Skip to content

Dual Time Point PET in Lymphoma

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01894945
Enrollment
30
Registered
2013-07-10
Start date
2012-03-31
Completion date
2014-07-31
Last updated
2013-07-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hodgkin's and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Brief summary

This study aims to investigate the value of dual time point PET/CT in lymphoma. Since FDG uptake is linked to glucose metabolism, PET imaging is also used to detect suspected sites for infectious and inflammatory disorders. In a clinical setting, it is a challenge to distinguish between FDG uptake in benign and malignant lesions and this gives rise to a considerable quantity of false positive results and decreased positive predictive values. Performing FDG-PET imaging sixty minutes after injection is common practice in the staging and surveillance of lymphoma but this procedure may not be optimal, especially not in settings where benign inflammatory lesions are of clinical concern. In an attempt to find an alternative method for this discrimination, dual time point FDG-PET was introduced. This technique has shown itself to be a potentially promising method in FDG-PET imaging for distinguishing between malignant and benign lesions using SUV values. The reason for the different FDG uptake patterns between inflammatory and malignant lesions is unclear. Several factors may contribute to this phenomenon on a cellular basis. It has been shown that cancer cells exhibit increased numbers of glucose transporter and low level of glucose-6-phosphatase. Varying levels between different cancer cell types may explain the different FDG uptake curves. Because various cell types exhibit varying rates of FDG uptake we believe that kinetic investigation may prove to be of value in understanding different types of lymphoma and identifying how to perform precise imaging for staging and surveillance.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Odense University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age\>18 years * Planned for curative treatment

Exclusion criteria

* Previously treatment with chemotherapy or irradiation * Primary CNS lymphoma * Recurrent lymphoma * Transformation from indolent lymphoma * Presence of diabetes mellitus, HIV, chronic inflammatory disease or infections * Pregnancy or lactation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression Free Survival2 yearsTo evaluate the predictive value of PET after 60min compared to PET after 180min in terms of outcome.
Progression free survival3 yearsTo evaluate the predictive value of PET after 60min compared to PET after 180min in terms of outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall survival2 years, 3 yearsTo evaluate the predictive value of PET after 60min compared to PET after 180min in terms of outcome.

Other

MeasureTime frame
To compare SUVmax with the expression of GLUT1, hexokinase, G6Pase in lymphoma cells1 day (After diagnostic biopsy)

Countries

Denmark

Contacts

Primary ContactKaren Juul Mylam, MD
karen.mylam@rsyd.dk0045 6541 3186

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026