Sarcoma
Conditions
Keywords
Bone sarcoma, Soft-tissue sarcoma, Sarcoma, KPT-330, Food, Effects, Selinexor
Brief summary
The purpose of this research study is to find out more information such as: to determine the effects of high and low fat foods on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of oral KPT-330 tablets and to compare PK of capsules and tablets in Arms 1 and 2; to evaluate tumor response in sarcoma participants in Arm 3; to compare the PK of 60 milligrams (mg) of the new, 2nd generation tablet formulation and 60 mg of the selinexor suspension formula to the current, 1st generation tablets.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Patients must have histologically confirmed soft tissue or bone/cartilage sarcoma. Patients with sarcoma of small round blue cell tumor types are allowed. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are excluded. 2. Patients must have received at least one prior anticancer regimen for metastatic disease unless there is no other therapy available and evidence of progressive disease on study entry. Patients with stable disease will be included if there has been failure to respond to another drug(s) within the previous 3 months
Exclusion criteria
1. Patients with known liver metastases 2. Radiation, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, any other systemic anticancer therapy or participation in an investigational anti-cancer study ≤ 3 weeks prior to initiation of therapy 3. Patients with known brain metastasis 4. Patients with any gastrointestinal dysfunctions that could interfere with the interpretation of the food effect data 5. Patients with known intolerance to low or high fat meals 6. In the opinion of the investigator, patients who are significantly below their ideal body weight
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From the Time Zero to the Last Non-zero Concentration (AUC0-t) of Selinexor | Day 1 of weeks 1-3 in Cycle 1: Pre-dose (within 10 minutes before swallowing study drug), 15, 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10,18, 24, and 48 hours post-dose | AUC0-t was defined as area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last non-zero concentration. |
| Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From the Time Zero to Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Selinexor | Day 1 of weeks 1-3 in Cycle 1: Pre-dose (within 10 minutes before swallowing study drug), 15, 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 18, 24, and 48 hours post-dose | AUC0-inf was defined as area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (extrapolated), AUC0-inf was calculated as AUC0-t + Ct/ elimination rate constant (kel), where: Ct = the last observed non- zero concentration. |
| Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Selinexor | Day 1 of weeks 1-3 in Cycle 1: Pre-dose (within 10 minutes before swallowing study drug), 15, 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 18, 24, and 48 hours post-dose | Cmax was defined as maximum observed concentration, taken directly from the plasma concentration data. |
| Time of First Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Selinexor | Day 1 of weeks 1-3 in Cycle 1: Pre-dose (within 10 minutes before swallowing study drug), 15, 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 18, 24, and 48 hours post-dose | Tmax was defined as time of first observation of Cmax, taken directly from the plasma concentration data. |
| Terminal Phase Half-Life (t1/2) of Selinexor | Day 1 of weeks 1-3 in Cycle 1: Pre-dose (within 10 minutes before swallowing study drug), 15, 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 18, 24, and 48 hours post-dose | t1/2 was the terminal phase half-life, it was calculated as ln(2)/kel. |
| Apparent Total Body Clearance (CL/F) of Selinexor | Day 1 of weeks 1-3 in Cycle 1: Pre-dose (within 10 minutes before swallowing study drug), 15, 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 18, 24, and 48 hours post-dose | Apparent total body clearance was calculated as Dose/AUC0-inf, uncorrected for fraction absorbed; reported normalized by participant body weight (kilogram \[kg\]). |
| Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F) of Selinexor | Day 1 of weeks 1-3 in Cycle 1: Pre-dose (within 10 minutes before swallowing study drug), 15, 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 18, 24, and 48 hours post-dose | Vd/F was calculated as Dose/ (kel \*AUC0-inf), uncorrected for fraction absorbed; reported normalized by participant body weight (kg). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity | From screening up to 30 days post last study drug dose (up to 39 months) | AE was defined as the appearance of (or worsening of any pre-existing) undesirable sign, symptom, or medical condition that occur after participant's signed informed consent obtained. TEAE was defined as any AE with onset or worsening of a pre-existing condition on or after the first administration of study treatment through 28 days following last dose or any event considered drug-related by the investigator through the end of the study. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE displays Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: Grade 1: mild, Grade 2: moderate, Grade 3: severe, Grade 4: life-threatening, and Grade 5: death. |
| Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities | From screening up to 30 days post last study drug dose (up to 39 months) | Number of participants with clinically significant laboratory abnormalities including clinical chemistry, hematology, coagulation and urinalysis. Number of participants with clinically significant laboratory abnormalities which were deemed clinically significant by the investigator were reported. |
| Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 Criteria | From the date of first documented response until the date of documented progression or last disease assessment (up to 39 months) | Best overall response rate was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved complete response (CR), and partial response (PR), as assessed by the RECIST v1.1 criteria. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non target) must have reduction in the short axis to less than (\<) 10 millimeter (mm). PR was defined as At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter (LD). |
| Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECGs) | From screening up to 30 days post last study drug dose | Twelve lead ECGs were obtained after the participant has rested in a supine position for at least 5 minutes. Clinically significant findings were defined as such in the opinion of the investigator or designated physician occurring at any time on treatment from normal pre-dose. |
| Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | From screening up to 30 days post last study drug dose (up to 39 months) | Vital signs included blood pressure (systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure). Measurements were made after the participant had been resting supine for a minimum of 5 minutes. Clinically significant findings were defined as such in the opinion of the investigator occurring at any time on treatment from normal pre-dose based on the condition met (Yes/No). Number of participants with clinically significant changes in vital signs with condition (Yes) were only reported. |
| Duration of Stable Disease as Per RECIST v1.1 Criteria | From the date of first dose of study treatment to first documented radiologic evidence of disease recurrence or progression, censored date (up to 39 months) | Duration of at least stable disease was defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to first documented radiologic evidence of disease recurrence or progression as per RECIST v1.1 Criteria. Participants without evidence of progression were censored at time of last disease assessment. Progressive Disease (PD) was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of measured lesions taking as references the smallest sum of diameters recorded since the treatment started. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Appearance of one or more new lesions also constituted progressive disease. |
| Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per RECIST v1.1 Criteria | From first dose of study treatment to time of disease progression or death, censored date (up to 39 months) | PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the first date of Independent Review Committee (IRC)-confirmed PD per RECIST v1.1, or death due to any cause. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD), taking as reference the smallest sum of the longest diameter (SLD) recorded from baseline or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Participants who were last known to be alive and without evidence of progression were censored at time of last disease assessment. If date of progression or death occurred after more than 1 missed disease assessment interval, or 30 days after end of treatment, participants were censored at the time of last evaluable disease assessment prior to the missed assessment. |
| Overall Survival (OS) | From first dose of study treatment to death, censored date (up to 39 months) | OS was defined as the time from date first dose of study treatment to the date of death. Participants who were still alive prior to the data cutoff for final efficacy analysis, or who dropped out prior to study end, were censored at the day they were last known to be alive. |
| Time to Progression (TTP) | From first dose of study treatment to first documented evidence of disease recurrence or progression, or death, censored date (up to 39 months) | TTP was defined as the time from date of first dose of study treatment to first documented evidence of disease recurrence or progression, or death due to disease progression, whichever occurred first. Participants without evidence of progression were censored at time of last evaluable disease assessment. |
| Number of Participants With Growth Modulation Index (GMI) Less Than or Equal to (<=) 1.33 and Greater Than (>) 1.33 | Up to 39 months | GMI was defined as the ratio between the TTP with selinexor and the TTP with the most recent prior treatment. GMI was calculated, using a previously described threshold of 1.3 or greater as a sign of potential drug activity and improved overall survival. |
| Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs | From screening up to 30 days post last study drug dose (up to 39 months) | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product during the course of a study and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. SAE defined as any AE, occurring at any dose (including after the informed consent form was signed and prior to dosing) that and regardless of causality that: results in death, is life-threatening (participant was at immediate risk of death from event as it occurred), requires in-patient hospitalization (formal admission to a hospital for medical reasons) or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAE was defined as any AE with onset or worsening of a pre-existing condition on or after the first administration of study treatment through 30 days following last dose or any event considered drug-related by the investigator through the end of the study. |
Countries
Canada, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
This study was conducted at 2 sites in United States and Canada from 30 July 2013 to 21 October 2016.
