Skip to content

Dose-response Study of Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A to Treat Spasticity of the Leg(s) in Cerebral Palsy

Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Dose-response Study of Three Doses Xeomin® (incobotulinumtoxinA, NT 201) for the Treatment of Lower Limb Spasticity in Children and Adolescents (Age 2 - 17 Years) With Cerebral Palsy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01893411
Enrollment
311
Registered
2013-07-09
Start date
2013-06-30
Completion date
2016-05-31
Last updated
2021-08-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lower Limb Spasticity Due to Cerebral Palsy

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether injections of Botulinum toxin type A into muscles of the leg(s) are effective in treating children/adolescents (age 2-17 years) with increased muscle tension/uncontrollable muscle stiffness (spasticity) due to cerebral palsy.

Interventions

DRUGIncobotulinumtoxinA (16 Units per kg body weight)

Active ingredient: Clostridium Botulinum neurotoxin Type A free from complexing proteins. Solution for injection prepared by reconstitution of powder with 0.9% Sodium Chloride (NaCl); Total volume 8.0 mL; 400 units; Mode of administration: intramuscular injection into spastic muscles.

DRUGIncobotulinumtoxinA (12 Units per kg body weight)

Active ingredient: Clostridium Botulinum neurotoxin Type A free from complexing proteins. Solution for injection prepared by reconstitution of powder with 0.9% Sodium Chloride (NaCl); Total volume 8.0 mL; 300 units; Mode of administration: intramuscular injection into spastic muscles.

DRUGIncobotulinumtoxinA (4 Units per kg body weight)

Active ingredient: Clostridium Botulinum neurotoxin Type A free from complexing proteins. Solution for injection prepared by reconstitution of powder with 0.9% Sodium Chloride (NaCl); Total volume 8.0 mL; 100 units; Mode of administration: intramuscular injection into spastic muscles.

Sponsors

Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female or male subject of 2 to 17 years of age (inclusive). * Uni- or bilateral cerebral palsy with clinical need for uni- or bilateral LL injections with BoNT for the treatment of spasticity. * Ashworth Scale \[AS\] score ≥2 in plantar flexors (at least unilaterally). * Clinical need for a total dose of 16 U/kg BW NT 201 (maximum of 400 U) for the treatment of LL spasticity according to the clinical judgment of the investigator.

Exclusion criteria

* Fixed contracture defined as severe restriction of the range of joint movement on passive stretch or predominant forms of muscle hypertonia other than spasticity (e.g., dystonia) in the target limb(s). * Surgery on pes equinus on side(s) intended to be treated with BoNT injections in this study within 12 months prior to Screening Visit (V1), in the screening period or planned for the time of participation in this study. * Hip flexion requiring BoNT injection.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in the Ashworth Scale (AS) Score of Plantar Flexors of the Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First Injection Cycle (1st IC)Baseline, Week 4The Ashworth Scale (AS) is a well known and commonly used scale in clinical trials with spasticity. In spastic muscles the resistance to passive movement is assessed. It is a 5-point scale that ranges from 0 (= no increase in tone) to 4 (=limb rigid in flexion or extension). For participants with bilateral pes equinus, the body side for primary efficacy analysis i.e. primary body side was decided by investigator at screening and was kept throughout the entire study. For participants with unilateral treatment, the treated body side was kept throughout the entire study. Values represent least square (LS) mean differences between baseline and Week 4 resulting from MMRM (Mixed Model Repeated Measurement) models comparing high versus low and in a second step mid versus low dose groups, respectively. Values for the low group may differ slightly depending on the comparison and are therefore provided separately for each comparison.
Co-primary Variable: Investigator's Global Impression of Change of Plantar Flexor Spasticity Scale (GICS-PF) of the Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First Injection CycleBaseline, Week 4This variable is classified as co-primary to satisfy a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) request. The GICS-PF scale is a 7-Point Likert Scale for the assessment of the functional change due to treatment of plantar flexor spasticity only. Ranges from +3 (very much improved function) to -3 (very much worse function). For participants with bilateral pes equinus, the body side for primary efficacy analysis i.e. primary body side was decided by investigator at screening and was kept throughout the entire study. For participants with unilateral treatment, the treated body side was kept throughout the entire study. Values represent least square (LS) mean differences between baseline and Week 4 resulting from ANCOVA models comparing high versus low and in a second step mid versus low dose groups, respectively. Values for the low group may differ slightly depending on the comparison and are therefore provided separately for each comparison.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes From Baseline in AS Score of Plantar Flexors of the Primary Body Side at Day 57 (Week 8) and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleBaseline to Week 8 and 12 of 1st IC and 2nd IC (Week 20-44 and 24-48)The Ashworth Scale (AS) is a well known and commonly used scale in clinical trials with spasticity. In spastic muscles the resistance to passive movement is assessed. It is a 5-point scale that ranges from 0 (=no increase in tone) to 4 (=limb rigid in flexion or extension). For participants with bilateral pes equinus, the body side for primary efficacy analysis i.e. primary body side was decided by investigator at screening and was kept throughout the entire study. For participants with unilateral treatment, the treated body side was kept throughout the entire study. Values represent least square (LS) mean differences between baseline and the respective week (w) resulting from MMRM (Mixed Model Repeated Measurement) models comparing high versus low and in a second step mid versus low dose groups, respectively. Values for the low group may differ slightly depending on the comparison and are therefore provided separately for each comparison.
Changes From Baseline in AS Score of Knee Flexors or Thigh Adductors in Participants With Unilateral Treatment at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleBaseline to Week 4 of 1st IC and 2nd IC (Week 16-40)The Ashworth Scale (AS) is a well known and commonly used scale in clinical trials with spasticity. In spastic muscles the resistance to passive movement is assessed. It is a 5-point scale that ranges from 0 (=no increase in tone) to 4 (=limb rigid in flexion or extension). Values represent least square (LS) mean differences between baseline and the respective week (w) resulting from MMRM (Mixed Model Repeated Measurement) models comparing high versus low and in a second step mid versus low dose groups, respectively. Values for the low group may differ slightly depending on the comparison and are therefore provided separately for each comparison. KF = Knee Flexors; TA = Thigh Adductors; w = week.
Changes From Baseline in Modified Tardieu Scale [MTS] of Plantar Flexors of Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4), Day 57 (Week 8), and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleBaseline to Week 4, 8, and 12 of 1st IC and 2nd IC (Week 16-40, 20-44 and 24-48)The Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS) assesses spastic muscle tone by subtraction of two angles measured at different conditions of passive muscle stretch. R2 is the angle of passive range of motion with a passive movement at slow speed. R1 is the angle where a catch-and-release or clonus can be triggered at the fastest possible speed. Score values represent the measured (R2-R1) difference, i.e. the dynamic tone component of the examined muscle(s). Decreases of (R2-R1) represent reductions in the dynamic component of spasticity, i.e. improvement of dynamic muscle spasticity. Values represent least square (LS) mean differences between baseline and the respective week (w) resulting from ANCOVA models comparing high versus low and in a second step mid versus low dose groups, respectively. Values for the low group may differ slightly depending on the model used for comparison and are therefore provided separately for each comparison.
Investigator's, Child's/Adolescent's, and Parent's/Caregiver's Global Impression of Change Scale [GICS] at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and Second Injection CycleBaseline to Week 4 of 1st IC and 2nd IC (Week 16-40)The Global Impression of Change Scales (GICS) are global outcomes to assess the impression of change due to treatment. GICS were assessed by the investigator, by the participant (if feasible) and by parents'/caregiver (if applicable). GICS are 7-Point Likert Scales ranging from +3 (very much improved function) to -3 (very much worse function). Values represent least square (LS) mean differences between baseline and the respective week (w) resulting from MMRM (Mixed Model Repeated Measurement) models comparing high versus low and in a second step mid versus low dose groups, respectively. Values for the low group may differ slightly depending on the comparison and are therefore provided separately for each comparison.
Investigator's Global Impression of Change of GICS-Plantar-Flexor of Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and Second Injection CycleBaseline to Week 4 of 1st IC and 2nd IC (Week 16-40)The GICS are global outcomes to assess the impression of change due to treatment. GICS were assessed by the investigator, by the participant (if feasible) and by parents'/caregiver (if applicable). GICS are 7-Point Likert Scales ranging from +3 (very much improved function) to -3 (very much worse function). For participants with bilateral pes equinus, the body side for primary efficacy analysis i.e. primary body side was decided by investigator at screening and was kept throughout the entire study. For participants with unilateral treatment, the treated body side was kept throughout the entire study. Values represent least square (LS) mean differences between baseline and the respective week (w) resulting from ANCOVA models comparing high versus low and in a second step mid versus low dose groups, respectively. Values for the low group may differ slightly depending on the comparison and are therefore provided separately for each comparison.
Changes From Baseline in Gross Motor Function Measure [GMFM]-66 Score at the End of First Injection Cycle and at the End of Study VisitBaseline to Week 12-36 of 1st IC and 2nd IC (End of study = Week 24-72)The GMFM-66 is a standardized observational 66-item instrument designed and validated to measure change in gross motor function over time in participants with cerebral palsy. Score values represent the total GMFM-66 score. Total GMFM scores range from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Values represent least square (LS) mean differences between baseline and the respective week (w) resulting from ANCOVA models comparing high versus low and in a second step mid versus low dose groups, respectively. Values for the low group may differ slightly depending on the comparison and are therefore provided separately for each comparison.
Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleBaseline to Week 4, 8, and 12 of 1st IC and 2nd IC (Week 16-40, 20-44 and 24-48)The QPS is a patient-reported outcome for children and adolescents (2-17 years) with cerebral palsy on spasticity-related pain. Pain intensity (from participants) and pain frequency (from parent/caregiver) to be assessed with 'Questionnaire on Pain caused by Spasticity \[QPS\]'. The QPS Total Score for pain intensity ranges from 0 ('No Hurt') to 10 ('Hurt Worst'). The QPS Total Score for the observed pain frequency ranges from 0 (Never) to 4 (Always). Values represent least square (LS) mean differences between baseline and the respective week (w) resulting from ANCOVA models comparing high versus low and in a second step mid versus low dose groups, respectively. Values for the low group may differ slightly depending on the comparison and are therefore provided separately for each comparison.
Change From Baseline in the AS Score of Plantar Flexors of the Nonprimary Body Side in Participants With Bilateral Treatment at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First (1st) and Second Injection Cycle (2nd IC)Baseline, Week 4 of 1st IC and Week 16-40 of 2nd ICThe Ashworth Scale (AS) is a well known and commonly used scale in clinical trials with spasticity. In spastic muscles the resistance to passive movement is assessed. It is a 5-point scale that ranges from 0 (=no increase in tone) to 4 (=limb rigid in flexion or extension). Values represent least square (LS) mean differences between baseline and the respective week (w) resulting from MMRM (Mixed Model Repeated Measurement) models comparing high versus low and in a second step mid versus low dose groups, respectively. Values for the low group may differ slightly depending on the comparison and are therefore provided separately for each comparison.
Occurrence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Overall and Per Injection CycleUp to End of study visit (Week 24-72)Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are events observed from the time point of first injection until end of study visit (week 24-72). Values reported here refer to the number of participants affected.
Occurrence of Participants With TEAEs of Special Interest (TEAESIs) Overall and Per Injection CycleUp to End of study visit (Week 24-72)Adverse Events (AE's) occurring after treatment that were thought to possibly indicate toxin spread throughout the trial conduct are defined as AE's of Special Interests. Values reported here refer to the number of participants affected.
Occurrence of Serious TEAEs (TESAEs) Overall and Per Injection CycleUp to End of study visit (Week 24-72)Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) are events observed from the time point of first injection until end of study visit (week 24-72). Values reported here refer to the number of participants affected.
Occurrence of TEAEs Related to Treatment as Assessed by the Investigator Overall and Per Injection CycleUp to End of study visit (Week 24-72)Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are events observed from the time point of first injection until end of study visit (week 24-72). Values reported here refer to the number of participants affected.
Occurrence of TEAEs by Worst Intensity Overall and Per Injection CycleUp to End of study visit (Week 24-72)Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are events observed from the time point of first injection until end of study visit (week 24-72). Values reported here refer to the number of participants affected.
Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection CycleUp to End of study visit (Week 24-72)Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are events observed from the time point of first injection until end of study visit (week 24-72). Values reported here refer to the number of participants affected.
Occurrence of TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation Overall and Per Injection CycleUp to End of study visit (Week 24-72)Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEASs) are events observed from the time point of first injection until end of study visit (week 24-72). Values reported here refer to the number of participants affected.
Time to Reinjection for Each of the Three Dose Groups for the First and Second Injection CycleBaseline up to Week 24-72
Change From Baseline in the AS Score of Plantar Flexors of the Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4) of the Second Injection CycleBaseline to Week 4 of 2nd IC (Week 16-40)The Ashworth Scale (AS) is a well known and commonly used scale in clinical trials with spasticity. In spastic muscles the resistance to passive movement is assessed. It is a 5-point scale that ranges from 0 (=no increase in tone) to 4 (=limb rigid in flexion or extension). For participants with bilateral pes equinus, the body side for primary efficacy analysis i.e. primary body side was decided by investigator at screening and was kept throughout the entire study. For participants with unilateral treatment, the treated body side was kept throughout the entire study. Values represent least square (LS) mean differences between baseline and Week 16-40 resulting from MMRM (Mixed Model Repeated Measurement) models comparing high versus low and in a second step mid versus low dose groups, respectively. Values for the low group may differ slightly depending on the comparison and are therefore provided separately for each comparison.

