Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of a New Formulation of Chondroitin Sulfate and Glucosamine Sulfate to Treat Knee Osteoarthritis

Phase III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Chondroitin Sulfate and Glucosamine Sulfate in Combination Versus Placebo in Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01893905
Enrollment
158
Registered
2013-07-09
Start date
2013-06-30
Completion date
2014-08-31
Last updated
2017-08-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Osteoarthritis

Brief summary

The main objective is to assess the efficacy of a new formulation containing chondroitin sulfate and glucosamine sulfate (CS+GS) compared with placebo in patients with primary osteoarthritis of the knee.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a new combination of chondroitin sulfate and glucosamine sulfate administered once a day is superior to placebo in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe knee osteoarthritis. Eligible patients will be randomized 1:1 and the treatments will be administered for 24 weeks. Clinical efficacy at the end of treatment will be evaluated. Safety will be evaluated through adverse events recoding during the study period.

Interventions

DRUGCS+SG

Chondroitin sulfate+glucosamine sulfate orally administered once a day for 24 weeks.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo of chondroitin sulfate+glucosamine sulfate orally administered once a day for 24 weeks.

Sponsors

Tedec-Meiji Farma, S.A.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient \>= 45 years . * Primary OA of the knee according to ACR criteria. * OA radiological grade II-III according to Kellgren and Lawrence. * Patients with moderate-severe pain.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with clinical significant trauma or surgery in the target knee. * Concurrent arthritic disease (antecedents and/or current signs) that could confound or interfere with the evaluation of pain efficacy such as chondrocalcinosis, Paget's disease of the ipsilateral limb to the target knee, rheumatoid arthritis, aseptic osteonecrosis, gout, septic arthritis, ochronosis, acromegaly, haemochromatosis, Wilson's disease, osteochondromatosis, seronegative spondyloarthropathy, mixed connective tissue disease, collagen vascular disease, psoriasis, inflammatory bowel disease or fibromyalgia. * Pain in other parts of the body greater than the knee pain that could interfere with the evaluation. * Subjects with any active acute or chronic infections requiring antimicrobial therapy, or serious viral (e.g., hepatitis, herpes zoster, HIV positivity) or fungal infections. * Clinical diagnosis established of uncontrolled diabetes mellitus. * Patients with asthma. * History of hypersensitivity to the active drugs or any excipients of the formulations.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Pain According to VAS (0-100 mm)24 weeksVAS=The visual analogue scale is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. When responding to a VAS item, the patients specify their condition by indicating a position along a continuous line between two end-points. In our case a 0-100 mm line was used to define the degree of pain. The change between baseline and each evaluation visit (week 4, week 12 and week 24) was calculated to evaluate the efficacy of the treatments (a negative number represents a decrease in pain).

Countries

Spain

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
CS+SG
Chondroitin sulfate+glucosamine sulfate
80
Placebo
Placebo oral
78
Total158

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event93
Overall StudyLack of adherence to treatment20
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy57
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall StudyOther reason13
Overall StudyProtocol Violation61
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCS+SGPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous65.49 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.17
67.60 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9
66.53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.58
Sex: Female, Male
Female
65 Participants67 Participants132 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants11 Participants26 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
20 / 8018 / 78
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 802 / 78

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Pain According to VAS (0-100 mm)

VAS=The visual analogue scale is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. When responding to a VAS item, the patients specify their condition by indicating a position along a continuous line between two end-points. In our case a 0-100 mm line was used to define the degree of pain. The change between baseline and each evaluation visit (week 4, week 12 and week 24) was calculated to evaluate the efficacy of the treatments (a negative number represents a decrease in pain).

Time frame: 24 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CS+SGChange in Pain According to VAS (0-100 mm)-11.86 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.42
PlaceboChange in Pain According to VAS (0-100 mm)-20.57 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.41
p-value: <0.0307Pocock approach

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026