Skip to content

A Phase I Trial to Assess the Effects of Food and Formulation on PK of KPT-330 in Patients With Sarcoma

An Open-Label Phase IB Trial To Evaluate the Effects of Food and Formulation on Pharmacokinetics of the Oral Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export/SINE Compound KPT-330 in Patients With Soft-Tissue or Bone Sarcoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01896505
Enrollment
54
Registered
2013-07-11
Start date
2013-07-30
Completion date
2016-10-21
Last updated
2024-01-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sarcoma

Keywords

Bone sarcoma, Soft-tissue sarcoma, Sarcoma, KPT-330, Food, Effects, Selinexor

Brief summary

The purpose of this research study is to find out more information such as: to determine the effects of high and low fat foods on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of oral KPT-330 tablets and to compare PK of capsules and tablets in Arms 1 and 2; to evaluate tumor response in sarcoma participants in Arm 3; to compare the PK of 60 milligrams (mg) of the new, 2nd generation tablet formulation and 60 mg of the selinexor suspension formula to the current, 1st generation tablets.

Interventions

DRUGKCP-330

Sponsors

Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients must have histologically confirmed soft tissue or bone/cartilage sarcoma. Patients with sarcoma of small round blue cell tumor types are allowed. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are excluded. 2. Patients must have received at least one prior anticancer regimen for metastatic disease unless there is no other therapy available and evidence of progressive disease on study entry. Patients with stable disease will be included if there has been failure to respond to another drug(s) within the previous 3 months

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with known liver metastases 2. Radiation, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, any other systemic anticancer therapy or participation in an investigational anti-cancer study ≤ 3 weeks prior to initiation of therapy 3. Patients with known brain metastasis 4. Patients with any gastrointestinal dysfunctions that could interfere with the interpretation of the food effect data 5. Patients with known intolerance to low or high fat meals 6. In the opinion of the investigator, patients who are significantly below their ideal body weight