Countries

Austria, Czechia, Estonia, France, Germany, Israel, Poland, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, South Korea, Spain, Turkey (Türkiye), Ukraine

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

The Safety Evaluation Set (SES) is the subset of all participants treated with study medication at least once.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)
Participants received 16 U/kg BW of IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin) with a maximum of 400 Units per injection treatment via intramuscular injection into spastic muscles.
156
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)
Participants received 12 U/kg BW of IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin) with a maximum of 300 Units per injection treatment via intramuscular injection into spastic muscles.
77
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)
Participants received 4 U/kg BW of IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin) with a maximum of 100 Units per injection treatment via intramuscular injection into spastic muscles.
78
Total311

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event100
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy210
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up201
Overall StudyOther313
Overall StudyPhysician Decision112
Overall StudyProtocol Violation100
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject743

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHigh Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
156 Participants77 Participants78 Participants311 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Continuous6.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9
6.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8
7.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6
6.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1
Sex: Female, Male
Female
83 Participants44 Participants42 Participants169 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
73 Participants33 Participants36 Participants142 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
23 / 15610 / 7715 / 78
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 1561 / 776 / 78

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in the Ashworth Scale (AS) Score of Plantar Flexors of the Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First Injection Cycle (1st IC)

The Ashworth Scale (AS) is a well known and commonly used scale in clinical trials with spasticity. In spastic muscles the resistance to passive movement is assessed. It is a 5-point scale that ranges from 0 (= no increase in tone) to 4 (=limb rigid in flexion or extension). For participants with bilateral pes equinus, the body side for primary efficacy analysis i.e. primary body side was decided by investigator at screening and was kept throughout the entire study. For participants with unilateral treatment, the treated body side was kept throughout the entire study. Values represent least square (LS) mean differences between baseline and Week 4 resulting from MMRM (Mixed Model Repeated Measurement) models comparing high versus low and in a second step mid versus low dose groups, respectively. Values for the low group may differ slightly depending on the comparison and are therefore provided separately for each comparison.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

