Skip to content

Autologous Muscle Derived Cells for Female Urinary Sphincter Repair

A Double-blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of AMDC-USR With Placebo in Female Subjects With Stress Urinary Incontinence

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01893138
Enrollment
311
Registered
2013-07-08
Start date
2013-11-21
Completion date
2020-11-10
Last updated
2023-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stress Urinary Incontinence

Keywords

Urinary Incontinence, Stress, Tissue Therapy (Cell Therapy), Transplantation, Autologous

Brief summary

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, confirmatory study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of Cook MyoSite Incorporated Autologous Muscle-Derived Cells (generic name Iltamiocel) compared to a placebo (vehicle) control dose in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in adult female patients.

Detailed description

Study comparing intrasphincteric injection of iltamiocel with placebo. Subjects unblinded after 12 month visits, but followed for up to 2 years. Subjects randomized to placebo could elect to receive open-label iltamiocel after completing 12 month visit.

Interventions

OTHERPlacebo

Placebo control is the vehicle solution used for the study product.

BIOLOGICALIltamiocel

AMDC is the study product (autologous muscle-derived cells). The generic name is iltamiocel. Single intraurethral injection of 150 x 10\^6 cells.

Sponsors

Cook MyoSite
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female patient has primary symptoms of SUI, as confirmed by patient medical history and clinical symptoms, including a focused incontinence evaluation.

Exclusion criteria

* Patient has symptoms of pure urge incontinence as confirmed by basic evaluation of etiology from a patient medical history, including a focused incontinence history. * Patient has symptoms of mixed urinary incontinence where urge incontinence is the predominant factor. * Patient has had stress urinary incontinence symptoms less than 6 months prior to signing the informed consent. * Patient has not previously attempted conservative treatment prior to signing the informed consent. (Examples of conservative treatment include behavior modifications, bladder exercises, biofeedback, etc.) * Patient has more than 2 episode of awakening to void during normal sleeping hours. * Patient cannot be maintained on a stable dose and/or frequency of medication (including diuretics) known to affect lower urinary tract function, including but not limited to, anticholinergics, tricyclic antidepressants or alpha-adrenergic blockers, for at least 2 weeks prior to screening or is likely to change during the course of the study. * Patient is pregnant, lactating, or plans to become pregnant during the course of the study. * Patient refuses to provide written informed consent. * Patient is not at least 18 years of age. * Patient is not available for the follow-up evaluations as required by the protocol.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Stress Incontinence Episode Frequency From Baseline to 12 Months Post-treatment; as Assessed by 3 Day DiaryBaseline and 12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Participants With 0 or 1 Stress Incontinence Episodes Based on 3 Day Diary Records at 12 MonthsBaseline and 12 months
Change in the Frequency of Stress Incontinence Episodes From Baseline at 12 MonthsBaseline and 12 months
Participants With at ≥ 75% Reduction in Stress Incontinence Episodes From Baseline at 12 MonthsBaseline and 12 months

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Association of Change in Quality of Life Scores With Change in Stress Incontinence Episode FrequencyBaseline and 12 monthsSpearman's correlation used for analysis
Treatment Durability at 24 MonthsBaseline, 12 months, and 24 months after injection with iltamiocelTreatment durability defined as iltamiocel-treated participants with reduction in stress incontinence episode frequency (SIEF) at 12 months who maintained that response at 24 months

Countries

Belgium, Germany, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

311 subjects were enrolled (underwent biopsy procedure) and 297 subjects underwent study treatment with iltamiocel (199 subjects) or placebo (98 subjects). Analysis population is based on 297 subjects that underwent study treatment. At randomization, participants stratified by presence or absence of prior incontinence surgery and by \< 10 or ≥10 stress incontinence episodes over 3 day diary at screening.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Iltamiocel
AMDC is the study product (autologous muscle-derived cells). The generic name is iltamiocel. Single intraurethral injection of 150 x 10\^6 cells.
199
Placebo
Placebo control is the vehicle solution used for the study product. Single intraurethral injection of vehicle control.
98
Total297