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From the Time Zero to the Last Non-zero Concentration (AUC0-t) of SelinexorDay 1 of weeks 1-3 in Cycle 1: Pre-dose (within 10 minutes before swallowing study drug), 15, 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10,18, 24, and 48 hours post-doseAUC0-t was defined as area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last non-zero concentration.
Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From the Time Zero to Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of SelinexorDay 1 of weeks 1-3 in Cycle 1: Pre-dose (within 10 minutes before swallowing study drug), 15, 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 18, 24, and 48 hours post-doseAUC0-inf was defined as area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (extrapolated), AUC0-inf was calculated as AUC0-t + Ct/ elimination rate constant (kel), where: Ct = the last observed non- zero concentration.
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of SelinexorDay 1 of weeks 1-3 in Cycle 1: Pre-dose (within 10 minutes before swallowing study drug), 15, 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 18, 24, and 48 hours post-doseCmax was defined as maximum observed concentration, taken directly from the plasma concentration data.
Time of First Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of SelinexorDay 1 of weeks 1-3 in Cycle 1: Pre-dose (within 10 minutes before swallowing study drug), 15, 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 18, 24, and 48 hours post-doseTmax was defined as time of first observation of Cmax, taken directly from the plasma concentration data.
Terminal Phase Half-Life (t1/2) of SelinexorDay 1 of weeks 1-3 in Cycle 1: Pre-dose (within 10 minutes before swallowing study drug), 15, 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 18, 24, and 48 hours post-doset1/2 was the terminal phase half-life, it was calculated as ln(2)/kel.
Apparent Total Body Clearance (CL/F) of SelinexorDay 1 of weeks 1-3 in Cycle 1: Pre-dose (within 10 minutes before swallowing study drug), 15, 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 18, 24, and 48 hours post-doseApparent total body clearance was calculated as Dose/AUC0-inf, uncorrected for fraction absorbed; reported normalized by participant body weight (kilogram \[kg\]).
Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F) of SelinexorDay 1 of weeks 1-3 in Cycle 1: Pre-dose (within 10 minutes before swallowing study drug), 15, 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 18, 24, and 48 hours post-doseVd/F was calculated as Dose/ (kel \*AUC0-inf), uncorrected for fraction absorbed; reported normalized by participant body weight (kg).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityFrom screening up to 30 days post last study drug dose (up to 39 months)AE was defined as the appearance of (or worsening of any pre-existing) undesirable sign, symptom, or medical condition that occur after participant's signed informed consent obtained. TEAE was defined as any AE with onset or worsening of a pre-existing condition on or after the first administration of study treatment through 28 days following last dose or any event considered drug-related by the investigator through the end of the study. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE displays Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: Grade 1: mild, Grade 2: moderate, Grade 3: severe, Grade 4: life-threatening, and Grade 5: death.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesFrom screening up to 30 days post last study drug dose (up to 39 months)Number of participants with clinically significant laboratory abnormalities including clinical chemistry, hematology, coagulation and urinalysis. Number of participants with clinically significant laboratory abnormalities which were deemed clinically significant by the investigator were reported.
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 CriteriaFrom the date of first documented response until the date of documented progression or last disease assessment (up to 39 months)Best overall response rate was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved complete response (CR), and partial response (PR), as assessed by the RECIST v1.1 criteria. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non target) must have reduction in the short axis to less than (\<) 10 millimeter (mm). PR was defined as At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter (LD).
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECGs)From screening up to 30 days post last study drug doseTwelve lead ECGs were obtained after the participant has rested in a supine position for at least 5 minutes. Clinically significant findings were defined as such in the opinion of the investigator or designated physician occurring at any time on treatment from normal pre-dose.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsFrom screening up to 30 days post last study drug dose (up to 39 months)Vital signs included blood pressure (systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure). Measurements were made after the participant had been resting supine for a minimum of 5 minutes. Clinically significant findings were defined as such in the opinion of the investigator occurring at any time on treatment from normal pre-dose based on the condition met (Yes/No). Number of participants with clinically significant changes in vital signs with condition (Yes) were only reported.
Duration of Stable Disease as Per RECIST v1.1 CriteriaFrom the date of first dose of study treatment to first documented radiologic evidence of disease recurrence or progression, censored date (up to 39 months)Duration of at least stable disease was defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to first documented radiologic evidence of disease recurrence or progression as per RECIST v1.1 Criteria. Participants without evidence of progression were censored at time of last disease assessment. Progressive Disease (PD) was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of measured lesions taking as references the smallest sum of diameters recorded since the treatment started. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Appearance of one or more new lesions also constituted progressive disease.
Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per RECIST v1.1 CriteriaFrom first dose of study treatment to time of disease progression or death, censored date (up to 39 months)PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the first date of Independent Review Committee (IRC)-confirmed PD per RECIST v1.1, or death due to any cause. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD), taking as reference the smallest sum of the longest diameter (SLD) recorded from baseline or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Participants who were last known to be alive and without evidence of progression were censored at time of last disease assessment. If date of progression or death occurred after more than 1 missed disease assessment interval, or 30 days after end of treatment, participants were censored at the time of last evaluable disease assessment prior to the missed assessment.
Overall Survival (OS)From first dose of study treatment to death, censored date (up to 39 months)OS was defined as the time from date first dose of study treatment to the date of death. Participants who were still alive prior to the data cutoff for final efficacy analysis, or who dropped out prior to study end, were censored at the day they were last known to be alive.
Time to Progression (TTP)From first dose of study treatment to first documented evidence of disease recurrence or progression, or death, censored date (up to 39 months)TTP was defined as the time from date of first dose of study treatment to first documented evidence of disease recurrence or progression, or death due to disease progression, whichever occurred first. Participants without evidence of progression were censored at time of last evaluable disease assessment.
Number of Participants With Growth Modulation Index (GMI) Less Than or Equal to (<=) 1.33 and Greater Than (>) 1.33Up to 39 monthsGMI was defined as the ratio between the TTP with selinexor and the TTP with the most recent prior treatment. GMI was calculated, using a previously described threshold of 1.3 or greater as a sign of potential drug activity and improved overall survival.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsFrom screening up to 30 days post last study drug dose (up to 39 months)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product during the course of a study and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. SAE defined as any AE, occurring at any dose (including after the informed consent form was signed and prior to dosing) that and regardless of causality that: results in death, is life-threatening (participant was at immediate risk of death from event as it occurred), requires in-patient hospitalization (formal admission to a hospital for medical reasons) or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAE was defined as any AE with onset or worsening of a pre-existing condition on or after the first administration of study treatment through 30 days following last dose or any event considered drug-related by the investigator through the end of the study.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted at 2 sites in United States and Canada from 30 July 2013 to 21 October 2016.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 54 participants were enrolled and randomized to study treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm 1:
Participants with advanced sarcomas (Liposarcoma, Leiomyosarcoma, and Other sarcoma) received selinexor 30 mg/m\^2 orally twice weekly in treatment sequence ABCD (Treatment A: fasted, tablet formulation on Day 1 of Week 1; Treatment B: high-fat meal, tablet formulation on Day 1 of Week 2; Treatment C: low-fat meal, tablet formulation on Day 1 of Week 3; Treatment D: low-fat meal, capsule formulation on Day 1 of Week 4 in Cycle 1 (Weeks 1 to 4).
10
Arm 2:
Participants with advanced sarcomas (Liposarcoma, Leiomyosarcoma, and Other sarcoma) received selinexor 30 mg/m\^2 orally twice weekly in treatment sequence BADC (Treatment B: high-fat meal, tablet formulation on Day 1 of Week 1; Treatment A: fasted, tablet formulation on Day 1 of Week 2; Treatment D: low-fat meal, capsule formulation on Day 1 of Week 3; Treatment C: low-fat meal, tablet formulation on Day 1 of Week 4 in Cycle 1 (Weeks 1 to 4).
9
Arm 3:
Participants with advanced sarcomas (Liposarcoma, Leiomyosarcoma, and Other sarcoma) received selinexor 50 mg/m\^2 first generation tablets twice weekly on Days 1 and 3 of each week within 30 minutes of solid food consumption.
17
Arm 4:
Participants with advanced sarcomas (Liposarcoma, Leiomyosarcoma, and Other sarcoma) received selinexor 60 mg/m\^2 orally in treatment sequence ABC (Treatment A: current \[1st generation\] tablets on Day 1 of Week 1; Treatment B: new \[2nd generation\] tablets on Day 1 of Week 2; Treatment C: suspension dose of current \[1st generation\] tablets on Day 1 of Week 3 in Cycle 1 (Weeks 1 to 3). All participants received the current (1st generation) tablet formula at a dose of 60 mg on Day 3 of Weeks 1-3 of Cycle 1.
7
Arm 5:
Participants with advanced sarcomas (Liposarcoma, Leiomyosarcoma, and Other sarcoma) received selinexor 60 mg/m\^2 orally in treatment sequence CAB (Treatment C: suspension dose of current \[1st generation\] tablets on Day 1 of Week 1; Treatment A: current \[1st generation\] tablets on Day 1 of Week 2; Treatment B: new \[2nd generation\] tablets on Day 1 of Week 3 in Cycle 1 (Weeks 1 to 3). All participants received the current (1st generation) tablet formula at a dose of 60 mg on Day 3 of Weeks 1-3 of Cycle 1.
5
Arm 6:
Participants with advanced sarcomas (Liposarcoma, Leiomyosarcoma, and Other sarcoma) received selinexor 60 mg/m\^2 orally in treatment sequence BCA (Treatment B: new \[2nd generation\] tablets on Day 1 of Week 1; Treatment C: suspension dose of current \[1st generation\] tablets on Day 1 of Week 2; Treatment A: current \[1st generation\] tablets on Day 1 of Week 3 in Cycle 1 (Weeks 1 to 3). All participants received the current (1st generation) tablet formula at a dose of 60 mg on Day 3 of Weeks 1-3 of Cycle 1.
6
Total54