Population: FAS population is subset in the SES for whom primary efficacy variable (participants who had at least an AS score of plantar flexor at baseline \[Day 1\] or investigator's Global Impression of Change of Plantar Flexor Spasticity Scale (GICS-PF) \[participants with bilateral treatment on same body side\] at Day 29 \[Week 4\] of the 1st IC) were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Change From Baseline in the Ashworth Scale (AS) Score of Plantar Flexors of the Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First Injection Cycle (1st IC)Week 4 of 1st IC (high versus low)-0.7 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.061
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change From Baseline in the Ashworth Scale (AS) Score of Plantar Flexors of the Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First Injection Cycle (1st IC)Week 4 of 1st IC (mid versus low)-0.7 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.089
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change From Baseline in the Ashworth Scale (AS) Score of Plantar Flexors of the Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First Injection Cycle (1st IC)Week 4 of 1st IC (high versus low)-0.66 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.084
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change From Baseline in the Ashworth Scale (AS) Score of Plantar Flexors of the Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First Injection Cycle (1st IC)Week 4 of 1st IC (mid versus low)-0.66 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.088
p-value: =0.6595% CI: [-0.23, 0.14]Mixed Model Repeated Measure
p-value: =0.74195% CI: [-0.26, 0.18]Mixed Model Repeated Measure
Primary

Co-primary Variable: Investigator's Global Impression of Change of Plantar Flexor Spasticity Scale (GICS-PF) of the Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First Injection Cycle

This variable is classified as co-primary to satisfy a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) request. The GICS-PF scale is a 7-Point Likert Scale for the assessment of the functional change due to treatment of plantar flexor spasticity only. Ranges from +3 (very much improved function) to -3 (very much worse function). For participants with bilateral pes equinus, the body side for primary efficacy analysis i.e. primary body side was decided by investigator at screening and was kept throughout the entire study. For participants with unilateral treatment, the treated body side was kept throughout the entire study. Values represent least square (LS) mean differences between baseline and Week 4 resulting from ANCOVA models comparing high versus low and in a second step mid versus low dose groups, respectively. Values for the low group may differ slightly depending on the comparison and are therefore provided separately for each comparison.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

Population: FAS population is subset in the SES for whom the primary efficacy variable (participants who had at least an AS score of plantar flexor at baseline \[Day 1\] or the investigator's GICS-PF \[for participants with bilateral treatment on same body side\] at Day 29 \[Week 4\] of the first injection cycle) were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Co-primary Variable: Investigator's Global Impression of Change of Plantar Flexor Spasticity Scale (GICS-PF) of the Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First Injection CycleWeek 4 of 1st IC (high versus low)1.53 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.059
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Co-primary Variable: Investigator's Global Impression of Change of Plantar Flexor Spasticity Scale (GICS-PF) of the Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First Injection CycleWeek 4 of 1st IC (mid versus low)1.38 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.092
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Co-primary Variable: Investigator's Global Impression of Change of Plantar Flexor Spasticity Scale (GICS-PF) of the Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First Injection CycleWeek 4 of 1st IC (high versus low)1.37 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.081
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Co-primary Variable: Investigator's Global Impression of Change of Plantar Flexor Spasticity Scale (GICS-PF) of the Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First Injection CycleWeek 4 of 1st IC (mid versus low)1.32 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
p-value: =0.07595% CI: [-0.02, 0.34]Mixed Model Repeated Measure
p-value: =0.60395% CI: [-0.16, 0.27]Mixed Model Repeated Measure
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the AS Score of Plantar Flexors of the Nonprimary Body Side in Participants With Bilateral Treatment at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First (1st) and Second Injection Cycle (2nd IC)

The Ashworth Scale (AS) is a well known and commonly used scale in clinical trials with spasticity. In spastic muscles the resistance to passive movement is assessed. It is a 5-point scale that ranges from 0 (=no increase in tone) to 4 (=limb rigid in flexion or extension). Values represent least square (LS) mean differences between baseline and the respective week (w) resulting from MMRM (Mixed Model Repeated Measurement) models comparing high versus low and in a second step mid versus low dose groups, respectively. Values for the low group may differ slightly depending on the comparison and are therefore provided separately for each comparison.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4 of 1st IC and Week 16-40 of 2nd IC

Population: FAS population is subset in the SES for whom the primary efficacy variable (participants who had at least an AS score of plantar flexor at baseline \[Day 1\] or the investigator's GICS-PF \[for participants with bilateral treatment on same body side\] at Day 29 \[Week 4\] of the first injection cycle) were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Change From Baseline in the AS Score of Plantar Flexors of the Nonprimary Body Side in Participants With Bilateral Treatment at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First (1st) and Second Injection Cycle (2nd IC)Week 4 of 1st IC (high versus low)-0.76 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.073
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Change From Baseline in the AS Score of Plantar Flexors of the Nonprimary Body Side in Participants With Bilateral Treatment at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First (1st) and Second Injection Cycle (2nd IC)Week 4 of 2nd IC (high versus low)-0.95 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.077
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change From Baseline in the AS Score of Plantar Flexors of the Nonprimary Body Side in Participants With Bilateral Treatment at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First (1st) and Second Injection Cycle (2nd IC)Week 4 of 1st IC (mid versus low)-0.6 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.105
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change From Baseline in the AS Score of Plantar Flexors of the Nonprimary Body Side in Participants With Bilateral Treatment at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First (1st) and Second Injection Cycle (2nd IC)Week 4 of 2nd IC (mid versus low)-0.85 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.124
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change From Baseline in the AS Score of Plantar Flexors of the Nonprimary Body Side in Participants With Bilateral Treatment at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First (1st) and Second Injection Cycle (2nd IC)Week 4 of 1st IC (mid versus low)-0.58 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.108
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change From Baseline in the AS Score of Plantar Flexors of the Nonprimary Body Side in Participants With Bilateral Treatment at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First (1st) and Second Injection Cycle (2nd IC)Week 4 of 2nd IC (mid versus low)-0.76 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.123
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change From Baseline in the AS Score of Plantar Flexors of the Nonprimary Body Side in Participants With Bilateral Treatment at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First (1st) and Second Injection Cycle (2nd IC)Week 4 of 2nd IC (high versus low)-0.74 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.106
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change From Baseline in the AS Score of Plantar Flexors of the Nonprimary Body Side in Participants With Bilateral Treatment at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First (1st) and Second Injection Cycle (2nd IC)Week 4 of 1st IC (high versus low)-0.61 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.104
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the AS Score of Plantar Flexors of the Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4) of the Second Injection Cycle

The Ashworth Scale (AS) is a well known and commonly used scale in clinical trials with spasticity. In spastic muscles the resistance to passive movement is assessed. It is a 5-point scale that ranges from 0 (=no increase in tone) to 4 (=limb rigid in flexion or extension). For participants with bilateral pes equinus, the body side for primary efficacy analysis i.e. primary body side was decided by investigator at screening and was kept throughout the entire study. For participants with unilateral treatment, the treated body side was kept throughout the entire study. Values represent least square (LS) mean differences between baseline and Week 16-40 resulting from MMRM (Mixed Model Repeated Measurement) models comparing high versus low and in a second step mid versus low dose groups, respectively. Values for the low group may differ slightly depending on the comparison and are therefore provided separately for each comparison.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 4 of 2nd IC (Week 16-40)

Population: FAS population is subset in the SES for whom the primary efficacy variable (participants who had at least an AS score of plantar flexor at baseline \[Day 1\] or the investigator's GICS-PF \[for participants with bilateral treatment on same body side\] at Day 29 \[Week 4\] of the first injection cycle) were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Change From Baseline in the AS Score of Plantar Flexors of the Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4) of the Second Injection CycleWeek 4 of 2nd IC (high versus low)-0.89 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.061
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change From Baseline in the AS Score of Plantar Flexors of the Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4) of the Second Injection CycleWeek 4 of 2nd IC (mid versus low)-1.03 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.094
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change From Baseline in the AS Score of Plantar Flexors of the Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4) of the Second Injection CycleWeek 4 of 2nd IC (high versus low)-0.82 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.082
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change From Baseline in the AS Score of Plantar Flexors of the Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4) of the Second Injection CycleWeek 4 of 2nd IC (mid versus low)-0.85 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.091
Secondary

Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection Cycle

The QPS is a patient-reported outcome for children and adolescents (2-17 years) with cerebral palsy on spasticity-related pain. Pain intensity (from participants) and pain frequency (from parent/caregiver) to be assessed with 'Questionnaire on Pain caused by Spasticity \[QPS\]'. The QPS Total Score for pain intensity ranges from 0 ('No Hurt') to 10 ('Hurt Worst'). The QPS Total Score for the observed pain frequency ranges from 0 (Never) to 4 (Always). Values represent least square (LS) mean differences between baseline and the respective week (w) resulting from ANCOVA models comparing high versus low and in a second step mid versus low dose groups, respectively. Values for the low group may differ slightly depending on the comparison and are therefore provided separately for each comparison.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 4, 8, and 12 of 1st IC and 2nd IC (Week 16-40, 20-44 and 24-48)

Population: FAS population is subset in the SES for whom the primary efficacy variable (participants who had at least an AS score of plantar flexor at baseline \[Day 1\] or the investigator's GICS-PF \[for participants with bilateral treatment on same body side\] at Day 29 \[Week 4\] of the first injection cycle) were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParticipant, w 4 of 2nd IC (high versus low)-0.53 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParticipant, w 4 of 1st IC (high versus low)-0.66 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.198
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParent/Caregiver, w 8 of 1st IC (high versus low)-0.48 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.069
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParent/Caregiver, w 12, 2nd IC (high versus low)-0.49 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.085
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParent/Caregiver, w 8 of 2nd IC (high versus low)-0.55 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParent/Caregiver, w 4 of 2nd IC (high versus low)-0.54 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.078
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParticipant, w 8 of 2nd IC (high versus low)-0.78 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.272
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParent/Caregiver, w 4 of 1st IC (high versus low)-0.44 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.067
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParent/Caregiver, Week12, 1st IC (high versus low)-0.44 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.071
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParticipant, w 12 of 1st IC (high versus low)-0.42 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.207
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParticipant, w 12 of 2nd IC (high versus low)-0.34 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.299
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParticipant, w 8 of 1st IC (high versus low)-0.6 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.228
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParent/Caregiver, w 12, 1st IC (mid versus low)-0.21 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.095
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParticipant, w 8 of 2nd IC (mid versus low)-1.56 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.312
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParticipant, w 12 of 2nd IC (mid versus low)-1.37 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.333
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParent/Caregiver, w 4 of 2nd IC (mid versus low)-0.59 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.111
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParent/Caregiver, w 8 of 2nd IC (mid versus low)-0.54 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.119
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParticipant, w 4 of 2nd IC (mid versus low)-1.36 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.347
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParent/Caregiver, w 12, 2nd IC (mid versus low)-0.52 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.128
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParticipant, w 4 of 1st IC (mid versus low)-1.02 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.301
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParticipant, w 8 of 1st IC (mid versus low)-0.94 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.299
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParticipant, w 12 of 1st IC (mid versus low)-1.14 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.253
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParent/Caregiver, w 4 of 1st IC (mid versus low)-0.31 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.094
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParent/Caregiver, w 8 of 1st IC (mid versus low)-0.29 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.092
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParent/Caregiver, w 12, 2nd IC (mid versus low)-0.33 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.121
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParticipant, w 4 of 2nd IC (high versus low)-1.03 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.289
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParticipant, w 4 of 1st IC (high versus low)-1.32 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParticipant, w 8 of 2nd IC (high versus low)-1.16 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.302
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParticipant, w 4 of 1st IC (mid versus low)-1.61 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParent/Caregiver, w 12, 1st IC (mid versus low)-0.3 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.095
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParticipant, w 8 of 1st IC (high versus low)-0.93 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.265
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParent/Caregiver, w 8 of 1st IC (mid versus low)-0.33 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.091
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParticipant, w 8 of 1st IC (mid versus low)-1.06 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.308
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParent/Caregiver, w 8 of 2nd IC (high versus low)-0.47 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.104
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParticipant, w 12 of 1st IC (high versus low)-1.13 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.241
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParticipant, w 8 of 2nd IC (mid versus low)-1.61 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.315
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParticipant, w 12 of 1st IC (mid versus low)-1.47 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.261
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParent/Caregiver, w 4 of 2nd IC (high versus low)-0.47 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.102
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParent/Caregiver, w 4 of 1st IC (high versus low)-0.49 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.089
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParent/Caregiver, Week12, 1st IC (high versus low)-0.37 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.095
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParent/Caregiver, w 4 of 1st IC (mid versus low)-0.34 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.093
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParticipant, w 12 of 2nd IC (high versus low)-0.97 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.333
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParent/Caregiver, w 4 of 2nd IC (mid versus low)-0.46 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.105
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParticipant, w 12 of 2nd IC (mid versus low)-1.4 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.336
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParent/Caregiver, w 8 of 2nd IC (mid versus low)-0.44 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.113
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParticipant, w 4 of 2nd IC (mid versus low)-1.53 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.351
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParent/Caregiver, w 12, 2nd IC (high versus low)-0.4 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.112
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Change in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) to All Post Baseline Visits of the First and of the Second Injection CycleParent/Caregiver, w 8 of 1st IC (high versus low)-0.47 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.092
Secondary

Changes From Baseline in AS Score of Knee Flexors or Thigh Adductors in Participants With Unilateral Treatment at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and of the Second Injection Cycle

The Ashworth Scale (AS) is a well known and commonly used scale in clinical trials with spasticity. In spastic muscles the resistance to passive movement is assessed. It is a 5-point scale that ranges from 0 (=no increase in tone) to 4 (=limb rigid in flexion or extension). Values represent least square (LS) mean differences between baseline and the respective week (w) resulting from MMRM (Mixed Model Repeated Measurement) models comparing high versus low and in a second step mid versus low dose groups, respectively. Values for the low group may differ slightly depending on the comparison and are therefore provided separately for each comparison. KF = Knee Flexors; TA = Thigh Adductors; w = week.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 4 of 1st IC and 2nd IC (Week 16-40)

Population: FAS population is subset in the SES for whom the primary efficacy variable (participants who had at least an AS score of plantar flexor at baseline \[Day 1\] or the investigator's GICS-PF \[for participants with bilateral treatment on same body side\] at Day 29 \[Week 4\] of the first injection cycle) were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in AS Score of Knee Flexors or Thigh Adductors in Participants With Unilateral Treatment at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleKnee Flexors, Week 4 of 1st IC (high versus low)-0.6 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in AS Score of Knee Flexors or Thigh Adductors in Participants With Unilateral Treatment at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleKnee Flexors, Week 4 of 2nd IC (high versus low)-0.64 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.173
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in AS Score of Knee Flexors or Thigh Adductors in Participants With Unilateral Treatment at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleThigh Adductors,Week 4 of 1st IC (high versus low)-0.61 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.287
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in AS Score of Knee Flexors or Thigh Adductors in Participants With Unilateral Treatment at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleThigh Adductors,Week 4 of 2nd IC (high versus low)NA Units on a scale
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in AS Score of Knee Flexors or Thigh Adductors in Participants With Unilateral Treatment at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleKnee Flexors, Week 4 of 2nd IC (mid versus low)-0.31 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.269
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in AS Score of Knee Flexors or Thigh Adductors in Participants With Unilateral Treatment at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleThigh Adductors,Week 4 of 1st IC (mid versus low)NA Units on a scale
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in AS Score of Knee Flexors or Thigh Adductors in Participants With Unilateral Treatment at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleKnee Flexors, Week 4 of 1st IC (mid versus low)-0.07 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.285
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in AS Score of Knee Flexors or Thigh Adductors in Participants With Unilateral Treatment at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleThigh Adductors,Week 4 of 2nd IC (mid versus low)NA Units on a scale
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in AS Score of Knee Flexors or Thigh Adductors in Participants With Unilateral Treatment at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleThigh Adductors,Week 4 of 1st IC (mid versus low)NA Units on a scale
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in AS Score of Knee Flexors or Thigh Adductors in Participants With Unilateral Treatment at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleThigh Adductors,Week 4 of 2nd IC (mid versus low)NA Units on a scale
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in AS Score of Knee Flexors or Thigh Adductors in Participants With Unilateral Treatment at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleKnee Flexors, Week 4 of 1st IC (high versus low)-0.39 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.214
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in AS Score of Knee Flexors or Thigh Adductors in Participants With Unilateral Treatment at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleThigh Adductors,Week 4 of 2nd IC (high versus low)NA Units on a scale
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in AS Score of Knee Flexors or Thigh Adductors in Participants With Unilateral Treatment at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleKnee Flexors, Week 4 of 1st IC (mid versus low)-0.32 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.204
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in AS Score of Knee Flexors or Thigh Adductors in Participants With Unilateral Treatment at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleKnee Flexors, Week 4 of 2nd IC (high versus low)-0.79 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in AS Score of Knee Flexors or Thigh Adductors in Participants With Unilateral Treatment at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleKnee Flexors, Week 4 of 2nd IC (mid versus low)-0.67 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in AS Score of Knee Flexors or Thigh Adductors in Participants With Unilateral Treatment at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleThigh Adductors,Week 4 of 1st IC (high versus low)-0.76 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.506
Secondary