Pre-assignment details
A total of 54 participants were enrolled and randomized to study treatment.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Arm 1: Participants with advanced sarcomas (Liposarcoma, Leiomyosarcoma, and Other sarcoma) received selinexor 30 mg/m\^2 orally twice weekly in treatment sequence ABCD (Treatment A: fasted, tablet formulation on Day 1 of Week 1; Treatment B: high-fat meal, tablet formulation on Day 1 of Week 2; Treatment C: low-fat meal, tablet formulation on Day 1 of Week 3; Treatment D: low-fat meal, capsule formulation on Day 1 of Week 4 in Cycle 1 (Weeks 1 to 4). | 10 |
| Arm 2: Participants with advanced sarcomas (Liposarcoma, Leiomyosarcoma, and Other sarcoma) received selinexor 30 mg/m\^2 orally twice weekly in treatment sequence BADC (Treatment B: high-fat meal, tablet formulation on Day 1 of Week 1; Treatment A: fasted, tablet formulation on Day 1 of Week 2; Treatment D: low-fat meal, capsule formulation on Day 1 of Week 3; Treatment C: low-fat meal, tablet formulation on Day 1 of Week 4 in Cycle 1 (Weeks 1 to 4). | 9 |
| Arm 3: Participants with advanced sarcomas (Liposarcoma, Leiomyosarcoma, and Other sarcoma) received selinexor 50 mg/m\^2 first generation tablets twice weekly on Days 1 and 3 of each week within 30 minutes of solid food consumption. | 17 |
| Arm 4: Participants with advanced sarcomas (Liposarcoma, Leiomyosarcoma, and Other sarcoma) received selinexor 60 mg/m\^2 orally in treatment sequence ABC (Treatment A: current \[1st generation\] tablets on Day 1 of Week 1; Treatment B: new \[2nd generation\] tablets on Day 1 of Week 2; Treatment C: suspension dose of current \[1st generation\] tablets on Day 1 of Week 3 in Cycle 1 (Weeks 1 to 3). All participants received the current (1st generation) tablet formula at a dose of 60 mg on Day 3 of Weeks 1-3 of Cycle 1. | 7 |
| Arm 5: Participants with advanced sarcomas (Liposarcoma, Leiomyosarcoma, and Other sarcoma) received selinexor 60 mg/m\^2 orally in treatment sequence CAB (Treatment C: suspension dose of current \[1st generation\] tablets on Day 1 of Week 1; Treatment A: current \[1st generation\] tablets on Day 1 of Week 2; Treatment B: new \[2nd generation\] tablets on Day 1 of Week 3 in Cycle 1 (Weeks 1 to 3). All participants received the current (1st generation) tablet formula at a dose of 60 mg on Day 3 of Weeks 1-3 of Cycle 1. | 5 |
| Arm 6: Participants with advanced sarcomas (Liposarcoma, Leiomyosarcoma, and Other sarcoma) received selinexor 60 mg/m\^2 orally in treatment sequence BCA (Treatment B: new \[2nd generation\] tablets on Day 1 of Week 1; Treatment C: suspension dose of current \[1st generation\] tablets on Day 1 of Week 2; Treatment A: current \[1st generation\] tablets on Day 1 of Week 3 in Cycle 1 (Weeks 1 to 3). All participants received the current (1st generation) tablet formula at a dose of 60 mg on Day 3 of Weeks 1-3 of Cycle 1. | 6 |
| Total | 54 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 | FG004 | FG005 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Death | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Disease Progression | 7 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Overall Study | Intercurrent illness | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Need of treatment not allowed per protocol | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Physician Decision | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Arm 1: | Arm 2: | Arm 3: | Arm 4: | Arm 5: | Arm 6: | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 51.7 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.72 | 57.6 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.18 | 59.9 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9 | 53.4 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1 | 43.6 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.32 | 53.8 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.62 | 55.0 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.22 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 9 Participants | 7 Participants | 16 Participants | 7 Participants | 4 Participants | 6 Participants | 49 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black or African American | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Unknown or Not Reported | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 8 Participants | 9 Participants | 12 Participants | 4 Participants | 3 Participants | 5 Participants | 41 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 4 Participants | 7 Participants | 11 Participants | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 31 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 6 Participants | 2 Participants | 6 Participants | 4 Participants | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 23 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk | EG004 affected / at risk | EG005 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 2 / 10 | 2 / 9 | 1 / 17 | 3 / 7 | 3 / 5 | 2 / 6 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 10 / 10 | 9 / 9 | 17 / 17 | 7 / 7 | 5 / 5 | 6 / 6 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 4 / 10 | 5 / 9 | 5 / 17 | 2 / 7 | 2 / 5 | 4 / 6 |
Outcome results
Apparent Total Body Clearance (CL/F) of Selinexor
Apparent total body clearance was calculated as Dose/AUC0-inf, uncorrected for fraction absorbed; reported normalized by participant body weight (kilogram \[kg\]).
Time frame: Day 1 of weeks 1-3 in Cycle 1: Pre-dose (within 10 minutes before swallowing study drug), 15, 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 18, 24, and 48 hours post-dose
Population: PK population included all participants in Arms 1, 2 and Arms 4, 5, and 6 who received selinexor, and for whom the PK profile for all treatments could be adequately characterized. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants who are evaluable for this outcome measure. As pre-specified in SAP and protocol Arm 3 was a non-PK group assessment, so data was not collected and analyzed for this PK outcome.