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Overall StudyAdverse Event102110
Overall StudyDeath001101
Overall StudyDisease Progression758444
Overall StudyIntercurrent illness010000
Overall StudyNeed of treatment not allowed per protocol001000
Overall StudyPhysician Decision132001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject103100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm 1:Arm 2:Arm 3:Arm 4:Arm 5:Arm 6:Total
Age, Continuous51.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.72
57.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.18
59.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9
53.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
43.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.32
53.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.62
55.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.22
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
9 Participants7 Participants16 Participants7 Participants4 Participants6 Participants49 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
8 Participants9 Participants12 Participants4 Participants3 Participants5 Participants41 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants7 Participants11 Participants3 Participants3 Participants3 Participants31 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants2 Participants6 Participants4 Participants2 Participants3 Participants23 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 102 / 91 / 173 / 73 / 52 / 6
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 109 / 917 / 177 / 75 / 56 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 105 / 95 / 172 / 72 / 54 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Apparent Total Body Clearance (CL/F) of Selinexor

Apparent total body clearance was calculated as Dose/AUC0-inf, uncorrected for fraction absorbed; reported normalized by participant body weight (kilogram \[kg\]).

Time frame: Day 1 of weeks 1-3 in Cycle 1: Pre-dose (within 10 minutes before swallowing study drug), 15, 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 18, 24, and 48 hours post-dose

Population: PK population included all participants in Arms 1, 2 and Arms 4, 5, and 6 who received selinexor, and for whom the PK profile for all treatments could be adequately characterized. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants who are evaluable for this outcome measure. As pre-specified in SAP and protocol Arm 3 was a non-PK group assessment, so data was not collected and analyzed for this PK outcome.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationApparent Total Body Clearance (CL/F) of Selinexor0.3 Liter per hour per kilogram (L/h/kg)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 32.1
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationApparent Total Body Clearance (CL/F) of Selinexor0.22 Liter per hour per kilogram (L/h/kg)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 21.3
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationApparent Total Body Clearance (CL/F) of Selinexor0.22 Liter per hour per kilogram (L/h/kg)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 16.3
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationApparent Total Body Clearance (CL/F) of Selinexor0.21 Liter per hour per kilogram (L/h/kg)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 18.7
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletApparent Total Body Clearance (CL/F) of Selinexor0.21 Liter per hour per kilogram (L/h/kg)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 20.6
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletApparent Total Body Clearance (CL/F) of Selinexor0.20 Liter per hour per kilogram (L/h/kg)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 16.6
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment C: Oral SuspensionApparent Total Body Clearance (CL/F) of Selinexor0.21 Liter per hour per kilogram (L/h/kg)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 14.2
Primary

Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F) of Selinexor

Vd/F was calculated as Dose/ (kel \*AUC0-inf), uncorrected for fraction absorbed; reported normalized by participant body weight (kg).