Changes From Baseline in AS Score of Plantar Flexors of the Primary Body Side at Day 57 (Week 8) and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection Cycle

The Ashworth Scale (AS) is a well known and commonly used scale in clinical trials with spasticity. In spastic muscles the resistance to passive movement is assessed. It is a 5-point scale that ranges from 0 (=no increase in tone) to 4 (=limb rigid in flexion or extension). For participants with bilateral pes equinus, the body side for primary efficacy analysis i.e. primary body side was decided by investigator at screening and was kept throughout the entire study. For participants with unilateral treatment, the treated body side was kept throughout the entire study. Values represent least square (LS) mean differences between baseline and the respective week (w) resulting from MMRM (Mixed Model Repeated Measurement) models comparing high versus low and in a second step mid versus low dose groups, respectively. Values for the low group may differ slightly depending on the comparison and are therefore provided separately for each comparison.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 8 and 12 of 1st IC and 2nd IC (Week 20-44 and 24-48)

Population: FAS population is subset in the SES for whom the primary efficacy variable (participants who had at least an AS score of plantar flexor at baseline \[Day 1\] or the investigator's GICS-PF \[for participants with bilateral treatment on same body side\] at Day 29 \[Week 4\] of the first injection cycle) were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in AS Score of Plantar Flexors of the Primary Body Side at Day 57 (Week 8) and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 8 of 1st IC (high versus low)-0.62 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.059
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in AS Score of Plantar Flexors of the Primary Body Side at Day 57 (Week 8) and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 12 of 1st IC (high versus low)-0.43 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.056
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in AS Score of Plantar Flexors of the Primary Body Side at Day 57 (Week 8) and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 8 of 2nd IC (high versus low)-0.76 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.058
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in AS Score of Plantar Flexors of the Primary Body Side at Day 57 (Week 8) and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 12 of 2nd IC (high versus low)-0.57 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.058
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in AS Score of Plantar Flexors of the Primary Body Side at Day 57 (Week 8) and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 12 of 1st IC (mid versus low)-0.45 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.086
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in AS Score of Plantar Flexors of the Primary Body Side at Day 57 (Week 8) and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 8 of 2nd IC (mid versus low)-0.92 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.092
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in AS Score of Plantar Flexors of the Primary Body Side at Day 57 (Week 8) and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 8 of 1st IC (mid versus low)-0.74 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.088
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in AS Score of Plantar Flexors of the Primary Body Side at Day 57 (Week 8) and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 12 of 2nd IC (mid versus low)-0.64 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.088
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in AS Score of Plantar Flexors of the Primary Body Side at Day 57 (Week 8) and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 8 of 2nd IC (mid versus low)-0.79 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in AS Score of Plantar Flexors of the Primary Body Side at Day 57 (Week 8) and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 12 of 2nd IC (mid versus low)-0.68 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.085
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in AS Score of Plantar Flexors of the Primary Body Side at Day 57 (Week 8) and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 8 of 1st IC (high versus low)-0.69 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in AS Score of Plantar Flexors of the Primary Body Side at Day 57 (Week 8) and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 12 of 2nd IC (high versus low)-0.65 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.079
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in AS Score of Plantar Flexors of the Primary Body Side at Day 57 (Week 8) and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 8 of 1st IC (mid versus low)-0.69 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.086
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in AS Score of Plantar Flexors of the Primary Body Side at Day 57 (Week 8) and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 12 of 1st IC (high versus low)-0.58 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.077
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in AS Score of Plantar Flexors of the Primary Body Side at Day 57 (Week 8) and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 12 of 1st IC (mid versus low)-0.59 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.085
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in AS Score of Plantar Flexors of the Primary Body Side at Day 57 (Week 8) and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 8 of 2nd IC (high versus low)-0.76 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.079
Secondary

Changes From Baseline in Gross Motor Function Measure [GMFM]-66 Score at the End of First Injection Cycle and at the End of Study Visit

The GMFM-66 is a standardized observational 66-item instrument designed and validated to measure change in gross motor function over time in participants with cerebral palsy. Score values represent the total GMFM-66 score. Total GMFM scores range from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Values represent least square (LS) mean differences between baseline and the respective week (w) resulting from ANCOVA models comparing high versus low and in a second step mid versus low dose groups, respectively. Values for the low group may differ slightly depending on the comparison and are therefore provided separately for each comparison.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12-36 of 1st IC and 2nd IC (End of study = Week 24-72)

Population: FAS population is subset in the SES for whom the primary efficacy variable (participants who had at least an AS score of plantar flexor at baseline \[Day 1\] or the investigator's GICS-PF \[for participants with bilateral treatment on same body side\] at Day 29 \[Week 4\] of the first injection cycle) were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in Gross Motor Function Measure [GMFM]-66 Score at the End of First Injection Cycle and at the End of Study VisitWeek 12-36 of 1st IC (high versus low)1.23 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.288
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in Gross Motor Function Measure [GMFM]-66 Score at the End of First Injection Cycle and at the End of Study VisitWeek 12-36 of 2nd IC (high versus low)2.31 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.359
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in Gross Motor Function Measure [GMFM]-66 Score at the End of First Injection Cycle and at the End of Study VisitWeek 12-36 of 1st IC (mid versus low)1.14 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.448
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in Gross Motor Function Measure [GMFM]-66 Score at the End of First Injection Cycle and at the End of Study VisitWeek 12-36 of 2nd IC (mid versus low)3.1 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.542
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in Gross Motor Function Measure [GMFM]-66 Score at the End of First Injection Cycle and at the End of Study VisitWeek 12-36 of 1st IC (mid versus low)1.49 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.445
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in Gross Motor Function Measure [GMFM]-66 Score at the End of First Injection Cycle and at the End of Study VisitWeek 12-36 of 2nd IC (mid versus low)2.59 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.539
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in Gross Motor Function Measure [GMFM]-66 Score at the End of First Injection Cycle and at the End of Study VisitWeek 12-36 of 2nd IC (high versus low)2.46 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.488
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in Gross Motor Function Measure [GMFM]-66 Score at the End of First Injection Cycle and at the End of Study VisitWeek 12-36 of 1st IC (high versus low)1.64 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.392
Secondary

Changes From Baseline in Modified Tardieu Scale [MTS] of Plantar Flexors of Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4), Day 57 (Week 8), and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection Cycle

The Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS) assesses spastic muscle tone by subtraction of two angles measured at different conditions of passive muscle stretch. R2 is the angle of passive range of motion with a passive movement at slow speed. R1 is the angle where a catch-and-release or clonus can be triggered at the fastest possible speed. Score values represent the measured (R2-R1) difference, i.e. the dynamic tone component of the examined muscle(s). Decreases of (R2-R1) represent reductions in the dynamic component of spasticity, i.e. improvement of dynamic muscle spasticity. Values represent least square (LS) mean differences between baseline and the respective week (w) resulting from ANCOVA models comparing high versus low and in a second step mid versus low dose groups, respectively. Values for the low group may differ slightly depending on the model used for comparison and are therefore provided separately for each comparison.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 4, 8, and 12 of 1st IC and 2nd IC (Week 16-40, 20-44 and 24-48)