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Double-Blind PeriodWithdrawal by Subject11
Open Label - Unblinded PeriodAdverse Event10
Open Label - Unblinded PeriodLack of Efficacy90
Open Label - Unblinded PeriodLost to Follow-up43
Open Label - Unblinded PeriodWithdrawal by Subject187

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalPlaceboIltamiocel
24 Hour Pad Test Weight45.2 grams
STANDARD_DEVIATION 81.1
40.9 grams
STANDARD_DEVIATION 52.8
47.6 grams
STANDARD_DEVIATION 91.8
6-Item Urogenital Distress Inventory Score - Short Form (UDI-6)39.2 scores on scales
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.8
40.5 scores on scales
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.4
38.5 scores on scales
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
7-Item Incontinence Impact Questionnaire - Short Form (IIQ-7)44.2 scores on scales
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.2
43.7 scores on scales
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.8
44.4 scores on scales
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.9
Age, Continuous54.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8
55.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
54.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
289 Participants93 Participants196 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Global Quality of Life Assessment (GQOL)5.7 scores on scales
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
5.6 scores on scales
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1
5.7 scores on scales
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
Incontinence Quality of Life (IQOL) Assessment -Total Score59.2 scores on scales
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20
59.5 scores on scales
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.2
59.0 scores on scales
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21
Incontinence Severity Index (ISI)7.5 scores on scales
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
7.4 scores on scales
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8
7.6 scores on scales
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
5 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
8 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
8 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
273 Participants89 Participants184 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
3 participants1 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
7 participants3 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
287 participants94 participants193 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
297 Participants98 Participants199 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Stress Incontinence Episodes Over 3 Day Diary14.5 stress leaks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
15 stress leaks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.2
14.2 stress leaks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1990 / 980 / 1980 / 92
other
Total, other adverse events
84 / 19928 / 9821 / 19822 / 92
serious
Total, serious adverse events
11 / 1999 / 9812 / 1984 / 92

Outcome results

Primary

Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Stress Incontinence Episode Frequency From Baseline to 12 Months Post-treatment; as Assessed by 3 Day Diary

Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

Population: All participants with baseline and 12 month 3 day diary data

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IltamiocelParticipants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Stress Incontinence Episode Frequency From Baseline to 12 Months Post-treatment; as Assessed by 3 Day Diary103 Participants
PlaceboParticipants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Stress Incontinence Episode Frequency From Baseline to 12 Months Post-treatment; as Assessed by 3 Day Diary52 Participants
Secondary

Change in the Frequency of Stress Incontinence Episodes From Baseline at 12 Months

Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

Population: All participants with baseline and 12 month 3 day diary data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IltamiocelChange in the Frequency of Stress Incontinence Episodes From Baseline at 12 Months-5.8 stress leaksStandard Deviation 11
PlaceboChange in the Frequency of Stress Incontinence Episodes From Baseline at 12 Months-4.9 stress leaksStandard Deviation 13.5
Secondary

Participants With 0 or 1 Stress Incontinence Episodes Based on 3 Day Diary Records at 12 Months

Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

Population: All participants with baseline and 12 month diary data

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IltamiocelParticipants With 0 or 1 Stress Incontinence Episodes Based on 3 Day Diary Records at 12 Months53 Participants
PlaceboParticipants With 0 or 1 Stress Incontinence Episodes Based on 3 Day Diary Records at 12 Months22 Participants
Secondary

Participants With at ≥ 75% Reduction in Stress Incontinence Episodes From Baseline at 12 Months

Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

Population: All participants with baseline and 12 month 3 day diary data

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IltamiocelParticipants With at ≥ 75% Reduction in Stress Incontinence Episodes From Baseline at 12 Months73 Participants
PlaceboParticipants With at ≥ 75% Reduction in Stress Incontinence Episodes From Baseline at 12 Months30 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Association of Change in Quality of Life Scores With Change in Stress Incontinence Episode Frequency