| Arm | Measure | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Apparent Total Body Clearance (CL/F) of Selinexor | 0.3 Liter per hour per kilogram (L/h/kg) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 32.1 |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Apparent Total Body Clearance (CL/F) of Selinexor | 0.22 Liter per hour per kilogram (L/h/kg) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 21.3 |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Apparent Total Body Clearance (CL/F) of Selinexor | 0.22 Liter per hour per kilogram (L/h/kg) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 16.3 |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Apparent Total Body Clearance (CL/F) of Selinexor | 0.21 Liter per hour per kilogram (L/h/kg) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 18.7 |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Apparent Total Body Clearance (CL/F) of Selinexor | 0.21 Liter per hour per kilogram (L/h/kg) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 20.6 |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Apparent Total Body Clearance (CL/F) of Selinexor | 0.20 Liter per hour per kilogram (L/h/kg) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 16.6 |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment C: Oral Suspension | Apparent Total Body Clearance (CL/F) of Selinexor | 0.21 Liter per hour per kilogram (L/h/kg) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 14.2 |
Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F) of Selinexor
Vd/F was calculated as Dose/ (kel \*AUC0-inf), uncorrected for fraction absorbed; reported normalized by participant body weight (kg).
Time frame: Day 1 of weeks 1-3 in Cycle 1: Pre-dose (within 10 minutes before swallowing study drug), 15, 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 18, 24, and 48 hours post-dose
Population: PK population included all participants in Arms 1, 2 and Arms 4, 5, and 6 who received selinexor, and for whom the PK profile for all treatments could be adequately characterized. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants who are evaluable for this outcome measure. As pre-specified in SAP and protocol Arm 3 was a non-PK group assessment, so data was not collected and analyzed for this PK outcome.
| Arm | Measure | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F) of Selinexor | 2.2 Liter per kilogram (L/kg) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 49.5 |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F) of Selinexor | 1.8 Liter per kilogram (L/kg) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 32.3 |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F) of Selinexor | 1.7 Liter per kilogram (L/kg) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 26.1 |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F) of Selinexor | 1.7 Liter per kilogram (L/kg) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 26.6 |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F) of Selinexor | 2.0 Liter per kilogram (L/kg) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 16.9 |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F) of Selinexor | 1.9 Liter per kilogram (L/kg) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 18.3 |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment C: Oral Suspension | Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F) of Selinexor | 1.9 Liter per kilogram (L/kg) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 18.2 |
Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From the Time Zero to Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Selinexor
AUC0-inf was defined as area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (extrapolated), AUC0-inf was calculated as AUC0-t + Ct/ elimination rate constant (kel), where: Ct = the last observed non- zero concentration.
Time frame: Day 1 of weeks 1-3 in Cycle 1: Pre-dose (within 10 minutes before swallowing study drug), 15, 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 18, 24, and 48 hours post-dose
Population: PK population included all participants in Arms 1, 2 and Arms 4, 5, and 6 who received selinexor, and for whom the PK profile for all treatments could be adequately characterized. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants who are evaluable for this outcome measure. As pre-specified in SAP and protocol Arm 3 was a non-PK group assessment, so data was not collected and analyzed for this PK outcome.
| Arm | Measure | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From the Time Zero to Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Selinexor | 2969 ng*h/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 34.1 |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From the Time Zero to Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Selinexor | 3412 ng*h/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 23.8 |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From the Time Zero to Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Selinexor | 3483 ng*h/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 18.1 |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From the Time Zero to Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Selinexor | 3561 ng*h/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 20.6 |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From the Time Zero to Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Selinexor | 4117 ng*h/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 22.4 |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From the Time Zero to Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Selinexor | 4250 ng*h/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 21.8 |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment C: Oral Suspension | Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From the Time Zero to Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Selinexor | 4002 ng*h/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 21.1 |
Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From the Time Zero to the Last Non-zero Concentration (AUC0-t) of Selinexor
AUC0-t was defined as area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last non-zero concentration.
Time frame: Day 1 of weeks 1-3 in Cycle 1: Pre-dose (within 10 minutes before swallowing study drug), 15, 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10,18, 24, and 48 hours post-dose
Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) population included all participants in Arms 1, 2 and Arms 4, 5, and 6 who received selinexor, and for whom the PK profile for all treatments could be adequately characterized. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure. As pre-specified in SAP and protocol Arm 3 was a non-PK group assessment, so data was not collected and analyzed for this PK outcome.
| Arm | Measure | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From the Time Zero to the Last Non-zero Concentration (AUC0-t) of Selinexor | 2752 Nanograms*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 37.5 |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From the Time Zero to the Last Non-zero Concentration (AUC0-t) of Selinexor | 3175 Nanograms*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 25.3 |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From the Time Zero to the Last Non-zero Concentration (AUC0-t) of Selinexor | 3280 Nanograms*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 19.3 |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From the Time Zero to the Last Non-zero Concentration (AUC0-t) of Selinexor | 3342 Nanograms*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 21.4 |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From the Time Zero to the Last Non-zero Concentration (AUC0-t) of Selinexor | 4086 Nanograms*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 22.3 |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From the Time Zero to the Last Non-zero Concentration (AUC0-t) of Selinexor | 4220 Nanograms*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 22 |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment C: Oral Suspension | Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From the Time Zero to the Last Non-zero Concentration (AUC0-t) of Selinexor | 3955 Nanograms*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 21.2 |
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Selinexor
Cmax was defined as maximum observed concentration, taken directly from the plasma concentration data.
