vestibular Ocular Reflex (VOR) Phase (in Degrees) at 6 WeeksVOR Phase at 0.08 Hz1.8914 change in degrees from baselineStandard Deviation 4.2548
MethylphenidateChange From Baseline in Vestibular Ocular Reflex (VOR) Phase (in Degrees) at 6 WeeksVOR Phase at 0.16 Hz0.9449 change in degrees from baselineStandard Deviation 2.24
MethylphenidateChange From Baseline in Vestibular Ocular Reflex (VOR) Phase (in Degrees) at 6 WeeksVOR Phase at 0.32 Hz-1.3564 change in degrees from baselineStandard Deviation 7.0617
MethylphenidateChange From Baseline in Vestibular Ocular Reflex (VOR) Phase (in Degrees) at 6 WeeksVOR Phase at 0.04 Hz2.2790 change in degrees from baselineStandard Deviation 5.2622
MethylphenidateChange From Baseline in Vestibular Ocular Reflex (VOR) Phase (in Degrees) at 6 WeeksVOR Phase at 0.64 Hz-2.7082 change in degrees from baselineStandard Deviation 3.601
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Vestibular Ocular Reflex (VOR) Phase (in Degrees) at 6 WeeksVOR Phase at 0.64 Hz0.2833 change in degrees from baselineStandard Deviation 1.78
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Vestibular Ocular Reflex (VOR) Phase (in Degrees) at 6 WeeksVOR Phase at 0.16 Hz-0.3342 change in degrees from baselineStandard Deviation 3.6845
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Vestibular Ocular Reflex (VOR) Phase (in Degrees) at 6 WeeksVOR Phase at 0.04 Hz1.9535 change in degrees from baselineStandard Deviation 4.2274
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Vestibular Ocular Reflex (VOR) Phase (in Degrees) at 6 WeeksVOR Phase at 0.32 Hz0.5981 change in degrees from baselineStandard Deviation 3.6808
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Vestibular Ocular Reflex (VOR) Phase (in Degrees) at 6 WeeksVOR Phase at 0.08 Hz-1.4716 change in degrees from baselineStandard Deviation 2.5754

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026