Spearman's correlation used for analysis

Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

Population: All participants with baseline and 12 month diary data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
IltamiocelAssociation of Change in Quality of Life Scores With Change in Stress Incontinence Episode FrequencyAssociation of IIQ-7 improvement with stress incontinence episode reduction at 12 months0.522 correlation coefficient
IltamiocelAssociation of Change in Quality of Life Scores With Change in Stress Incontinence Episode FrequencyAssociation of GQOL improvement with stress incontinence episode reduction at 12 months0.537 correlation coefficient
IltamiocelAssociation of Change in Quality of Life Scores With Change in Stress Incontinence Episode FrequencyAssociation of UDI-6 improvement with stress incontinence episode reduction at 12 months0.408 correlation coefficient
IltamiocelAssociation of Change in Quality of Life Scores With Change in Stress Incontinence Episode FrequencyAssociation of ISI improvement with stress incontinence episode reduction at 12 months0.529 correlation coefficient
IltamiocelAssociation of Change in Quality of Life Scores With Change in Stress Incontinence Episode FrequencyAssociation of IQOL improvement with stress incontinence episode reduction at 12 months-0.556 correlation coefficient
PlaceboAssociation of Change in Quality of Life Scores With Change in Stress Incontinence Episode FrequencyAssociation of ISI improvement with stress incontinence episode reduction at 12 months0.599 correlation coefficient
PlaceboAssociation of Change in Quality of Life Scores With Change in Stress Incontinence Episode FrequencyAssociation of IQOL improvement with stress incontinence episode reduction at 12 months-0.456 correlation coefficient
PlaceboAssociation of Change in Quality of Life Scores With Change in Stress Incontinence Episode FrequencyAssociation of IIQ-7 improvement with stress incontinence episode reduction at 12 months0.442 correlation coefficient
PlaceboAssociation of Change in Quality of Life Scores With Change in Stress Incontinence Episode FrequencyAssociation of UDI-6 improvement with stress incontinence episode reduction at 12 months0.433 correlation coefficient
PlaceboAssociation of Change in Quality of Life Scores With Change in Stress Incontinence Episode FrequencyAssociation of GQOL improvement with stress incontinence episode reduction at 12 months0.422 correlation coefficient
Post Hoc

Association of Change in Quality of Life Scores With Change in Stress Incontinence Episode Frequency (Prior Surgery Participants Only)

Spearman's correlation used for analysis

Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

Population: All participants with prior surgery and baseline and 12 month diary data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
IltamiocelAssociation of Change in Quality of Life Scores With Change in Stress Incontinence Episode Frequency (Prior Surgery Participants Only)Association of IIQ-7 improvement with stress incontinence episode reduction at 12 months0.427 correlation coefficient
IltamiocelAssociation of Change in Quality of Life Scores With Change in Stress Incontinence Episode Frequency (Prior Surgery Participants Only)Association of GQOL improvement with stress incontinence episode reduction at 12 months0.561 correlation coefficient
IltamiocelAssociation of Change in Quality of Life Scores With Change in Stress Incontinence Episode Frequency (Prior Surgery Participants Only)Association of UDI-6 improvement with stress incontinence episode reduction at 12 months0.424 correlation coefficient
IltamiocelAssociation of Change in Quality of Life Scores With Change in Stress Incontinence Episode Frequency (Prior Surgery Participants Only)Association of ISI improvement with stress incontinence episode reduction at 12 months0.426 correlation coefficient
IltamiocelAssociation of Change in Quality of Life Scores With Change in Stress Incontinence Episode Frequency (Prior Surgery Participants Only)Association of IQOL improvement with stress incontinence episode reduction at 12 months-0.489 correlation coefficient
PlaceboAssociation of Change in Quality of Life Scores With Change in Stress Incontinence Episode Frequency (Prior Surgery Participants Only)Association of ISI improvement with stress incontinence episode reduction at 12 months0.476 correlation coefficient
PlaceboAssociation of Change in Quality of Life Scores With Change in Stress Incontinence Episode Frequency (Prior Surgery Participants Only)Association of IQOL improvement with stress incontinence episode reduction at 12 months-0.460 correlation coefficient
PlaceboAssociation of Change in Quality of Life Scores With Change in Stress Incontinence Episode Frequency (Prior Surgery Participants Only)Association of IIQ-7 improvement with stress incontinence episode reduction at 12 months0.542 correlation coefficient
PlaceboAssociation of Change in Quality of Life Scores With Change in Stress Incontinence Episode Frequency (Prior Surgery Participants Only)Association of UDI-6 improvement with stress incontinence episode reduction at 12 months0.604 correlation coefficient
PlaceboAssociation of Change in Quality of Life Scores With Change in Stress Incontinence Episode Frequency (Prior Surgery Participants Only)Association of GQOL improvement with stress incontinence episode reduction at 12 months0.190 correlation coefficient
Post Hoc