Time frame: Day 1 of weeks 1-3 in Cycle 1: Pre-dose (within 10 minutes before swallowing study drug), 15, 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 18, 24, and 48 hours post-dose
Population: PK population included all participants in Arms 1, 2 and Arms 4, 5, and 6 who received selinexor, and for whom the PK profile for all treatments could be adequately characterized. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants who are evaluable for this outcome measure. As pre-specified in SAP and protocol Arm 3 was a non-PK group assessment, so data was not collected and analyzed for this PK outcome.
| Arm | Measure | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Selinexor | 355 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 52.6 |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Selinexor | 404 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 39.1 |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Selinexor | 436 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 21.9 |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Selinexor | 429 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 29.1 |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Selinexor | 519 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 34.4 |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Selinexor | 527 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 30.7 |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment C: Oral Suspension | Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Selinexor | 450 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 52.8 |
Terminal Phase Half-Life (t1/2) of Selinexor
t1/2 was the terminal phase half-life, it was calculated as ln(2)/kel.
Time frame: Day 1 of weeks 1-3 in Cycle 1: Pre-dose (within 10 minutes before swallowing study drug), 15, 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 18, 24, and 48 hours post-dose
Population: PK population included all participants in Arms 1, 2 and Arms 4, 5, and 6 who received selinexor, and for whom the PK profile for all treatments could be adequately characterized. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants who are evaluable for this outcome measure. As pre-specified in SAP and protocol Arm 3 was a non-PK group assessment, so data was not collected and analyzed for this PK outcome.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Terminal Phase Half-Life (t1/2) of Selinexor | 6.2 Hour | Standard Deviation 1.71 |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Terminal Phase Half-Life (t1/2) of Selinexor | 5.9 Hour | Standard Deviation 1.36 |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Terminal Phase Half-Life (t1/2) of Selinexor | 5.6 Hour | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Terminal Phase Half-Life (t1/2) of Selinexor | 5.7 Hour | Standard Deviation 1.06 |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Terminal Phase Half-Life (t1/2) of Selinexor | 6.7 Hour | Standard Deviation 1.34 |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Terminal Phase Half-Life (t1/2) of Selinexor | 6.6 Hour | Standard Deviation 1.14 |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment C: Oral Suspension | Terminal Phase Half-Life (t1/2) of Selinexor | 6.5 Hour | Standard Deviation 1.51 |
Time of First Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Selinexor
Tmax was defined as time of first observation of Cmax, taken directly from the plasma concentration data.
Time frame: Day 1 of weeks 1-3 in Cycle 1: Pre-dose (within 10 minutes before swallowing study drug), 15, 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 18, 24, and 48 hours post-dose
Population: PK population included all participants in Arms 1, 2 and Arms 4, 5, and 6 who received selinexor, and for whom the PK profile for all treatments could be adequately characterized. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants who are evaluable for this outcome measure. As pre-specified in SAP and protocol Arm 3 was a non-PK group assessment, so data was not collected and analyzed for this PK outcome.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Time of First Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Selinexor | 1.5 Hour |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Time of First Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Selinexor | 3.4 Hour |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Time of First Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Selinexor | 3.4 Hour |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Time of First Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Selinexor | 3.8 Hour |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Time of First Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Selinexor | 2.1 Hour |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Time of First Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Selinexor | 3.0 Hour |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment C: Oral Suspension | Time of First Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Selinexor | 1.6 Hour |
Duration of Stable Disease as Per RECIST v1.1 Criteria
Duration of at least stable disease was defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to first documented radiologic evidence of disease recurrence or progression as per RECIST v1.1 Criteria. Participants without evidence of progression were censored at time of last disease assessment. Progressive Disease (PD) was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of measured lesions taking as references the smallest sum of diameters recorded since the treatment started. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Appearance of one or more new lesions also constituted progressive disease.
Time frame: From the date of first dose of study treatment to first documented radiologic evidence of disease recurrence or progression, censored date (up to 39 months)
Population: Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of selinexor. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed as per disease specific sarcoma.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Duration of Stable Disease as Per RECIST v1.1 Criteria | 7.49 Months |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Duration of Stable Disease as Per RECIST v1.1 Criteria | 3.94 Months |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Duration of Stable Disease as Per RECIST v1.1 Criteria | 8.34 Months |
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECGs)
Twelve lead ECGs were obtained after the participant has rested in a supine position for at least 5 minutes. Clinically significant findings were defined as such in the opinion of the investigator or designated physician occurring at any time on treatment from normal pre-dose.