Population: FAS population is subset in the SES for whom the primary efficacy variable (participants who had at least an AS score of plantar flexor at baseline \[Day 1\] or the investigator's GICS-PF \[for participants with bilateral treatment on same body side\] at Day 29 \[Week 4\] of the first injection cycle) were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in Modified Tardieu Scale [MTS] of Plantar Flexors of Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4), Day 57 (Week 8), and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 4 of 2nd IC (high versus low)-4.72 AngleStandard Error 1.173
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in Modified Tardieu Scale [MTS] of Plantar Flexors of Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4), Day 57 (Week 8), and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 12 of 1st IC (high versus low)-3.1 AngleStandard Error 0.848
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in Modified Tardieu Scale [MTS] of Plantar Flexors of Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4), Day 57 (Week 8), and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 12 of 2nd IC (high versus low)-4.27 AngleStandard Error 0.968
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in Modified Tardieu Scale [MTS] of Plantar Flexors of Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4), Day 57 (Week 8), and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 4 of 1st IC (high versus low)-2.38 AngleStandard Error 0.897
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in Modified Tardieu Scale [MTS] of Plantar Flexors of Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4), Day 57 (Week 8), and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 8 of 2nd IC (high versus low)-4.72 AngleStandard Error 1.065
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in Modified Tardieu Scale [MTS] of Plantar Flexors of Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4), Day 57 (Week 8), and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 8 of 1st IC (high versus low)-3.15 AngleStandard Error 0.921
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in Modified Tardieu Scale [MTS] of Plantar Flexors of Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4), Day 57 (Week 8), and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 8 of 1st IC (mid versus low)-1.74 AngleStandard Error 1.393
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in Modified Tardieu Scale [MTS] of Plantar Flexors of Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4), Day 57 (Week 8), and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 4 of 1st IC (mid versus low)-0.88 AngleStandard Error 1.389
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in Modified Tardieu Scale [MTS] of Plantar Flexors of Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4), Day 57 (Week 8), and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 12 of 1st IC (mid versus low)-0.07 AngleStandard Error 1.231
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in Modified Tardieu Scale [MTS] of Plantar Flexors of Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4), Day 57 (Week 8), and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 4 of 2nd IC (mid versus low)-3.24 AngleStandard Error 1.773
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in Modified Tardieu Scale [MTS] of Plantar Flexors of Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4), Day 57 (Week 8), and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 8 of 2nd IC (mid versus low)-2.97 AngleStandard Error 1.634
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in Modified Tardieu Scale [MTS] of Plantar Flexors of Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4), Day 57 (Week 8), and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 12 of 2nd IC (mid versus low)-2.12 AngleStandard Error 1.519
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in Modified Tardieu Scale [MTS] of Plantar Flexors of Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4), Day 57 (Week 8), and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 8 of 1st IC (high versus low)-2.63 AngleStandard Error 1.267
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in Modified Tardieu Scale [MTS] of Plantar Flexors of Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4), Day 57 (Week 8), and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 4 of 2nd IC (high versus low)-3.83 AngleStandard Error 1.594
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in Modified Tardieu Scale [MTS] of Plantar Flexors of Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4), Day 57 (Week 8), and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 12 of 2nd IC (high versus low)-5.68 AngleStandard Error 1.298
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in Modified Tardieu Scale [MTS] of Plantar Flexors of Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4), Day 57 (Week 8), and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 4 of 2nd IC (mid versus low)-3.6 AngleStandard Error 1.713
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in Modified Tardieu Scale [MTS] of Plantar Flexors of Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4), Day 57 (Week 8), and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 4 of 1st IC (mid versus low)-2.47 AngleStandard Error 1.367
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in Modified Tardieu Scale [MTS] of Plantar Flexors of Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4), Day 57 (Week 8), and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 8 of 2nd IC (high versus low)-4.25 AngleStandard Error 1.44
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in Modified Tardieu Scale [MTS] of Plantar Flexors of Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4), Day 57 (Week 8), and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 12 of 2nd IC (mid versus low)-5.45 AngleStandard Error 1.455
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in Modified Tardieu Scale [MTS] of Plantar Flexors of Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4), Day 57 (Week 8), and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 8 of 2nd IC (mid versus low)-4.04 AngleStandard Error 1.575
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in Modified Tardieu Scale [MTS] of Plantar Flexors of Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4), Day 57 (Week 8), and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 8 of 1st IC (mid versus low)-2.56 AngleStandard Error 1.372
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in Modified Tardieu Scale [MTS] of Plantar Flexors of Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4), Day 57 (Week 8), and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 12 of 1st IC (high versus low)-2.67 AngleStandard Error 1.157
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in Modified Tardieu Scale [MTS] of Plantar Flexors of Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4), Day 57 (Week 8), and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 4 of 1st IC (high versus low)-2.56 AngleStandard Error 1.231
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Changes From Baseline in Modified Tardieu Scale [MTS] of Plantar Flexors of Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4), Day 57 (Week 8), and Day 85 (Week 12) of the First and of the Second Injection CycleWeek 12 of 1st IC (mid versus low)-2.59 AngleStandard Error 1.213
Secondary

Investigator's, Child's/Adolescent's, and Parent's/Caregiver's Global Impression of Change Scale [GICS] at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and Second Injection Cycle

The Global Impression of Change Scales (GICS) are global outcomes to assess the impression of change due to treatment. GICS were assessed by the investigator, by the participant (if feasible) and by parents'/caregiver (if applicable). GICS are 7-Point Likert Scales ranging from +3 (very much improved function) to -3 (very much worse function). Values represent least square (LS) mean differences between baseline and the respective week (w) resulting from MMRM (Mixed Model Repeated Measurement) models comparing high versus low and in a second step mid versus low dose groups, respectively. Values for the low group may differ slightly depending on the comparison and are therefore provided separately for each comparison.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 4 of 1st IC and 2nd IC (Week 16-40)