Change in the Frequency of Stress Incontinence Episodes From Baseline at 12 Months (Prior Surgery Participants Only)

Participants with a history of prior SUI surgery with baseline and 12 month diary data.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IltamiocelChange in the Frequency of Stress Incontinence Episodes From Baseline at 12 Months (Prior Surgery Participants Only)-6.7 stress leaksStandard Deviation 14.5
PlaceboChange in the Frequency of Stress Incontinence Episodes From Baseline at 12 Months (Prior Surgery Participants Only)-4.5 stress leaksStandard Deviation 11.5
Post Hoc

Participants With 0 or 1 Stress Incontinence Episodes Based on 3 Day Diary Records at 12 Months (Prior Surgery Participants Only)

Participants with a history of prior SUI surgery with baseline and 12 month diary data.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IltamiocelParticipants With 0 or 1 Stress Incontinence Episodes Based on 3 Day Diary Records at 12 Months (Prior Surgery Participants Only)14 Participants
PlaceboParticipants With 0 or 1 Stress Incontinence Episodes Based on 3 Day Diary Records at 12 Months (Prior Surgery Participants Only)3 Participants
Post Hoc

Participants With at ≥ 75% Reduction in Stress Incontinence Episodes From Baseline at 12 Months (Prior Surgery Participants Only)

Participants with a history of prior SUI surgery with baseline and 12 month diary data.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IltamiocelParticipants With at ≥ 75% Reduction in Stress Incontinence Episodes From Baseline at 12 Months (Prior Surgery Participants Only)20 Participants
PlaceboParticipants With at ≥ 75% Reduction in Stress Incontinence Episodes From Baseline at 12 Months (Prior Surgery Participants Only)4 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Treatment Durability at 24 Months

Treatment durability defined as iltamiocel-treated participants with reduction in stress incontinence episode frequency (SIEF) at 12 months who maintained that response at 24 months

Time frame: Baseline, 12 months, and 24 months after injection with iltamiocel

Population: All participants who received iltamiocel treatment during the double-blind period and with 12-month and 24-month stress incontinence episode frequency (SIEF) diary data. Participants who received placebo treatment in the double-blind period are not included due to receiving iltamiocel treatment in the open-label period after unblinding or were exited from the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IltamiocelTreatment Durability at 24 MonthsParticipants that had ≥ 50% reduction in stress incontinence episodes at Month 12 and Month 24 data80 Participants
IltamiocelTreatment Durability at 24 MonthsParticipants that had ≥ 75% reduction in stress incontinence episodes at Month 12 and Month 24 data50 Participants
IltamiocelTreatment Durability at 24 MonthsParticipants that had ≤1 stress incontinence episodes at Month 12 and Month 24 data36 Participants
Post Hoc

Treatment Durability at 24 Months (Prior Surgery Participants)

Treatment durability defined as participants with reduction in stress incontinence episode frequency (SIEF) at 12 months who maintained response at 24 months

Time frame: Baseline, 12 months, and 24 months after injection with iltamiocel

Population: Prior surgery participants who received iltamiocel treatment during the double-blind period with 12-month and 24-month stress incontinence episode frequency (SIEF) diary data. Prior surgery participants who received placebo treatment in the double-blind period are not included due to receiving iltamiocel treatment in the open-label period after unblinding or were exited from the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IltamiocelTreatment Durability at 24 Months (Prior Surgery Participants)Participants that had ≥ 50% reduction in stress incontinence episodes at Month 12 and Month 24 data19 Participants
IltamiocelTreatment Durability at 24 Months (Prior Surgery Participants)Participants that had ≥ 75% reduction in stress incontinence episodes at Month 12 and Month 24 data12 Participants
IltamiocelTreatment Durability at 24 Months (Prior Surgery Participants)Participants that had ≤1 stress incontinence episodes at Month 12 and Month 24 data11 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026