Time frame: From screening up to 30 days post last study drug dose
Population: Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of selinexor. As pre-specified in SAP, safety data was collected and analyzed as per the individual arms with specified treatment sequences only.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECGs) | 2 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECGs) | 0 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECGs) | 1 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECGs) | 0 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECGs) | 0 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECGs) | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs
Vital signs included blood pressure (systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure). Measurements were made after the participant had been resting supine for a minimum of 5 minutes. Clinically significant findings were defined as such in the opinion of the investigator occurring at any time on treatment from normal pre-dose based on the condition met (Yes/No). Number of participants with clinically significant changes in vital signs with condition (Yes) were only reported.
Time frame: From screening up to 30 days post last study drug dose (up to 39 months)
Population: Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of selinexor. As pre-specified in SAP, safety data was collected and analyzed as per the individual arms with specified treatment sequences only.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 2 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 90 mmHg (Yes) | 4 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: < 100 mmHg and > 20 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 1 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 20 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 2 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure : > 140 mmHg (Yes) | 2 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: < 60 mmHg and > 5 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 2 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 160 mmHg and > 20 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 0 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: < 60 mmHg and > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 2 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: < 60 mmHg (Yes) | 2 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 5 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 6 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: < 100 mmHg (Yes) | 2 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 160 mmHg and > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 0 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 100 mmHg and > 5 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 0 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 20 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 1 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 5 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 8 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: < 100 mmHg and > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 1 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 3 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 160 mmHg (Yes) | 0 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 2 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 100 mmHg and > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 0 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 5 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 100 mmHg (Yes) | 0 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 160 mmHg and > 20 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 0 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure : > 140 mmHg (Yes) | 3 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: < 60 mmHg and > 5 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 2 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: < 100 mmHg (Yes) | 5 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: < 60 mmHg and > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 2 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 4 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 20 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 4 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 100 mmHg and > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 0 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 5 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 5 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 100 mmHg (Yes) | 0 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: < 100 mmHg and > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 4 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 90 mmHg (Yes) | 3 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: < 100 mmHg and > 20 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 1 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 100 mmHg and > 5 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 0 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 7 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 160 mmHg and > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 0 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: < 60 mmHg (Yes) | 3 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 20 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 5 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 5 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 7 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 6 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 160 mmHg (Yes) | 0 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 5 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: < 60 mmHg (Yes) | 10 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: < 100 mmHg (Yes) | 8 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 14 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 20 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 10 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: < 100 mmHg and > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 7 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: < 100 mmHg and > 20 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 4 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 5 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 15 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 12 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: < 60 mmHg and > 5 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 9 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: < 60 mmHg and > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 9 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure : > 140 mmHg (Yes) | 6 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 160 mmHg (Yes) | 1 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 11 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 20 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 3 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 160 mmHg and > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 1 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 160 mmHg and > 20 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 0 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 90 mmHg (Yes) | 6 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 100 mmHg (Yes) | 1 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 5 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 13 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 8 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 100 mmHg and > 5 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 1 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 100 mmHg and > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 0 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 160 mmHg (Yes) | 1 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 5 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 4 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 3 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: < 100 mmHg and > 20 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 2 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 20 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 4 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 160 mmHg and > 20 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 0 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure : > 140 mmHg (Yes) | 2 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 100 mmHg (Yes) | 1 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: < 100 mmHg (Yes) | 4 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: < 60 mmHg and > 5 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 2 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 2 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 90 mmHg (Yes) | 2 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: < 60 mmHg and > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 2 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: < 100 mmHg and > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 3 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 100 mmHg and > 5 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 1 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 20 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 1 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 6 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 100 mmHg and > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 1 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: < 60 mmHg (Yes) | 2 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 5 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 5 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 6 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 160 mmHg and > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 1 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 5 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 160 mmHg (Yes) | 0 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 5 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 4 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 100 mmHg and > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 0 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 4 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: < 60 mmHg (Yes) | 2 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 20 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 1 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 100 mmHg and > 5 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 0 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 160 mmHg and > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 0 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: < 100 mmHg and > 20 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 1 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 160 mmHg and > 20 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 0 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: < 100 mmHg and > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 3 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: < 100 mmHg (Yes) | 3 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 90 mmHg (Yes) | 3 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 100 mmHg (Yes) | 0 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 20 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 1 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 5 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 4 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 3 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: < 60 mmHg and > 5 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 1 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: < 60 mmHg and > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 0 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 3 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure : > 140 mmHg (Yes) | 3 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 100 mmHg and > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 0 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 160 mmHg and > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 0 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 4 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 5 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 6 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 5 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: < 100 mmHg and > 20 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 2 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 20 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 4 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: < 60 mmHg (Yes) | 2 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure : > 140 mmHg (Yes) | 3 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: < 60 mmHg and > 5 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 2 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: < 100 mmHg (Yes) | 3 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 5 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 4 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 160 mmHg (Yes) | 0 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 90 mmHg (Yes) | 3 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 20 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 3 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: < 100 mmHg and > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 2 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Systolic Blood Pressure: > 160 mmHg and > 20 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 0 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 5 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 5 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 100 mmHg (Yes) | 0 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: < 60 mmHg and > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes) | 2 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Diastolic Blood Pressure: > 100 mmHg and > 5 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes) | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities
Number of participants with clinically significant laboratory abnormalities including clinical chemistry, hematology, coagulation and urinalysis. Number of participants with clinically significant laboratory abnormalities which were deemed clinically significant by the investigator were reported.