Population: FAS population is subset in the SES for whom the primary efficacy variable (participants who had at least an AS score of plantar flexor at baseline \[Day 1\] or the investigator's GICS-PF \[for participants with bilateral treatment on same body side\] at Day 29 \[Week 4\] of the first injection cycle) were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Investigator's, Child's/Adolescent's, and Parent's/Caregiver's Global Impression of Change Scale [GICS] at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and Second Injection CycleInvestigator, 2nd IC (high versus low)1.46 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.071
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Investigator's, Child's/Adolescent's, and Parent's/Caregiver's Global Impression of Change Scale [GICS] at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and Second Injection CycleParent/Caregiver, 1st IC (high versus low)1.53 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.068
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Investigator's, Child's/Adolescent's, and Parent's/Caregiver's Global Impression of Change Scale [GICS] at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and Second Injection CycleParent/Caregiver, 2nd IC (high versus low)1.45 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.076
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Investigator's, Child's/Adolescent's, and Parent's/Caregiver's Global Impression of Change Scale [GICS] at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and Second Injection CycleParticipants, 1st IC (high versus low)1.72 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.205
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Investigator's, Child's/Adolescent's, and Parent's/Caregiver's Global Impression of Change Scale [GICS] at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and Second Injection CycleInvestigator, 1st IC (high versus low)1.5 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.056
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Investigator's, Child's/Adolescent's, and Parent's/Caregiver's Global Impression of Change Scale [GICS] at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and Second Injection CycleParticipants, 2nd IC (high versus low)1.53 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Investigator's, Child's/Adolescent's, and Parent's/Caregiver's Global Impression of Change Scale [GICS] at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and Second Injection CycleParent/Caregiver, 1st IC (mid versus low)1.26 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.107
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Investigator's, Child's/Adolescent's, and Parent's/Caregiver's Global Impression of Change Scale [GICS] at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and Second Injection CycleParticipants, 1st IC (mid versus low)1.17 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.203
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Investigator's, Child's/Adolescent's, and Parent's/Caregiver's Global Impression of Change Scale [GICS] at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and Second Injection CycleInvestigator, 2nd IC (mid versus low)1.56 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Investigator's, Child's/Adolescent's, and Parent's/Caregiver's Global Impression of Change Scale [GICS] at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and Second Injection CycleParticipants, 2nd IC (mid versus low)1.44 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.276
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Investigator's, Child's/Adolescent's, and Parent's/Caregiver's Global Impression of Change Scale [GICS] at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and Second Injection CycleParent/Caregiver, 2nd IC (mid versus low)1.67 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.115
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Investigator's, Child's/Adolescent's, and Parent's/Caregiver's Global Impression of Change Scale [GICS] at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and Second Injection CycleInvestigator, 1st IC (mid versus low)1.36 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.087
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Investigator's, Child's/Adolescent's, and Parent's/Caregiver's Global Impression of Change Scale [GICS] at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and Second Injection CycleParent/Caregiver, 2nd IC (mid versus low)1.4 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.109
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Investigator's, Child's/Adolescent's, and Parent's/Caregiver's Global Impression of Change Scale [GICS] at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and Second Injection CycleInvestigator, 1st IC (high versus low)1.35 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.076
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Investigator's, Child's/Adolescent's, and Parent's/Caregiver's Global Impression of Change Scale [GICS] at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and Second Injection CycleInvestigator, 1st IC (mid versus low)1.33 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.086
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Investigator's, Child's/Adolescent's, and Parent's/Caregiver's Global Impression of Change Scale [GICS] at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and Second Injection CycleParticipants, 1st IC (high versus low)1.64 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.223
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Investigator's, Child's/Adolescent's, and Parent's/Caregiver's Global Impression of Change Scale [GICS] at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and Second Injection CycleParticipants, 1st IC (mid versus low)1.3 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.216
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Investigator's, Child's/Adolescent's, and Parent's/Caregiver's Global Impression of Change Scale [GICS] at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and Second Injection CycleParent/Caregiver, 1st IC (high versus low)1.43 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.092
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Investigator's, Child's/Adolescent's, and Parent's/Caregiver's Global Impression of Change Scale [GICS] at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and Second Injection CycleParent/Caregiver, 1st IC (mid versus low)1.39 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.105
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Investigator's, Child's/Adolescent's, and Parent's/Caregiver's Global Impression of Change Scale [GICS] at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and Second Injection CycleInvestigator, 2nd IC (high versus low)1.38 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.096
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Investigator's, Child's/Adolescent's, and Parent's/Caregiver's Global Impression of Change Scale [GICS] at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and Second Injection CycleInvestigator, 2nd IC (mid versus low)1.46 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.104
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Investigator's, Child's/Adolescent's, and Parent's/Caregiver's Global Impression of Change Scale [GICS] at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and Second Injection CycleParticipants, 2nd IC (mid versus low)1.53 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.283
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Investigator's, Child's/Adolescent's, and Parent's/Caregiver's Global Impression of Change Scale [GICS] at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and Second Injection CycleParent/Caregiver, 2nd IC (high versus low)1.34 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.101
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Investigator's, Child's/Adolescent's, and Parent's/Caregiver's Global Impression of Change Scale [GICS] at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and Second Injection CycleParticipants, 2nd IC (high versus low)1.66 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.224
Secondary

Investigator's Global Impression of Change of GICS-Plantar-Flexor of Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and Second Injection Cycle

The GICS are global outcomes to assess the impression of change due to treatment. GICS were assessed by the investigator, by the participant (if feasible) and by parents'/caregiver (if applicable). GICS are 7-Point Likert Scales ranging from +3 (very much improved function) to -3 (very much worse function). For participants with bilateral pes equinus, the body side for primary efficacy analysis i.e. primary body side was decided by investigator at screening and was kept throughout the entire study. For participants with unilateral treatment, the treated body side was kept throughout the entire study. Values represent least square (LS) mean differences between baseline and the respective week (w) resulting from ANCOVA models comparing high versus low and in a second step mid versus low dose groups, respectively. Values for the low group may differ slightly depending on the comparison and are therefore provided separately for each comparison.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 4 of 1st IC and 2nd IC (Week 16-40)

Population: FAS population is subset in the SES for whom the primary efficacy variable (participants who had at least an AS score of plantar flexor at baseline \[Day 1\] or the investigator's GICS-PF \[for participants with bilateral treatment on same body side\] at Day 29 \[Week 4\] of the first injection cycle) were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Investigator's Global Impression of Change of GICS-Plantar-Flexor of Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and Second Injection CycleWeek 4 of 1st IC (high versus low)1.53 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.059
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Investigator's Global Impression of Change of GICS-Plantar-Flexor of Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and Second Injection CycleWeek 4 of 2nd IC (high versus low)1.43 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.073
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Investigator's Global Impression of Change of GICS-Plantar-Flexor of Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and Second Injection CycleWeek 4 of 1st IC (mid versus low)1.38 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.092
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Investigator's Global Impression of Change of GICS-Plantar-Flexor of Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and Second Injection CycleWeek 4 of 2nd IC (mid versus low)1.54 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Investigator's Global Impression of Change of GICS-Plantar-Flexor of Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and Second Injection CycleWeek 4 of 1st IC (mid versus low)1.32 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Investigator's Global Impression of Change of GICS-Plantar-Flexor of Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and Second Injection CycleWeek 4 of 2nd IC (mid versus low)1.48 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.103
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Investigator's Global Impression of Change of GICS-Plantar-Flexor of Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and Second Injection CycleWeek 4 of 2nd IC (high versus low)1.38 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.098
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Investigator's Global Impression of Change of GICS-Plantar-Flexor of Primary Body Side at Day 29 (Week 4) of the First and Second Injection CycleWeek 4 of 1st IC (high versus low)1.37 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.081
Secondary

Occurrence of Participants With TEAEs of Special Interest (TEAESIs) Overall and Per Injection Cycle

Adverse Events (AE's) occurring after treatment that were thought to possibly indicate toxin spread throughout the trial conduct are defined as AE's of Special Interests. Values reported here refer to the number of participants affected.

Time frame: Up to End of study visit (Week 24-72)

Population: FAS population is subset in the SES for whom the primary efficacy variable (participants who had at least an AS score of plantar flexor at baseline \[Day 1\] or the investigator's GICS-PF \[for participants with bilateral treatment on same body side\] at Day 29 \[Week 4\] of the first injection cycle) were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of Participants With TEAEs of Special Interest (TEAESIs) Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle2 Participants
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of Participants With TEAEs of Special Interest (TEAESIs) Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle4 Participants
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of Participants With TEAEs of Special Interest (TEAESIs) Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall Period5 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of Participants With TEAEs of Special Interest (TEAESIs) Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle0 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of Participants With TEAEs of Special Interest (TEAESIs) Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle1 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of Participants With TEAEs of Special Interest (TEAESIs) Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall Period1 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of Participants With TEAEs of Special Interest (TEAESIs) Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle0 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of Participants With TEAEs of Special Interest (TEAESIs) Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall Period1 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of Participants With TEAEs of Special Interest (TEAESIs) Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle1 Participants
Secondary

Occurrence of Serious TEAEs (TESAEs) Overall and Per Injection Cycle

Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) are events observed from the time point of first injection until end of study visit (week 24-72). Values reported here refer to the number of participants affected.

Time frame: Up to End of study visit (Week 24-72)

Population: FAS population is subset in the SES for whom the primary efficacy variable (participants who had at least an AS score of plantar flexor at baseline \[Day 1\] or the investigator's GICS-PF \[for participants with bilateral treatment on same body side\] at Day 29 \[Week 4\] of the first injection cycle) were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of Serious TEAEs (TESAEs) Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle3 Participants
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of Serious TEAEs (TESAEs) Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle4 Participants
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of Serious TEAEs (TESAEs) Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall Period7 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of Serious TEAEs (TESAEs) Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle1 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of Serious TEAEs (TESAEs) Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle0 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of Serious TEAEs (TESAEs) Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall Period1 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of Serious TEAEs (TESAEs) Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle3 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of Serious TEAEs (TESAEs) Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall Period6 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of Serious TEAEs (TESAEs) Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle3 Participants
Secondary

Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection Cycle

Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are events observed from the time point of first injection until end of study visit (week 24-72). Values reported here refer to the number of participants affected.