Time frame: Day 1 of weeks 1-3 in Cycle 1: Pre-dose (within 10 minutes before swallowing study drug), 15, 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 18, 24, and 48 hours post-dose

Population: PK population included all participants in Arms 1, 2 and Arms 4, 5, and 6 who received selinexor, and for whom the PK profile for all treatments could be adequately characterized. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants who are evaluable for this outcome measure. As pre-specified in SAP and protocol Arm 3 was a non-PK group assessment, so data was not collected and analyzed for this PK outcome.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationApparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F) of Selinexor2.2 Liter per kilogram (L/kg)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 49.5
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationApparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F) of Selinexor1.8 Liter per kilogram (L/kg)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 32.3
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationApparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F) of Selinexor1.7 Liter per kilogram (L/kg)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 26.1
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationApparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F) of Selinexor1.7 Liter per kilogram (L/kg)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 26.6
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletApparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F) of Selinexor2.0 Liter per kilogram (L/kg)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 16.9
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletApparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F) of Selinexor1.9 Liter per kilogram (L/kg)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 18.3
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment C: Oral SuspensionApparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F) of Selinexor1.9 Liter per kilogram (L/kg)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 18.2
Primary

Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From the Time Zero to Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Selinexor

AUC0-inf was defined as area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (extrapolated), AUC0-inf was calculated as AUC0-t + Ct/ elimination rate constant (kel), where: Ct = the last observed non- zero concentration.

Time frame: Day 1 of weeks 1-3 in Cycle 1: Pre-dose (within 10 minutes before swallowing study drug), 15, 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 18, 24, and 48 hours post-dose

Population: PK population included all participants in Arms 1, 2 and Arms 4, 5, and 6 who received selinexor, and for whom the PK profile for all treatments could be adequately characterized. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants who are evaluable for this outcome measure. As pre-specified in SAP and protocol Arm 3 was a non-PK group assessment, so data was not collected and analyzed for this PK outcome.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationArea Under the Concentration Time Curve From the Time Zero to Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Selinexor2969 ng*h/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 34.1
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationArea Under the Concentration Time Curve From the Time Zero to Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Selinexor3412 ng*h/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 23.8
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationArea Under the Concentration Time Curve From the Time Zero to Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Selinexor3483 ng*h/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18.1
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationArea Under the Concentration Time Curve From the Time Zero to Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Selinexor3561 ng*h/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 20.6
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletArea Under the Concentration Time Curve From the Time Zero to Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Selinexor4117 ng*h/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 22.4
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletArea Under the Concentration Time Curve From the Time Zero to Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Selinexor4250 ng*h/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 21.8
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment C: Oral SuspensionArea Under the Concentration Time Curve From the Time Zero to Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Selinexor4002 ng*h/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 21.1
Primary

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From the Time Zero to the Last Non-zero Concentration (AUC0-t) of Selinexor

AUC0-t was defined as area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last non-zero concentration.

Time frame: Day 1 of weeks 1-3 in Cycle 1: Pre-dose (within 10 minutes before swallowing study drug), 15, 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10,18, 24, and 48 hours post-dose

Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) population included all participants in Arms 1, 2 and Arms 4, 5, and 6 who received selinexor, and for whom the PK profile for all treatments could be adequately characterized. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure. As pre-specified in SAP and protocol Arm 3 was a non-PK group assessment, so data was not collected and analyzed for this PK outcome.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationArea Under the Concentration-time Curve From the Time Zero to the Last Non-zero Concentration (AUC0-t) of Selinexor2752 Nanograms*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 37.5
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationArea Under the Concentration-time Curve From the Time Zero to the Last Non-zero Concentration (AUC0-t) of Selinexor3175 Nanograms*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 25.3
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationArea Under the Concentration-time Curve From the Time Zero to the Last Non-zero Concentration (AUC0-t) of Selinexor3280 Nanograms*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 19.3
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationArea Under the Concentration-time Curve From the Time Zero to the Last Non-zero Concentration (AUC0-t) of Selinexor3342 Nanograms*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 21.4
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletArea Under the Concentration-time Curve From the Time Zero to the Last Non-zero Concentration (AUC0-t) of Selinexor4086 Nanograms*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 22.3
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletArea Under the Concentration-time Curve From the Time Zero to the Last Non-zero Concentration (AUC0-t) of Selinexor4220 Nanograms*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 22
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment C: Oral SuspensionArea Under the Concentration-time Curve From the Time Zero to the Last Non-zero Concentration (AUC0-t) of Selinexor3955 Nanograms*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 21.2
Primary

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Selinexor

Cmax was defined as maximum observed concentration, taken directly from the plasma concentration data.