Time frame: From screening up to 30 days post last study drug dose (up to 39 months)
Population: Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of selinexor. As pre-specified in SAP, safety data was collected and analyzed as per the individual arms with specified treatment sequences only.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities | Hematology | 1 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities | Urinalysis | 0 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities | Coagulation: Prothrombin intl. normalized ratio | 0 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities | Clinical Chemistry | 4 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities | Urinalysis | 0 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities | Clinical Chemistry | 1 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities | Hematology | 2 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities | Coagulation: Prothrombin intl. normalized ratio | 0 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities | Coagulation: Prothrombin intl. normalized ratio | 1 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities | Clinical Chemistry | 7 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities | Hematology | 7 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities | Urinalysis | 0 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities | Coagulation: Prothrombin intl. normalized ratio | 0 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities | Clinical Chemistry | 1 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities | Hematology | 1 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities | Urinalysis | 0 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities | Urinalysis | 0 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities | Clinical Chemistry | 1 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities | Hematology | 2 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities | Coagulation: Prothrombin intl. normalized ratio | 0 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities | Clinical Chemistry | 1 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities | Hematology | 1 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities | Urinalysis | 0 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities | Coagulation: Prothrombin intl. normalized ratio | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Growth Modulation Index (GMI) Less Than or Equal to (<=) 1.33 and Greater Than (>) 1.33
GMI was defined as the ratio between the TTP with selinexor and the TTP with the most recent prior treatment. GMI was calculated, using a previously described threshold of 1.3 or greater as a sign of potential drug activity and improved overall survival.
Time frame: Up to 39 months
Population: Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of selinexor. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed as per disease specific sarcoma. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Growth Modulation Index (GMI) Less Than or Equal to (<=) 1.33 and Greater Than (>) 1.33 | GMI <= 1.33 | 11 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Growth Modulation Index (GMI) Less Than or Equal to (<=) 1.33 and Greater Than (>) 1.33 | GMI > 1.33 | 7 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Growth Modulation Index (GMI) Less Than or Equal to (<=) 1.33 and Greater Than (>) 1.33 | GMI <= 1.33 | 8 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Growth Modulation Index (GMI) Less Than or Equal to (<=) 1.33 and Greater Than (>) 1.33 | GMI > 1.33 | 4 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Growth Modulation Index (GMI) Less Than or Equal to (<=) 1.33 and Greater Than (>) 1.33 | GMI <= 1.33 | 17 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Growth Modulation Index (GMI) Less Than or Equal to (<=) 1.33 and Greater Than (>) 1.33 | GMI > 1.33 | 3 Participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product during the course of a study and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. SAE defined as any AE, occurring at any dose (including after the informed consent form was signed and prior to dosing) that and regardless of causality that: results in death, is life-threatening (participant was at immediate risk of death from event as it occurred), requires in-patient hospitalization (formal admission to a hospital for medical reasons) or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAE was defined as any AE with onset or worsening of a pre-existing condition on or after the first administration of study treatment through 30 days following last dose or any event considered drug-related by the investigator through the end of the study.
Time frame: From screening up to 30 days post last study drug dose (up to 39 months)
Population: Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of selinexor. As pre-specified in SAP, safety data was collected and analyzed as per the individual arms with specified treatment sequences only.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs | Participants with TEAEs | 10 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs | Participants with Serious TEAEs | 4 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs | Participants with TEAEs | 9 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs | Participants with Serious TEAEs | 5 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs | Participants with TEAEs | 17 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs | Participants with Serious TEAEs | 5 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs | Participants with TEAEs | 7 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs | Participants with Serious TEAEs | 2 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs | Participants with TEAEs | 5 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs | Participants with Serious TEAEs | 2 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs | Participants with TEAEs | 6 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs | Participants with Serious TEAEs | 4 Participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity
AE was defined as the appearance of (or worsening of any pre-existing) undesirable sign, symptom, or medical condition that occur after participant's signed informed consent obtained. TEAE was defined as any AE with onset or worsening of a pre-existing condition on or after the first administration of study treatment through 28 days following last dose or any event considered drug-related by the investigator through the end of the study. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE displays Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: Grade 1: mild, Grade 2: moderate, Grade 3: severe, Grade 4: life-threatening, and Grade 5: death.