Time frame: Up to End of study visit (Week 24-72)

Population: FAS population is subset in the SES for whom the primary efficacy variable (participants who had at least an AS score of plantar flexor at baseline \[Day 1\] or the investigator's GICS-PF \[for participants with bilateral treatment on same body side\] at Day 29 \[Week 4\] of the first injection cycle) were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall: recovered/resolved w/ sequelae1 Participants
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall: fatal0 Participants
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall: unknown1 Participants
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle: recovered/resolved42 Participants
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle: recovering/resolving0 Participants
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle: recovering/resolving2 Participants
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle: unknown0 Participants
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall: not recovered/ not resolved6 Participants
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle: recovered/resolved52 Participants
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle: recovered/resolved w/ sequela1 Participants
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle: not recovered/ not resolved3 Participants
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle: recovered/resolved w/ sequel0 Participants
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle: not recovered/ not resolved3 Participants
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle: fatal0 Participants
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle: fatal0 Participants
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall: recovered/resolved74 Participants
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall: recovering/resolving2 Participants
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle: unknown1 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle: recovering/resolving1 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall: recovered/resolved w/ sequelae0 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle: unknown0 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle: fatal0 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall: fatal0 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle: recovered/resolved15 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle: not recovered/ not resolved0 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall: unknown0 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle: not recovered/ not resolved2 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle: recovered/resolved w/ sequela0 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle: recovering/resolving0 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle: recovered/resolved14 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle: fatal0 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle: recovered/resolved w/ sequel0 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle: unknown0 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall: recovering/resolving1 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall: not recovered/ not resolved2 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall: recovered/resolved25 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall: not recovered/ not resolved3 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle: recovered/resolved17 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle: recovering/resolving0 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle: not recovered/ not resolved1 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle: recovered/resolved w/ sequela0 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle: fatal0 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle: unknown0 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle: recovering/resolving0 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle: not recovered/ not resolved2 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle: recovered/resolved w/ sequel0 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle: fatal0 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle: unknown0 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall: recovered/resolved28 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall: recovering/resolving0 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall: recovered/resolved w/ sequelae0 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall: fatal0 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall: unknown0 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle: recovered/resolved20 Participants
Secondary

Occurrence of TEAEs by Worst Intensity Overall and Per Injection Cycle

Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are events observed from the time point of first injection until end of study visit (week 24-72). Values reported here refer to the number of participants affected.

Time frame: Up to End of study visit (Week 24-72)

Population: FAS population is subset in the SES for whom the primary efficacy variable (participants who had at least an AS score of plantar flexor at baseline \[Day 1\] or the investigator's GICS-PF \[for participants with bilateral treatment on same body side\] at Day 29 \[Week 4\] of the first injection cycle) were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Worst Intensity Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle: Moderate AE's18 Participants
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Worst Intensity Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle: Moderate AE's17 Participants
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Worst Intensity Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall: Moderate AE's33 Participants
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Worst Intensity Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle: Severe AE's2 Participants
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Worst Intensity Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall: Mild AE's41 Participants
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Worst Intensity Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle: Mild AE's35 Participants
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Worst Intensity Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle: Mild AE's24 Participants
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Worst Intensity Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle: Severe AE's1 Participants
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Worst Intensity Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall: Severe AE's3 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Worst Intensity Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle: Severe AE's1 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Worst Intensity Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle: Moderate AE's9 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Worst Intensity Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle: Severe AE's0 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Worst Intensity Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle: Mild AE's9 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Worst Intensity Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle: Moderate AE's5 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Worst Intensity Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall: Mild AE's14 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Worst Intensity Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall: Moderate AE's11 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Worst Intensity Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall: Severe AE's1 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Worst Intensity Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle: Mild AE's6 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Worst Intensity Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle: Moderate AE's9 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Worst Intensity Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle: Moderate AE's4 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Worst Intensity Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall: Moderate AE's10 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Worst Intensity Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle: Mild AE's11 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Worst Intensity Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle: Mild AE's14 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Worst Intensity Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle: Severe AE's1 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Worst Intensity Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall: Severe AE's1 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Worst Intensity Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle: Severe AE's0 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs by Worst Intensity Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall: Mild AE's19 Participants
Secondary

Occurrence of TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation Overall and Per Injection Cycle

Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEASs) are events observed from the time point of first injection until end of study visit (week 24-72). Values reported here refer to the number of participants affected.

Time frame: Up to End of study visit (Week 24-72)

Population: FAS population is subset in the SES for whom the primary efficacy variable (participants who had at least an AS score of plantar flexor at baseline \[Day 1\] or the investigator's GICS-PF \[for participants with bilateral treatment on same body side\] at Day 29 \[Week 4\] of the first injection cycle) were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle0 Participants
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle1 Participants
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall Period1 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle0 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle0 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall Period0 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle0 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall Period0 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle0 Participants
Secondary

Occurrence of TEAEs Related to Treatment as Assessed by the Investigator Overall and Per Injection Cycle

Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are events observed from the time point of first injection until end of study visit (week 24-72). Values reported here refer to the number of participants affected.

Time frame: Up to End of study visit (Week 24-72)

Population: FAS population is subset in the SES for whom the primary efficacy variable (participants who had at least an AS score of plantar flexor at baseline \[Day 1\] or the investigator's GICS-PF \[for participants with bilateral treatment on same body side\] at Day 29 \[Week 4\] of the first injection cycle) were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs Related to Treatment as Assessed by the Investigator Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle4 Participants
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs Related to Treatment as Assessed by the Investigator Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle7 Participants
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs Related to Treatment as Assessed by the Investigator Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall Period11 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs Related to Treatment as Assessed by the Investigator Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle1 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs Related to Treatment as Assessed by the Investigator Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle1 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs Related to Treatment as Assessed by the Investigator Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall Period2 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs Related to Treatment as Assessed by the Investigator Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle2 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs Related to Treatment as Assessed by the Investigator Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall Period2 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of TEAEs Related to Treatment as Assessed by the Investigator Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle1 Participants
Secondary

Occurrence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Overall and Per Injection Cycle

Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are events observed from the time point of first injection until end of study visit (week 24-72). Values reported here refer to the number of participants affected.

Time frame: Up to End of study visit (Week 24-72)

Population: FAS population is subset in the SES for whom the primary efficacy variable (participants who had at least an AS score of plantar flexor at baseline \[Day 1\] or the investigator's GICS-PF \[for participants with bilateral treatment on same body side\] at Day 29 \[Week 4\] of the first injection cycle) were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle44 Participants
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle53 Participants
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Occurrence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall Period77 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle15 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle15 Participants
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall Period26 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Overall and Per Injection Cycle1st Injection Cycle18 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Overall and Per Injection CycleOverall Period30 Participants
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Occurrence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Overall and Per Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle21 Participants
Secondary

Time to Reinjection for Each of the Three Dose Groups for the First and Second Injection Cycle

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24-72

Population: FAS population is subset in the SES for whom the primary efficacy variable (participants who had at least an AS score of plantar flexor at baseline \[Day 1\] or the investigator's GICS-PF \[for participants with bilateral treatment on same body side\] at Day 29 \[Week 4\] of the first injection cycle) were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Time to Reinjection for Each of the Three Dose Groups for the First and Second Injection Cycle1st Injection cycle15.3 WeeksStandard Deviation 4.6
High Dose: 16 U/kg Body Weight IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)Time to Reinjection for Each of the Three Dose Groups for the First and Second Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle17 WeeksStandard Deviation 6.5
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Time to Reinjection for Each of the Three Dose Groups for the First and Second Injection Cycle1st Injection cycle15.9 WeeksStandard Deviation 5.7
Mid Dose: 12 U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Time to Reinjection for Each of the Three Dose Groups for the First and Second Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle17.9 WeeksStandard Deviation 7.8
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Time to Reinjection for Each of the Three Dose Groups for the First and Second Injection Cycle1st Injection cycle15.7 WeeksStandard Deviation 5.9
Low Dose: 4U/kg Body Weight Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin)Time to Reinjection for Each of the Three Dose Groups for the First and Second Injection Cycle2nd Injection Cycle15.5 WeeksStandard Deviation 4.9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026