Time frame: Day 1 of weeks 1-3 in Cycle 1: Pre-dose (within 10 minutes before swallowing study drug), 15, 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 18, 24, and 48 hours post-dose

Population: PK population included all participants in Arms 1, 2 and Arms 4, 5, and 6 who received selinexor, and for whom the PK profile for all treatments could be adequately characterized. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants who are evaluable for this outcome measure. As pre-specified in SAP and protocol Arm 3 was a non-PK group assessment, so data was not collected and analyzed for this PK outcome.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Selinexor355 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 52.6
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Selinexor404 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 39.1
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Selinexor436 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 21.9
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Selinexor429 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 29.1
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Selinexor519 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 34.4
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Selinexor527 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 30.7
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment C: Oral SuspensionMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Selinexor450 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 52.8
Primary

Terminal Phase Half-Life (t1/2) of Selinexor

t1/2 was the terminal phase half-life, it was calculated as ln(2)/kel.

Time frame: Day 1 of weeks 1-3 in Cycle 1: Pre-dose (within 10 minutes before swallowing study drug), 15, 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 18, 24, and 48 hours post-dose

Population: PK population included all participants in Arms 1, 2 and Arms 4, 5, and 6 who received selinexor, and for whom the PK profile for all treatments could be adequately characterized. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants who are evaluable for this outcome measure. As pre-specified in SAP and protocol Arm 3 was a non-PK group assessment, so data was not collected and analyzed for this PK outcome.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationTerminal Phase Half-Life (t1/2) of Selinexor6.2 HourStandard Deviation 1.71
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationTerminal Phase Half-Life (t1/2) of Selinexor5.9 HourStandard Deviation 1.36
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationTerminal Phase Half-Life (t1/2) of Selinexor5.6 HourStandard Deviation 1
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationTerminal Phase Half-Life (t1/2) of Selinexor5.7 HourStandard Deviation 1.06
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletTerminal Phase Half-Life (t1/2) of Selinexor6.7 HourStandard Deviation 1.34
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletTerminal Phase Half-Life (t1/2) of Selinexor6.6 HourStandard Deviation 1.14
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment C: Oral SuspensionTerminal Phase Half-Life (t1/2) of Selinexor6.5 HourStandard Deviation 1.51
Primary

Time of First Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Selinexor

Tmax was defined as time of first observation of Cmax, taken directly from the plasma concentration data.

Time frame: Day 1 of weeks 1-3 in Cycle 1: Pre-dose (within 10 minutes before swallowing study drug), 15, 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 18, 24, and 48 hours post-dose

Population: PK population included all participants in Arms 1, 2 and Arms 4, 5, and 6 who received selinexor, and for whom the PK profile for all treatments could be adequately characterized. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants who are evaluable for this outcome measure. As pre-specified in SAP and protocol Arm 3 was a non-PK group assessment, so data was not collected and analyzed for this PK outcome.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationTime of First Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Selinexor1.5 Hour
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationTime of First Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Selinexor3.4 Hour
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationTime of First Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Selinexor3.4 Hour
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationTime of First Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Selinexor3.8 Hour
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletTime of First Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Selinexor2.1 Hour
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletTime of First Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Selinexor3.0 Hour
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment C: Oral SuspensionTime of First Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Selinexor1.6 Hour
Secondary

Duration of Stable Disease as Per RECIST v1.1 Criteria

Duration of at least stable disease was defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to first documented radiologic evidence of disease recurrence or progression as per RECIST v1.1 Criteria. Participants without evidence of progression were censored at time of last disease assessment. Progressive Disease (PD) was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of measured lesions taking as references the smallest sum of diameters recorded since the treatment started. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Appearance of one or more new lesions also constituted progressive disease.

Time frame: From the date of first dose of study treatment to first documented radiologic evidence of disease recurrence or progression, censored date (up to 39 months)

Population: Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of selinexor. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed as per disease specific sarcoma.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationDuration of Stable Disease as Per RECIST v1.1 Criteria7.49 Months
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationDuration of Stable Disease as Per RECIST v1.1 Criteria3.94 Months
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationDuration of Stable Disease as Per RECIST v1.1 Criteria8.34 Months
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECGs)

Twelve lead ECGs were obtained after the participant has rested in a supine position for at least 5 minutes. Clinically significant findings were defined as such in the opinion of the investigator or designated physician occurring at any time on treatment from normal pre-dose.