Time frame: From screening up to 30 days post last study drug dose (up to 39 months)
Population: Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of selinexor. As pre-specified in SAP, safety data was collected and analyzed as per the individual arms with specified treatment sequences only.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity | Grade 4: Life Threatening | 2 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity | Grade 2: Moderate | 3 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity | Grade 1: Mild | 0 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity | Grade 5: Fatal | 0 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity | Grade 3: Severe | 5 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity | Grade 2: Moderate | 2 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity | Grade 4: Life Threatening | 1 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity | Grade 1: Mild | 0 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity | Grade 5: Fatal | 1 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity | Grade 3: Severe | 5 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity | Grade 2: Moderate | 2 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity | Grade 4: Life Threatening | 0 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity | Grade 5: Fatal | 1 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity | Grade 3: Severe | 14 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity | Grade 1: Mild | 0 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity | Grade 3: Severe | 3 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity | Grade 1: Mild | 0 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity | Grade 2: Moderate | 1 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity | Grade 4: Life Threatening | 3 Participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule Formulation | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity | Grade 5: Fatal | 0 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity | Grade 4: Life Threatening | 1 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity | Grade 5: Fatal | 1 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity | Grade 1: Mild | 0 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity | Grade 2: Moderate | 1 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity | Grade 3: Severe | 2 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity | Grade 5: Fatal | 0 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity | Grade 4: Life Threatening | 1 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity | Grade 2: Moderate | 1 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity | Grade 1: Mild | 0 Participants |
| Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation Tablet | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity | Grade 3: Severe | 4 Participants |
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time from date first dose of study treatment to the date of death. Participants who were still alive prior to the data cutoff for final efficacy analysis, or who dropped out prior to study end, were censored at the day they were last known to be alive.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment to death, censored date (up to 39 months)
Population: Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of selinexor. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed as per disease specific sarcoma.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Overall Survival (OS) | 9.00 Months |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Overall Survival (OS) | 7.03 Months |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Overall Survival (OS) | NA Months |
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 Criteria
Best overall response rate was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved complete response (CR), and partial response (PR), as assessed by the RECIST v1.1 criteria. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non target) must have reduction in the short axis to less than (\<) 10 millimeter (mm). PR was defined as At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter (LD).
Time frame: From the date of first documented response until the date of documented progression or last disease assessment (up to 39 months)
Population: Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of selinexor. Data for this outcome measure analysis was planned to be analyzed as per disease specific sarcoma.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 Criteria | Complete Response (CR) | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 Criteria | Partial Response (PR) | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 Criteria | Complete Response (CR) | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 Criteria | Partial Response (PR) | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 Criteria | Complete Response (CR) | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 Criteria | Partial Response (PR) | 0 Percentage of participants |
Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per RECIST v1.1 Criteria
PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the first date of Independent Review Committee (IRC)-confirmed PD per RECIST v1.1, or death due to any cause. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD), taking as reference the smallest sum of the longest diameter (SLD) recorded from baseline or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Participants who were last known to be alive and without evidence of progression were censored at time of last disease assessment. If date of progression or death occurred after more than 1 missed disease assessment interval, or 30 days after end of treatment, participants were censored at the time of last evaluable disease assessment prior to the missed assessment.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment to time of disease progression or death, censored date (up to 39 months)
Population: Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of selinexor. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed as per disease specific sarcoma.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per RECIST v1.1 Criteria | 4.44 Months |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per RECIST v1.1 Criteria | 3.52 Months |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per RECIST v1.1 Criteria | 1.84 Months |
Time to Progression (TTP)
TTP was defined as the time from date of first dose of study treatment to first documented evidence of disease recurrence or progression, or death due to disease progression, whichever occurred first. Participants without evidence of progression were censored at time of last evaluable disease assessment.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment to first documented evidence of disease recurrence or progression, or death, censored date (up to 39 months)
Population: Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of selinexor. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed as per disease specific sarcoma.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet Formulation | Time to Progression (TTP) | 4.44 Months |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Time to Progression (TTP) | 3.52 Months |
| Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet Formulation | Time to Progression (TTP) | 1.74 Months |