Time frame: From screening up to 30 days post last study drug dose

Population: Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of selinexor. As pre-specified in SAP, safety data was collected and analyzed as per the individual arms with specified treatment sequences only.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECGs)2 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECGs)0 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECGs)1 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECGs)0 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECGs)0 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECGs)0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs

Vital signs included blood pressure (systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure). Measurements were made after the participant had been resting supine for a minimum of 5 minutes. Clinically significant findings were defined as such in the opinion of the investigator occurring at any time on treatment from normal pre-dose based on the condition met (Yes/No). Number of participants with clinically significant changes in vital signs with condition (Yes) were only reported.

Time frame: From screening up to 30 days post last study drug dose (up to 39 months)

Population: Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of selinexor. As pre-specified in SAP, safety data was collected and analyzed as per the individual arms with specified treatment sequences only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)2 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 90 mmHg (Yes)4 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: < 100 mmHg and > 20 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)1 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 20 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)2 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure : > 140 mmHg (Yes)2 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: < 60 mmHg and > 5 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)2 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 160 mmHg and > 20 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)0 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: < 60 mmHg and > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)2 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: < 60 mmHg (Yes)2 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 5 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)6 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: < 100 mmHg (Yes)2 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 160 mmHg and > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)0 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 100 mmHg and > 5 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)0 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 20 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)1 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 5 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)8 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: < 100 mmHg and > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)1 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)3 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 160 mmHg (Yes)0 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)2 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 100 mmHg and > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)0 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)5 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 100 mmHg (Yes)0 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 160 mmHg and > 20 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)0 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure : > 140 mmHg (Yes)3 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: < 60 mmHg and > 5 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)2 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: < 100 mmHg (Yes)5 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: < 60 mmHg and > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)2 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)4 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 20 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)4 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 100 mmHg and > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)0 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 5 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)5 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 100 mmHg (Yes)0 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: < 100 mmHg and > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)4 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 90 mmHg (Yes)3 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: < 100 mmHg and > 20 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)1 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 100 mmHg and > 5 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)0 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)7 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 160 mmHg and > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)0 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: < 60 mmHg (Yes)3 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 20 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)5 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 5 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)7 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)6 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 160 mmHg (Yes)0 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)5 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: < 60 mmHg (Yes)10 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: < 100 mmHg (Yes)8 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)14 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 20 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)10 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: < 100 mmHg and > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)7 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: < 100 mmHg and > 20 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)4 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 5 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)15 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)12 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: < 60 mmHg and > 5 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)9 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: < 60 mmHg and > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)9 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure : > 140 mmHg (Yes)6 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 160 mmHg (Yes)1 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)11 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 20 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)3 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 160 mmHg and > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)1 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 160 mmHg and > 20 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)0 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 90 mmHg (Yes)6 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 100 mmHg (Yes)1 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 5 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)13 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)8 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 100 mmHg and > 5 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)1 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 100 mmHg and > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)0 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 160 mmHg (Yes)1 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 5 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)4 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)3 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: < 100 mmHg and > 20 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)2 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 20 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)4 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 160 mmHg and > 20 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)0 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure : > 140 mmHg (Yes)2 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 100 mmHg (Yes)1 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: < 100 mmHg (Yes)4 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: < 60 mmHg and > 5 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)2 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)2 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 90 mmHg (Yes)2 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: < 60 mmHg and > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)2 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: < 100 mmHg and > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)3 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 100 mmHg and > 5 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)1 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 20 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)1 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)6 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 100 mmHg and > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)1 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: < 60 mmHg (Yes)2 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)5 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 5 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)6 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 160 mmHg and > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)1 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)5 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 160 mmHg (Yes)0 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 5 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)4 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 100 mmHg and > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)0 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)4 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: < 60 mmHg (Yes)2 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 20 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)1 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 100 mmHg and > 5 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)0 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 160 mmHg and > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)0 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: < 100 mmHg and > 20 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)1 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 160 mmHg and > 20 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)0 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: < 100 mmHg and > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)3 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: < 100 mmHg (Yes)3 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 90 mmHg (Yes)3 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 100 mmHg (Yes)0 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 20 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)1 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 5 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)4 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)3 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: < 60 mmHg and > 5 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)1 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: < 60 mmHg and > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)0 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)3 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure : > 140 mmHg (Yes)3 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 100 mmHg and > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)0 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 160 mmHg and > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)0 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)4 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 5 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)6 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)5 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: < 100 mmHg and > 20 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)2 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 20 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)4 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: < 60 mmHg (Yes)2 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure : > 140 mmHg (Yes)3 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: < 60 mmHg and > 5 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)2 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: < 100 mmHg (Yes)3 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)5 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 10 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)4 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 160 mmHg (Yes)0 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 90 mmHg (Yes)3 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 20 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)3 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: < 100 mmHg and > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)2 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSystolic Blood Pressure: > 160 mmHg and > 20 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)0 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 5 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)5 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 100 mmHg (Yes)0 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: < 60 mmHg and > 10 mmHg decrease from baseline (Yes)2 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDiastolic Blood Pressure: > 100 mmHg and > 5 mmHg increase from baseline (Yes)0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities

Number of participants with clinically significant laboratory abnormalities including clinical chemistry, hematology, coagulation and urinalysis. Number of participants with clinically significant laboratory abnormalities which were deemed clinically significant by the investigator were reported.

Time frame: From screening up to 30 days post last study drug dose (up to 39 months)

Population: Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of selinexor. As pre-specified in SAP, safety data was collected and analyzed as per the individual arms with specified treatment sequences only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematology1 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesUrinalysis0 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesCoagulation: Prothrombin intl. normalized ratio0 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesClinical Chemistry4 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesUrinalysis0 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesClinical Chemistry1 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematology2 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesCoagulation: Prothrombin intl. normalized ratio0 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesCoagulation: Prothrombin intl. normalized ratio1 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesClinical Chemistry7 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematology7 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesUrinalysis0 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesCoagulation: Prothrombin intl. normalized ratio0 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesClinical Chemistry1 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematology1 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesUrinalysis0 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesUrinalysis0 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesClinical Chemistry1 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematology2 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesCoagulation: Prothrombin intl. normalized ratio0 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesClinical Chemistry1 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematology1 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesUrinalysis0 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesCoagulation: Prothrombin intl. normalized ratio0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Growth Modulation Index (GMI) Less Than or Equal to (<=) 1.33 and Greater Than (>) 1.33

GMI was defined as the ratio between the TTP with selinexor and the TTP with the most recent prior treatment. GMI was calculated, using a previously described threshold of 1.3 or greater as a sign of potential drug activity and improved overall survival.

Time frame: Up to 39 months

Population: Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of selinexor. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed as per disease specific sarcoma. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Growth Modulation Index (GMI) Less Than or Equal to (<=) 1.33 and Greater Than (>) 1.33GMI <= 1.3311 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Growth Modulation Index (GMI) Less Than or Equal to (<=) 1.33 and Greater Than (>) 1.33GMI > 1.337 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Growth Modulation Index (GMI) Less Than or Equal to (<=) 1.33 and Greater Than (>) 1.33GMI <= 1.338 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Growth Modulation Index (GMI) Less Than or Equal to (<=) 1.33 and Greater Than (>) 1.33GMI > 1.334 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Growth Modulation Index (GMI) Less Than or Equal to (<=) 1.33 and Greater Than (>) 1.33GMI <= 1.3317 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Growth Modulation Index (GMI) Less Than or Equal to (<=) 1.33 and Greater Than (>) 1.33GMI > 1.333 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product during the course of a study and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. SAE defined as any AE, occurring at any dose (including after the informed consent form was signed and prior to dosing) that and regardless of causality that: results in death, is life-threatening (participant was at immediate risk of death from event as it occurred), requires in-patient hospitalization (formal admission to a hospital for medical reasons) or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAE was defined as any AE with onset or worsening of a pre-existing condition on or after the first administration of study treatment through 30 days following last dose or any event considered drug-related by the investigator through the end of the study.

Time frame: From screening up to 30 days post last study drug dose (up to 39 months)

Population: Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of selinexor. As pre-specified in SAP, safety data was collected and analyzed as per the individual arms with specified treatment sequences only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsParticipants with TEAEs10 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsParticipants with Serious TEAEs4 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsParticipants with TEAEs9 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsParticipants with Serious TEAEs5 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsParticipants with TEAEs17 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsParticipants with Serious TEAEs5 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsParticipants with TEAEs7 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsParticipants with Serious TEAEs2 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsParticipants with TEAEs5 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsParticipants with Serious TEAEs2 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsParticipants with TEAEs6 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsParticipants with Serious TEAEs4 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity

AE was defined as the appearance of (or worsening of any pre-existing) undesirable sign, symptom, or medical condition that occur after participant's signed informed consent obtained. TEAE was defined as any AE with onset or worsening of a pre-existing condition on or after the first administration of study treatment through 28 days following last dose or any event considered drug-related by the investigator through the end of the study. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE displays Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: Grade 1: mild, Grade 2: moderate, Grade 3: severe, Grade 4: life-threatening, and Grade 5: death.

Time frame: From screening up to 30 days post last study drug dose (up to 39 months)

Population: Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of selinexor. As pre-specified in SAP, safety data was collected and analyzed as per the individual arms with specified treatment sequences only.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityGrade 4: Life Threatening2 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityGrade 2: Moderate3 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityGrade 1: Mild0 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityGrade 5: Fatal0 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityGrade 3: Severe5 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityGrade 2: Moderate2 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityGrade 4: Life Threatening1 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityGrade 1: Mild0 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityGrade 5: Fatal1 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityGrade 3: Severe5 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityGrade 2: Moderate2 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityGrade 4: Life Threatening0 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityGrade 5: Fatal1 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityGrade 3: Severe14 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityGrade 1: Mild0 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityGrade 3: Severe3 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityGrade 1: Mild0 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityGrade 2: Moderate1 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityGrade 4: Life Threatening3 Participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment D: Low-Fat Meal, Capsule FormulationNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityGrade 5: Fatal0 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityGrade 4: Life Threatening1 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityGrade 5: Fatal1 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityGrade 1: Mild0 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityGrade 2: Moderate1 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment A: First Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityGrade 3: Severe2 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityGrade 5: Fatal0 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityGrade 4: Life Threatening1 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityGrade 2: Moderate1 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityGrade 1: Mild0 Participants
Arms 4, 5, and 6: Treatment B: Second Generation TabletNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityGrade 3: Severe4 Participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from date first dose of study treatment to the date of death. Participants who were still alive prior to the data cutoff for final efficacy analysis, or who dropped out prior to study end, were censored at the day they were last known to be alive.

Time frame: From first dose of study treatment to death, censored date (up to 39 months)

Population: Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of selinexor. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed as per disease specific sarcoma.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationOverall Survival (OS)9.00 Months
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationOverall Survival (OS)7.03 Months
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationOverall Survival (OS)NA Months
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 Criteria

Best overall response rate was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved complete response (CR), and partial response (PR), as assessed by the RECIST v1.1 criteria. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non target) must have reduction in the short axis to less than (\<) 10 millimeter (mm). PR was defined as At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter (LD).

Time frame: From the date of first documented response until the date of documented progression or last disease assessment (up to 39 months)

Population: Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of selinexor. Data for this outcome measure analysis was planned to be analyzed as per disease specific sarcoma.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationPercentage of Participants With Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 CriteriaComplete Response (CR)0 Percentage of participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationPercentage of Participants With Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 CriteriaPartial Response (PR)0 Percentage of participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationPercentage of Participants With Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 CriteriaComplete Response (CR)0 Percentage of participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationPercentage of Participants With Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 CriteriaPartial Response (PR)0 Percentage of participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationPercentage of Participants With Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 CriteriaComplete Response (CR)0 Percentage of participants
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationPercentage of Participants With Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 CriteriaPartial Response (PR)0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per RECIST v1.1 Criteria

PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the first date of Independent Review Committee (IRC)-confirmed PD per RECIST v1.1, or death due to any cause. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD), taking as reference the smallest sum of the longest diameter (SLD) recorded from baseline or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Participants who were last known to be alive and without evidence of progression were censored at time of last disease assessment. If date of progression or death occurred after more than 1 missed disease assessment interval, or 30 days after end of treatment, participants were censored at the time of last evaluable disease assessment prior to the missed assessment.

Time frame: From first dose of study treatment to time of disease progression or death, censored date (up to 39 months)

Population: Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of selinexor. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed as per disease specific sarcoma.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationProgression Free Survival (PFS) as Per RECIST v1.1 Criteria4.44 Months
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationProgression Free Survival (PFS) as Per RECIST v1.1 Criteria3.52 Months
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationProgression Free Survival (PFS) as Per RECIST v1.1 Criteria1.84 Months
Secondary

Time to Progression (TTP)

TTP was defined as the time from date of first dose of study treatment to first documented evidence of disease recurrence or progression, or death due to disease progression, whichever occurred first. Participants without evidence of progression were censored at time of last evaluable disease assessment.

Time frame: From first dose of study treatment to first documented evidence of disease recurrence or progression, or death, censored date (up to 39 months)

Population: Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of selinexor. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed as per disease specific sarcoma.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment A: Fasted, Tablet FormulationTime to Progression (TTP)4.44 Months
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment B: High-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationTime to Progression (TTP)3.52 Months
Arms 1 and 2: Treatment C: Low-Fat Meal, Tablet FormulationTime to Progression (TTP)1.74 Months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026